The human liver is dynamic organ with minute to hourly adaptions in response to feeding. Patients with non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) and cirrhosis have altered transcriptomic features compared to controls but how and if food intake affects such is unknown in humans. Our aim was to investigate the hepatic transcriptome at both fasting and postprandial states in patients with NAFLD, cirrhosis, and healthy controls and secondly to develop a browsable resource enabling easy and unrestricted access to such data. We hypothesized that hepatic transcriptome differed between groups, and this was also regulated by food intake. We obtained liver tissue by transjugular liver biopsies from patients with NAFLD (n = 9, mean age 49 (16 SD) y, BMI 35 (5) kg/m2), cirrhosis (n = 9, age 61 (11) y, BMI 32 (5) kg/m2) and healthy controls (n = 10, age 25 (3) y, BMI 23 (3) kg/m2). The hepatic transcriptome was sequenced using NGS and evaluated in bioinformatic analyses to assess differentially expressed genes (DEG) and gene ontology biological processes (GOBP). We identified 553 DEG between healthy controls and patients with NAFLD, 5527 DEG between healthy controls and patients with cirrhosis, and 3898 DEG in NAFLD compared with cirrhosis. A hitherto uncharacterized gene (MET proto-oncogene) was differentially expressed in human NAFLD and cirrhosis. The hepatic transcriptome changed significantly during a standardized meal and these changes were blunted in patients with NAFLD and cirrhosis. GOBP analyses revealed an increase in pro-inflammatory and pro-fibrotic genes in NAFLD and cirrhosis, as well as a decrease in genes related to metabolism. Data were made browsable using two web-based apps. The hepatic transcriptome is differentially regulated by a standardized meal in healthy individuals compared to patients with fatty liver disease.
Autoimmune liver diseases are associated with an increased risk of diabetes, yet the underlying mechanisms remain unknown. In this cross-sectional study, we investigated the glucose-regulatory disturbances in patients with autoimmune hepatitis (AIH, n = 19), primary biliary cholangitis (PBC, n = 15), and primary sclerosing cholangitis (PSC, n = 6). Healthy individuals (n = 24) and patients with metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease (MASLD, n = 18) were included as controls. Blood samples were collected during a 120-min oral glucose tolerance test. We measured the concentrations of glucose, C-peptide, insulin, glucagon, and the two incretin hormones, glucose insulinotropic peptide (GIP) and glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1). We calculated the homeostasis model assessment of insulin resistance (HOMA-IR), whole body insulin resistance (Matsuda index), insulin clearance, and insulinogenic index. All patient groups had increased fasting plasma glucose and impaired glucose responses compared with healthy controls. Beta-cell secretion was increased in AIH, PBC, and MASLD but not in PSC. Patients with AIH and MASLD had hyperglucagonemia and hepatic, as well as peripheral, insulin resistance and decreased insulin clearance, resulting in hyperinsulinemia. Patients with autoimmune liver disease had an increased GIP response, and those with AIH or PBC had an increased GLP-1 response. Our data demonstrate that the mechanism underlying glucose disturbances in patients with autoimmune liver disease differs from that underlying MASLD, including compensatory incretin responses in patients with autoimmune liver disease. Our results suggest that glucose disturbances are present at an early stage of the disease. NEW & NOTEWORTHY Patients with autoimmune liver disease but without overt diabetes display glucose disturbances early on in their disease course. We identified pathophysiological traits specific to these patients including altered incretin responses.
AIM:Increased growth differentiation factor 15 (GDF15) may reflect impaired metabolic health and an inflammatory state in metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease (MASLD). We investigated the role of GDF15 in histologically verified MASLD in a meal test (discovery) cohort (n = 20) and a prospective (validation) cohort with 2 years of follow-up (n = 276). METHODS:Participants were evaluated clinically and histologically in both cohorts. Fibrosis severity was classified as no/mild (F0/F1) or significant (F2-4). Plasma GDF15 was measured by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays and the SOMAScan platform. Hepatic GDF15 mRNA expression was analyzed by RNA in situ hybridization and bulk RNA-sequencing. In addition, we used data from public single-nucleus RNA-sequencing datasets. RESULTS:In both cohorts, plasma GDF15 was increased in MASLD compared with healthy controls (p < 0.0001) with the highest levels in patients with significant fibrosis (area under the curve 0.83; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.76-0.91). The GDF15 levels were unaffected by a standardized meal and there was no difference in peripheral or hepatic venous concentrations. After 2 years, the increase in GDF15 levels was reduced in patients treated with glucagon-like peptide receptor agonists (GLP-1-RA) compared to patients receiving lifestyle advice (-28%; 95% CI, -44 to -8; p = 0.01). Plasma GDF15 was associated with circulating insulin-like growth factor 1 and related proteins. Hepatic GDF15 mRNA was mainly expressed in hepatocytes and in cholangiocytes in fibrotic areas and was increased in MASLD (p = 0.02) with the highest expression in the group with steatohepatitis (p = 0.009). CONCLUSIONS:Increased hepatic and circulating GDF15 are found in MASLD. Treatment with GLP-1-RA may reduce GDF15, possibly reflecting beneficial metabolic and inflammatory effects.
Background Alterations in the production of short-chain fatty acids (SCFAs) may reflect disturbances in the gut microbiota and have been linked to metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease (MASLD). We assessed plasma SCFAs in patients with MASLD and healthy controls. Methods Fasting venous blood samples were collected and eight SCFAs were measured using gas chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (GC-MS/MS). Relative between-group differences in circulating SCFA concentrations were estimated by linear regression, and the relation between SCFA concentrations, MASLD, and fibrosis severity was investigated using logistic regression. Results The study includes 100 patients with MASLD (51% with mild/no fibrosis and 49% with significant fibrosis) and 50 healthy controls. Compared with healthy controls, MASLD patients had higher plasma concentrations of propionate (21.8%, 95% CI 3.33 to 43.6, p = 0.02), formate (21.9%, 95% CI 6.99 to 38.9, p = 0.003), valerate (35.7%, 95% CI 4.53 to 76.2, p = 0.02), and α-methylbutyrate (16.2%, 95% CI 3.66 to 30.3, p = 0.01) but lower plasma acetate concentrations (− 30.0%, 95% CI − 40.4 to − 17.9, p < 0.001). Among patients with MASLD, significant fibrosis was positively associated with propionate ( p = 0.02), butyrate ( p = 0.03), valerate ( p = 0.03), and α-methylbutyrate ( p = 0.02). Six of eight SCFAs were significantly increased in F4 fibrosis. Conclusions In the present study, SCFAs were associated with MASLD and fibrosis severity, but further research is needed to elucidate the potential mechanisms underlying our observations and to assess the possible benefit of therapies modulating gut microbiota.
Increased plasma concentrations of glucagon (hyperglucagonemia) are reported in patients with type 2 diabetes (T2D) and are considered a diabetogenic risk factor. Emerging evidence suggests that hepatic steatosis in obesity is causing a condition of resistance toward glucagon's effects on amino acid metabolism, resulting in an amino acid-induced hyperglucagonemia. We investigated the presence of hyperglucagonemia in individuals with biopsy-verified metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease (MASLD), and whether body mass index (BMI), T2D, hepatic steatosis, and/or fibrosis contribute to this relationship. To dissect potential mechanisms, we also determined hepatic gene expression related to amino acid transport and catabolism. Individuals with MASLD had hyperglucagonemia {controls (n = 74) vs. MASLD (n = 106); median [Q1, Q3]; 4 [3, 7] vs. 8 [6, 13] pM), P < 0.0001} and were glucagon resistant (assessed by the glucagon-alanine index) {1.3 [0.9, 2.1] vs. 3.3 [2.1, 5.3] pM·mM, P < 0.0001}. These changes were associated with hepatic steatosis (P < 0.001, R2 > 0.25) independently of BMI, sex, age, and T2D. Plasma levels of glucagon were similar in individuals with MASLD when stratified on T2D status {MASLD-T2D (n = 52) vs. MASLD + T2D (n = 54); 8 [6, 11] vs. 8 [6, 13] pM, P = 0.34} and hepatic fibrosis {MASLD + F0 (n = 25) vs. MASLD + F1-F3 (n = 67); 8.4 [7.0, 13.3] vs. 7.9 [5.2, 11.6] pM, P = 0.43}. Obesity (BMI = 30 kg/m2) did not alter glucagon levels (P = 0.65) within groups (control/MASLD). The mRNA expression of proteins involved in amino acid transport and catabolism was downregulated in MASLD. Thus, relative hyperglucagonemia is present in individuals with biopsy-verified MASLD, and hepatic steatosis partially drives hyperglucagonemia and glucagon resistance, irrespective of T2D, BMI, and hepatic fibrosis.NEW & NOTEWORTHY Individuals with metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease (MASLD) present with increased plasma levels of glucagon (hyperglucagonemia), irrespective of body mass index (BMI) and type 2 diabetes. Therefore, MASLD and the resultant hyperglucagonemia may act as a diabetogenic risk factor. Notably, hepatic steatosis was a significant contributor to the hyperglucagonemia in MASLD, potentially unveiling a pathway for the hyperglucagonemia in some patients with type 2 diabetes.
Background: Genetic testing can be used to evaluate disease risk. We evaluated if the use of three Single Nucleotide Polymorphisms (SNPs), alone or combined into a genetic risk score (GRS), can aid identify significant fibrosis in subjects with metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease (MASLD). Methods: We assessed three known risk variants: PNPLA3 rs738409, TM6SF2 rs58542926, and HSD17B13 rs72613567. The study included 414 adult individuals invited from the Danish population, who were defined as at-risk of MASLD due to elevated ALT and body mass index (BMI) >25 kg/m(2). Participants were assessed clinically and by the Fibrosis-4 (FIB-4) index and Fibroscan. Results: In total, 17 participants (4.1 %) had alcohol-related liver disease, 79 (19.1 %) had no evidence of liver disease, and four (1.0 %) were diagnosed with other liver diseases, including malignant disease. The remaining 314 participants (75.8 %) were diagnosed with MASLD. Of the 27 who underwent a liver biopsy for suspected fibrosis, 15 had significant fibrosis (>= F2) and 12 had no/mild fibrosis (F0/F1). The GRS was not associated with significant fibrosis (p = 0.09) but PNPLA3 was with an odds ratio of 6.75 (95 % CI 1.29-50.7; p = 0.039) risk allele CG/GG versus CC. The diagnostic accuracy of PNPLA3 combined with an increased Fib-4 (>1.3) was excellent for detecting significant fibrosis with a sensitivity of 1.00 (95 % CI 0.72-1.00), but the specificity was no better than for FIB-4 alone. Conclusions: This study found no evidence to support the use of GRS for diagnosing significant fibrosis in MASLD. However, the combination of PNPLA3 and Fib-4 increased sensitivity considerably. In addition, ALT remains a useful tool for screening diagnosing other liver diseases than MASLD.
Introduction: Abdominal ultrasound (US) and CT are important tools for the initial evaluation of patients with liver disease. Our study aimed to determine the accuracy of these methods for diagnosing cirrhosis. Methods: In all, 377 participants from 4 prospective cohort studies evaluating patients with various liver diseases were included. All patients were included between 2017 and 2022 and had undergone a liver biopsy as well as US and/or CT. Using the histological assessment as the gold standard, we calculated diagnostic accuracy for US and CT. Liver biopsies were evaluated by expert histopathologists and diagnostic scans by experienced radiologists. Results: The mean age was 54 ± 14 years and 47% were female. Most patients had NAFLD (58.3%) or alcohol-associated liver disease (25.5%). The liver biopsy showed cirrhosis in 147 patients (39.0%). Eighty-three patients with cirrhosis had Child-Pugh A (56.4% of patients with cirrhosis) and 64 had Child-Pugh B/C (43.6%). Overall, the sensitivity for diagnosing cirrhosis by US was 0.71 (95% CI 0.62–0.79) and for CT 0.74 (95% CI 0.64–0.83). The specificity was high for US (0.94, 95% CI 0.90–0.97) and for CT (0.93, 95% CI 0.83–0.98). When evaluating patients with Child-Pugh A cirrhosis, sensitivity was only 0.62 (95% CI 0.49–0.74) for US and 0.60 (95% CI 0.43–0.75) for CT. For patients with Child-Pugh B/C, sensitivity was 0.83 (95% CI 0.70–0.92) for US and 0.87 (95% CI 0.74–0.95) for CT. When limiting our analysis to NAFLD (20% with cirrhosis), the sensitivity for US was 0.45 (95% CI 0.28–0.64) and specificity was 0.97 (95% CI 0.93–0.99). Conclusion: US and CT show moderate sensitivity and may potentially overlook compensated cirrhosis underlining the need for additional diagnostic testing.
Fatty liver disease has mainly been characterized under fasting conditions. However, as the liver is essential for postprandial homeostasis, identifying postprandial disturbances may be important. Here, we investigated postprandial changes in markers of metabolic dysfunction between healthy individuals, obese individuals with non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) and patients with cirrhosis. We included individuals with biopsy-proven NAFLD (n = 9, mean age 50 years, mean BMI 35 kg/m(2), no/mild fibrosis), cirrhosis with hepatic steatosis (n = 10, age 62 years, BMI 32 kg/m(2), CHILD A/B) and healthy controls (n = 10, age 23, BMI 25 kg/m(2)), randomized 1:1 to fasting or standardized mixed meal test (postprandial). None of the patients randomized to mixed meal test had type 2 diabetes (T2D). Peripheral blood was collected for 120 min. After 60 min, a transjugular liver biopsy and liver vein blood was taken. Plasma levels of glucose, insulin, C-peptide, glucagon, and fibroblast growth factor 21 (FGF21) were measured. Postprandial peak glucose and C-peptide were significantly increased in NAFLD, and cirrhosis compared with healthy. Patients with NAFLD and cirrhosis had hyperglucagonemia as a potential sign of glucagon resistance. FGF21 was increased in NAFLD and cirrhosis independent of sampling from the liver vein versus peripheral blood. Glucagon levels were higher in the liver vein compared with peripheral blood. Patients with NAFLD and cirrhosis without T2D showed impaired glucose tolerance, hyperinsulinemia, and hyperglucagonemia after a meal compared to healthy individual. Postprandial characterization of patients with NAFLD may be important to capture their metabolic health.
Based on documentary materials, the article examines the settlement of the Cossack villages of the Psekup Cossack regiment and the description of the resettlement movement in the North-Western Caucasus. The author focuses, first of all, on the civil-settlement aspect, since historical settlements arose from a complex interweaving of politics and geography, power and settlement way of life, reflecting not only the way of life familiar to the Cossacks, but also the Cossack identity. The Psekup Cossack Cavalry Regiment, which was both a military unit of the Kuban Cossack army and an administrative unit within the Kuban region is considered. It is emphasized that, in fact, a military-civilian administration was formed with the maximum sphere of competence in this territory. The problematic aspects of surveying and land use in the Cossack villages of the regiment are revealed. The purpose of the study is to analyze the processes of development of the Trans-Kuban spaces in the form of fortified stanitsa settlements, as well as the penetration of Russian influence in a new area of the historical region of Kuban. The author comes to the conclusion that the villages of the Psekup cavalry regiment were interconnected with the regimental military organization, acting as a stronghold for securing Russian positions in the TransKuban region.
Objective: The effect of oral glucose-induced release of gastrointestinal hormones on satiety and appetite independently of prevailing plasma glucose excursions is unknown. The objective is to investigate the effect of oral glucose on appetite and satiety sensations as compared to isoglycemic IV glucose infusion (IIGI) in healthy volunteers.Design: A crossover study involving two study days for each participant.Participants: Nineteen healthy participants (6 women, mean age 55.1 [SD 14.2] years; mean body mass index 26.7 [SD 2.2] kg/m(2)).Interventions: Each participant underwent a 3-h 50-g oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT) and, on a subsequent study day, an IIGI mimicking the glucose excursions from the OGTT. On both study days, appetite and satiety were indicated regularly on visual analog scale (VAS), and blood was drawn regularly for measurement of pancreatic and gut hormones.Primary outcomes: Difference in appetite and satiety sensations during OGTT and IIGI.Results: Circulating concentrations of glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide (P < .0001), glucagon-like peptide 1 (P < .0001), insulin (P < .0001), C-peptide (P < .0001), and neurotensin (P = .003) increased significantly during the OGTT as compared to the IIGI, whereas glucagon responses were similarly suppressed (P = .991). Visual analog scale-assessed ratings of hunger, satiety, fullness, thirst, well-being, and nausea, respectively, were similar during OGTT and IIGI whether assessed as mean 0-3-h values or area under the curves. For both groups, a similar, slow increase in appetite and decrease in satiation were observed. Area under the curve, for prospective food consumption (P = .049) and overall appetite score (P = .044) were slightly lower during OGTT compared to IIGI, whereas mean 0-3-h values were statistically similar for prospective food consumption (P = .053) and overall appetite score (P = .063).Conclusions: Despite eliciting robust responses of appetite-reducing and/or satiety-promoting gut hormones, we found that oral glucose administration has little or no effect on appetite and satiety as compared to an IIGI, not affecting the release of appetite-modulating hormones.