BackgroundBased on clinical observations, we hypothesized that tacrolimus (TAC) exposure and acute kidney injury (AKI) are associated with the development of chronic lung allograft dysfunction (CLAD) after lung transplantation (LTx).MethodsOf 827 lung transplant recipients treated between 2000 and 2018, 509 with complete data sets from the University Hospital of Munich (LMU) were included in this study. In the context of a 10% reduction in FEV1 (CLAD10), tacrolimus and renal function were examined descriptively, inferentially, and through confounder analysis with regard to the occurrence of CLAD10.ResultsOf 509 LTx patients, 67 (13%) died within the first 2 years after LTx. Among these 67 patients, 38 (57%) developed CLAD10 within 2 years of LTx. In these patients, we observed a temporal pattern characterized by a peak in TAC levels, followed by AKI, and subsequently subtherapeutic TAC concentrations, which occurred a few weeks before the onset of CLAD10. The confounder analysis demonstrated a significant influence of renal failure and tacrolimus fluctuations on the hazards ratio for developing CLAD10.ConclusionOur data suggest that a transient decline in TAC serum concentrations, often caused by a TAC-induced AKI, may trigger the onset of CLAD10 and subsequently elevate the risk of premature death.

Background:Lung transplantation (LuTX) can be the last resort for patients with end-stage lung diseases. In the last decades, improvements were implemented in transplant medicine, from immunosuppression throughout preservation of the donor organ to enhance lung allograft survival. This retrospective study aims to illustrate the development of the LuTX-program at the University Hospital of Munich, LMU, Munich, Germany, since its launch in 1990 by depicting and comparing postoperative outcome. Methods:We analyzed all LuTX performed from 1990 to 2019. Data was collected on indication for transplantation (TX), date, type (double/single) and postoperative survival. Survival analysis and Kaplan-Meier estimator were used to identify factors that are detrimental to post-LuTX-outcome. Results:A total of 1,054 LuTX were performed over 30 years, comprising overall 1,024 patients (30 retransplantations). The best results regarding five-year survival rates (5-YSR) were observed in patients with lymphangioleiomyomatosis (LAM) and hypersensitivity pneumonitis (HP) (5-YSR: LAM: 78.6%, HP: 73.6%). We could show that besides that the type of LuTX played a crucial role in post-TX survival, depicting double superior to single LuTX (5-YSR: single: 47.2%, double: 64.5%). Additionally, cytomegalovirus (CMV) risk constellation (high/intermediate risk; P=0.02) and infection (P<0.001) were identified as risk factors for deteriorated survival. Conclusions:Data analysis demonstrates that the field of LuTX has undergone enormous progress over the years. Therapeutic advances and improvements in interdisciplinary cooperation, pre- and postoperative management, changes in immunosuppressive medication, diagnosis and treatment of allograft rejections have clearly improved lung allograft and patient survival.

The calcineurin inhibitor tacrolimus, which is available as an immediate- or extended-release formulation, is the standard-of-care immunosuppression after kidney transplantation with low rejection rates, especially in the first year after transplantation. However, its highly variable metabolism rate, narrow therapeutic window, and nephrotoxic side effects require close drug monitoring and individual dosing. Here, we describe first the application of extended-release tacrolimus (ER-Tac) twice daily with beneficial effects in a kidney transplant recipient under extensive therapeutic drug monitoring. A 47-year-old female kidney transplant recipient, who was identified as a fast metabolizer for tacrolimus, presented with declining allograft function and low tacrolimus through levels over time and 8 years after a second kidney transplantation despite the administration of high doses of ER-Tac once daily. Therefore, the area under the concentration–time curve (AUC) showed exceedingly high blood levels of ER-Tac. The latest biopsy of the kidney transplant showed arteriolar hyalinosis with pole vessel stenosis as a sign of chronic transplant vasculopathy and transplant glomerulopathy as a sign of chronic humoral rejection. After the exclusion of other options for immunosuppressive therapy due to the patient’s high immunological risk, the patient was switched from ER-Tac once daily to ER-Tac twice daily. After switching to ER-Tac twice daily, the AUC for oral tacrolimus decreased and the transplant function improved despite higher tacrolimus trough levels and a lower total dose administered. This case highlights the importance of careful therapeutic drug monitoring with the performance of an AUC in the follow-up management of kidney transplant recipients.

Graphical abstract Unique 40-year survival after heart transplantation with normal graft function and spontaneous operational tolerance.

This observational study focuses on the characteristics and survival of patients taken off of the liver transplant waiting list. Assessment of post-delisting survival and a frequent follow-up of patients after delisting are important keys to improve the survival rate of patients with liver failure after being delisted. Within this study, delisted liver transplant candidates were divided into the following groups: (1) “too good” (54%) or (2) “too sick” (22%) for transplantation, (3) adherence issues (12%) or (4) therapy goal changed (11%). The 5-year survival after delisting within these groups was 84%, 9%, 50%, and 68%, respectively. Less than 3% of the delisted patients had to be relisted again. The clinical expert decision of the multidisciplinary transplant team was sufficiently accurate to differentiate between patients requiring liver transplantation and those who were delisted after a stable recovery of liver function. The assessment of post-delisting survival may serve as a complementary metric to assess differences in center practices and to estimate cumulative post-delisting mortality risk.

Immunosuppressants and antifibrotics are currently used to treat patients with various interstitial lung diseases, which may undergo lung transplantation (LTx). The retrospective study aimed to evaluate the potential effects of therapeutic regimen on the perioperative course in patients with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) or progressive pulmonary fibrosis (PPF) undergoing LTx. All patients with IPF and PPF undergoing LTx between January 2014 and December 2021 were included. We retrospectively screened for previous use of immunosuppressants and antifibrotic therapy. We analyzed perioperative courses, short-term outcomes, and safety retrospectively. In total, 286 patients with diagnosis of IPF or PPF were analyzed. According to the treatment regimen before LTx, the study cohort was divided into four groups and compared. No differences between antifibrotic monotherapy, combined antifibrotic and immunosuppressive therapy with regard to postoperative complications were observed. Length of mechanical ventilation was shorter in patients with antifibrotics prior to LTx. Pretreatment with antifibrotic monotherapy and a combination of antifibrotic drugs with immunosuppressive therapy, lower body mass index (BMI) and lower blood loss, were independently associated with primary graft dysfunction grades 0-3 72 hours after LTx (p < 0.001). Finally, patients with antifibrotic monotherapy developed significantly less de novo donor-specific antibodies (DSA) (p = 0.009). Higher intraoperative blood loss, etiology of interstitial lung disease (ILD) and older age were independently associated with shorter survival after LTx. Use of antifibrotic monotherapy and a combination of antifibrotic drugs with immunosuppressive therapy in IPF/PPF patients undergoing LTx, proved to be safe and might lead to beneficial effects after LTx.

Abstract BACKGROUND AND AIMS Kidney transplantation is the best treatment option for patients with end stage kidney disease (ESKD) with a superiority of transplantation after living kidney donation (LKD) compared to deceased donation. However, a large part of potential donors and recipients are ineligible for LKD. Here, we analyze the leading causes for disqualification of prospective living donor-recipient pairs from the LKD program and the health-related consequences for ESKD patients excluded from the LKD program in a German tertiary transplant center. METHOD In this single-center retrospective cohort study we evaluated all candidates (potential donors and recipients) presenting for assessment of LKD from 2012 to 2020 at our transplant center. Thereby we focused on candidates excluded from the LKD program. Main reasons for disqualification were categorized as medical (donor-related), psychosocial, immunological, recipient-related and unknown. RESULTS Overall, 601 donor-recipient pairs referred to our transplant center for LKD assessment during the observation time. Out of those, 326 (54.2%) discontinued the program with 52 (8.7%) dropouts and 274 (45.6%) donor-recipient pairs being ineligible for LKD. Donor-related medical contraindications were the main reason for disqualification (139 out of 274 (50.7%) potential donors) followed by recipient-related contraindications (62 out of 274 (22.6%) of potential donor-recipient pairs). Only 77 out of 257 (29.9%) potential recipients excluded from the LKD program received a kidney transplant afterwards with a median waiting time of 2 (IQR: 1.0–4.0) years. Overall, 18 (7.0%) ESKD patients initially declined for LKD died in this period. CONCLUSION A large percentage of donor-recipient pairs disqualified from the German LKD program, mostly due to medical reasons related to the donor and with partly severe consequences for the potential recipients. For these, we need alternative concepts to make transplantation possible.

Background Kidney transplantation is the best treatment option for patients with end-stage kidney disease (ESKD) with a superiority of graft survival after living kidney donation (LKD) compared to deceased donation. However, a large part of potential donors and recipients are ineligible for LKD. Here, we analyze the leading causes for disqualification of potential living donor-recipient pairs from the LKD program and the health-related consequences for ESKD patients excluded from the LKD program in a German transplant center. Methods In this single-center retrospective cohort study we evaluated all candidates (potential donors and recipients) presenting for assessment of LKD from 2012 to 2020 at our transplant center. Thereby we focused on candidates excluded from the LKD program. Main reasons for disqualification were categorized as medical (donor-related), psychosocial, immunological, recipient-related, and unknown. Results Overall, 601 donor-recipient pairs were referred to our transplant center for LKD assessment during the observation time. Out of those, 326 (54.2%) discontinued the program with 52 (8.7%) dropouts and 274 (45.6%) donor-recipient pairs being ineligible for LKD. Donor-related medical contraindications were the main reason for disqualification [139 out of 274 (50.7%) potential donors] followed by recipient-related contraindications [60 out of 274 (21.9%) of potential donor-recipient pairs]. Only 77 out of 257 (29.9%) potential recipients excluded from the LKD program received a kidney transplant afterward with a median waiting time of 2 (IQR: 1.0–4.0) years. Overall, 18 (7.0%) ESKD patients initially declined for LKD died in this period. Conclusion A large percentage of donor-recipient pairs are disqualified from the German LKD program, mostly due to medical reasons related to the donor and with partly severe consequences for the potential recipients. For these, alternative solutions that promptly enable kidney transplantation are essential for improving patient quality of life and survival.

Protecting against CMV infection and maintaining CMV in latent state are largely provided by CMV‐specific T‐cells in lung transplant recipients. The aim of the study was to assess whether a specific T‐cell response is associated with the risk for CMV infection in seronegative patients who are at high risk for delayed CMV infection.

Introduction: Chronic kidney disease (CKD) is associated with significant morbidity and mortality after lung transplantation (LTX). Calcineurin inhibitor (CNI) nephrotoxicity is the leading cause of CKD. After kidney transplantation, polyomavirus-associated nephropathy (PyVAN) is a well-recognized problem. This study aims to evaluate the role of polyomavirus in patients after LTX. Methods: From January 2017 to January 2020, all lung transplant recipients who performed follow-up visits in our center were included in the study and retrospectively assessed. We measured renal function (creatinine levels before and after transplantation), JCPyV, and BKPyV load by polymerase chain reaction (PCR) in serum and urine samples after transplantation. Results: In total, 104 consecutive patients (59 males, 56.7%) with a mean age of 49.6 +/- 11.1 years were identified. JCPyV was found in urine of 36 patients (34.6%) and serum of 3 patients (2.9%). BKPyV was found in urine of 40 patients (38.5%) and serum of 4 patients (3.8%), respectively. Urine evidence for JCPyV (p < 0.001, coefficient: +21.44) and BKPyV (p < 0.001, coefficient: +29.65) correlated highly with further kidney function decline. Conclusion: Kidney function deterioration is associated with JCPyV and BKPyV viruria in patients after LTX. This might indicate a role of PyVAN in lung transplant recipients.

Letermovir is a new antiviral drug approved for the prophylaxis of CMV infection in allogeneic stem cell transplants. The aim of the study was to assess the therapeutic efficacy of letermovir in difficult to treat CMV infections in lung transplant recipients. All lung transplant recipients between March 2018 and August 2020, who have been treated with letermovir for ganciclovir‐resistant or refractory CMV infection were included in the study and analysed retrospectively. In total, 28 patients were identified. CMV disease was present in 15 patients (53.6%). In 23 patients (82.1%), rapid response was noticed, and CMV‐viral load could be significantly decreased (>1 log10) after a median of 17 [14–27] days and cleared subsequently in all of these patients. Five patients (17.9%) were classified as non‐responder. Thereof, development of a mutation of the CMV UL56 terminase (UL‐56‐Gen: C325Y) conferring letermovir resistance could be observed in three patients (60%). Common side effects were mild and mostly of gastrointestinal nature. Mild adjustments of the immunosuppressive drugs were mandatory upon treatment initiation with letermovir. In addition to other interventions, letermovir was effective in difficult to treat CMV infections in lung transplant recipients. However, in patients with treatment failure mutation conferring letermovir, resistance should be taken into account.

Tobacco use after lung transplantation is associated with adverse outcome. Therefore, active smoking is regarded as a contraindication for lung transplantation and should be excluded prior to placement on the waiting list. The aim of the study was to compare self-reporting with a systematic cotinine based screening approach to identify patients with active nicotine abuse. Nicotine use was systematically assessed by interviews and cotinine test in all lung transplant candidates at every visit in our center. Patients were classified according to the stage prior to transplantation and cotinine test results were compared to self-reports and retrospectively analyzed until June 2019. Of 620 lung transplant candidates, 92 patients (14.8%) had at least one positive cotinine test. COPD as underlying disease (OR 2.102, CI 1.110-3.981; p = 0.023), number of pack years (OR 1.014, CI 1.000-1.028; p = 0.047) and a time of cessation less than one year (OR 2.413, CI 1.410-4.128; p = 0.001) were associated with a positive cotinine test in multivariable regression analysis. The majority of non-COPD patients (n = 13, 72.2%) with a positive test had a cessation time of less than one year. 78 patients (84.7%) falsely declared not consuming any nicotine-based products prior to the test. Finally, all never smokers were test negative. In conclusion, our data demonstrate that active nicotine use is prevalent in transplant candidates with a high prevalence of falsely declaring nicotine abstinence. COPD was the main diagnosis in affected patients. Short cessation time and a high number of pack years are risk factors for continued nicotine abuse.

Introduction Early conversion to a CNI-free immunosuppression with SRL was associated with an improved 1- and 3- yr renal function as compared with a CsA-based regimen in the SMART-Trial. Mixed results were reported on the occurrence of donor specific antibodies under mTOR-Is. Here, we present long-term results of the SMART-Trial. Methods and materials N = 71 from 6 centers (n = 38 SRL and n = 33 CsA) of the original SMART-Trial (ITT n = 140) were enrolled in this observational, non-interventional extension study to collect retrospectively and prospectively follow-up data for the interval since baseline. Primary objective was the development of dnDSA. Blood samples were collected on average 8.7 years after transplantation. Results Development of dnDSA was not different (SRL 5/38, 13.2% vs. CsA 9/33, 27.3%; P = 0.097). GFR remained improved under SRL with 64.37 ml/min/1.73m(2)vs. 53.19 ml/min/1.73m(2)(p = 0.044). Patient survival did not differ between groups at 10 years. There was a trend towards a reduced graft failure rate (11.6% SRL vs. 23.9% CsA, p = 0.064) and less tumors under SRL (2.6% SRL vs. 15.2% CsA, p = 0.09). Conclusions An early conversion to SRL did not result in an increased incidence of dnDSA nor increased long-term risk for the recipient. Transplant function remains improved with benefits for the graft survival.

BACKGROUND: Phenotyping chronic lung allograft dysfunction (CLAD) in single lung transplant (SLTX) recipients is challenging. The aim of this study was to assess the diagnostic and prognostic value of longitudinal lung function tests in SLTX recipients with CLAD. METHODS: A total of 295 SLTX recipients were analyzed and stratified according to native lung physiology. In addition to spirometry, measurements of static lung volumes and lung capacities were used to phenotype patients and to assess their prognostic value. Outcome was survival after CLAD onset. Patients with insufficient clinical information were excluded (n = 71). RESULTS: Of 224 lung transplant recipients, 105 (46.9%) developed CLAD. Time to CLAD onset (hazard ratio [HR]: 0.82, 95% CI: 0.74-0.90; p < 0.001), severity of CLAD at onset (HR: 0.97, 95% CI: 0.94-0.99; p = 0.009), and progression after onset of CLAD (HR: 1.03, 95% CI: 1.00-1.05; p = 0.023) were associated with outcome. Phenotypes at onset were bronchiolitis obliterans syndrome (BOS) (59.1%), restrictive allograft syndrome (RAS) (12.4%), mixed phenotype (6.7%), and undefined phenotype (21.9%). Survival estimates differed significantly between phenotypes (p = 0.004), with RAS and mixed phenotype being associated with the worst survival, followed by BOS and undefined phenotype. Finally, a higher hazard for mortality was noticed for RAS (HR: 2.34, 95% CI: 0.99-5.52; p = 0.054) and mixed phenotype (HR: 3.30, 95% CI: 1.20-9.11; p = 0.021) while controlling for time to CLAD onset and severity of CLAD at onset. CONCLUSIONS: Phenotyping CLAD in SLTX remains challenging with a high number of patients with an undefined phenotype despite comprehensive lung function testing. However, phenotyping is of prognostic value. Furthermore, early, severe, and progressive CLADs are associated with worse survival. (C) 2020 International Society for Heart and Lung Transplantation. All rights reserved.

Pirfenidone demonstrated pleiotropic antiinflammatory effects in various experimental and clinical settings. The aim of this study was to assess the impact of previous treatment with pirfenidone on short-term outcomes after single lung transplantation (SLTx). Therefore, patients with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) who were undergoing SLTx were screened retrospectively for previous use of pirfenidone and compared to respective controls. Baseline parameters and short-term outcomes were recorded and analyzed. In total, 17 patients with pirfenidone were compared with 26 patients without antifibrotic treatment. Baseline characteristics and severity of disease did not differ between groups. Use of pirfenidone did not increase blood loss, wound-healing, or anastomotic complications. Severity of primary graft dysfunction at 72 hours was less (0.3 ± 0.6 vs 1.4 ± 1.3, P = .002), and length of mechanical ventilation (37.5 ± 34.8 vs 118.5 ± 151.0 hours, P = .016) and intensive care unit (ICU) stay (6.6 ± 7.1 vs 15.6 ± 20.3, P = .089) were shorter in patients with pirfenidone treatment. An independent beneficial effect of pirfenidone was confirmed by regression analysis while controlling for confounding variables (P = .016). Finally, incidence of acute cellular rejections within the first 30 days after SLTx was lower in patients with previous pirfenidone treatment (0.0% vs 19.2%; P = .040). Our data suggest a beneficial role of previous use of pirfenidone in patients with IPF who were undergoing SLTx.

This 36th adult lung and heart-lung transplant report summarizes data from 69,200 adult lung and 4,128 adult heart-lung transplants performed through June 30, 2018 and reported to the International Thoracic Organ Transplant Registry. With each year's report, we now provide more detailed analyses on a particular focus theme important to patient outcomes. Since 2013, these have been donor and recipient age; retransplantation; early graft failure; indication for transplant; allograft ischemic time; and multiorgan transplantation. Although widely accepted as critical to decision making at the time of receipt of an organ donor offer, there is surprisingly little literature outlining current practice and the impact of size (mis-)matching on outcomes. Hence, this year's report focuses on an overall theme of donor and recipient size matching. In addition to reporting donor and recipient height and weight difference for all adult lung and heart-lung transplant recipients stratified by transplant type (bilateral or single) and indication, we report historical trends and associations between size match and survival. The Registry's online slide sets include results from additional analyses and complementary information not included in this publication (see https://ishltregistries.org/registries/slides.asp).

The original version of this chapter was revised. This chapter was inadvertently published with incorrect author name “Denise Wanga” instead of “Denise Wang”.

Internationally 3% of the donor hearts are distributed to re-transplant patients. In Eurotransplant, only patients with a primary graft dysfunction (PGD) within 1 week after heart transplantation (HTX) are indicated for high urgency listing. The aim of this study is to provide evidence for the discussion on whether these patients should still be allocated with priority. All consecutive HTX performed in the period 1981-2015 were included. Multivariate Cox' model was built including: donor and recipient age and gender, ischaemia time, recipient diagnose, urgency status and era. The study population included 18 490 HTX, of these 463 (2.6%) were repeat transplants. The major indications for re-HTX were cardiac allograft vasculopathy (CAV) (50%), PGD (26%) and acute rejection (21%). In a multivariate model, compared with first HTX hazards ratio and 95% confidence interval for repeat HTX were 2.27 (1.83-2.82) for PGD, 2.24 (1.76-2.85) for acute rejection and 1.22 (1.00-1.48) for CAV (P < 0.0001). Outcome after cardiac re-HTX strongly depends on the indication for re-HTX with acceptable outcomes for CAV. In contrast, just 47.5% of all hearts transplanted in patients who were re-transplanted for PGD still functioned at 1-month post-transplant. Alternative options like VA-ECMO should be first offered before opting for acute re-transplantation.