Large waist circumference (central obesity) is related to an increased risk of developing cardiovascular disease (CVD) and diabetes. Central obesity is frequently associated with hypertension, dyslipidemia and dysglycemia, a constellation of risk factors commonly referred to as metabolic syndrome (MetSyn). We re-examined a random and representative sample of 791 middle-aged Newfoundland men and women to determine if MetSyn independently predicts the incidence of CVD events.

Heart rate (HR) has been linked to cardiovascular disease (CVD) and overall mortality. In a recent study, elevated HR was significantly associated with metabolic syndrome (MetSyn) (Rogowski et al., 2009). We assessed whether a high resting HR was significantly related to the presence of MetSyn in a previously established Newfoundland cohort. A random and representative sample of Newfoundland men and women who participated in a CVD prevention trial (1991-1993) was analyzed using a cross-sectional design. MetSyn was diagnosed according to the 2009 harmonized definition for MetSyn (Alberti et al., 2009). A resting HR of 75 beats per minute (bpm) or higher was considered as the cutpoint for elevated HR. Those with a history of CVD or missing MetSyn criteria were excluded from the present study. Group differences were first compared using t-test (continuous variables) and Chi-square analysis (categorical date). Logistic regression was then performed to obtain odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) for the presence of MetSyn based on two models: Model 1 - HR; and Model 2 - Model 1 plus the covariables age, sex, LDL-cholesterol, diabetes, smoking and exercise. A P value of 0.05 was set as the level of significance. A total of 622 respondents were included in the study, of which 46.3% were male and the average age 46.3 yrs ± 8.7. The prevalence of MetSyn was 43.7% in the overall sample. The average HR was 78.0 bpm ± 10.6 among those with MetSyn and 74.5 bpm ± 10.6 in those without the syndrome (P < 0.001). A larger proportion of individuals in the MetSyn group were classified as having an elevated resting HR (≥75 bpm) compared to the non-MetSyn group (62.5% vs. 48.9%; P < 0.001). In unadjusted regression analysis, individuals with high HR had a 1.75-fold increased risk of having MetSyn (95% CI, 1.26-2.41; P = 0.001). Raised HR remained a significant risk factor for the presence of MetSyn in multivariate analysis (OR, 1.82; 95% CI, 1.30-2.56; P = 0.001). Our study confirms previous findings which have reported a significant relationship between elevated HR and the presence of MetSyn. We suggest that assessing resting HR, a quick and inexpensive measurement to perform, in those with MetSyn may enhance the detection of individuals at increased CVD risk.

Men with haemophilia have not only the challenges of living with HIV and/or HCV infection and premature arthritis as complications of their disorder, but they also confront the other ails of ageing. These include genitourinary problems such as prostatic hypertrophy, prostatic cancer and renal stone disease, and arterial disease for which haemophilia is not protective. Progressive arthritis and declining fitness may lead to loss of independence which causes great concern. Associated with the physical aspects of ageing, many patients also suffer from psychological symptoms which may be precipitated by changes in work such as early retirement and altered family dynamics. Many older men with haemophilia may never have consulted primary care physicians because of the rarity and complexity of their disorder. Haemophilia centre staff often assume responsibility for the identification and management of all health problems of their patients. Even when other clinicians are involved, patients require their centre's involvement in the investigation and support of many procedures such as coronary artery surgery and urological surgery. This paper addresses falls in the older man with haemophilia, their causes and consequences and cardiovascular problems in particular. Very little literature has been published about these common problems. We need to be aware of the ageing issues in haemophilia and develop 'wellness' programs which are directed to the early identification of disease as well as preventative strategies to reduce the physical and psychological impacts of ageing.

BACKGROUND:Rosiglitazone is a thiazolidinedione that reduces insulin resistance and might preserve insulin secretion. The aim of this study was to assess prospectively the drug's ability to prevent type 2 diabetes in individuals at high risk of developing the condition.METHODS:5269 adults aged 30 years or more with impaired fasting glucose or impaired glucose tolerance, or both, and no previous cardiovascular disease were recruited from 191 sites in 21 countries and randomly assigned to receive rosiglitazone (8 mg daily; n=2365) or placebo (2634) and followed for a median of 3 years. The primary outcome was a composite of incident diabetes or death. Analyses were done by intention to treat. This trial is registered at ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT00095654.FINDINGS:At the end of study, 59 individuals had dropped out from the rosiglitazone group and 46 from the placebo group. 306 (11.6%) individuals given rosiglitazone and 686 (26.0%) given placebo developed the composite primary outcome (hazard ratio 0.40, 95% CI 0.35-0.46; p<0.0001); 1330 (50.5%) individuals in the rosiglitazone group and 798 (30.3%) in the placebo group became normoglycaemic (1.71, 1.57-1.87; p<0.0001). Cardiovascular event rates were much the same in both groups, although 14 (0.5%) participants in the rosiglitazone group and two (0.1%) in the placebo group developed heart failure (p=0.01).INTERPRETATION:Rosiglitazone at 8 mg daily for 3 years substantially reduces incident type 2 diabetes and increases the likelihood of regression to normoglycaemia in adults with impaired fasting glucose or impaired glucose tolerance, or both.

BACKGROUND: Epidemiological studies suggest that mild to moderate elevation in plasma homocysteine concentration is associated with increased risk of atherothrombotic cardiovascular (CV) disease. Simple, inexpensive and nontoxic therapy with folic acid and vitamins B-6 and B-12 reduces plasma homocysteine levels by approximately 25% to 30% and may reduce CV events. Therefore, a large, randomized clinical trial - the Heart Outcomes Prevention Evaluation (HOPE)-2 study - is being conducted to evaluate this therapy in patients at high risk for CV events.OBJECTIVES: To evaluate whether long-term therapy with folic acid and vitamins B-6 and B-12 reduces the risk of major CV events in a high-risk population. The primary study outcome is the composite of death from CV causes, myocardial infarction and stroke.METHODS: A total of 5522 patients aged 55 years or older with preexisting CV disease or with diabetes and additional risk factor(s) at 145 centres in 13 countries were randomly assigned to daily therapy with combined folic acid 2.5 mg, vitamin B-6 50 mg and vitamin B-12 1 mg, or to placebo. Follow-up will average five years, to be completed by the end of 2005.RESULTS: The patients' baseline characteristics confirmed their high-risk status. Baseline homocysteine levels varied between countries and regions. HOPE-2 is one of the largest trials of folate and vitamins B-6 and B-12 and is expected to significantly contribute to the evaluation of the role of homocysteine lowering in CV prevention.

BACKGROUND:A substantial proportion of patients receiving fibrinolytic therapy for myocardial infarction with ST-segment elevation have inadequate reperfusion or reocclusion of the infarct-related artery, leading to an increased risk of complications and death.METHODS:We enrolled 3491 patients, 18 to 75 years of age, who presented within 12 hours after the onset of an ST-elevation myocardial infarction and randomly assigned them to receive clopidogrel (300-mg loading dose, followed by 75 mg once daily) or placebo. Patients received a fibrinolytic agent, aspirin, and when appropriate, heparin (dispensed according to body weight) and were scheduled to undergo angiography 48 to 192 hours after the start of study medication. The primary efficacy end point was a composite of an occluded infarct-related artery (defined by a Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction flow grade of 0 or 1) on angiography or death or recurrent myocardial infarction before angiography.RESULTS:The rates of the primary efficacy end point were 21.7 percent in the placebo group and 15.0 percent in the clopidogrel group, representing an absolute reduction of 6.7 percentage points in the rate and a 36 percent reduction in the odds of the end point with clopidogrel therapy (95 percent confidence interval, 24 to 47 percent; P<0.001). By 30 days, clopidogrel therapy reduced the odds of the composite end point of death from cardiovascular causes, recurrent myocardial infarction, or recurrent ischemia leading to the need for urgent revascularization by 20 percent (from 14.1 to 11.6 percent, P=0.03). The rates of major bleeding and intracranial hemorrhage were similar in the two groups.CONCLUSIONS:In patients 75 years of age or younger who have myocardial infarction with ST-segment elevation and who receive aspirin and a standard fibrinolytic regimen, the addition of clopidogrel improves the patency rate of the infarct-related artery and reduces ischemic complications.

Background Hypertension is a well-established risk factor for myocardial infarction (MI), but its prognostic importance in survivors of an acute MI is less clear.Methods We used Cox proportional hazards models to examine the risk of any major cardiovascular event (cardiovascular death, heart failure, recurrent MI, or stroke) -combined or individual components-and all-cause death and evaluate the efficacy of captopril in 906 patients with hypertension and 1325 patients without hypertension in the Survival and Ventricular Enlargement (SAVE) clinical trial. All patients had survived an acute MI with resultant left ventricular (LV) systolic dysfunction, but without overt heart failure, and were randomized within 3 to 16 days after the index MI to receive either captopril or placebo. The mean (+/- SD) follow-up period was 42 10 months.Results After adjustment for known risk factors, medication use at enrollment, and baseline systolic blood pressure, patients with hypertension had a significant increase in the risk of experiencing a combined cardiovascular event (47.7% vs 31.3%; hazard ratio [HR], 1.49; 95% CI, 1.28-1.74), cardiovascular death (23.4% vs 15.9%; HR, 1.40; 95% CI, 1.12-1.74), heart failure (27.7% vs 15.5%; HR, 1.64; 95% CI, 1.34-2.02), and all-cause death (27.4 vs 19.3%; HR, 1.25; 95% CI, 1.02-1.53), and a similar but statistically non-significant increase in the risk of non-fatal or fatal recurrent MI (17.4% vs 10.9%; HR, 1.27; 95% CI, 0.98-1.65), and non-fatal or fatal stroke (5.0% vs 3.6%; HR, 1.31; 95% CI, 0.81-2.09). Captopril resulted in similar benefits for both patients with and patients without hypertension. The number of combined cardiovascular events prevented for every 100 patients treated with captopril was 7.0 (95% CI, 0.5-13.5) in patients with hypertension and 7.5 (95% CI, 2.6-12.5) in patients without hypertension.Conclusions In survivors of an acute MI with LV systolic dysfunction, antecedent hypertension was associated with a greater risk of subsequent adverse cardiovascular events, not directly explained by elevated blood pressure levels. Captopril use was beneficial in both patients with and patients without hypertenson.

The Canadian medical community in general, and the Canadian Cardiovascular Society (CCS) in particular, have played a major role in promoting evidencebased clinical practice in Canada. The Heart Failure Guideline Consensus Panel of the CCS published one of the first national guidelines on the clinical evidence for the diagnosis and treatment of heart failure in 1994 and published a comprehensive update in The Canadian Journal of Cardiology in December 2001.

BACKGROUND:Electrocardiographic markers of left ventricular hypertrophy (LVH) predict poor prognosis. We determined whether the ACE inhibitor ramipril prevents the development and causes regression of ECG-LVH and whether these changes are associated with improved prognosis independent of blood pressure reduction.METHODS AND RESULTS:In the Heart Outcomes Prevention Evaluation (HOPE) study, patients at high risk were randomly assigned to ramipril or placebo and followed for 4.5years. ECGs were recorded at baseline and at study end. We compared prevention/regression and development/persistence of ECG-LVH in the two groups and related these changes to outcomes. At baseline, 676 patients had LVH (321 in the ramipril group and 355 in the placebo group) and 7605 patients did not have LVH (3814 in the ramipril group and 3791 in the placebo group). By study end, 336 patients in the ramipril group (8.1%) compared with 406 in the placebo group (9.8%) had development/persistence of LVH; in contrast, 3799 patients in the ramipril group (91.9%) compared with 3740 in the placebo group (90.2%) had regression/prevention of LVH (P=0.007). The effect of ramipril on LVH was independent of blood pressure changes. Patients who had regression/prevention of LVH had a lower risk of the predefined primary outcome (cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction, or stroke) compared with those who had development/persistence of LVH (12.3% versus 15.8%, P=0.006) and of congestive heart failure (9.3% versus 15.4%, P<0.0001).CONCLUSIONS:The ACE inhibitor ramipril decreases the development and causes regression of ECG-LVH independent of blood pressure reduction, and these changes are associated with reduced risk of death, myocardial infarction, stroke, and congestive heart failure.

OBJECTIVES We sought to evaluate whether oral anticoagulant (AC) therapy given for five months was superior to standard (control) therapy in patients with unstable angina receiving aspirin. BACKGROUND The long-term risk of myocardial infarction (MI) or death remains high in patients with unstable angina, despite the use of aspirin. Therefore, additional treatments are necessary. METHODS Of the 10,141 patients entering the main trial, 3,712 were randomized 12 to 48 h later to receive oral AC therapy (n = 1,848) or standard therapy (n = 1,864). RESULTS One-hundred forty patients (7.6%) suffered from cardiovascular death, MI or stroke while receiving oral AC, compared with 155 patients (8.3%) on standard therapy (relative risk [RR] 0.90, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.72 to 1.14; p = 0.40). The rates of the primary outcomes plus refractory angina were 16.7% (n = 308) versus 17.5% (n = 327) (RR 0.95, 95% CI 0.81 to 1.11; p = 0.53). Countries were divided into good or poor compliers (based on the use of oral AC above or below 70% at 35 days), without knowledge of results by country. In good-complier countries, oral AC was discontinued in only 10.4% of patients at seven days and in 23.6% by five months, compared with 27.6% and 44.9%, respectively, in poor complier countries. There were significant reductions in the risks of both the primary (6.1% vs. 8.9%; RR 0.68, 95% CI 0.48 to 0.95; p = 0.02) and secondary outcomes (11.9% vs. 16.5%; RR 0.70, 95% CI 0.55 to 0.90; p = 0.005) with oral AC in the good-complier countries. There was little difference in the poor-complier countries (9.0% vs. 7.8% for the primary and 21.3% vs. 18.5% for the secondary outcomes, tests for interactions comparing the RRs for the primary and secondary outcomes were p < 0.02 and p = 0.002, respectively, between the two sets of countries). In the overall study, there was an excess of major bleeding (2.7% vs. 1.3%; p = 0.004), which was larger in the good-complier countries (RR 2.71) compared with the poor-complier countries (RR 1.58). There were also reductions in cardiac catheterization (RR 0.80; p = 0.004) and coronary revascularization procedures (RR 0.82; p = 0.06) in the good-complier countries, but not in the poor-complier countries (RR 0.98 and 1.06, respectively, p for interaction of 0.06 and 0.04, respectively). CONCLUSIONS Overall, oral AC led to a small, nonsignificant reduction in the risk of the primary and secondary outcomes. Stratifying the countries or centers by their rates of compliance to oral AC suggested that good compliance to oral AC could potentially lead to clinically important reductions in major ischemic cardiovascular events. (C) 2001 by the American College of Cardiology.

BACKGROUND:Other than aspirin, there are few oral antithrombotic treatments with proven efficacy in patients with acute coronary syndrome. In this report, we present the rationale, design and baseline characteristics of the Clopidogrel in Unstable angina to prevent Recurrent ischaemic Events (CURE) trial, which includes a meta-analysis of the effects of thienopyridines in patients with vascular disease.METHODS AND RESULTS:Combined data from randomized trials of thienopyrindines in patients with atherosclerotic disease demonstrated a 29% reduction in vascular events when compared with placebo/control (n=2392) (OR 0.71, 95% CI 0.58-0.86, P=0.0006) and a 10% reduction in vascular events when compared with aspirin (n=22 254) (OR 0.91, 95% Cl 0.84-0.99, P=0.039). Similarly, randomized trials of aspirin plus thienopyridines in patients undergoing intracoronary stenting, demonstrated a marked benefit of aspirin plus ticlopidine in reducing death or myocardial infarction compared with aspirin alone (OR 0.23, 95% CI 0.11-0.49, P=0.0001) or aspirin plus warfarin (OR 0.51, 95% CI 0.33-0.78, P=0.002). Whether these benefits extend to the much larger population of patients with acute coronary syndrome is unknown. CURE is an international, randomized, double-blind trial, in which patients with acute coronary syndrome will be randomized to receive either a bolus dose of clopidogrel (300 mg) followed by 75 mg per day for 3-12 months, or matching placebo. Both groups will receive aspirin. The co-primary efficacy end-points of CURE are: (1) the composite of cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction or stroke; and (2) the composite of cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction, stroke or refractory ischaemia. CURE will recruit approximately 12 500 patients with acute coronary syndrome (from 28 countries) and its power to detect moderate treatment benefits will be in the region of 80-90%, while maintaining an overall type I error (alpha) of 0.05. The baseline characteristics of the study population are consistent with at least a moderate risk group of patients with acute coronary syndrome.CONCLUSIONS:Randomized trials of thienopyridines in patients with vascular disease demonstrate that thienopyridines are effective in reducing vascular events when compared with placebo/control or aspirin, as well as when used in combination with aspirin in patients undergoing intracoronary stent implantation. The CURE trial is a large international study to determine if acute and long-term treatment with the combination of clopidogrel and aspirin is superior to aspirin alone in patients with acute coronary syndrome.

AIMS:To compare effects of heparin and hirudin on biochemical markers of coagulation.METHODS AND RESULTS:Patients (n=395) with unstable angina or myocardial infarction without ST elevation were randomized to a 72-h infusion of one of three regimens: unfractionated heparin (bolus of 5000 IU followed by an infusion of 1200 IU. h(-1)), low-dose hirudin (HBW 023; 0.2 mg. kg(-1)bolus followed by 0.10 mg. kg(-1). h(-1)) or medium-dose hirudin (0.4 mg. kg(-1)bolus followed by 0.15 mg. kg(-1). h(-1)). Infusions were adjusted to maintain an activated partial thromboplastin time of between 60-100 s. Activated partial thromboplastin time, prothrombin fragment 1.2 (F1.2), thrombin antithrombin III complex and D-dimer were measured before, during and after the infusion. Median activated partial thromboplastin time was similar in the two groups early on, but was significantly lower in the heparin group than in the combined hirudin group 48 h after starting the infusion (53 s and 75 s, respectively;P<0.001), and 6 h after stopping (31 s and 46 s, respectively;P<0.001). Median F1.2 levels were not significantly different between the groups during the infusion. Median thrombin antithrombin III levels in the heparin and hirudin groups were 2.8 microg. l(-1)and 2.3 microg. l(-1), respectively, at 6 h (P<0.001), and 3.0 microg. l(-1)and 2.3 microg. l(-1), respectively, at 48 h (P<0.001). Median D-dimer levels were 320 ng. ml(-1)and 260 ng. ml(-1)48 h after starting the infusion in the heparin and hirudin groups, respectively (P<0.001), and 415 ng. ml(-1)and 280 ng. ml(-1), respectively (P<0.001) 6 h after stopping. D-dimer levels were significantly elevated above baseline values in both groups 24-48 h after stopping the infusions.CONCLUSIONS:The greater reduction of thrombin antithrombin III and D-dimer during the hirudin infusion supports the hypothesis that hirudin is a more potent antithrombin agent than heparin. Increased D-dimer levels after stopping heparin or hirudin suggest that there is an ongoing pro-coagulant state. These results point to the greater efficacy of hirudin in preventing early clinical events (death, myocardial infarction and refractory ischaemia) compared with heparin that have been observed in large randomized trials. Persistent activation of coagulation afterstopping infusions in our study suggests that a longer course of antithrombotic treatment may be needed to pacify the thrombus.

Background —Plasma triglyceride concentration has been an inconsistent independent risk factor for coronary heart disease, perhaps because of the metabolic heterogeneity among VLDL particles, the main carriers of triglycerides in plasma. Methods and Results —We conducted a prospective, nested case-control study in the Cholesterol and Recurrent Events (CARE) trial, a randomized placebo-controlled trial of pravastatin in 4159 patients with myocardial infarction and average LDL concentrations at baseline (115 to 174 mg/dL, mean 139 mg/dL). Baseline concentrations of VLDL–apolipoprotein (apo) B (the VLDL particle concentration), VLDL lipids, and apoCIII and apoE in VLDL+LDL and in HDL were compared in patients who had either a myocardial infarction or coronary death (cases, n=418) with those in patients who did not have a cardiovascular event (control subjects, n=370) in 5 years of follow-up. VLDL-cholesterol, VLDL-triglyceride, VLDL-apoB, apoCIII and apoE in VLDL+LDL and apoE in HDL were all interrelated, and each was a univariate predictor of subsequent coronary events. The significant independent predictors were VLDL-apoB (relative risk [RR] 3.2 for highest to lowest quintiles, P =0.04), apoCIII in VLDL+LDL (RR 2.3, P =0.04), and apoE in HDL (RR 1.8, P =0.02). Plasma triglycerides, a univariate predictor of coronary events (RR 1.6, P =0.03), was not related to coronary events (RR 1.3, P =0.6) when apoCIII in VLDL+LDL was included in the model, whereas apoCIII remained significant. Adjustment for LDL- and HDL-cholesterol did not affect these results. Conclusions —The plasma concentrations of VLDL particles and apoCIII in VLDL and LDL are more specific measures of coronary heart disease risk than plasma triglycerides perhaps because their known metabolic properties link them more closely to atherosclerosis.

Background Diabetes mellitus is a strong risk factor for cardiovascular and renal disease. We investigated whether the angiotensin-converting-enzyme (ACE) inhibitor ramipril can lower these risks in patients with diabetes.Methods 3577 people with diabetes included in the Heart Outcomes Prevention Evaluation study, aged 55 years or older, who had a previous cardiovascular event or at least one other cardiovascular risk factor, no clinical proteinuria, heart failure, or low ejection fraction, and who were not taking ACE inhibitors, were randomly assigned ramipril (10 mg/day) or placebo, and Vitamin E or placebo, according to a two-by-two factorial design. The combined primary outcome was myocardial infarction, stroke, or cardiovascular death. Overt nephropathy was a main outcome in a substudy.Findings The study was stopped 6 months early (after 4.5 years) by the independent data safety and monitoring board because of a consistent benefit of ramipril compared with placebo. Ramipril lowered the risk of the combined primary outcome by 25% (95% CI 12-36, p=0.0004), myocardial infarction by 22% (6-36), stroke by 33% (10-50), cardiovascular death by 37% (21-51), total mortality by 24% (8-37), revascularisation by 17% (2-30), and overt nephropathy by 24% (3-40, p=0.027). After adjustment for the changes in systolic (2.4 mm Hg) and diastolic (1.0 mm Hg) brood pressures, ramipril stilt lowered the risk of the combined primary outcome by 25% (12-36, p=0.0004).Interpretation Ramipril was beneficial for cardiovascular events and overt nephropathy in people with diabetes. The cardiovascular benefit was greater than that attributable to the decrease in blood pressure. This treatment represents a vasculoprotective and renoprotective effect for people with diabetes.

BACKGROUND Metoprolol provides clinical benefits in patients with congestive heart failure (CHF). In this study, we investigated the effects of controlled-release metoprolol (metoprolol CR) on clinical status, on left ventricular (LV) volumes and function, and on neurohumoral activation in a large number of patients with CHF of mixed causes. METHODS AND RESULTS Four hundred twenty-six patients with symptomatic CHF were randomized to receive metoprolol CR or placebo for 24 weeks. Metoprolol CR did not affect 6-minute walk distance, New York Heart Association functional class, or quality of life. However, there was a significant improvement in measures of LV function with an attenuation in the increase in LV end-diastolic (+23+/-65 mL [placebo] versus +6+/-61 mL, P=0.01) and LV end-systolic (+19+/-55 mL [placebo] versus -2+/-51 mL, P<0.001) volumes after 24 weeks of therapy. LV ejection fraction was unchanged (-0.05% or -0.005) in the placebo group but increased by 2. 4% in the metoprolol CR-treated patients (P=0.001). Patients receiving metoprolol CR had a greater decrease in angiotensin II (P=0.036) and renin (P=0.032) levels but an increase in N-terminal atrial natriuretic peptide and brain natriuretic peptide levels (P<0. 01). There were fewer deaths in the group receiving beta-blockers (3. 4% versus 8.1%), and there was a similar number of patients experiencing the composite outcomes of death or any hospitalization. CONCLUSIONS When added to ACE inhibitors, angiotensin II receptor antagonists, or both, the use of metoprolol CR improves ventricular function, reduces activation of the renin-angiotensin systems, and results in fewer deaths.