Objective: Intensive multidisciplinary intervention (IMI) is the most evidence-based approach to treat pediatric feeding disorders. The goal of this exploratory study was to assess changes in health care charges for patients with gastrostomy tube dependence following participation in IMI compared to a waitlist control. Methods: Medical charges were assessed for 9 families who participated in IMI compared to 6 control families on a multi-year waitlist for IMI. The IMI and control groups were compared on raw charges submitted as well as individual year-over-year changes in medical charges. Results: The IMI group decreased health care charges by 71% on average in the year following IMI compared to the control group increasing charges by 22% over the same period. Conclusions: IMI also holds potential cost-savings in the year following treatment compared to children who do not receive treatment and adds to previous research focusing on long-term cost effectiveness of IMI.
Selective eating is a common childhood feeding problem associated with family stress and micronutrient deficiencies. While there are empirically-supported behavioral strategies for addressing selective eating, there are significant systems-level barriers to implementing them. The aim of this study was to develop and test a selfadministered intervention for parents of children with selective eating. Participants were 156 parents of children with selective eating ages 18 months-6 years who were randomly assigned to either the handout + video condition (8-module video intervention and detailed handout) or handout condition (detailed handout only). Outcome measures were administered pre-intervention and 4 weeks post-intervention. Only 23 % of participants in the handouts plus video condition played more than one video module. Both groups had significant decreases in maladaptive mealtime parenting practices, undesired child mealtime behaviors, and number of foods offered. No significant effect of study condition was found on the outcome measures. Further research is needed to determine how to encourage engagement of parents with self-administered intervention materials.
Purpose: To assess which pediatric patients experiencing persistent post-concussive symptoms (PCS) benefit most from multidisciplinary treatment including specialists in Neurology, Neuropsychology, Physical Therapy, and Athletic Training, and to explore the effectiveness of this approach. Methods: A retrospective chart review of 56 adolescents 10-20 years old (M = 15.0 +/- 2.1) receiving multidisciplinary care for PCS (>30 days) was conducted. Results: Systolic blood pressure and Body Mass Index predicted time to concussion resolution (p < .05), such that higher values were associated with slower resolution. PCS scores significantly decreased between participants' initial and final clinic visits, p < .01, and among the 25 participants for whom pre-intervention PCS scores were available, symptom severity scores significantly declined following multidisciplinary intervention compared to pre-referral values (p < .01). Conclusions: Exploratory analyses reveal that multidisciplinary treatment is a promising approach for reducing symptoms among adolescents with PCS, and that those with greater levels of physical fitness may benefit most.
Introduction: Efficient access to pediatric mental health services is a growing concern as the number of patients increases and outpaces efforts to expand services. This study outlines interventions implemented using quality improvement (QI) science and methodology to demonstrate how a clinic embedded in a large children’s hospital can improve access to the first appointment for a population seeking pain management services. Methods: A process improvement project started with a QI team, whose members designed interventions to change scheduling practices. Initial changes involved decreased time between calls to families, and efforts to streamline notifications among clinicians. Additional interventions included a close examination of waitlist assignment based on appropriateness and assessing patient interest in treatment. Results: Within 3 months of implementation, a significant decline in wait time occurred for patients seeking services for pain management, from 106 to 48 days. This change remained stable for 6 months. In light of a sharp increase in referrals and wait time during the study period, efforts to engage additional clinicians in managing referrals resulted in wait time to stabilize at an average of 63 days to the first appointment. This change remained for 10 months. Scheduling changes did not negatively affect other providers. Conclusions: This study demonstrates the application of QI science to improve patient access to mental health care. Future directions will focus on enhancing the use of the electronic health record, along with previsit family engagement.
INTRODUCTION:Efforts to monitor outcomes in pediatric behavioral health are becoming a quality, financial, and regulatory imperative. The implementation of a broad-based measure to assess patient functioning at the start of pediatric psychology services, as well as at subsequent visits, has not been demonstrated. This article describes the systematic implementation of a measure of health-related quality of life (HRQOL) to assess functional impairment across an entire clinic population using quality improvement science and methodologies.METHODS:The Pediatric Quality of Life Inventory Generic Core 4.0 (PedsQL) was administered at initial and subsequent visits for all patients seeking treatment at a large, tertiary care pediatric psychology clinic in an academic pediatric medical center (Nationwide Children's Hospital, Columbus, Ohio). The goal of this project was to design a process change to support a 90% completion rate of this measurement tool by all clinicians.RESULTS:Within 16 months, the completion rate of the PedsQL increased from a baseline of 39% to the identified goal of 90%. This process change was within control limits (over 80%) for over 12 months.CONCLUSION:This study demonstrates the implementation of a systematic process for collection of outcome measures in a pediatric behavioral health care setting. Successful administration of an outcome measure at multiple time points during the care of children and adolescents in a large psychology clinic can allow for quantitative assessment of treatment progress and identify a pathway for administration of additional measures.