PURPOSE:The cerebellum's role in posttreatment neurocognitive decline is unexplored. This study investigated associations between cerebellar microstructural integrity using quantitative neuroimaging biomarkers and neurocognition among patients with primary brain tumors receiving partial-brain radiation therapy (RT). METHODS AND MATERIALS:In a prospective trial, 65 patients underwent volumetric brain magnetic resonance imaging, diffusion tensor imaging, and memory, executive function, language, attention, and processing speed (PS) assessment before RT and at 3, 6, and 12 months after RT. Delis-Kaplan Executive Function System-Trail Making (D-KEFS-TM) visual scanning and number and letter sequencing and Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale, Fourth Edition, coding were used to evaluate PS. The cerebellar cortex and white matter (WM) and supratentorial structures subserving the previously mentioned cognitive domains were autosegmented. Volume was measured within each structure at each time point along with diffusion biomarkers (fractional anisotropy and mean diffusivity) in WM structures. Linear mixed-effects models assessed cerebellar biomarkers as predictors of neurocognitive scores. If associated, cerebellar biomarkers were evaluated as independent predictors of cognitive scores controlling for domain-specific supratentorial biomarkers. RESULTS:Left (P = .04) and right (P < .001) cerebellar WM volume declined significantly over time. Cerebellar biomarkers were not associated with memory, executive function, or language. Smaller left cerebellar cortex volume was associated with worse D-KEFS-TM number (P = .01) and letter (P = .01) sequencing scores. A smaller right cerebellar cortex volume correlated with worse D-KEFS-TM visual scanning (P = .02) and number (P = .03) and letter (P = .02) sequencing scores. Greater right cerebellar WM mean diffusivity, indicating WM injury, was associated with worse D-KEFS-TM visual scanning performance (P = .03). Associations remained significant after controlling for corpus callosum and intrahemispheric WM injury biomarkers. CONCLUSIONS:Injury to the cerebellum as measured with quantitative biomarkers correlates with worse post-RT PS, independent of corpus callosum and intrahemispheric WM damage. Efforts to preserve cerebellar integrity may preserve PS.

Pleomorphic xanthoastrocytoma (PXA) is an uncommon primary brain tumor where radiation therapy is utilized for recurrence or adjuvant treatment after surgery. This chapter addresses considerations for contouring and treatment planning approaches.

PURPOSE:The corpus callosum (CC) and intrahemispheric white matter tracts (IHWM) subserve critical aspects of attention and processing speed. We analyzed imaging biomarkers of microstructural injury within these regions and association with attention and processing speed performance before and after radiation therapy in primary brain tumor patients.METHODS AND MATERIALS:In a prospective clinical trial, 44 primary brain tumor patients underwent cognitive testing and magnetic resonance imaging/diffusion-weighted imaging at baseline (pre-radiation therapy) and 3-, 6-, and 12-months post-radiation therapy. CC (subregions, total) and IHWM tracts (left/right without CC, total) were autosegmented; tumor, tumor bed, and edema were censored. Biomarkers included volume changes (cm3), mean diffusivity ([MD]; higher values indicate white matter injury), fractional anisotropy ([FA]; lower values indicate white matter injury). Reliable-change indices measured changes in attention (Weschler Adult Intelligence Scale [WAIS-IV] digits-forward; Delis-Kaplan Executive Function System Trail Making [D-KEFS-TM] visual-scanning), and processing speed (WAIS-IV coding; D-KEFS-TM number-sequencing, letter-sequencing), accounting for practice effects. Linear mixed-effects models evaluated associations between mean radiation dose and biomarkers (volume, MD, FA) and imaging biomarkers and neurocognitive performance. Statistics were corrected for multiple comparisons.RESULTS:Processing speed declined at 6 months following radiation therapy (number sequencing, letter sequencing; P < .04). Seizures and antiepileptic drug therapy were associated with lower visual-scanning attention reliable-change indices at 6 months (P = .039). Higher radiation dose correlated with smaller midanterior CC volume (P = .023); lower FA in posterior CC, anterior CC, and total CC (all P < .03); and higher MD in anterior CC (P = .012). Smaller midanterior CC and left IHWM volume correlated with worse processing speed (coding, letter-sequencing, number-sequencing; all P < .03). Higher FA in right, left, and total IHWM correlated with better coding scores (all P < .01). Lower FA in total IHWM (P = .009) was associated with worse visual-scanning attention scores. Higher FA in midposterior CC (P = .029) correlated with better digits-forward attention scores.CONCLUSIONS:The CC demonstrated radiation dose-dependent atrophy and WM injury. Microstructural injury within the CC and IHWM was associated with attention and processing speed decline after radiation therapy. These areas represent possible avoidance regions for preservation of attention and processing speed.

BACKGROUND We explored fine motor skills (FMS) before and after brain radiotherapy (RT), analyzing associations between longitudinal FMS and imaging biomarkers of cortical and white matter (WM) integrity in motor regions of interest (ROIs). METHODS On a prospective trial, 52 primary brain tumor patients receiving fractionated brain RT underwent volumetric brain MRI, diffusion tensor imaging, and FMS assessments (Delis-Kaplan Executive Function System Trail Making Test Motor Speed [DKEFS-MS], Grooved Pegboard Dominant [PDH] and Non-dominant [PNDH] Hands) at baseline and 3, 6, and 12 months post-RT. Motor ROIs autosegmented included: sensorimotor cortices and superficial WM, corticospinal tracts, cerebellar cortices and WM, and basal ganglia. Volume (cc) was measured in all ROIs at each timepoint. Diffusion biomarkers (FA and MD) were additionally measured in WM ROIs. Linear mixed-effects models assessed biomarkers as predictors of FMS scores. P-values were corrected for multiple comparisons. RESULTS Higher RT dose was associated with right paracentral cortical thinning (β=-2.42 Gy/(month*mm), p=0.03) and higher right precentral WM MD (β=0.69 Gy/(month*µm 2/ms), p=0.04). Higher left (β=38.7 points/(month*µm 2/ms), p=0.004) and right (β=42.4 points/(month*µm 2/ms), p=0.01) cerebellar WM MD, left precentral cortical atrophy (β=-8.67 points/(month*mm), p=0.02), and reduced right cerebral peduncle FA (β=-0.50 points/month, p=0.01) were associated with worse DKEFS-MS performance. Left precentral cortex thinning was associated with worse PDH scores (β=-17.3 points/(month*mm), p=0.02). Left (β=-0.87 points/(month*cm 3), p=0.001) and right (β=-0.64 points/(month*cm 3), p=0.02) cerebellar cortex, left pons (β=-19.8 points/(month*cm 3), p=0.02), and right pallidum (β=-10.8 points/(month*cm 3), p=0.02) atrophy and reduced right internal capsule FA (β=-1.02 points/month, p=0.03, p=0.03) were associated with worse PNDH performance. CONCLUSIONS Biomarkers of microstructural injury in motor-associated brain regions were associated with worse FMS. Dose avoidance in these areas may preserve FMS.

BACKGROUND:Adjuvant ipilimumab was found to improve the overall survival and reduce toxicity compared to high-dose interferon (HDI) in patients with resected, high-risk melanoma. However, the cost of ipilimumab is substantially higher than HDI. This study evaluates the cost-effectiveness of ipilimumab as an adjuvant treatment in melanoma from a healthcare perspective.METHODS:We designed a Markov model simulating resected, high-risk melanoma patients receiving either ipilimumab or HDI. Transition probabilities, including risks of survival, disease progression, and toxicity, were ascertained from clinical trial data. Costs and quality of life measurements (health utilities) were extracted from the literature. Incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs), defined as incremental costs divided by incremental quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs), assessed cost-effectiveness. ICERs <$100,000/QALY were deemed cost-effective. We measured model uncertainty with one-way and probabilistic sensitivity analyses.RESULTS:In our base case model, ipilimumab increased costs by $107,100 and increased effectiveness by 0.43 QALY, yielding an ICER of $392,600/QALY. Our model was moderately sensitive to the costs of ipilimumab, though the cost of ipilimumab would need to decrease by 44% for ipilimumab to become cost-effective compared to HDI. The model was not sensitive to survival, toxicity, or other costs. Probabilistic sensitivity analysis showed that HDI would remain the cost-effective treatment option 96.2% of the time at a willingness-to-pay threshold of $100,000/QALY.CONCLUSIONS:Adjuvant ipilimumab increases the survival and decreases the toxicity compared to HDI in resected, high-risk melanoma patients, though this would not be considered cost-effective due to the high price of ipilimumab.

Supplemental Digital Content is available in the text. Objective: We conducted a prospective clinical trial of patients receiving radiation (RT) for brain metastases to identify clinical predictors of pre-RT and post-RT health-related quality of life (hrQoL). Materials and Methods: Patients with brain metastases completed overall (European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer QLQ C15-PAL) and brain tumor-specific (QLQ-BN20) hrQoL assessments pre-RT (n=127) and 1 (n=56) and 3 (n=45) months post-RT. Linear and proportional-odds models analyzed patient, disease, and treatment predictors of baseline, 1-, and 3-month hrQoL scores. Generalized estimating equations and repeated measures proportional-odds models assessed predictors of longitudinal hrQoL scores. Results: Most patients underwent stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) (69.3%) and had non−small-cell lung (36.0%) metastases. Compared with SRS, receipt of whole brain RT was associated with a higher odds of appetite loss (baseline P=0.04, 1 mo P=0.02) and greater motor dysfunction (baseline P=0.01, 1 mo P=0.003, 3 mo P=0.02). Receipt of systemic therapy was associated with better emotional functioning after RT (1 mo P=0.03, 3 mo P=0.01). Compared with patients with breast cancer, patients with melanoma had higher odds of better global hrQoL (P=0.01) and less pain (P=0.048), while patients with lung cancer reported lower physical function (P=0.048) 3 months post-RT. Nonmarried patients had greater odds of higher global hrQoL (1 mo P=0.01), while male patients had lower odds of reporting more hair loss (baseline P=0.03, 3 mo P=0.045). Patients 60 years and above had lower odds of more drowsiness (P=0.04) and pain (P=0.049) over time. Conclusions: Patients receiving SRS versus whole brain RT and systemic therapy reported better posttreatment hrQoL. In addition, melanoma metastases, nonmarried, male, and older patients with reported better hrQoL in various as well as domains after intracranial RT.

PurposeWe conducted the first prospective longitudinal study examining the independent association between patient-reported health-related quality of life (hrQoL) (physical, social/family, emotional, functional, and brain cancer-specific) and neurocognitive function (NCF), while controlling for mood symptoms in patients with primary brain tumors.Methods and MaterialsPatients with primary brain tumors (n = 59) receiving brain radiation therapy underwent hrQOL (Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Brain), mood (Beck Depression and Anxiety Inventories), and neurocognitive evaluation at baseline and 3, 6, and 12 months postradiation therapy in a prospective clinical trial. Neurocognitive assessments measured attention/processing speed, memory, and executive function, including the Delis-Kaplan Executive Function System Verbal Fluency, Hopkins Verbal Learning Test Revised (HVLT-R), and Brief Visuospatial Memory Test. Subjects underwent neurocognitive, mood, and hrQoL assessments in the same testing session. Multivariable linear mixed-effects models assessed associations between hrQOL and NCF over time, controlling for patient, tumor, and treatment characteristics as well as timepoint-specific patient-reported mood (ie, anxiety and depression symptoms). P values were adjusted for multiple comparisons.ResultsHigher physical hrQoL was associated with better verbal memory (HVLT-R Total Recall, P = .047), and higher functional hrQoL was associated with better executive function (Delis-Kaplan Executive Function System Verbal Fluency Switching Total, P = .009) and verbal memory (HVLT-R Delayed Recall, P = .006). Higher brain tumor-specific hrQoL was associated with better verbal and nonverbal memory (HVLT-R Total, P = .004 and Delayed Recall, P = .030; Brief Visuospatial Memory Test Total, P = .049 and Delayed Recall, P = .049). There was no association between social/family or emotional hrQoL and NCF after controlling for mood.ConclusionsHigher physical, functional, and brain tumor-specific hrQoL were associated with better executive function and memory among patients with primary brain tumors. Physical and functional impairments are correlated with cognitive performance. Interventions to maximize quality of life after treatment may influence neurocognition and vice versa.

Purpose: Our purpose was to investigate the association between imaging biomarkers of radiation-induced white matter (WM) injury within perisylvian regions and longitudinal language decline in patients with brain tumors. Methods and Materials: Patients with primary brain tumors (n = 44) on a prospective trial underwent brain magnetic resonance imaging, diffusion-weighted imaging, and language assessments of naming (Boston Naming Test [BNT]) and fluency (Delis-Kaplan Executive Function System Category Fluency [DKEFS-CF]) at baseline and 3, 6, and 12 months after fractionated radiation therapy (RT). Reliable change indices of language function (0-6 months), accounting for practice effects (RCI-PE), evaluated decline. Bilateral perisylvian WM regions (superficial WM subadjacent to Broca's area and the superior temporal gyrus [STG], inferior longitudinal fasciculus [ILF], inferior fronto-occipital fasciculus [IFOF], and arcuate fasciculus) were autosegmented. We quantified volume and diffusion measures of WM microstructure: fractional anisotropy (FA; lower values indicate disruption) and mean diffusivity (MD; higher values indicate injury). Linear mixed-effects models assessed mean dose as predictor of imaging biomarker change and imaging biomarkers as longitudinal predictors of language scores. Results: DKEFS-CF scores declined at 6 months post-RT (RCI-PE, -0.483; P = .01), whereas BNT scores improved (RCI-PE, 0.262; P = .04). Higher mean dose to left and right regions was predictive of decreased volume (left-STG, P = .02; right-ILF and IFOF, P = .03), decreased FA (left-WM tracts, all P < .01; right-STG and IFOF, P < .02), and increased MD of left-WM tracts (all P < .03). Volume loss within left-Broca's area (P = .01), left-ILF (P = .01), left-IFOF (P = .01), and left-arcuate fasciculus (P = .04) was associated with lower BNT scores. Lower FA correlated with poorer DKEFS-CF and BNT scores within left-ILF (P = .02, not significant), left-IFOF (P = .02,.04), and left-arcuate fasciculus (P = .01,.01), respectively. Poorer DKEFS-CF scores correlated with increased MD values within the left-arcuate fasciculus (P = .03). Right-sided biomarkers did not correlate with language scores. Conclusions: Patients with primary brain tumors experience language fluency decline post-RT. Poorer fluency and naming function may be explained by microstructural injury to left-sided perisylvian WM, representing potential dose-avoidance targets for language preservation. (C) 2020 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Background and purposeRecently published HyTEC report summarized lung toxicity data and proposed guidelines of mean lung dose (MLD) <8 Gy and normal lung receiving at least 20 Gy, V 20Gy <10-15% to avoid lung toxicity.Support for preferred use of a particular dosimetric parameter has been limited.We performed a detailed dose-volume analysis of data on radiation pneumonitis (RP) following lung stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) to search for parameters showing the strongest correlation with RP. Materials and methodsTwo patient cohorts (primary and metastatic lung tumor patients) from previously reported studies were analyzed.Total number of patients was 96, and incidence of grade ≥2 RP was 13.5% (13/96).Fitting to the logistic function was performed to investigate correlation between incidence of RP and reported dosimetric and volumetric parameters.Another independent cohort was used to explore correlation between dosimetric parameters. ResultsAmong normal lung parameters (MLD and reported V x ), only MLD consistently showed significant correlation with incidence of RP.Gross tumor volume (GTV), internal target volume, planning target volume (PTV), and minimum dose covering 95% of GTV or PTV did not show statistical significance.A significant correlation between reported V x and MLD was observed in all cohorts. ConclusionsIn considering tumor-and target-specific (e.g., GTV, PTV) and normal lung-specific (e.g., MLD, V x ) metrics, MLD was the only parameter that consistently correlated with incidence of RP across both cohorts.Because SBRT planning constraints allow small normal lung volumes to receive high doses, utility of MLD is not obvious.The parallel structure of lung is one possible explanation, but correlation between dosimetric parameters obscures elucidation of the preferred or mechanistically based parameter to guide radiotherapy planning.