BACKGROUND:Unstable osteochondritis dissecans of the capitellum (OCD-C) is most commonly treated with debridement and marrow stimulation. This treatment has historically been associated with suboptimal return to high-demand upper extremity sports and persistent elbow pain. Fresh osteochondral allograft transplant (OCAlloT) is an alternative treatment that restores subchondral bone and articular cartilage without the donor site morbidity that is associated with autograft harvest. PURPOSE:To evaluate the outcomes of OCAlloT in pediatric patients with unstable OCD-C ≥10 mm in diameter. STUDY DESIGN:Case series; Level of evidence, 4. METHODS:A single-center prospective study was performed of pediatric patients younger than 19 years who had unstable OCD-C ≥10 mm in diameter treated with primary fresh OCAlloT using precut osteochondral allograft cores. Postoperative magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) was obtained to assess graft incorporation. Patient-reported outcome (PRO) scores were obtained preoperatively and then annually after surgery. Minimum follow-up duration was 2 years. RESULTS:The study included 28 elbows in 26 patients, mean age 13.5 years (range, 11.3-17.1 years). The most common primary sports were gymnastics and baseball. OCD location was far-lateral in 6 elbows (21%). Mean OCD size was 11 mm in width, 12 mm in length, and 7 mm in depth. Twenty-four elbows (86%) were treated with a single allograft plug. Median OCAlloT size was 11.8 mm in diameter. Mean follow-up duration was 40 months. No infections or graft failures occurred. Two elbows (7%) had a secondary surgery for arthrofibrosis and posterolateral synovial impingement. Postoperative MRI scans were obtained in 19 elbows (68%) and demonstrated a high degree of graft incorporation. All patients had preoperative, 1-year, and 2-year PRO scores, and the 1- and 2-year PRO scores showed significant improvements compared with preoperative PRO scores. A total of 23 elbows (82%) had returned to sports at 1 year, and 27 (96%) had returned to sports at 2 years. CONCLUSION:OCAlloT for treatment of OCD-C was associated with low rates of complications, excellent graft incorporation, high elbow function, patient satisfaction, and overall high rates of return to sports at 2 years.

The incidence of anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injury continues to increase in the skeletally immature population. These injuries were historically treated with nonsurgical measures in this age group due to concerns for iatrogenic damage to the physis during ACL reconstruction. However, delayed surgery often led to recurrent instability, meniscal tears, and chondral damage. With the development of newer and safer surgical techniques with satisfactory outcomes, ACL reconstruction has become much more common in this age group. The patient's skeletal age is often used to determine remaining growth, which helps to decide the surgical technique chosen. These techniques include physeal sparing, partial transphyseal, and transphyseal surgical options, using soft-tissue autografts. Each technique has been shown to have favorable patient-reported outcomes, but no technique is without the risk of complications. This article will review the management of skeletally immature ACL injuries, including relevant anatomy, risk factors for injury, assessment of skeletal age, and different treatment options and outcomes.

Background: Management of glenohumeral instability in the adolescent population can be both challenging and controversial. There are no current guidelines for optimal management of glenohumeral instability in this population (unidirectional or multidirectional), and the cutoff ages for transition to adult treatment are not known. Purpose: To develop consensus-based guidelines for the management of glenohumeral instability in adolescents. Study Design: Consensus statement. Methods: A 26-question, multiple-choice survey was developed after 2 rounds of iterations and was submitted to the orthopaedic surgeons of the Pediatric Research in Sports Medicine (PRiSM) Society. The survey comprised 3 sections—demographics, practice setting, and decision-making—and included cutoff ages and management in 5 specific case scenarios. Consensus-based guidelines were generated with 66% response agreement. An indication score was then applied to each response related to more aggressive management to determine if variables related to consensus (or lack thereof) could be identified. Results: A total of 54 responses were returned. Of the respondents, 59% were from academic practice, 84% were pediatric orthopaedic fellowship trained, and 46% performed >25 shoulder instability cases per year. In the setting of first-time anterior shoulder dislocation, nonoperative treatment was preferred for boys aged <14 years and girls aged <13 years. Besides age, proximal humerus physeal status, injury mechanism, sport, and presence of bony injury affected treatment selection. The presence of a Bankart lesion was an indication for stabilization in first-time dislocations for contact athletes with a closing or closed physis, but not in patients with an open physis or noncontact injury mechanisms. For recurrent anterior shoulder dislocation, stabilization was preferred irrespective of physis status. Initial nonoperative treatment was preferred for multidirectional instability. Conclusion: In the setting of first-time anterior shoulder dislocation in patients with open physes, nonoperative treatment was preferred for boys <14 years and girls <13 years. Future multicenter prospective studies focusing on outcomes would help to validate current practice patterns, especially in scenarios for which no consensus was reached.

Objectives: Unstable osteochondritis dissecans of the capitellum (OCD-C) is treated surgically, most commonly with loose body removal and marrow stimulation. This treatment has historically been associated with suboptimal return to high-demand upper extremity sports (baseball and gymnastics) and persistent elbow pain. Fresh osteochondral allograft transplantation (OAlloT) is an alternative treatment which restores subchondral bone and articular cartilage without donor site morbidity associated with autograft harvest. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the outcomes of osteochondral allograft transplantation in pediatric patients with unstable OCD-C 10mm or greater in size. Methods: A single-center prospective study was performed of consecutive pediatric patients, less than 19 years of age, with unstable OCD-C 10mm or greater in size treated with primary fresh OCAlloT using pre-cut 10mm, 12mm, or 16mm cores. Imaging, including radiographs and MRI were obtained preoperatively to assess OCD size and characteristics, as well as postoperatively to assess incorporation of the OCA. Patient reported outcome scores (PROs), including sport data, were obtained preoperatively and annually following surgery. Minimum follow-up duration was 2 years. Results: 26 elbows in 24 patients, mean age 13.4 years (11.3 – 17.1 years) met inclusion. The most common primary sport was gymnastics in 11 elbows (42%), baseball/softball in 7 elbows (27%), and cheer in 3 elbow (12%). The majority of patients (88%) played at a competitive level. Median symptom duration prior to presentation was 3 months. The most common presenting symptoms were pain (85%) and mechanical symptoms (81%). Sixteen elbows (62%) presented with a >5° loss of elbow extension compared to the contralateral side. The capitellar physis was open in 23 elbows (88%). OCD location was central in 17 elbows (65%) and far lateral in 9 elbow (35%). Mean MRI size of the OCD was 11 mm in coronal width, 12 mm in sagittal length, and 6 mm in depth. Twelve elbows (48%) had a loose body on MRI. The majority of elbows (22, 85%) were treated with a single allograft plug, while 4 elbows had two allograft plugs transplanted. Median OCA size was 12 mm. There were no infections nor arthrofibrosis. Two elbows (8%) had a secondary surgery, both underwent partial synovectomy and chondroplasty at 14- and 16-months following the primary surgery. Postoperative MRIs were obtained in 15 elbows (58%) and had a mean BOGIE (Boston Osteochondral Graft Incorporation in the Elbow) score of 11, thus documenting a high degree of incorporation. Mean follow-up duration was 40 months (range 25 – 60 months). All patients had preoperative, 1-year, and 2-year PROs (Table 1). 21 elbows (81%) had returned to sports at 1-year postoperatively9, and all but 1 patient had returned to sports by 2 years following surgery. Forty-five percent of gymnasts returned to gymnastics, while the remaining pursued different sports. Five of 6 baseball players (83%) returned to baseball. Conclusions: OCAlloT as a treatment for OCD-C is a procedure associated with low rates of complications, excellent graft incorporation, high elbow function and patient satisfaction, and overall high rates of return to sports at 2-years. Return to sports, particularly among gymnasts was less than 50% in this series, which we attribute to a combination of factors, including loss of training and competition time at a critical time for an elite gymnast as well as physician counseling on alternative sports with less stress on the elbow. Continued patient follow-up is ongoing and will be critical to the assessment of this treatment on the mid- and long-term outcomes in these young athletes. [Figure: see text]

BACKGROUND:Multiple clinical and radiologic risk factors for recurrent instability after arthroscopic Bankart repair have been described. Humeral bone loss has gained more recent attention, particularly with respect to "off-track" lesions and increased rates of recurrent instability and revision surgery.PURPOSE:To evaluate clinical and radiologic predictors of failure after arthroscopic Bankart repair in adolescents.STUDY DESIGN:Case series; Level of evidence, 4.METHODS:A single-institution retrospective study was performed in patients <19 years of age treated with arthroscopic Bankart repair from 2011 to 2017. Magnetic resonance imaging measurements of glenoid and humeral bone loss, the glenoid track, and the presence of off-track Hill-Sachs (HS) lesions were assessed. All patients had a minimum follow-up of 24 months and completed patient-reported outcome scores. Failure was defined as revision surgery or postoperative subjective instability.RESULTS:A total of 59 patients (46 male, 13 female) with a median age of 16 years (range, 12-18 years) were included. Ten patients (17%) had revision surgery and 8 patients (14%) had subjective instability without revision surgery. No clinical or radiologic factors were significantly different between the failure cohort and the nonfailure cohort. Four patients (7%) measured off-track, and 2 of these patients experienced failure. A total of 38 patients (64%) were identified to have an HS defect. Subgroup analysis of these patients identified a greater HS interval (HSI) in patients who underwent revision surgery as compared with those patients who did not have revision surgery. Among patients with GT ratio ≥15 mm, there was a 50% rate of revision surgery. The Pediatric/Adolescent Shoulder Survey (PASS) and Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation (SANE) scores at the final follow-up were not significantly different among patients with or without revision surgery. However, those with subjective instability who had not undergone revision surgery had significantly lower PASS and SANE scores as compared with the remainder of the cohort.CONCLUSION:Of the adolescents in this cohort, 31% either had revision surgery (17%) or reported subjective feelings of instability (14%) after arthroscopic Bankart repair. Off-track instability was identified in 7% of the cohort but was not predictive of failure. Among the subgroup of patients with an HS defect, those who underwent revision surgery had a significantly larger HSI.

Purpose: The purpose was to assess the outcomes of medial patellofemoral ligament (MPFL) allograft reconstruction with or without tibial tubercle osteotomy (TTO) in adolescents, with a focus on evaluating demographic and imaging characteristics on outcomes. Methods: A single-institution retrospective study was performed of patients ages 12 to 19 years who underwent MPFL reconstruction +/− TTO for the treatment of lateral patellar instability. Demographic, clinical, surgical, and postoperative information was collected. All x-ray and magnetic resonance imaging measurements were completed independently by 2 surgeons. Patients were contacted to complete patient-reported outcomes at a minimum of 2 years following surgery. The primary outcome measure was recurrent instability resulting in revision surgery. Results: Seventy-eight knees in 74 patients, with a median age of 15.3 years (interquartile range: 14.4, 16.1), were included. Forty-five knees underwent isolated MPFL reconstruction and 33 knees had a combined MPFL + TTO. The knees that underwent MPFL + TTO had significantly greater tibial tubercle-trochlear groove distance (19.0 mm vs. 15.4 mm, P =0.015) and patellar tendon-lateral trochlear ridge distance (10.9 mm vs. 5.9 mm, P =0.018) than the knees treated with isolated MPFL reconstruction. Four knees (5.1%) underwent revision stabilization surgery, including 3 knees in the MPFL cohort (6.7%) and 1 knee in the MPFL + TTO cohort (3.0%). The rate of failure between the MPFL and MPFL + TTO knees was not significantly different, P =0.634. There were no differences in age, sex, body mass index, number of dislocations, or any imaging characteristics in patients who underwent revision versus those who did not. Patient-reported outcomes were collected on 50 knees at a median of 36 months (interquartile range: 24, 54) after surgery, and no differences were noted between cohorts. Conclusions: Patellar stabilization surgery, including MPFL reconstruction and TTO in carefully selected patients, had excellent revision-free outcomes in 95% of this adolescent cohort. In this case series, those patients whose treatment included TTO had greater tibial tubercle-trochlear groove and patellar tendon-lateral trochlear ridge as compared to the isolated MPFL cohort. Despite previous literature suggesting demographic and imaging characteristics as risks for recurrent instability, we identified no characteristics within these two distinct surgical treatment groups to be predictive of the need for revision stabilization, regardless of the treatment group. Level of Evidence: Level III—retrospective comparison study

Background: Traumatic hip dislocations are uncommon injuries in the pediatric population. Injury recognition and prompt closed reduction is standard of care. The purpose of this study is to describe injury patterns, treatment (including hip arthroscopy), and patient reported outcomes of traumatic hip dislocation in pediatric patients. Methods: A retrospective review was performed of all patients less than 18 years of age treated for a traumatic hip dislocation between 2011 – 2017 at a single center. Chart and radiographic review were performed, and patients were contacted to obtain outcome scores, including the Harris hip score (HHS) and hip outcome score (HOS). Results: 23 patients, 18 males and 5 females, with a mean age of 11.3 years (range 4 – 16) were included. The most common mechanisms of injury were motor vehicle crashes (8), football (7), and falls (3). The direction of hip dislocation was posterior (21) and obturator (2). Twenty patients had a CT to assess the hip reduction and associated injuries and 15 (75%) had a posterior wall acetabular fracture and 6 (30%) had an incarcerated fragment within the joint. 5 patients had an MRI and all had an associated posterior wall fracture and posterior labral tear. Fourteen patients were treated non-operatively. Patient-reported outcome scores were obtained in 10 patients (71%). Mean HOS-ADL, HOS-Sport, and mHHS were 75 (69 – 76), 32 (18 – 36), and 97 (85 – 100) respectively at a mean of 40 months after injury. Nine patients were treated operatively, including 5 patients with hip arthroscopy. Patient-reported outcome scores were obtained in 7 patients (78%). Mean HOS-ADL, HOS-Sport, and mHHS were 69 (50 – 76), 30 (14 – 36), and 86 (59 – 100) respectively at a mean of 34 months after surgery. Conclusion: Traumatic hip dislocations in the pediatric population occur most frequently as isolated orthopaedic injuries in association with posterior wall acetabular fractures. Incarcerated fragments occurred in 30% of the patients, yet were commonly not recognized on plain radiographs alone. Axial imaging should be routinely obtained following reduction. Selective hip arthroscopy after traumatic hip dislocations is a viable less invasive method for treatment of incarcerated fragments and labral injury. Key Concepts Pediatric and adolescent traumatic hip dislocations are rare and most often occur as an isolated orthopedic injury. Advanced axial imaging, preferably an MRI, should be obtained after reduction in all patients to evaluate for intra-articular pathology. Without incarcerated fragments, patients may be treated non-operatively with good mid-term functional outcome scores Selective hip arthroscopy may be effectively utilized in patients with intra-articular blocks to reduction and significant labral pathology. Level of Evidence: IV

Background: Surgical treatment of navicular stress fractures (NSF) in athletes has been recommended secondary to the poor blood supply of the navicular and frequency of delayed union and refracture. Regardless of treatment, nonunion and persistent pain are complications described in adults. The purpose of this study was to describe patient and fracture characteristics and outcomes of surgical treatment of NSF in adolescents. Methods: An IRB approved retrospective review was performed of patients less than 18 years of age treated with surgical screw fixation of NSF from 2014 – 2019. All patients were contacted for collection of patient reported outcome measures (PROMs). Results: Five patients with a median age of 15.8 years (range 14 – 17 years) were included. Three patients, all baseball catchers, had a dorsal navicular osteophyte. All fractures were in the lateral third of the navicular. There were 3 type 2 fractures and 2 type 3 fractures. Median clinical follow-up was 7.1 months (range 5 – 14 months). No patient developed avascular necrosis. PROMs at a median of 61 months following surgery demonstrated that all patients returned to their primary sport at the same level and no patients reported refracture or subsequent surgeries. Conclusions: In a cohort of adolescent patients, operative fixation of type 2 and 3 NSF results in reliable healing, no evidence for AVN, and excellent mid-term outcomes with full return to sports. These outcomes are in contrast to higher rates of non-union and inability to return to sports reported in the adult literature.

Background: Since the most recent epidemiologic study of injuries in National Basketball Association (NBA) players was completed in 2012, the understanding and diagnosis of intra-articular hip injury has advanced. Purpose: To report the epidemiology of intra- versus extra-articular hip injuries in NBA players with regard to missed games, risk factors for injury, and treatment types. Study Design: Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3. Methods: The NBA injury database was queried for all reported hip and groin injuries from 2013 to 2017. The injuries were then divided into intra-articular and extra-articular types. Variables compared between injury types included player age, NBA tenure, season schedule (preseason or offseason), onset type, injury mechanism, roster position, games missed, time to return to play, and need for surgery. Results: A total of 224 athletes sustaining 353 total hip pathologies were identified. Of these injuries, 216 (61.2%) were sustained during game competition and affected 156 (69.6%) of the athletes. Intra-articular injuries represented 39 (11.0%) cases and involved 36 (16.1%) players. The time to return to play was significantly longer after intra-articular versus extra-articular injury (44.6 ± 96.0 vs 11.8 ± 32.0 days; P = .03), and the number of games missed was significantly greater after intra-articular versus extra-articular injury (8.0 ± 18.7 vs 1.54 ± 4.9 games; P = .03). Patients with intra-articular hip injuries were more likely to undergo surgery (odds ratio, 5.5 [95% CI, 1.8-16.7]; P = .005). There was no statistically significant difference in the number of games missed due to surgery (35.2 ± 8.3 [intra-articular] vs 35.4 ± 11.6 [extra-articular]; P = .42) or nonoperative treatment (4.2 ± 3.4 [intra-articular] vs 1.3 ± 0.5 [extra-articular]; P = .11). Years of NBA tenure were not significantly different between intra-articular and extra-articular injuries (7.1 ± 3.7 vs 6.3 ± 4.0 years). For both types of hip injury, there was no correlation between player age and either days to return to play or number of games missed (R 2 = 0.014). Conclusion: NBA players with intra-articular hip injuries underwent surgery more frequently and had a longer return-to-play time compared with those with extra-articular hip injuries. NBA tenure and player age were not correlated with the risk of developing hip injury or the need for surgery.

Abstract The purpose of this study is to describe the surgical technique and outcomes of transosseous repair of patellar sleeve fractures in a pediatric cohort. A retrospective review was performed on patients younger than 16 years undergoing transosseous repair of distal patellar sleeve fractures. A chart review was performed on demographics, surgical repair technique, and postoperative care. Primary outcomes included intact extensor mechanism function and range of motion (ROM) at final follow-up. In this study, 20 patients, 17 males and 3 females, with a mean age of 11.7 years were included. ROM was initiated at a median of 27.5 days following surgery. All patients had a healed patellar sleeve fracture and intact extensor function at final follow-up. Final mean knee ROM among the 18 patients with minimum 3-month follow-up was 132 degrees. Thirteen patients (72%) achieved full ROM (≥ 130 degrees) and 5 patients (28%) achieved less than 130 degrees knee flexion. Duration of initial immobilization was found to be the only variable strongly associated with final postoperative ROM. Mean duration of immobilization for patients achieving ≥ 130 degrees was 24 days versus 44 days in those patients achieving < 130 degrees, p = 0.009. All patients who began knee ROM within 21 days of surgery obtained full knee ROM. No patients experienced construct failure or extensor lag. Operative management of displaced patellar sleeve fractures with anatomic transosseous suture repair of the sleeve fracture, brief immobilization no more than 21 days, and initiation range of early ROM results in excellent outcomes.

INTRODUCTION: The treatment of adolescent shoulder instability can be a challenging problem, with multiple patient and radiographic risk factors for recurrent instability. Although glenoid bone loss has been well described, humeral bone loss has gained more recent attention. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the incidence and clinical outcomes of “off track” shoulder lesions and their association with clinical outcomes. METHODS: A retrospective IRB approved study was performed to identify patients less than 19 years of age treated with isolated arthroscopic anterior labral repair for unidirectional shoulder instability. Radiographic measurements of glenoid diameter, % glenoid bone loss, glenoid track, hill-sachs interval (HIS), HS/glenoid track ratio, and intact anterior articular angle (IAAA) were performed for all patients with magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). All patients were contacted at final follow-up to collect outcome scores (PASS and SANE scores, activity level). A multivariable logistic regression analysis was performed to identify predictors of revision surgery or subjective instability (RI). RESULTS: 86 patients were identified to meet inclusion criteria and 69 of these patients, 53 males and 16 females with a median age of 16 years [15, 17], had minimum 1-year clinical follow-up and were included in assessment of clinical outcomes and multivariable analysis. 12 patients (17%) had revision surgery and 10 patients had subjective instability without revision (14%) In univariate analysis (Table 1), patient height was the only patient factor which was significantly different between the revision/instability (RI) cohort and the non-revision/instability (NRI) cohort. All 86 patients were included in radiographic analysis. Intra- and inter-rater reliability (ICCs) for radiographic measurements are presented in table 2. Agreement was good and excellent for all measurements with the exception of inter-rater reliability of IAAA. Multivariable regression analysis demonstrated that HS/glenoid track ratio was not a predictor for RI. PASS and SANE scores at final follow-up were significantly lower in the RI cohort (79.5 and 70) respectively) as compared to the NRI cohort (94 and 90 respectively), p<0.001. 42 patients (69%) returned to the same or higher level of sports following surgery and this was no different between RI and NRI cohorts. CONCLUSIONS: 31% of adolescent patients in our cohort experienced RI following arthroscopic bankart repair and this was associated with inferior PASS and SANE scores. Off-track lesions were not predictive of failure with primary repair.

Background: Anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) tears are frequently associated with meniscal injury. Risk factors for concomitant meniscal injuries have been studied in the adult population but less so in pediatric patients. Purpose: To evaluate the relationship between age and body mass index (BMI) and the presence of a concomitant meniscal tear at the time of ACL reconstruction (ACLR) in pediatric patients. Study Design: Case-control study; Level of evidence, 3. Methods: A single-institution retrospective review was performed of patients aged <19 years who underwent primary ACLR over a 3.5-year period. Revision ACLR and multiligament knee reconstructions were excluded. Logistic regression was used to identify risk factors associated with having a meniscal tear at the time of surgery. Subgroup analysis was performed for medial and lateral meniscal tears. Results: Included in this study were 453 patients (230 males, 223 females; median age, 15 years). Of these, 265 patients (58%) had a meniscal tear, including 150 isolated lateral meniscal tears, 53 isolated medial meniscal tears, and 62 patients with both lateral and medial meniscal tears. Median time from injury to surgery was 48 days. For every 1-year increase in age, there was a 16% increase in the adjusted odds of having any meniscal tear (odds ratio [OR], 1.16; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.05-1.27; P = .002), with a 20% increase in the odds of having a medial meniscal tear (OR, 1.20; 95% CI, 1.07-1.35; P = .002) and a 16% increase in the odds of having a lateral meniscal tear (OR, 1.16; 95% CI, 1.05-1.27; P = .003). For every 2-point increase in BMI, there was a 12% increase in the odds of having any meniscal tear (OR, 1.12; 95% CI, 1.02-1.22; P = .016) and a 10% increase in the odds of having a lateral meniscal tear (OR, 1.10; 95% CI, 1.01-1.19; P = .028). Conclusion: Pediatric patients undergoing ACLR had a 58% incidence of concomitant meniscal pathology. Increasing age and BMI were independent risk factors for these injuries, while no association was found between time to surgery and meniscal pathology.

As the number of pediatric and adolescent patients participating in sports continues to increase, so too does the incidence of anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) tears in this population. There is increasing research on pediatric and adolescent ACL tears; hundreds of articles on the topic have been published in the past few years alone. It is important to highlight the most pertinent information in the past decade. In discussing pediatric ACL tears, it is also important to review tibial spine fractures. These injuries are rightfully grouped together because tibial spine fractures often occur with a mechanism of injury similar to that of ACL tears, but typically in a younger age group. Because management is different, understanding the similarities and differences between the two pathologies is important. Recent updates on the epidemiology, diagnosis, management, and outcomes of both pediatric ACL tears and tibial spine fractures need to be reviewed.

Objectives: Meniscus tears are a common and significant source of knee dysfunction in active young adult patients, and no high-quality prospective cohort or RCTs studies exist evaluating patient-reported outcomes in patients in this age group with ligamentously stable knees. Our objective was to identify patient-reported outcomes and patient-specific risk factors from a prospective cohort with a minimum of one-year follow-up following meniscal repair or excision in patients with ligamentously stable knees. We hypothesized that both groups would have significant improvement in outcomes; patients undergoing meniscal repair would have a higher reoperation rate; and articular cartilage injuries, subsequent knee surgery, and certain demographic characteristics would be significant risk factors to inferior outcomes at one year. Methods: Between February 2015 and December 2017, ligamentously stable meniscal procedures were enrolled and prospectively followed using the outcomes management evaluation system (OME) at Cleveland Clinic. Patients aged 23-39 preoperatively completed a series of validated outcome measurements including the Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score for both Pain (KOOS Pain) and Quality of Life (KOOS QoL). At the time of surgery, physicians documented all intra-articular findings, treatment, and surgical techniques utilized. Patients were followed at minimum of 1-year postoperatively through the OME platform and asked to complete the same outcome instruments done at baseline as well as a question designed to evaluate the Patient Acceptable Symptom State (PASS). The incidence and details of any subsequent knee surgeries were also obtained. Multivariable regression analysis was used to identify significant predictors of outcomes. Results: A total of 371 patients aged 23-39 underwent meniscus excision or repair during the study period. One hundred ninety-four met inclusion criteria, and one-year follow-up was obtained on 72% (n = 139) of the cohort (67% male; median age 32). Both KOOS Pain and KOOS QoL improved significantly at one-year for the entire cohort. Fourteen percent of the cohort (9% on the ipsilateral knee, 5% on the contralateral knee) underwent subsequent surgery at a minimum of one-year postoperatively. The patient-specific risk factors for worse one-year outcomes included preoperative baseline mental capacity score (VR-12 MCS), lower baseline KOOS QoL score, and the intraoperative finding of any grade 3 or 4 chondral changes. Conclusion: Young adult patients with ligamentously stable knees undergoing meniscal surgery have significantly improved patient-reported outcomes regardless of excision or repair; however, 14% of patients underwent additional knee surgery at a minimum of one-year postoperatively. The risk factors for worse outcomes include lower baseline mental health score, lower baseline KOOS QoL score, and any grade 3 or 4 chondromalacia scene.

BACKGROUND:Most pediatric tibial shaft fractures (75%)1 can be treated nonoperatively; however, unstable and open fractures require surgical intervention. Titanium elastic nails have become a popular technique for fixation of pediatric tibial shaft fractures. They act as internal splints that impart relative stability to the fracture, promoting callus formation at the fracture site2. DESCRIPTION:After the patient is placed in the supine position, the proximal tibial physis is marked using fluoroscopy. An anteromedial and anterolateral incision are made distal to the physis. Entry holes are created in the proximal part of the tibia, and appropriately sized titanium nails are introduced into the bone. Nail size should be 40% of the width of the canal, yielding 80% canal fill when 2 nails are used. The nails are prebent into a gentle C-shape to increase cortical contact at the apex so that 3-point fixation is achieved. The nails are passed to the fracture site, and the fracture is then reduced. The nails are then passed across the fracture site and stopped proximal to the distal tibial physis. The nails are then cut and tamped distally until there is just a short portion of nail left out of the proximal part of the tibia so that the nails can be removed once the fracture is healed. The wounds are then closed, and postoperative immobilization is applied. ALTERNATIVES:Many pediatric tibial shaft fractures can be treated with closed reduction and cast immobilization. Open fractures, or fractures that fail nonoperative management, can be treated with external fixation, open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF), or intramedullary stabilization3. RATIONALE:Anatomic reduction and fracture compression can be achieved with ORIF; however, a drawback to this technique is the lack of soft-tissue coverage in the diaphyseal area of the tibia, which can lead to infection and wound-healing problems4. External fixation has traditionally been the technique of choice for open tibial fractures; however, with the ability to use flexible tibial nails in both open and closed tibial fractures, external fixation is now reserved for open fractures with large soft-tissue defects or in fractures with segmental bone loss. Intramedullary flexible nailing can be used in both open and closed tibial fractures, provides excellent fracture fixation, and utilizes incisions that are more cosmetically appealing to patients5,6. EXPECTED OUTCOMES:Outcomes following flexible nailing for pediatric tibial fractures are excellent. In a study of 19 patients undergoing flexible nailing for tibial shaft fractures, 18 had excellent or satisfactory results7. Compared with patients who had external fixation, those treated with flexible nails had less pain, shorter time to union, and better functional outcomes2. Compared with patients treated with ORIF, those who underwent flexible intramedullary nailing spent less time in the operating room and had lower rates of wound complications4. In the immediate postoperative period, clinicians should be aware of the risk of compartment syndrome, particularly in patients with high-energy injuries, older patients (>14 years old), and heavier patients (>50 kg)8. There is also an increased risk of soft-tissue irritation and fracture malunion in heavier patients treated with flexible nails9,10. IMPORTANT TIPS:Nail size should be 80% of the canal diameter (e.g., two 4.0-mm nails should be chosen for a canal that measures 10 mm).Nails should be properly contoured to avoid corticotomy of the far cortex during insertion; apex of the bend should be positioned at the level of the fracture.During insertion, leave room to advance nails further after they are cut proximally.Do not bury the proximal nail tips beneath the cortex as extraction will be difficult.Ensure that the ends of the nails are not lying up against the proximal tibial physis as this may cause premature growth arrest.

Objectives: In high school and college athletes, the results of isolated meniscectomy compared to meniscal repair in ligamentously stable knees is unknown. Our objective was to compare patient-reported outcomes and reoperation rates at a minimum 1 year of follow-up for high school and college athletes undergoing isolated meniscal repair compared to meniscectomy. We hypothesized that both groups would see significant improvement in outcomes with meniscectomy having higher reported outcomes and a lower reoperation rate compared to meniscal repair. Methods: Patients aged 13-22 years old undergoing meniscal surgery at a single institution between 2015-2017 were prospectively enrolled and followed in our outcomes management evaluation system (OME). Pre-operatively, patients’ baseline demographics and patient-reported outcomes (PROMs) specific to meniscal pathology were collected, including Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) pain and quality of life (QoL) subsets. Post-operatively, intra-operative findings and treatments were recorded from OME. Patients were contacted and completed a minimum 1- or 2-year patient-reported outcome measures survey. Embedded in the post-operative survey was a question designed to evaluate the Patient Acceptable Symptom State (PASS). Patients were also specifically asked if they had undergone any subsequent surgeries to either knee since their primary procedure as a preliminary assessment of early failure. Results: A total of 145 patients were enrolled (70% male; median age, 18 years). One-year minimum PROMs were obtained on 73% (n=106) of the cohort. The results are displayed in the table and figure. KOOS QoL (see figure) and pain scores at minimum 1-year follow-up were not significantly different between meniscal repair compared to meniscectomy. Reoperation rate was 7.5% overall with no significant difference noted between the groups. No individual variables, including body mass index (BMI), smoking, level of education, mental health status, or grade 3 or 4 cartilage lesions were found not to be significant risk factors for outcome in either group. A PASS was achieved in 82% of the meniscectomy group and 71% of the meniscal repair group. Conclusion: High school and college athletes undergoing isolated meniscal surgery had equally significant improvements in minimum 1-year PROMs regardless of whether they underwent meniscectomy or meniscal repair. Preliminary reoperation rates were similar amongst the two treatment groups and the majority of both groups achieved a patient acceptable symptom state. No individual variable was identified as a modifiable risk factor to poor outcome after isolated meniscal surgery in this age group. Figure 1.

Case: We present the case of a 15-year-old girl who has a history of Ponseti casting followed by Achilles tenotomies for congenital clubfeet as an infant and subsequently suffered an acute traumatic midsubstance Achilles tendon rupture on the left and midsubstance Achilles tendinosis on the right. Conclusions: Traumatic pediatric Achilles ruptures are rare. There are no prior reported cases in patients with a history of Achilles tenotomy, despite it being a described potential complication. This case highlights the potential for an Achilles rupture years after tenotomy and presents surgical repair as a satisfactory treatment option for Achilles ruptures in adolescents.

BACKGROUND:Glenoid morphology can influence the outcomes of total shoulder arthroplasty. This study examines the results of a new technique according to preoperative glenoid staging. We hypothesized that there would be no statistically significant difference in outcomes between Levine concentric (Walch A) and Levine nonconcentric (Walch B) glenoids treated for primary glenohumeral arthritis using nonspherical humeral head and inlay glenoid replacement.METHODS:This retrospective case series included 31 shoulders in 29 patients (25 male, 4 female), with an average age of 58.5 years. Outcomes included the Penn Shoulder Score (PSS), visual analog scale for pain (VAS-Pain), range of motion, radiographic analysis, and complications. Inclusion criteria were primary glenohumeral arthritis, intact rotator cuff, and no prior open shoulder surgeries.RESULTS:Mean follow-up was 42.6 months (range, 24-74 months). The study included 7 concentric and 24 nonconcentric glenoids. Outcomes comparison showed no statistically significant differences in PSS domains including Pain (P = .92), Function (P = .98), Satisfaction (P = .89), and Total (P = .98); forward flexion (P = .78); external rotation (P = .64); and VAS-Pain (P = 0.12). At the last follow-up, the mean PSS Pain was 25.3/30, Function 52.7/60, Satisfaction 8.4/10, and Total 87.0/100. The mean forward flexion was 167.3°, external rotation 56.6°, and VAS-Pain 0.9. There were no signs of periprosthetic fracture, component loosening, osteolysis, and hardware failure, and no revisions or 90-day rehospitalizations were required. One patient was prophylactically treated with oral antibiotics for a history of prior infection and 1 patient required a later open biceps tenodesis after a traumatic proximal biceps rupture postoperatively.CONCLUSION:Nonspherical shoulder arthroplasty with inlay glenoid replacement demonstrated excellent clinical benefits for both concentric and nonconcentric glenoids. The technique appears to be a promising option for glenohumeral arthritis even in the presence of posterior glenoid erosion.