Background: Symptomatic severe aortic stenosis is associated with increased mortality and morbidity. Early identification of these patients by echocardiography is crucial. We conducted this study to evaluate a handheld ultrasound device (HCU) in patients with suspected severe aortic stenosis (AS) in comparison to a standard echocardiography device (SE). Methods: A HCU (Vivid I; GE Healthcare) and a SE device (Philips iE 33) were used to evaluate 50 consecutive patients with suspected severe AS. Two consecutive echocardiographic studies were performed by two experienced and blinded examiners using HCU and SE device. AS was graded by mean transaortic pressure, aortic valve area (AVA), and indexed AVA (AVA adjusted for body surface area). Results: Mean difference for mean transaortic gradient, AVA and indexed AVA for the SE and HCU device were 1.28 mmHg (−0.70 to 3.26 mmHg), −0.02 cm2 (−0.06 to 0.01 cm2), and −0.01 cm2/m2 (−0.03 to 0.01 cm2/m2), respectively. Discrepancies between both devices were not associated with misinterpretation of the degree of AS. Conclusion: Our study demonstrates that HCU can be used to evaluate patients with suspected AS. (ECHOCARDIOGRAPHY 2010;27:481‐486)

A 41-year old female patient was admitted with acute onset of dyspnea and chest pain. Previous history revealed asthma, chronic sinusitis and eosinophilic proctitis. Electrocardiogram showed anterior ST-segment elevations and inferior ST-segment depression. Immediate heart catheterization revealed a distally occluded left anterior descending coronary artery, the occlusion being reversible after nitroglycerine. Cardiac magnetic resonance imaging was consistent with perimyocarditis. Hypereosinophilia and IgE elevation were present and Churg-strauss syndrome was diagnosed.

The probability of event-free survival of childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) approaches 80% or more with the use of modern multiagent chemotherapeutic regimens. One major contribution to this success has been reduction of the rate of central nervous system (CNS) relapses to less than 5%. However, heterogeneity is observed with regard to the incidence of CNS relapse in homogenously treated patient populations. One potential explanation for this heterogeneity is variation in the genetic background of these populations. Glutathione S-transferase P1 and P-glycoprotein are implicated in resistance to a variety of chemotherapeutic agents and have been localized to the blood-brain barrier. In a matched case-control study, we investigated the associations between CNS relapse in childhood ALL and the presence of phenotypically relevant single nucleotide polymorphisms within the GSTP1 (codon 105 and 114) and MDR1 genes (ABCB1; coding for Pgp; exon 26, C3435T). Significant reductions in risk of CNS relapse were observed for patients homozygous for the GSTP1 Val105 allele as well as for patients with the MDR1 3435T/T or C/T genotype. For both genotypes, the effect was restricted to patients at intermediate or high risk of treatment failure.These results suggested a modulating role for host genetic variation in the development of CNS relapse in childhood ALL treated according to Berlin-Frankfurt-Münster protocols.