Allergic rhinitis (AR) is a common chronic condition in children and may impact a child's quality of life. Increasing treatment compliance may improve quality of life. An oral suspension of fexofenadine hydrochloride (HCl) has been developed to ease administration to children and may, therefore, improve treatment compliance. The purpose of this study was to assess the pharmacokinetic behavior, safety, and tolerability of a single dose of fexofenadine HCl oral suspension administered to children aged 2-5 years with allergic rhinitis. Children (aged 2-5 years) with AR were recruited in a multicenter, open-label, single-dose study. Fexofenadine HCl (30 mg) was administered as a 6-mg/mL suspension (5 mL). Plasma samples were collected up to 24 hours postdose. Adverse events (AEs); electrocardiograms (ECGs); vital signs; and clinical laboratory tests for hematology, blood chemistry, and urinalysis were analyzed to evaluate safety and tolerability. Fifty subjects completed the study. Mean maximum plasma concentration of fexofenadine was 224 ng/mL, and mean area under the plasma concentration curve was 898 ng . hour/mL. Treatment-emergent AEs were mild in intensity and reported in a total of seven subjects. No trends or clinically meaningful changes in mean ECG, vital sign, or clinical laboratory test data occurred during the study. In children aged 2-5 years, the exposure after a 30-mg dose of fexofenadine HCl suspension was similar to the exposures previously seen after a 30- and 60-mg dose of fexofenadine HCl in children aged 6-11 years and in adults, respectively. The suspension was also well tolerated.

BACKGROUND:Antihistamines are an established first-line treatment for allergic rhinitis and are widely prescribed in infants for allergic symptoms.OBJECTIVE:To establish the safety and tolerability of fexofenadine hydrochloride in children aged 6 months to 2 years in 2 studies (T/3001 and T/3002).METHODS:Both studies had a multicenter, randomized, placebo-controlled design. Mean treatment duration was 8 days. Subjects were randomized (T/3001, n = 174; and T/3002, n = 219) to twice-daily fexofenadine hydrochloride, 15 or 30 mg, or placebo mixed with a standard vehicle.RESULTS:In the combined population, the incidence of treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) was comparable between groups (placebo, 48.2% [96/199]; fexofenadine hydrochloride, 15 mg, 40.0% [34/85]; and fexofenadine hydrochloride, 30 mg, 35.2% [38/108]). Vomiting was the most common TEAE (placebo, 13.6%; fexofenadine hydrochloride, 15 mg, 14.1%; and fexofenadine hydrochloride, 30 mg, 5.6%). Most TEAEs were unrelated to study medication, as evaluated by investigators; those possibly related to study medication were mild or moderate in intensity. No clinical differences were seen between fexofenadine and placebo for vital signs, electrocardiographic results, or physical examination results.CONCLUSION:Fexofenadine hydrochloride, 15 or 30 mg, given for a mean duration of 8 days is well tolerated, with a good safety profile, in children aged 6 months to 2 years.

Background: The safety of fexofenadine has been examined extensively in adults and school-age children. However, the safety of fexofenadine in children younger than 6 years has not been reported to date.Objective: To compare the safety and tolerability of twice-daily fexofenadine hydrochloride, 30 mg, and placebo in preschool children aged 2 to 5 years with allergic rhinitis.Methods: This was a multicenter, double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled, parallel-group study, conducted between February 29, 2000, and June 14, 2001. Participants were randomized to either fexofenadine hydrochloride, 30 mg, or placebo twice daily for a 2-week period. To facilitate dosing, capsule content was mixed with applesauce (approximately 10 mL). Safety assessments depended on date of entry into the study because of an amendment to the protocol. Before the amendment, assessments included physical examination, vital signs reporting (oral temperature, heart rate, and respiratory rate), and adverse event (AE) reporting. After the amendment, safety assessments included laboratory testing (blood chemistry and hematology profiles), physical examination, 12-lead electrocardiography, and vital signs (oral temperature, blood pressure, heart rate, and respiratory rate) and AE reporting.Results: Treatment-emergent AEs were observed in 116 of 231 participants receiving placebo and Ill of 222 receiving fexofenadine. These AEs were possibly related to study medication in 19 (8.2%) and 21 (9.5%) of the participants receiving placebo and fexofenadine, respectively, and most frequently involved the digestive system. No clinically relevant differences in laboratory measures, vital signs, and physical examinations were observed.Conclusions: The findings show that fexofenadine hydrochloride, 30 mg, is well tolerated and has a good safety profile in children aged 2 to 5 years with allergic rhinitis.

Objective: A 24-h extended-release formulation of fexofenadine HCI 180mg/pseudoephedrine HCI 240 mg (FEX 180 mg/PSE 240 mg) has recently been approved by the US Food and Drug Administration for symptom relief of seasonal allergic rhinitis, including nasal congestion. When considering a combination formulation, it is important to confirm that the metabolism and pharmacokinetics of the drugs remain unchanged when combined. Thus, the aim of this study was to evaluate single-dose and steady-state bioequivalence of FEX 180 mg/PSE 240 mg 24-h compared with the individual formulations taken concurrently.Research design and methods: This was an open-label, randomized, two-treatment, two-period, 10-day, crossover study. In Treatment A, healthy subjects received a single, oral dose of FEX 180 mg/PSE 240 mg combination tablet on Day 1 followed by 6 days of once-daily dosing beginning on Day 4. Participants in Treatment B were concurrently administered a single oral dose of FEX 180 mg immediate-release tablet and a PSE 240 mg extended-release tablet with a similar dosing schedule. After an 8-day washout period, subjects crossed over to the alternate treatment. Plasma concentrations of FEX and PSE were determined using high-performance liquid chromatography/mass spectrometry.Results: Pharmacokinetic parameters AUC(0-infinity)(1) and C-max1 following a single-dose (Day 1, dose 1), C-max7, AUC(0-24)(7) at steady-state and C-min7 measured at the end of the dosing interval (Day 9, dose 7) revealed bioequivalence between FEX 180 mg/PSE 240 mg combination tablet and the individual components taken concurrently. The 90% confidence intervals for the treatment ratios fell entirely within the bioequivalence range (80% to 125%). The combination tablet was well tolerated by all subjects, with a safety profile comparable to the individual components.Conclusions: These findings demonstrate that the pharmacokinetics of the new 24-h FEX 180 mg/PSE 240 mg combination formulation are bioequivalent to the concurrent administration of the individual drug components. Furthermore, both treatments were well tolerated in this population.

Fexofenadine hydrochloride is a non-sedating antihistamine that is used in the treatment of symptoms associated with seasonal allergic rhinitis and chronic idiopathic urticaria. A pooled analysis of pharmacokinetic data from children 6 months to 12 years of age and adults was conducted to identify the dose(s) in children that produce exposures comparable to those in adults for the treatment of seasonal allergic rhinitis. The pharmacokinetic parameter database included peak and overall exposure data from 269 treatment exposures from 136 adult subjects, and 90 treatment exposures from 77 pediatric allergic rhinitis patients. The data were pooled and analysed using NONMEM software, version 5.0. A covariate model based on body weight and age and a power function model based on body weight were identified as appropriate models to describe the variability in fexofenadine oral clearance and peak concentration, respectively. Individual oral clearance estimates were on average 44%, 36% and 61% lower in children 6 to 12 years (n=14), 2 to 5 years (n=21), and 6 months to 2 years (n=42), respectively, compared with adults. Trial simulations (n=100) were carried out based on the final pharmacostatistical models and parameter estimates to identify the appropriate dose(s) in children relative to the marketed dose of 60 mg fexofenadine hydrochloride in adults. The trials were designed as crossover studies in 18 subjects comprising various potential dosing regimens with and without weight stratification. Pharmacokinetic parameter variability was assumed to have a log-normal distribution. Individual weights and ages were simulated using mean (SD) estimates derived from the studies used in this analysis and proportional measurement/model mis-specification errors derived from the analysis were incorporated into the simulation. The results indicated that a 30 mg dose of fexofenadine hydrochloride administered to children 1 to 12 years of age and weighing >10.5 kg and a 15 mg dose administered to children 6 months and older and weighing <or=10.5 kg produces exposures similar to those seen with the 60 mg dose in adults.

Annals of the New York Academy of SciencesVolume 903, Issue 1 p. 542-546 Preliminary Results from an MRI/CT-Based Database for Vascular Dementia and Alzheimer's Disease PHILIP SCHELTENS, Corresponding Author PHILIP SCHELTENS European/Canadian Propentofylline Study Group, Department of Neurology, Academisch Ziekenhuis VU, PO Box 7057, 1007 MB Amsterdam, The Netherlands Address for Correspondence: Philip Scheltens, MD, Dept. of Neurology, Academisch Ziekenhuis VU, PO Box 7057, 1007 MB Amsterdam, The Netherlands. Tel.: +31 20 444 4444 (ext. 552); fax: +31 20 444 0715. e-mail: [email protected]Search for more papers by this authorBARBARA KITTNER, BARBARA KITTNER Hoechst Marion Roussel, Bridgewater, New Jersey, USASearch for more papers by this author PHILIP SCHELTENS, Corresponding Author PHILIP SCHELTENS European/Canadian Propentofylline Study Group, Department of Neurology, Academisch Ziekenhuis VU, PO Box 7057, 1007 MB Amsterdam, The Netherlands Address for Correspondence: Philip Scheltens, MD, Dept. of Neurology, Academisch Ziekenhuis VU, PO Box 7057, 1007 MB Amsterdam, The Netherlands. Tel.: +31 20 444 4444 (ext. 552); fax: +31 20 444 0715. e-mail: [email protected]Search for more papers by this authorBARBARA KITTNER, BARBARA KITTNER Hoechst Marion Roussel, Bridgewater, New Jersey, USASearch for more papers by this author First published: 30 January 2006 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1749-6632.2000.tb06411.xCitations: 26Read the full textAboutPDF ToolsRequest permissionExport citationAdd to favoritesTrack citation ShareShare Give accessShare full text accessShare full-text accessPlease review our Terms and Conditions of Use and check box below to share full-text version of article.I have read and accept the Wiley Online Library Terms and Conditions of UseShareable LinkUse the link below to share a full-text version of this article with your friends and colleagues. Learn more.Copy URL Citing Literature Volume903, Issue1VASCULAR FACTORS IN ALZHEIMER'S DISEASEApril 2000Pages 542-546 RelatedInformation

Annals of the New York Academy of SciencesVolume 903, Issue 1 p. 535-541 Investigating the Natural Course and Treatment of Vascular Dementia and Alzheimer's Disease: Parallel Study Populations in Two Randomized, Placebo-Controlled Trials BARBARA KITTNER, Corresponding Author BARBARA KITTNER European/Canadian Propentofylline Study Group, Aventis Pharmaceuticals, Route 202–206, Bridgewater, New Jersey 08807,USACorresponding author.Search for more papers by this authorPETER PAUL DE DEYN, PETER PAUL DE DEYN Department of Neurology, Middleheim Hospital, Born-Bunge Foundation, University of Antwerp, Antwerp, BelgiumSearch for more papers by this authorTIMO ERKINJUNTTI, TIMO ERKINJUNTTI Department of Neurology, University of Helsinki, Memory Research Unit, Helsinki, FinlandSearch for more papers by this author BARBARA KITTNER, Corresponding Author BARBARA KITTNER European/Canadian Propentofylline Study Group, Aventis Pharmaceuticals, Route 202–206, Bridgewater, New Jersey 08807,USACorresponding author.Search for more papers by this authorPETER PAUL DE DEYN, PETER PAUL DE DEYN Department of Neurology, Middleheim Hospital, Born-Bunge Foundation, University of Antwerp, Antwerp, BelgiumSearch for more papers by this authorTIMO ERKINJUNTTI, TIMO ERKINJUNTTI Department of Neurology, University of Helsinki, Memory Research Unit, Helsinki, FinlandSearch for more papers by this author First published: 30 January 2006 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1749-6632.2000.tb06410.xCitations: 16Read the full textAboutPDF ToolsRequest permissionExport citationAdd to favoritesTrack citation ShareShare Give accessShare full text accessShare full-text accessPlease review our Terms and Conditions of Use and check box below to share full-text version of article.I have read and accept the Wiley Online Library Terms and Conditions of UseShareable LinkUse the link below to share a full-text version of this article with your friends and colleagues. Learn more.Copy URL Share a linkShare onFacebookTwitterLinkedInRedditWechat Citing Literature Volume903, Issue1VASCULAR FACTORS IN ALZHEIMER'S DISEASEApril 2000Pages 535-541 RelatedInformation

The neuroprotective glial cell modulator propentofylline has been used in clinical trials involving more than 800 patients with vascular dementia (VaD). These data derive from two sources: a pooled group of VaD patients from four early phase III European trials, and a multinational European/Canadian phase III study (MN 305) that features a combined randomized withdrawal/delayed onset of progression design to evaluate the effect of propentofylline on disease progression. In the pooled studies, DSM-III-R criteria, Hachinski Ischemia Scores, computed tomography (CT), and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) were used to select subjects with mild-to-moderate disease; in MN 305, National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke/Association Internationale pour la Recherche et l'Enseignement en Neurosciences (NINDS-AIREN) criteria and neurologic examinations (including CT and MRI scans) were used to select patients with possible or probable VaD. The use of a central rater to assess cerebrovascular disease in neuroradiologic examinations for study MN 305 was considered to be a key feature for reducing the heterogeneity of the VaD patient population. In addition, the inclusion of patients with possible VaD in this trial greatly increased the number of eligible patients; subgroup analyses revealed no substantial differences between patients with probable versus possible VaD, justifying their inclusion in the study. VaD patients exhibited a more pronounced placebo response in global assessments compared with the Alzheimer disease population in a parallel study. In addition, they experienced less deterioration over time with respect to cognitive and global assessments. Beneficial effects of propentofylline were consistently demonstrated in the domains of cognitive and global function for both VaD populations; however, no treatment benefits could be demonstrated for activities of daily living, possibly due to factors relating to the study population/design, the lack of a validated test instrument for such patients, the caregiver-related phenomenon of "tutoring," or the nature of the disease itself.

Decline in functional abilities is a major component of the dementia syndrome. The definition of dementia in the International Classification of Diseases (10th rev.) requires a cognitive impairment sufficient to impair personal activities of daily living (ADL). The Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (4th ed.) also requires cognitive deficits sufficiently severe to cause impairment in occupational or social functioning and must represent a decline from a higher level of functioning. However, the term disability is more appropriate than impairment to describe a loss in activities, as opposed to a loss of elementary functions, and is consistent with World Health Organization definitions of impairment, disability, and handicap. There is no doubt that ADL outcomes are required in therapeutic drug studies on vascular dementia, and there is a good rationale and some evidence for the use of ADL scales developed for therapeutic research in Alzheimer disease, favoring scales devoid of items sensitive to physical disabilities. Similarly, ADL-related clinical milestones could be used for longer-term studies aiming predominantly at slowing progression of disease in both early and later stages of dementia. Slower decline in ADL and delay in reaching ADL-related clinical milestones should be considered as valid outcomes by regulatory bodies in the process of dementia drug approval.

Advances in our understanding of the pathogenesis of Alzheimer disease (AD) and vascular dementia (VaD) now permit responsible discussion of therapies that may go beyond relief of cognitive and behavioral symptoms and actually slow progression of disease. The mechanisms of neuronal death and the pathologic role of glia are being elucidated, and epidemiologic studies have suggested potential protective value for anti-inflammatory drugs, estrogen, and free-radical scavengers. However, demonstrating disease-modifying drug effects for progressive conditions such as dementia can be a daunting task, fraught with clinical, statistical, and ethical dilemmas. To evaluate trial designs for demonstrating such effects, the International Working Group on Harmonization of Dementia Drug Guidelines (IWG) conducted a symposium at the Sixth International Congress on Alzheimer's Disease and Related Disorders, held July 1998 in Amsterdam. The presentations at the IWG symposium covered the two basic designs currently being used in clinical trials, survival analysis and staggered-start/withdrawal, in addition to clinical data generated from the National Institute on Aging Alzheimer's Disease Cooperative Study vitamin E/selegiline trial in patients with AD and the phase III clinical studies of propentofylline in patients with AD and VaD. It is hoped that this article will open a dialogue among investigators and regulatory authorities regarding appropriate trial designs to support a regulatory claim for disease-modifying effects.

Propentofylline, a neuroprotective glial cell modulator, has been shown in preclinical studies to address some of the common pathological processes of Alzheimer's disease (AD) and vascular dementia (VaD), including glial cell activation and increased production of cytokines, free radicals, and glutamate. To examine whether propentofylline (300 mg t.i.d. taken 1 h before meals) would provide beneficial effects in patients with AD and/or VaD, 901 patients with mild-to-moderate AD and 359 patients with mild-to-moderate VaD were enrolled in four double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomized studies ranging in duration from 6 months to 56 weeks. Propentofylline was found to provide consistent improvements over placebo in efficacy assessments for both AD and VaD patients. In addition, results from a drug withdrawal study suggested that propentofylline does not merely relieve dementia symptoms but slows the progression of the disease itself. Propentofylline had a good safety profile and was generally well tolerated.

Pathophysiotogic processes common to both vascular (multi-infarct) dementia and dementia of the Alzheimer type may include microglial activation with resultant generation of inflammatory cytokines and neurotoxic free radicals, decreased secretion of nerve growth factor by astrocytes, excess release of glutamate with associated neurotoxicity, and loss: of cholinergic neurons. The functional benefits and neuroprotective effects of propentofylline (PPF)stem from its interference with these overlapping pathways of neurodegeneration. The clinical pharmacology and safety of PPF were studied in a number of phase I studies in healthy young and elderly adults and in patients with renal or hepatic impairment. These studies have shown that PPF 300 mg t.i.d. is safe and well tolerated when taken on an empty stomach 1 h before meals. In a randomized, double-blind phase II study involving 190 elderly subjects with clinically and psychometrically documented mild to moderate dementia, 12 weeks of PPF therapy produced significantly greater improvements than placebo in Gottfries-Brane-Steen (GBS) scores, Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) scores, and Clinical Global Impression (CGI), ratings. A subsequent phase II study using positron emission tomography (PET) revealed that cortical glucose metabolism improved significantly in patients with vascular dementia after 12 weeks of PPF treatment but deteriorated significantly with placebo. A third phase 11 study, which enrolled patients with Alzheimer-type dementia, demonstrated that PPF significantly enhanced functional reserve, as reflected by increases in regional cerebral glucose metabolism after stimulation with a verbal memory task. In contrast, patients randomized to placebo exhibited a significant decline in functional activation and significant worsening in their MMSE scores over the course of this 12-week study. Propentofylline proved to be safe, well tolerated, and free of severe side effects in all three of these phase II trials. Phase I trial results suggest that significant food interactions occur with PPF, indicating that the drug should be taken on an empty stomach 1 h before meals. Phase II trial results indicate that PPF yields clinically measurable improvements in the symptoms of dementia and prevents loss of stimulation-related increases in glucose metabolism over a treatment period of 3 months. Whether these results indicate that PPF can slow the progression of dementia can be determined only by long-term trials specifically designed to determine the drug's effect on disease progression.

To evaluate efficacy, safety, metabolic and clinical effects of propentofylline in Alzheimer's disease (AD), a prospective, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial was performed in 30 patients with mild to moderate AD who underwent pretreatment and posttreatment 18F-2-fluoro-2-deoxy-d-glucose positron emission tomography under resting conditions and during stimulation with an auditory memory paradigm. Twenty-eight subjects completed the 3-month study. The drug was well tolerated. In the active treatment group, a significant increase of cerebral metabolic response to the memory task was observed (multiple measurement ANOVA P=0.02). The placebo group showed a significantly decline in the MMSE score (P=0.02) while there was no change in the treatment group. This suggests a protective role for propentofylline in slowing the progression of AD.

ABSTRACT: The mode of action of propentofylline (a xanthine derivative) suggested that it would have beneficial effects in patients with Alzheimer's disease or vascular dementia. In four double‐blind, placebo‐controlled, randomized studies, 901 patients with mild to moderate Alzheimer's disease and 359 patients with mild to moderate vascular dementia were treated for up to 12 months (daily dose of propentofylline: 3 × 300 mg taken 1 hr before food). Patients were assessed at regular intervals for efficacy and safety of the drug. Efficacy variables covered cognitive and global functions as well as activities of daily living. Propentofylline showed statistically significant, clinically relevant improvements over placebo in efficacy assessments, both in patients with Alzheimer's disease and in patients with vascular dementia. The drug was also well tolerated. It had no significant effects on laboratory findings and the adverse events that were considered to be related to the study medication were mostly minor, transient, and affected the digestive and nervous systems.

Alzheimer's disease (AD) and vascular dementia (VaD) share several features such as overactivation of microglial cells, damage induced by free radicals, glutamate and calcium overload. Propentofylline (HWA 285) has shown beneficial effects on all of these common elements, thus favouring its use in both subtypes of dementia. In a multinational, randomized, 12-month, double-blind, parallel-group study 260 out-patients with mild to moderate AD or VaD received 300 mg propentofylline (n = 129) or placebo (n = 131) three times daily 1 h before meals. The efficacy was tested at four independent rater levels (physician, psychologist, relative and patient) with assessments covering three major domains of dementia (global function, cognitive function and activities of daily living). After 12 months, the total patient population showed statistically significant treatment differences in favour of propentofylline for the global measures of dementia (Gottfries-Bråne-Steen scale, GBS, p = 0.001; Clinical Global Impressions, CGI, item I: p = 0.004, item II: p = 0.072) as well as for the cognitive measures (Syndrome Short Test, SKT, p = 0.002) and Mini-Mental State Examination (p = 0.001). The activities of daily living also showed a significant treatment difference in favour of propentofylline (p = 0.002). No significant treatment differences were found for rating scales performed by the patients. At month 12, VaD patients showed treatment differences in favour of propentofylline for the GBS total score (p = 0.006), CGI item I (p = 0.004), GGI item II (p = 0.044) and SKT (p = 0.028). Treatment differences for AD patients were all in favour of propentofylline and reached statistical significance for the SKT (p = 0.018). Propentofylline showed a good safety profile with respect to adverse events, vital signs, ECG and laboratory changes.

The prevalence of dementia is predicted to increase rapidly in developing countries. Vascular risk factors may contribute to this rise. Our aim was to estimate the proportions of Alzheimer's disease (ADD) and vascular dementia (VAD) in a prevalent cohort of dementia cases in rural Tanzania.A two-stage door-to-door dementia prevalence study.Hai district, TanzaniaIn Phase I, the Community Screening Instrument for Dementia (CSI-D) was used to screen 1198 community-dwelling people for dementia. In Phase II, 168/184 (91.3%) of those with poor performance, 56/104 (53.8%) of those with intermediate performance and 72/910 (7.9%) of those with good performance on CSI-D were interviewed and diagnoses were made using the DSM-IV criteria.For subtype diagnosis, DSM-IV dementia criteria plus NINCDS-ADRDA criteria were used for ADD and NINDS-AIREN criteria for VAD. Other dementias were diagnosed by international consensus criteria. Diagnoses were confirmed or excluded by computerised tomography where clinically appropriate.Of 78 dementia cases, 38 (48.7%) were ADD and 32 (41.0%) were VAD. The crude prevalence of ADD was 3.7% (95% CI 2.5 to 4.9) and of VAD was 2.9% (95% CI 1.9 to 3.9). The age-adjusted prevalence was 3.0% (95% CI 1.8 to 4.2) for ADD and 2.6% (95% CI 1.6 to 3.6) for VAD. A previous diagnosis of diabetes mellitus was independently associated with greater odds of having VAD than ADD.VAD accounted for a greater proportion of dementia cases than expected. Further investigation and treatment of risk factors is required in this setting.

The pharmacological profile of HWA 285 favors its use in patients with both Alzheimer's disease (PDD) and/or vascular dementia (MID). Clinical trials showed clinically relevant, statistically significant efficacy in the domains of cognitive function, global function and activities of daily living (ADL) in both PDD and MID. HWA 285 had a prolonged symptomatic effect for at least 12 months, although therapeutic effects were seen already after the first 3 months of treatment. HWA 285 was very well tolerated for at least 1 year.

A double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group, multicentre study was conducted to evaluate the efficacy of pentoxifylline (Trental) in patients with multi-infarct dementia (MID) according to DSM-III-R criteria. Men and women aged 45 years or older, with a Hachinski Ischemia Scale score > or = 7 and a Mini Mental State Examination (MMSE) score of 10-25 at entry, and computed tomographic evidence of vascular disease were enrolled. A total of 289 patients were randomised to receive either oral pentoxifylline 400 mg t.i.d. or placebo for 9 months, and efficacy was assessed every 3 months. The primary outcome variable was the difference in scores between the two treatment groups, as measured on the Gottfries, Bråne, Steen (GBS) scale. Secondary outcome variables included the scores achieved on the Sandoz Clinical Assessment Geriatric (SCAG) scale and MMSE, and a battery of psychological and other tests. The intention-to-treat analysis for patients completing the study (n = 239) showed a statistically significant difference in the total GBS score in favour of pentoxifylline (improvement of 3.5 points, p = 0.028). A significant difference in the total GBS score in favour of pentoxifylline was even almost achieved in the intention-to-treat analysis for all evaluable patients (n = 269, improvement of 2.1 points, p = 0.065). It is concluded that treatment with pentoxifylline is beneficial for patients with MID, the global results of the GBS and SCAG scales being reinforced by significant improvements in those subscales specific for intellectual and cognitive function.

In a double-blind, placebo-controlled trial in thirty patients with mild to moderate vascular dementia (VD) according to DSM-III-R criteria, the effects of the adenosine uptake blocker propentofylline (HWA 285) on regional cerebral glucose metabolism (rCMRG1) was studied using positron emission tomography of 2-[18F]fluoro-2-deoxy-d-glucose (FDG). 25 subjects completed the 3-months study. Propentofylline significantly improved relative rCMRGl in the motor cortex, while relative rCMRG1 in the placebo treated group worsened significantly. Neuropsychologically, visual information processing was improved in the propentofylline group and we observed a trend towards a slowing of the progression of cognitive deterioration in patients with VD. The results of the longitudinal analysis showed further that neuropsychological and metabolic changes are closely related. These findings justify a large-scale clinical trial to prove therapeutic efficacy.