There is a 5 W/m 2 (about 0.35 %) difference between current on-orbit Total Solar Irradiance (TSI) measurements. On 18-20 July 2005, a workshop was held at the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) in Gaithersburg, Maryland that focused on understanding possible reasons for this difference, through an examination of the instrument designs, calibration approaches, and appropriate measurement equations. The instruments studied in that workshop included the Active Cavity Radiometer Irradiance Monitor III (ACRIM I1I) on the Active Cavity Radiometer Irradiance Monitor SATellite (ACRIMSAT), the Total Irradiance Monitor (TIM) on the Solar Radiation and Climate Experiment (SORCE), the Variability of solar IRradiance and Gravity Oscillations (VIRGO) on the Solar and Heliospheric Observatory (SOHO), and the Earth Radiation Budget Experiment (ERBE) on the Earth Radiation Budget Satellite (ERBS). Presentations for each instrument included descriptions of its design, its measurement equation and uncertainty budget, and the methods used to assess onorbit degradation. The workshop also included a session on satelliteand ground-based instrument comparisons and a session on laboratory-based comparisons and the application of new laboratory comparison techniques. The workshop has led to investigations of the effects of diffraction and of aperture area measurements on the differences between instruments. In addition, a laboratory-based instrument comparison is proposed that uses optical power measurements (with lasers that underEll the apertures of the TSI instruments), irradiance measurements (with lasers that overfill the apertures of the TSI instrument), and a cryogenic 2005—TSI—Workshop report. doe 1 https://ntrs.nasa.gov/search.jsp?R=20090027895 2019-07-04T09:18:02+00:00Z

In ocean-color remote sensing, approximately 90% of the flux at the sensor originates from atmospheric scattering, with the water-leaving radiance contributing the remaining 10% of the total flux. Consequently, errors in the measured top-of-the atmosphere radiance are magnified a factor of 10 in the determination of water-leaving radiance. Proper characterization of the atmosphere is thus a critical part of the analysis of ocean-color remote sensing data. It has always been necessary to calibrate the ocean-color satellite sensor vicariously, using in situ, ground-based results, independent of the status of the pre-flight radiometric calibration or the utility of on-board calibration strategies. Because the atmosphere contributes significantly to the measured flux at the instrument sensor, both the instrument and the atmospheric correction algorithm are simultaneously calibrated vicariously. The Marine Optical Buoy (MOBY), deployed in support of the Earth Observing System (EOS) since 1996, serves as the primary calibration station for a variety of ocean-color satellite instruments, including the Sea-viewing Wide Field-of-view Sensor (SeaWiFS), the Moderate Resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer (MODIS), the Japanese Ocean Color Temperature Scanner (OCTS) , and the French Polarization and Directionality of the Earth's Reflectances (POLDER). MOBY is located off the coast of Lanai, Hawaii. The site was selected to simplify the application of the atmospheric correction algorithms. Vicarious calibration using MOBY data allows for a thorough comparison and merger of ocean-color data from these multiple sensors.

Recent international comparisons [1,2] and key comparisons have shown that the realization of the International Temperature Scale of 1990 (ITS-90) above the freezing point of silver and its dissemination is more difficult than expected. In many cases, the deviations of the local scale realizations were larger than the combined estimated uncertainties could reasonably justify. On the other hand, it must be considered that the realization of the ITS-90 by radiation thermometry is a complex exercise involving a large number of operations with many influencing parameters. Furthermore, the key comparisons need a unified approach to the treatment of uncertainties. Consequently, a rigorous standard approach for the calculation of uncertainties is necessary. In this paper three different operational schemes have been identified for realizing the ITS-90 by radiation thermometry. For all three schemes an analysis is presented of the baseline parameters underlying the scale realization above the freezing point of silver with respect to their contribution to the uncertainty budget. The paper is a joint effort of the working group on radiation thermometry of the Consultative Committee for Thermometry (CCT) summarizing the knowledge and experience of all experts in this field.