Introduction: Sources of Strength is a universal prevention program for youth that provides tools and educational opportunities to promote wellness and reduce risk. A major aim of Sources is to build youth-adult relationships to support youth in times of distress. However, no study to date has investigated how adults effectively build re-lationships with youth despite this being critical to successful implementation of Sources. The present study explores both student and staff perspectives of what characteristics, skills, and approaches encourage the development of supportive student-adult relationships to inform efforts for successful intervention implementation.Methods: This qualitative supplement to a Randomized Controlled Trial (RCT) of Sources, recruited 23 students in grades 9 to 12 for individual interviews and 11 staff members for focus groups from 2 high schools implementing the intervention. Semi-structured interview guides were used, and emergent themes were identified through process and pattern coding.Results: Key facilitators of supportive and effective adult-youth relationships included perceptions of adults as approachable, caring, encouraging, and understanding. Successful adult advisors used humor and were perceived as invested and engaged in the lives of youth. Maintaining accountability for youth, balanced with intervention and provision of resources additionally emerged as a critical factor supporting positive relationships with youth. Sources itself emerged as a catalyst for the growth of these positive and supportive youth-adult relationships.Conclusions: Trusted adults are instrumental as both operators within prevention programs targeting young people and as facilitators in adult-youth relationships through leveraging key skills and approaches. These findings can inform quality implementation of interventions, like Sources, that embed adult-youth connections as a central feature of the program model.

Schools and students have faced a variety of challenges during the 2020–2021 academic year as the COVID-19 pandemic continues. These issues have drawn attention to the increased need for robust social-emotional learning skills at the elementary level to address the deficits exacerbated by the pandemic. Sources of Strength is an evidence-based suicide prevention program for middle and high school students. In 2020, Sources of Strength launched an elementary school curriculum focused on promoting protective factors and resilience. Data were collected across 11 elementary schools ( N = 1022; 3–5th graders) in the Great Plains region of the USA at two time points during the COVID-19 pandemic (T1: Fall of 2020, T2: Spring of 2021). We examine the effectiveness of the program using a pre- and post-test design measuring various student social-emotional outcomes including positive classroom climate, emotional problems, school belonging, help-seeking attitudes, bullying perpetration, peer victimization, student and teacher intervention, student well-being, and student resilience. The program was evaluated using multilevel regression models to examine the associations between self-reported student program exposure and student outcomes. Although comparisons between T1 and T2 indicated a worsening of several student outcomes, positive associations were found when accounting for the degree of student exposure to the program. Greater student exposure was associated with improved positive classroom climate, school belonging, help-seeking attitudes, student well-being, resiliency, and lower reports of emotional problems. Implications for research and practice are discussed.

The 2020–2021 academic year brought numerous challenges to teachers across the country as they worked to educate students amidst the COVID-19 pandemic. The current study is a secondary data analysis of qualitative responses collected as part of a teacher survey to evaluate a social emotional learning curriculum implemented during the 2020–2021 academic year. The lived experiences of teachers ( N = 52) across 11 elementary schools in the Great Plains region were captured through open-ended questions as the teachers transitioned from in-person to remote learning. A phenomenological approach was utilized to analyze the challenges expressed by teachers as they faced instability and additional professional demands. Given that stress and other factors that strain mental health exist within multiple layers of an individual's social ecology, a modified social-ecological framework was used to organize the results and themes. Findings suggest that during the academic year, teachers experienced stressors related to their personal and professional roles, concerns for students’ well-being which extended beyond academics, and frustrations with administration and other institutional entities around COVID safety measures. Without adequate support and inclusion of teacher perspectives, job-related stress may lead to teacher shortages, deterioration of teacher mental health, and ultimately worse outcomes for students. Implications for policy, research, and practice are discussed.