Dolutegravir (DTG) treatment can lead to neuropsychiatric adverse events (NPAEs). This study assessed the association between NPAEs and polymorphisms in DTG-related pharmacogenes, determined by next-generation sequencing panel testing. Using a case-control design, 36 patients having previously discontinued DTG due to NPAEs were compared to 98 patients tolerating DTG. In the latter group, psychometric scores were compared according to genotype, targeting polymorphisms associated with drug intolerance. NR1I2 c.-22-7659C > T was independently associated with a reduced risk of NPAE-related DTG discontinuation (odds ratio, 0.36 [95% confidence interval, .15-.88] for T-variant allele carriage) and was linked to decreased anxiety scores in control group participants.

Dolutegravir and bictegravir are second-generation HIV integrase strand transfer inhibitors (INSTIs) that were previously associated with abnormal weight gain. This monocentric cross-sectional study investigates associations between weight gain during the first year after initiation of dolutegravir, bictegravir or other anchor drugs and gut microbiome diversity as well as taxa composition. The study enrolled 79 participants receiving dolutegravir, 32 receiving bictegravir and 10 receiving non-INSTI based regimens. Most of them were treatment experienced at initiation of those anchor drugs agents. Although weight gain was not linked to overall bacterial diversity, strong associations with specific taxa were demonstrated (FDR q < 0.01). Using multiple linear regression, we identified 4 distinct groups of bacteria associated with either dolutegravir, bictegravir, weight loss or weight gain under treatment, allowing a machine learning model to predict 15.9% of the weight gain variability regardless of sex, age and body mass index (RMSE: 0.0126). Dysosmobacter sp. and Haemophilus sp., two bacteria previously associated with host metabolism, were among the strongest predictors. Our findings link INSTIs, weight gain, and the gut microbiome. Future research should investigate the causal role of the identified taxa to improve our understanding of microbiome-drug interactions and further support personalized antiretroviral strategies.Trial registration: Eudra-CT 2020-001103-17 (registration date: 2020-12-01).

AbstractBackgroundEmpiric antifungal therapy is considered the standard of care for high-risk neutropenic patients with persistent fever. The impact of a preemptive, diagnostic-driven approach based on galactomannan screening and chest computed tomography scan on demand on survival and on the risk of invasive fungal disease (IFD) during the first weeks of high-risk neutropenia is unknown.MethodsPatients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) or myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) and allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplant recipients were randomly assigned to receive caspofungin empirically (arm A) or preemptively (arm B), while receiving fluconazole 400 mg daily prophylactically. The primary end point of this noninferiority study was overall survival (OS) 42 days after randomization.ResultsOf 556 patients recruited, 549 were eligible: 275 in arm A and 274 in arm B. Eighty percent of the patients had AML or MDS requiring high-dose chemotherapy, and 93% of them were in the first induction phase. At day 42, the OS was not inferior in arm B (96.7%; 95% confidence interval [CI], 93.8%–98.3%) when compared with arm A (93.1%; 95% CI, 89.3%–95.5%). The rates of IFDs at day 84 were not significantly different, 7.7% (95% CI, 4.5%–10.8%) in arm B vs 6.6% (95% CI, 3.6%–9.5%) in arm A. The rate of patients who received caspofungin was significantly lower in arm B (27%) than in arm A (63%; P < .001).ConclusionsThe preemptive antifungal strategy was safe for high-risk neutropenic patients given fluconazole as prophylaxis, halving the number of patients receiving antifungals without excess mortality or IFDs.Clinical Trials Registration. NCT01288378; EudraCT 2010-020814-27.

Purpose A variety of diagnostic methods are available to validate the performance of population pharmacokinetic models. Internal validation, which applies these methods to the model building dataset and to additional data generated through Monte Carlo simulations, is often sufficient, but external validation, which requires a new dataset, is considered a more rigorous approach, especially if the model is to be used for predictive purposes. Our first objective was to validate a previously published population pharmacokinetic model of darunavir, an HIV protease inhibitor boosted with ritonavir or cobicistat. Our second objective was to use this model to derive optimal sampling strategies that maximize the amount of information collected with as few pharmacokinetic samples as possible. Methods A validation dataset comprising 164 sparsely sampled individuals using ritonavir-boosted darunavir was used for validation. Standard plots of predictions and residuals, NPDE, visual predictive check, and bootstrapping were applied to both the validation set and the combined learning/validation set in NONMEM to assess model performance. D-optimal designs for darunavir were then calculated in PopED and further evaluated in NONMEM through simulations. Results External validation confirmed model robustness and accuracy in most scenarios but also highlighted several limitations. The best one-, two-, and three-point sampling strategies were determined to be pre-dose (0 h); 0 and 4 h; and 1, 4, and 19 h, respectively. A combination of samples at 0, 1, and 4 h was comparable to the optimal three-point strategy. These could be used to reliably estimate individual pharmacokinetic parameters, although with fewer samples, precision decreased and the number of outliers increased significantly. Conclusions Optimal sampling strategies derived from this model could be used in clinical practice to enhance therapeutic drug monitoring or to conduct additional pharmacokinetic studies.

Objective: To describe the treatment outcomes of patients receiving dolutegravir (DTG) in a ‘real-world setting’ in Belgium. Design: Retrospective, observational, multicenter cohort. Methods: Inclusion criteria: HIV-1 patients at least 18 years old having received DTG as part of their combined antiretroviral therapy (cART) between 1 April 2014 and 1 December 2017. Primary endpoint: rate of virologic suppression, defined as plasma HIV-1 viral load less than 50 copies/ml, at weeks 24, 48, and 96. Secondary endpoints: durability, expressed as probability of experiencing loss of virologic suppression by week 96 (defined as two consecutive HIV-1 viral load measurements of at least 200 copies/ml after having initially achieved virologic suppression); immunological response at weeks 24, 48, and 96; incidence of and reasons for DTG discontinuation; and change in weight at week 96. Results: Four thousand, one hundred and one patients were included. Through 96 weeks, virologic suppression rate was 96% (on-treatment analysis), probability of experiencing loss of virologic suppression was 7%, and mean increase in CD4+ cell count was 100 cells/μl (SD 220). There were 785 (19.1%) discontinuations of DTG (8.9 discontinuations per 100 patient-years). The most common cause of discontinuation was an adverse drug reaction (ADR; 9.5%) with neuropsychiatric toxicity being the most prevalent (5.2%; 2.4 discontinuations per 100 patient-years). By week 96, the median change in weight for the study population was +2.0 kg (IQR −1 to 5). Conclusion: In this large cohort, DTG showed excellent virologic efficacy and was generally well tolerated. Whether DTG results in undesirable weight gain or rather statistically significant results, remains a debate.

Darunavir/cobicistat/emtricitabine/tenofovir alafenamide (D/C/F/TAF) 800/150/200/10 mg is being investigated in two Phase III trials, AMBER (NCT02431247; treatment-naive adults) and EMERALD (NCT02269917; treatment-experienced, virologically suppressed adults). Week 48 AMBER and EMERALD resistance analyses are presented. Postbaseline samples for genotyping/phenotyping were analyzed from protocol-defined virologic failures (PDVFs) with viral load (VL) ≥400 copies/mL at failure/later time points. Post hoc analyses were deep sequencing in AMBER, and HIV-1 proviral DNA from baseline samples (VL <50 copies/mL) in EMERALD. Through week 48 across both studies, no darunavir, primary PI, or tenofovir resistance-associated mutations (RAMs) were observed in HIV-1 viruses of 1,125 participants receiving D/C/F/TAF or 629 receiving boosted darunavir plus emtricitabine/tenofovir-disoproxil-fumarate. In AMBER, the nucleos(t)ide analog reverse transcriptase inhibitor (N(t)RTI) RAM M184I/V was identified in HIV-1 of one participant during D/C/F/TAF treatment. M184V was detected pretreatment as a minority variant (9%). In EMERALD, in participants with prior VF and genoarchive data (N = 140; 98 D/C/F/TAF and 42 control), 4% had viruses with darunavir RAMs, 38% with emtricitabine RAMs, mainly at position 184 (41% not fully susceptible to emtricitabine), 4% with tenofovir RAMs, and 21% ≥ 3 thymidine analog-associated mutations (24% not fully susceptible to tenofovir) detected at screening. All achieved VL <50 copies/mL at week 48 or prior discontinuation. D/C/F/TAF has a high genetic barrier to resistance; no darunavir, primary PI, or tenofovir RAMs were observed through 48 weeks in AMBER and EMERALD. Only one postbaseline M184I/V RAM was observed in HIV-1 of an AMBER participant. In EMERALD, baseline archived RAMs to darunavir, emtricitabine, and tenofovir in participants with prior VF did not preclude virologic response.

Protease inhibitors such as darunavir are an important therapeutic option in the anti-human immunodeficiency virus arsenal. Current dosage guidelines recommend using cobicistat- or ritonavir-boosted darunavir 800 mg every 24 h (q24h) in protease inhibitor-naïve patients, or ritonavir-boosted darunavir 600 mg q12h in experienced patients. However, darunavir displays a large, poorly characterized, inter-individual pharmacokinetic variability. The objectives of this study were to investigate the pharmacokinetics of darunavir and to elucidate the sources of its inter-individual variability using population pharmacokinetic modeling. Then, to determine the appropriateness of current treatment guidelines and the feasibility of alternative dosing regimens in a representative cohort of adult patients using simulations. Sparse pharmacokinetic samples were collected in 127 patients with human immunodeficiency virus type 1 infection, then supplemented with rich sampling data from a subset of 12 individuals. Data were analyzed using the nonlinear mixed-effects modeling software NONMEM. The effect of reduced doses (600 mg q24h and 400 mg q24h) or reduced frequency of administration (800 mg q24h for 5 days followed by 2 days of treatment interruption) was simulated. Our model adequately described the pharmacokinetics of darunavir. Predictors of individual exposure were CYP3A5*3 and SLCO3A1 rs8027174 genotypes, sex, and alpha-1 acid glycoprotein level. No relationship was apparent between darunavir area under the curve and treatment efficacy or safety. For reduced dose regimens, darunavir concentrations remained above the protein binding-corrected EC50 in the majority of subjects. More stringent pharmacokinetic targets were not reached in a significant proportion of patients. These results add to the growing body of evidence that darunavir-based therapy could be simplified to reduce costs and toxicity, as well as to improve patient compliance. However, the heterogeneity in pharmacokinetic response should be considered when assessing whether individual patients could benefit from a particular regimen, for instance through the use of population pharmacokinetic models. ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT03101644, date of registration: 5 April, 2017.

Darunavir/cobicistat/emtricitabine/tenofovir alafenamide (D/C/F/TAF) 800/150/200/10 mg was investigated through 96 weeks in EMERALD (NCT02269917). Virologically-suppressed, HIV-1-positive treatment-experienced adults (previous non-darunavir virologic failure [VF] allowed) were randomized (2:1) to D/C/F/TAF or boosted protease inhibitor (PI) plus emtricitabine/tenofovir-disoproxil-fumarate (F/TDF) over 48 weeks. At week 52 participants in the boosted PI arm were offered switch to D/C/F/TAF (late-switch, 44 weeks D/C/F/TAF exposure). All participants were followed on D/C/F/TAF until week 96. Efficacy endpoints were percentage cumulative protocol-defined virologic rebound (PDVR; confirmed viral load [VL] >= 50 copies/mL) and VL < 50 copies/mL (virologic suppression) and >= 50 copies/mL (VF) (FDA-snapshot analysis). Of 1141 randomized patients, 1080 continued in the extension phase. Few patients had PDVR (D/C/F/TAF: 3.1%, 24/763 cumulative through week 96; late-switch: 2.3%, 8/352 week 52-96). Week 96 virologic suppression was 90.7% (692/763) (D/C/F/TAF) and 93.8% (330/352) (late-switch). VF was 1.2% and 1.7%, respectively. No darunavir, primary PI, tenofovir or emtricitabine resistance-associated mutations were observed post-baseline. No patients discontinued for efficacy-related reasons. Few discontinued due to adverse events (2% D/C/F/TAF arm). Improved renal and bone parameters were maintained in the D/C/F/TAF arm and observed in the late-switch arm, with small increases in total cholesterol/high-density-lipoprotein-cholesterol ratio. A study limitation was the lack of a control arm in the week 96 analysis. Through 96 weeks, D/C/F/TAF resulted in low PDVR rates, high virologic suppression rates, very few VFs, and no resistance development. Late-switch results were consistent with D/C/F/TAF week 48 results. EMERALD week 96 results confirm the efficacy, high genetic barrier to resistance and safety benefits of D/C/F/TAF.

Background: Doravirine is a novel, nonnucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor with demonstrated efficacy in treatment-naive adults with HIV-1. Methods: In this open-label, active-controlled, noninferiority trial, adults with HIV-1 virologically suppressed for ≥6 months on 2 nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors plus a boosted protease inhibitor, boosted elvitegravir, or a non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor were randomized (2:1) to switch to once-daily, single-tablet doravirine 100 mg with lamivudine 300 mg and tenofovir disoproxil fumarate 300 mg (DOR/3TC/TDF) or to continue their current therapy (Baseline Regimen) for 24 weeks. The primary endpoint was the proportion of participants with HIV-1 RNA <50 copies/mL (defined by the FDA Snapshot approach), with the primary comparison between DOR/3TC/TDF at week 48 and Baseline Regimen at week 24 and a secondary comparison between the groups at week 24 (noninferiority margin, −8%). Results: Six hundred seventy participants (447 DOR/3TC/TDF, 223 Baseline Regimen) were treated and included in the analyses. At week 24, 93.7% on DOR/3TC/TDF vs 94.6% on Baseline Regimen had HIV-1 RNA <50 copies/mL [difference −0.9 (−4.7 to 3.0)]. At week 48, 90.8% on DOR/3TC/TDF had HIV-1 RNA <50 copies/mL, demonstrating noninferiority vs Baseline Regimen at week 24 [difference −3.8 (−7.9 to 0.3)]. In participants on ritonavir-boosted protease inhibitor at entry, mean reductions in fasting LDL-C and non-HDL-C at week 24 were significantly greater for DOR/3TC/TDF vs Baseline Regimen (P < 0.0001). Adverse events occurred in 68.9% on DOR/3TC/TDF and 52.5% on Baseline Regimen by week 24, leading to treatment discontinuation in 2.5% and 0.4%, respectively. Conclusions: Switching to once-daily DOR/3TC/TDF is a generally well-tolerated option for maintaining viral suppression in patients considering a change in therapy. Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02397096.

Background: Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia (SAB) is associated with significant morbidity and mortality. Previous studies had shown that PET/CT can be helpfull in the management of SAB, leading to reduction of mortality. Factors associated with increased or reduced mortality are not well known. Our objective was to analyze mortality in high risk SAB patients undergoing PET/CT and to identify factors associated with mortality rate. Materials and methods: We performed a retrospective study and reviewed all cases of high risk adult SAB between 2014 and 2017. We analyzed medical records and mortality at 30 days and 90 days and 1 year. Results: A total of 102 patients were included in whom 48 undergone PET/CT. Metastatic foci was identified in 45.8% of cases (22/48). The overall mortality rate was 31.4% (32/102). The mortality rate was 16.6% (8/48) and 44.4% (24/54) in patients undergoing or not PET/CT respectively (P = 0.002). There was a signicantly difference in mortality rate at 30 days (P = 0.001), 90 days (P = 0.004) and one at 1 year (P = 0.002) between patients undergoing or not PET/CT respectively. In multivariate analysis only 18-FDGPET/CT, kidney failure and bacteremia of unknown origin were the 3 mains factors modifying mortality in patients with high risk SAB. Conclusion: In our study mortality rate was reduced in high risk SAB patients undergoing PET/CT. kidney failure and bacteremia of unknown origin were other factors associtated with high mortality. Our study confirm that PET/CT is a usefull tool in the management of SAB. (C) 2019 Japanese Society of Chemotherapy and The Japanese Association for Infectious Diseases. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

The use and cost of antifungal are increasing. There is an urgent need to change prescribing practice. Objective: Our aim was to identify different patterns of inappropriate antifungal use in daily practice in our center (Cliniques Universitaires St Luc, Brussels). Setting: A 989 bed teaching hospital in Belgium. Method: Four point prevalence surveys (PPS) were undertaken prospectively during February, March, August 2014 and March 2015. One infectious disease specialist and two pharmacists assessed the quality of antifungal treatments according to standard guidelines. Antifungal use was evaluated by a modified algorithm used for antimicrobial use evaluation considering indication, dosage and duration of treatment. Main outcome measure: To assess the quality of use of antifungal agents in terms of indication, choice of molecule, dosage and duration of treatment. Toxicity and potential drug-drug interactions were also evaluated. Results: 108 antifungal therapies were prescribed to 104 patients during the four PPS. Fifty eight therapies were prophylactic indications (54%). 51.3% of the therapeutic indications were empirical and 21.3% targeted therapies. Fluconazole was the most frequently used drug (61.1%), followed by voriconazole (13%). According to Gyssens algorithm, only 61 prescriptions (56.5%) were judged definitely appropriate. Indications were considered correct in 93.5% (101). In 11.9% of cases the antifungal drug was not chosen correctly. The correct dose of antifungal drugs was prescribed in 75.9%. Conclusion: These four PPS days identified different patterns of inappropriate antifungal use that should be improved by education and feedback of these results of prescribing habits. This kind of interventions is one of the most successful means of influencing physicians' performance

Hemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis (HLH) is a rare but severe and potentially fatal syndrome that can occur during pregnancy. A 36 years-old woman, at 29 weeks of gestation, presented with itchiness and jaundice since a week. On clinical examination she was apyrexial and frankly icteric. Laboratory data showed evidence of acute hepatitis. A complete work-up was made excluding viral hepatitis (HAV, HEV, HBV, HCV, HHV6, CMV, EBV) and autoimmune liver disease. Liver diseases related to pregnancy were not completely excluded. A liver biopsy was performed and firstly interpreted as showing features of acute hepatitis. The clinical situation worsened, she developed fever with signs of fetal distress and emergent delivery was done. A second look at the liver biopsy showed features compatible with HLH, which was also confirmed on bone marrow biopsy. Extensive work-up with exclusion of infectious and malignant diseases, lead us to the diagnosis of HLH secondary to pregnancy and short term steroid therapy was started. She then completely recovered and didn't present any relapse after 4 months of follow up. HLH during pregnancy is very rare and this is the first case of HLH presenting as acute hepatitis and diagnosed on a liver biopsy.

The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of UGT1A1 polymorphisms on Raltegravir (RAL) and its metabolite RAL-glucuronide trough plasma concentrations ([RAL]plasma and [RAL-glu]plasma) and on the metabolic ratio (MR): [RAL-glu]plasma/[RAL]plasma. UGT1A1 genotyping was performed on 96 patients. 44% (n = 42) were homozygous UGT1A1*1/*1 while 50% (n = 48) and 6% (n = 6) were UGT1A1*28 and UGT1A1*36 carriers, respectively. The median concentration and interquartile range (IQR) of [RAL]plasma were 88.5 ng/ml (41.0–236), 168 ng/ml (85.8–318) and 92.5 ng/ml (36.4–316) for UGT1A1*1/*1, UGT1A1*28 and UGT1A1*36 carriers, respectively. Only the difference between UGT1A1*1/*1 and *28 carriers was statistically significant (p = 0.022). The median MR (IQR) were 5.8 (3–10), 2.9 (1.6–5.3) and 3.2 (1.7–5.9) for UGT1A1*1/*1, UGT1A1*28 and UGT1A1*36 carriers, respectively. Only the difference between UGT1A1*1/*1 and *28 carriers was statistically significant (p = 0.004) with an allele-dependent effect: UGT1A1*28 homozygous having lower MR than heterozygous carriers who show lower MR compared to *1/*1. Except for the sensation of fatigue, this PK effect did not correlate with clinical adverse events or biological abnormalities. In Conclusion, we demonstrate that UGT1A1*28 polymorphism has a significant impact on RAL metabolism: UGT1A1*28 carriers being characterized by higher [RAL]plasma and lower MR.

Abstract Objectives: This 5-year follow-up study aimed to assess clinical outcomes of HIV-1 infected adults treated with atazanavir (ATV) in clinical practice in Belgium, to describe patient profiles and characteristics, as well as treatment safety. Methods: A multicenter, non-interventional, non-comparative, retrospective cohort study was performed in HIV-1 positive adult patients treated with ATV between 2006 and 2012. Data were collected from 8 AIDS reference centers’ databases. All analyses were on-treatment. Sub-analyses were carried out in unboosted ATV treated patients and in females. The primary endpoint was defined as the time-to-treatment-discontinuation. Furthermore, virological suppression, immunological response, time to loss of virological response, reasons for ATV initiation, and discontinuation were also assessed. Results: 2264 ARV-naive and ARV-experienced patients (median age: 41 years) were included. Females and non-Caucasians were broadly represented (40 and 45%, respectively). The probability to remain on treatment was 0.78 (CI: 0.76; 0.78) for the first and 0.69 (CI: 0.66; 0.71) for the second year and was similar between males and females. Overall, 771 patients (34.1%) discontinued ATV over time, the median (Q1-Q3) time to discontinuation being 0.8 (0.3–1.5) year. In unboosted ATV-treated patients, results were comparable to the overall ATV population, except for a higher rate of discontinuation-over-time (45.1%). Conclusions: Clinical and safety data from this 5 year-cohort study show that the vast majority of patients remained on ATV treatment for the first and second years, overall as well as patients treated with unboosted ATV and females.

__Background:__ Tenofovir alafenamide, a tenofovir prodrug, results in 90% lower tenofovir plasma concentrations than does tenofovir disproxil fumarate, thereby minimising bone and renal risks. We investigated the efficacy, safety, and tolerability of switching to a single-tablet regimen containing rilpivirine, emtricitabine, and tenofovir alafenamide compared with remaining on rilpivirine, emtricitabine, and tenofovir disoproxil fumarate. __Methods:__ In this randomised, double-blind, multicentre, placebo-controlled, non-inferiority trial, HIV-1-infected adults were screened and enrolled at 119 hospitals in 11 countries in North America and Europe. Participants were virally suppressed (HIV-1 RNA u003c50 copies per mL) on rilpivirine, emtricitabine, and tenofovir disoproxil fumarate for at least 6 months before enrolment and had creatinine clearance of at least 50 mL/min. Participants were randomly assigned (1:1) to receive a single-tablet regimen of either rilpivirine (25 mg), emtricitabine (200 mg), and tenofovir alafenamide (25 mg) or to remain on a single-tablet regimen of rilpivirine (25 mg), emtricitabine (200 mg), and tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (300 mg), with matching placebo, once daily for 96 weeks. Investigators, participants, study staff, and those assessing outcomes were masked to treatment group. All participants who received one dose of study drug and were on the tenofovir disoproxil fumarate regimen before screening were included in primary efficacy analyses. The primary endpoint was the proportion of participants with less than 50 copies per mL of plasma HIV-1 RNA at week 48 (by the US Food and Drug Administration snapshot algorithm), with a prespecified non-inferiority margin of 8%. This study was registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT01815736. __Findings:__ Between Jan 26, 2015, and Aug 25, 2015, 630 participants were randomised (316 to the tenofovir alafenamide group and 314 to the tenofovir disoproxil fumarate group). At week 48, 296 (94%) of 316 participants on tenofovir alafenamide and 294 (94%) of 313 on tenofovir disoproxil fumarate had maintained less than 50 copies per mL HIV-1 RNA (difference -0·3%, 95·001% CI -4·2 to 3·7), showing non-inferiority of tenofovir alafenamide to tenofovir disoproxil fumarate. Numbers of adverse events were similar between groups. 20 (6%) of 316 participants had study-drug related adverse events in the tenofovir alafenamide group compared with 37 (12%) of 314 in the tenofovir disoproxil fumarate group; none of these were serious. __Interpretation:__ Switching to rilpivirine, emtricitabine, and tenofovir alafenamide was non-inferior to continuing rilpivirine, emtricitabine, tenofovir disoproxil fumarate in maintaining viral suppression and was well tolerated at 48 weeks. These findings support guidelines recommending tenofovir alafenamide-based regimens, including coformulation with rilpivirine and emtricitabine, as initial and ongoing treatment for HIV-1 infection. __Funding:__ Gilead Sciences.

Background Tenofovir alafenamide, a tenofovir prodrug, results in 90% lower tenofovir plasma concentrations than does tenofovir disproxil fumarate, thereby minimising bone and renal risks. We investigated the efficacy, safety, and tolerability of switching to a single-tablet regimen containing rilpivirine, emtricitabine, and tenofovir alafenamide compared with remaining on rilpivirine, emtricitabine, and tenofovir disoproxil fumarate.Methods In this randomised, double-blind, multicentre, placebo-controlled, non-inferiority trial, HIV-1-infected adults were screened and enrolled at 119 hospitals in 11 countries in North America and Europe. Participants were virally suppressed (HIV-1 RNA <50 copies per mL) on rilpivirine, emtricitabine, and tenofovir disoproxil fumarate for at least 6 months before enrolment and had creatinine clearance of at least 50 mL/min. Participants were randomly assigned (1: 1) to receive a single-tablet regimen of either rilpivirine (25 mg), emtricitabine (200 mg), and tenofovir alafenamide (25 mg) or to remain on a single-tablet regimen of rilpivirine (25 mg), emtricitabine (200 mg), and tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (300 mg), with matching placebo, once daily for 96 weeks. Investigators, participants, study staff, and those assessing outcomes were masked to treatment group. All participants who received one dose of study drug and were on the tenofovir disoproxil fumarate regimen before screening were included in primary efficacy analyses. The primary endpoint was the proportion of participants with less than 50 copies per mL of plasma HIV-1 RNA at week 48 (by the US Food and Drug Administration snapshot algorithm), with a prespecified non-inferiority margin of 8%. This study was registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT01815736.Findings Between Jan 26, 2015, and Aug 25, 2015, 630 participants were randomised (316 to the tenofovir alafenamide group and 314 to the tenofovir disoproxil fumarate group). At week 48, 296 (94%) of 316 participants on tenofovir alafenamide and 294 (94%) of 313 on tenofovir disoproxil fumarate had maintained less than 50 copies per mL HIV-1 RNA (difference -0.3%, 95.001% CI -4.2 to 3.7), showing non-inferiority of tenofovir alafenamide to tenofovir disoproxil fumarate. Numbers of adverse events were similar between groups. 20 (6%) of 316 participants had study-drug related adverse events in the tenofovir alafenamide group compared with 37 (12%) of 314 in the tenofovir disoproxil fumarate group; none of these were serious.Interpretation Switching to rilpivirine, emtricitabine, and tenofovir alafenamide was non-inferior to continuing rilpivirine, emtricitabine, tenofovir disoproxil fumarate in maintaining viral suppression and was well tolerated at 48 weeks. These findings support guidelines recommending tenofovir alafenamide-based regimens, including coformulation with rilpivirine and emtricitabine, as initial and ongoing treatment for HIV-1 infection.

A 39-year-old patient was admitted to our hospital for 10 days fever (up to 40°C) with pain in the right hypochondrium. Abdominal echography performed at the onset of symptoms was normal. Blood tests showed C-reactive protein 311 mg/L, leucocytes count 24x109 /L (neutrophils count at 19, 29x109/L), bilirubin 1.1 mg/dL, lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) 254 U/L, aspartate aminotransferase (ASAT) 67 U/L, alanin aminotransferase (ALAT) 66 U/L, gammaGlutamyltransferase (gGT) 79 U/L and alkaline phosphatase 221 U/L. Chest X-ray showed an infiltrate in the right …