We report the basal cell cancer (BCC) cohort of the SWOG/NCI 1609 Dual Anti-CTLA-4 & Anti-PD-1 blockade in Rare Tumors (DART), a phase II prospective, multicenter basket trial of nivolumab and ipilimumab. The primary endpoint was objective response rate (ORR) (RECIST v1.1). Overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), and toxicity were secondary endpoints. Sixteen patients with advanced/metastatic BCC were evaluable. The ORR was 31% (95% CI, 19–50%), and the 12-month OS, 75% (95% CI, 57–100%). Median PFS was 9.3 months (95% CI, 3.3–NA). Of 15 patients evaluable for clinical benefit, five partial responses (PRs) and five stable disease >6 months (total = 10/15 (66.7%)) were seen. The most common toxicities included fatigue (37.5%), pruritis (31.3%), and diarrhea (25%). In patients with advanced/metastatic BCC, ipilimumab and nivolumab produced an ORR of 31% and prolonged (>6 months) PFS in 73% of patients, with seven PFS/iPFS of >1 year, including one with prior anti-PD-1. ClinicalTrials.gov ID: NCT02834013 (Registered 7/15/2016; https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT02834013 ).

Background Tenosynovial giant cell tumour (TGCT) is a locally aggressive neoplasm for which few systemic treatment options exist. This study evaluated the efficacy and safety of vimseltinib, an oral, switch-control, CSF1R inhibitor, in patients with symptomatic TGCT not amenable to surgery. Methods MOTION is a multicentre, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 3 trial done in 35 specialised hospitals in 13 countries. Eligible patients were adults (aged ≥18 years) with a histologically confirmed diagnosis of TGCT for which surgical resection could potentially worsen functional limitation or cause severe morbidity. Patients were randomly assigned (2:1) with interactive response technology to vimseltinib (30 mg orally twice weekly) or placebo, administrated in 28-day cycles for 24 weeks. Patients and site personnel were masked to treatment assignment until week 25, unless progressive disease was confirmed earlier. The primary endpoint was objective response rate by independent radiological review using Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors, version 1.1 (RECIST) at week 25 in the intention-to-treat population. Safety was assessed in all patients who received the study drug. The trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT05059262, and enrolment is complete. Findings Between Jan 21, 2022, and Feb 21, 2023, 123 patients were randomly assigned (83 to vimseltinib and 40 to placebo). 73 (59%) patients were female and 50 (41%) were male. Nine (11%) of 83 patients assigned to vimseltinib and five (13%) of 40 patients assigned to placebo discontinued treatment before week 25; one patient in the placebo group did not receive any study drug. Objective response rate per RECIST was 40% (33 of 83 patients) in the vimseltinib group vs 0% (none of 40) in the placebo group (difference 40% [95% CI 29–51]; p<0·0001). Most treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were grade 1 or 2; the only grade 3 or 4 TEAE that occurred in more than 5% of patients receiving vimseltinib was increased blood creatine phosphokinase (eight [10%] of 83). One patient in the vimseltinib group had a treatment-related serious TEAE of subcutaneous abscess. No evidence of cholestatic hepatotoxicity or drug-induced liver injury was noted. Interpretation Vimseltinib produced a significant objective response rate and clinically meaningful functional and symptomatic improvement in patients with TGCT, providing an effective treatment option for these patients. Funding Deciphera Pharmaceuticals.

Introduction: Most patients with advanced gallbladder cancer are treated with multiagent chemotherapy. Immune checkpoint inhibitors offer the possibility of a durable response with less toxicity. This prospective, multicenter, open-label study was designed to evaluate the anticancer activity of nivolumab plus ipilimumab in patients with advanced gallbladder cancer. Methods: Nineteen patients with advanced gallbladder cancer refractory to >= 1 previous therapy received nivolumab 240 mg intravenously every 2 weeks and ipilimumab 1 mg/kg intravenously every 6 weeks until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. The primary end point was confirmed radiographic overall response rate (ORR) (complete response [CR] + partial response [PR] confirmed on subsequent scan); secondary end points included unconfirmed overall response, clinical benefit rate (confirmed and unconfirmed responses + stable disease >6 months), progression-free survival, overall survival, and toxicity. Results: The confirmed ORR was 16% (CR, n = 1 [5%]; PR, n = 2 [11%]); all were microsatellite stable, and the confirmed CR had undetectable programmed death-ligand 1 by immunohistochemistry. The unconfirmed ORR and clinical benefit rates were both 32%. The median duration of response was 14.8 months (range, 4-35.1+ months). The 6-month progression-free survival was 26% (95% CI, 12-55). The median overall survival was 7.0 months (95% CI, 3.9-19.1). The most common toxicities were fatigue (32%), anemia (26%), and anorexia (26%). Aspartate aminotransferase elevation was the most common grade 3/4 toxicity (11%). There was 1 possibly related death (sepsis with attendant hepatic failure). Conclusions: Ipilimumab plus nivolumab was well tolerated and showed modest efficacy with durable responses in previously treated patients with advanced gallbladder cancer.

BACKGROUND:Approximately half of patients with localised, high-risk soft tissue sarcoma of the extremity develop metastases. We aimed to assess whether the addition of pembrolizumab to preoperative radiotherapy and surgery would improve disease-free survival. METHODS:We completed an open-label, randomised clinical trial in patients with grade 2 or 3, stage III undifferentiated pleomorphic sarcoma or dedifferentiated or pleomorphic liposarcoma of the extremity and limb girdle. Patients were enrolled at 20 academic institutions in Australia, Canada, Italy, and the USA. Patients were randomly assigned to preoperative radiotherapy then surgery (control group) or preoperative pembrolizumab with radiotherapy (initiated 1-14 days after the first dose of pembrolizumab) then surgery and postoperative pembrolizumab (experimental group). Pembrolizumab (200 mg intravenously every 3 weeks) was administered as three neoadjuvant cycles (before, during, and after radiotherapy) and 14 or less adjuvant cycles. Primary endpoint was disease-free survival. This study is registered with ClincialTrials.gov (NCT03092323). FINDINGS:Between Nov 18, 2017, and Nov 14, 2023, 143 participants were randomly assigned to treatment. A modified intention-to-treat analysis of 127 patients with median follow-up of 43 months showed that the experimental group (n=64) had significantly longer disease-free survival than the control group (n=63; log-rank one-sided p=0·035; hazard ratio [HR] 0·61; 90% CI 0·39-0·96). The 2-year disease-free survival increased by 15% with addition of pembrolizumab: 52% (90% CI 42-64) and 67% (90% CI 58-78) for the control and experimental groups, respectively. Disease-free survival was similarly improved with pembrolizumab for the intention-to-treat patient population (HR 0·61 [90% CI 0·39-0·95]). Grade 3 or higher adverse events occurred more frequently in the experimental group (56%) than the control group (31%). INTERPRETATION:Addition of pembrolizumab to preoperative radiotherapy and surgery improves disease-free survival for patients with stage III undifferentiated pleomorphic sarcoma and pleomorphic or dedifferentiated liposarcoma of the extremity, which establishes a promising new treatment option for these patients. FUNDING:Stand Up to Cancer and Merck Sharp & Dohme.

BACKGROUND:Whether pembrolizumab given both before surgery (neoadjuvant therapy) and after surgery (adjuvant therapy), as compared with pembrolizumab given as adjuvant therapy alone, would increase event-free survival among patients with resectable stage III or IV melanoma is unknown. METHODS:In a phase 2 trial, we randomly assigned patients with clinically detectable, measurable stage IIIB to IVC melanoma that was amenable to surgical resection to three doses of neoadjuvant pembrolizumab, surgery, and 15 doses of adjuvant pembrolizumab (neoadjuvant-adjuvant group) or to surgery followed by pembrolizumab (200 mg intravenously every 3 weeks for a total of 18 doses) for approximately 1 year or until disease recurred or unacceptable toxic effects developed (adjuvant-only group). The primary end point was event-free survival in the intention-to-treat population. Events were defined as disease progression or toxic effects that precluded surgery; the inability to resect all gross disease; disease progression, surgical complications, or toxic effects of treatment that precluded the initiation of adjuvant therapy within 84 days after surgery; recurrence of melanoma after surgery; or death from any cause. Safety was also evaluated. RESULTS:At a median follow-up of 14.7 months, the neoadjuvant-adjuvant group (154 patients) had significantly longer event-free survival than the adjuvant-only group (159 patients) (P = 0.004 by the log-rank test). In a landmark analysis, event-free survival at 2 years was 72% (95% confidence interval [CI], 64 to 80) in the neoadjuvant-adjuvant group and 49% (95% CI, 41 to 59) in the adjuvant-only group. The percentage of patients with treatment-related adverse events of grades 3 or higher during therapy was 12% in the neoadjuvant-adjuvant group and 14% in the adjuvant-only group. CONCLUSIONS:Among patients with resectable stage III or IV melanoma, event-free survival was significantly longer among those who received pembrolizumab both before and after surgery than among those who received adjuvant pembrolizumab alone. No new toxic effects were identified. (Funded by the National Cancer Institute and Merck Sharp and Dohme; S1801 ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT03698019.).

TPS11578 Background: Conventional chondrosarcoma (cCS) accounts for ̃25% of primary bone cancers and is the second most common primary bone tumor after osteosarcoma. Surgical resection is the primary treatment for localized disease. No FDA approved therapy exists for advanced disease and chemotherapy has marginal efficacy with ORR < 12%. IDH1/2 mutation is seen in 50% of cases. Epigenetic dysregulation is central to oncogenesis in both IDH1/2 mutant and wild-type CS. Pre-clinical studies from our group show that combination treatment with HDAC and DNMT inhibitors is significantly more effective at suppressing the growth of CS models in vitro and in vivo compared to either therapy alone. The combination regimen mediates anti-tumor effects on CS by induction of apoptosis, induction of tumor suppressor genes (eg. E-cadherin), the induction of interferon responsive genes (eg. IRF7, OASL, ISG15, DDX58) and reversal of global hypomethylated state. Based on these findings we have designed a phase 2 clinical trial with an HDAC inhibitor (belinostat) and a DNMT inhibitor (guadecitabine) in patients with advanced cCS. Methods: NCI # 10330 is a single-arm, multi-center, Simon 2-stage, phase 2 clinical trial evaluating belinostat and guadecitabine in patients with advanced cCS. Eligible patients will have biopsy proven cCS which is measurable by RECIST v1.1 and amenable to biopsy, ECOG PS ≤ 2, any number of prior treatments (including none). Patients will receive guadecitabine 45 mg/m2 SC followed by belinostat 1000 mg/m2 IV once daily on days 1-5 of a 28-day cycle. A safety lead-in and continuous toxicity monitoring rule will be applied. The primary endpoint will be ORR. Since chemotherapy is associated with an ORR of 8-12% and targeted agents have shown an ORR of 0% in cCS, we will consider an ORR of 8% as inactive while an ORR of 28% will suggest promising activity. A Simon 2-stage design is employed. The design calls for 26 patients. If ≥ 2 responses are observed among 13 patients in stage I, the study will proceed to full accrual. If ≥ 5 responses are seen among 26 patients, the study treatment is considered promising. This design has 85% power with α of 0.054 to test for a response rate of 8% vs 28%. Secondary objectives include safety, tolerability and PFS. All patients will undergo pre-treatment and on-treatment tumor biopsies. Paired tissue will be used for correlative analysis including: 1) whole exome sequencing/RNAseq to evaluate changes in gene expression in response to treatment, 2) multiplex IHC to interrogate the effect of combination therapy on tumor immune microenvironment and 3) a global DNA methylation assay to better understand the changes in epigenetic landscape in response to treatment. This study is open throughout the ETCTN (NCT04340843). Six of the planned 26 patients in the safety lead-in have been enrolled without DLT. Further accrual is on hold pending completion of the safety lead-in. Clinical trial information: 04340843.

PurposeAngiosarcoma is a rare aggressive endothelial cell cancer with high mortality. Isolated reports suggest immune checkpoint inhibition efficacy in angiosarcoma, but no prospective studies have been published. We report results for angiosarcoma treated with ipilimumab and nivolumab as a cohort of an ongoing rare cancer study.MethodsThis is a prospective, open-label, multicenter phase II clinical trial of ipilimumab (1 mg/kg intravenously every 6 weeks) plus nivolumab (240 mg intravenously every 2 weeks) for metastatic or unresectable angiosarcoma. Primary endpoint was objective response rate (ORR) per RECIST 1.1. Secondary endpoints include progression-free (PFS) and overall survival, and toxicity. A two-stage design was used.ResultsOverall, there were 16 evaluable patients. Median age was 68 years (range, 25–81); median number of prior lines of therapy, 2. Nine patients had cutaneous and seven non-cutaneous primary tumors. ORR was 25% (4/16). Sixty per cent of patients (3/5) with primary cutaneous scalp or face tumors attained a confirmed response. Six-month PFS was 38%. Altogether, 75% of patients experienced an adverse event (AE) (at least possibly related to drug) (25% grade 3–4 AE); 68.8%, an immune-related AE (irAE) (2 (12.5%), grade 3 or 4 irAEs (alanine aminotransferase/aspartate aminotransferase increase and diarrhea)). There were no grade 5 toxicities. One of seven patients in whom tumor mutation burden (TMB) was assessed showed a high TMB (24 mutations/mb); that patient achieved a partial response (PR). Two of three patients with PDL1 immunohistochemistry assessed had high PDL1 expression; one achieved a PR.ConclusionThe combination of ipilimumab and nivolumab demonstrated an ORR of 25% in angiosarcoma, with three of five patients with cutaneous tumors of the scalp or face responding. Ipilimumab and nivolumab warrant further investigation in angiosarcoma.Trial registration numberNCT02834013.

Ifosfamide is an alkylating chemotherapeutic agent used in the treatment of many malignancies. Ifosfamide-induced encephalopathy is one potential side effect that represents a major drawback to ifosfamide therapy and often necessitates discontinuation of chemotherapy. Previous reports demonstrate moderate effectiveness of prophylactic methylene blue at thwarting ifosfamide-induced encephalopathy. This is a report of a 64-year-old female with relapsed double-hit diffuse large B-cell lymphoma who developed severe altered mental status and neurological symptoms after receiving a second dose of ifosfamide as part of her salvage standard dose R-IE (rituximab, ifosfamide, etoposide), in preparation for chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapy. Ifosfamide was stopped and extensive metabolic and infectious workups, in addition to brain images, were all unremarkable. Her symptoms were attributed to ifosfamide. Prior to initiating cycle 2 of R-IE, she was started on prophylactic oral thiamine 100 mg, once a day, one week prior to her admission, methylene blue 50 mg intravenous every 6 h (for a total of four doses) and intravenous hydration with normal saline starting on day one of admission. Ifosfamide was administered in the standard dose 2000 mg/m 2 , days 1–3 as continuous intravenous infusion over 24 h. She tolerated the first two days of ifosfamide well and only developed mild encephalopathy during her last dose of ifosfamide. Her symptoms resolved completely without any intervention the following day and she completed all scheduled doses. She eventually received chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapy. Our report demonstrates the use of hydration, methylene blue, and thiamine as a successful secondary prevention regimen for ifosfamide-induced encephalopathy.

Abstract Introduction: Growing evidence demonstrates activity of neoadjuvant carboplatin in triple negative breast cancer (TNBC). Underlying germline and somatic Homologous Recombination (HR) repair deficiency may predict response to DNA damaging agents like platinum compounds in TNBC. Certain DNA repair machinery genes (Fanconi Anemia gene) are also involved in the maintenance of hematopoetic stem cell (HSC) function and impaired repair of DNA double strand breaks can lead to HSC and progenitor cell dysfunction. Thus, in presence of HR defects DNA damaging chemotherapy may lead to unique hematological toxicity. It is also possible that in presence of HR defects breast cancer response and hematological toxicity with DNA damaging agents will parallel each other. Aim: To evaluate the impact of hematological toxicity on response to neoadjuvant Carboplatin/Docetaxel chemotherapy in patients with sporadic and BRCA associated TNBC utilizing clinical and BRCA mutation data from a prospective TNBC registry. Methods: 288 patients with Stage I (T>1cm) II and III TNBC were enrolled on a multisite prospective registry between 3/2011 to 4/2014, out of which 49 patients received neoadjuvant Carboplatin AUC 6 + Docetaxel 75mg/m2 every 21 days (4-6 cycles) and have undergone breast surgery. Carboplatin was dosed using the modified Cockcroft-Gault formula. Hematologic toxicity was graded using the CTCAE version 4.03. All patients received prophylactic pegfilgrastim on day 2. Pathological complete response (pCR) was defined as absence of invasive disease in the breast and axilla. All patients underwent comprehensive BRACAnalysis®(Myriad). Results: For the 49 eligible patients median age was 50 years, median weight was 172 lbs, 18% were African American, and 37% had LN+ disease. 26% (13 /49) of patients carried deleterious BRCA mutation (9 BRCA1, 4 BRCA2). pCR of the cohort was 65%. Overall 61%, 96%, and 12 % patients demonstrated > Grade1 thrombocytopenia (Tp), anemia, or neutropenia, respectively; 4%, 6%, and 6% patients demonstrated grade 3/4 thrombocytopenia, anemia, or neutropenia, respectively. There was no association between pCR and anemia or neutropenia. Carboplatin dose reductions/delays/omission was more common in patients with Tp compared to patients without Tp (33% vs. 5%; p=0.02). Patients with Tp were more likely to achieve a pCR compared to patients without Tp (85% vs. 47%; p=0.013). 77% of BRCA carriers and 64% of BRCA wild type TNBC demonstrated Tp (NS). pCR rates in BRCA wild type patients with and without Tp were 82% and 47%, respectively (p=0.041). pCR rates in BRCA mutation carriers with and without Tp were 89% and 50%, respectively (p=0.20). On multivariable platelet count was independently associated with pCR (p=0.001)Conclusions: Tp was associated with decreased dose delivery of carboplatin but an improved pCR in BRCA wild type TNBC. Comprehensive assessment of HR defects beyond germline BRCA mutation status may be required to elucidate the biological process that explains this observation. Tp may be a harbinger of underlying HR deficiency and further correlative studies exploring this association of Tp with pathological response to carboplatin in TNBC are warranted. Citation Format: Priyanka Sharma, Benjamin C Powers, Bruce F Kimler, Claire Ward, Jennifer R Klemp, Carol S Connor, Marilee K McGinness, Joshua MV Mammen, Jamie L Wagner, Qamar J Khan, Roy A Jensen, Andrew K Godwin, Carol J Fabian. Thrombocytopenia is associated with pathological complete response to neoadjuvant carboplatin/docetaxel chemotherapy in BRCA wild type triple negative breast cancer [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the Thirty-Seventh Annual CTRC-AACR San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium: 2014 Dec 9-13; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2015;75(9 Suppl):Abstract nr P3-06-16.

281 Background: Prostate cancer is the second most common cancer worldwide in males. The initial treatment in advanced cases is medical or surgical castration. The outlook declines when prostate cancer advances independently, despite the aforementioned castration. Within the last ten years, a handful of new agents have proven effective in this castration-resistant phase, but finding more effective, novel ways of treating advanced prostate cancer is warranted. MAGMAS (mitochondria-associated, granulocyte-macrophage colony stimulating factor (GM-CSF) signaling molecule) is a protein ubiquitously expressed in eukaryotic cells that plays a key role in embryonal development in a variety of species. Overexpression of MAGMAS has anti-apoptotic effects, as GM-CSF is a growth factor essential for survival, proliferation and differentiation of cells. MAGMAS and GM-CSF receptor levels have been shown to be overexpressed in prostate cancer, but do not correlate with pathological grade or clinical stage. The purpose of our study was to evaluate the efficacy of a MAGMAS inhibitor, synthesized by Dr Bhaskar Das, in androgen-dependent and androgen-independent prostate cancer cell lines, as well as in a normal prostate cell line as another control. Methods: The different cell lines were treated with MAGMAS inhibitor at various concentrations in vitro. For analysis, we used MTT Cell Proliferation assay at 24 and 48 hours, per manufacturer’s protocol. We tested MAGMAS inhibitor effect on apoptosis/necrosis, cell migration and microtubule destabilization as well. Results: After prostate cancer cell lines were treated with MAGMAS inhibitor in vitro, cell proliferation and migration decreased, apoptosis and necrosis were induced, and microtubules were destabilized, all showing more impressive results in the androgen-independent cells. MAGMAS inhibition did not affect cell proliferation in the normal prostate cells. Conclusions: In vitro studies show MAGMAS inhibition proves efficacious in both androgen-dependent and androgen-independent prostate cancer cell lines. This will be evaluated further in a xenograft mouse model.

CD30 expression is the hallmark of the cutaneous CD30+ lymphoproliferative disorders, lymphomatoid papulosis and anaplastic large cell lymphoma. We report CD30 expression in cutaneous follicle center cell lymphoma and in cutaneous post-transplant peripheral T-cell lymphoma. Histopathologists should be aware of CD30 expression in cutaneous lymphomas outside the realm of so-called CD30+ lymphoproliferative disorders to avoid diagnostic errors and improper medical treatment.

Lin28 is a family of RNA binding proteins and microRNA regulators. Two members of this family have been identified: Lin28A and Lin28B, which are encoded by genes localized in different chromosomes but share a high degree of sequence identity. The role of Lin28B in androgen-independent prostate cancer (AIPC) is not well understood. Lin28B is expressed in all grades of prostatic carcinomas and prostate cancer cell lines, but not in normal prostate tissue. In this study we found that Lin28B co-localized in the nucleus and cytoplasm of the DU145 AIPC. The expression of Lin28B protein positively correlated with the expression of the c-Myc protein in the prostate cancer cell lines and silencing of Lin28B also correlated with a lower expression of the c-Myc protein, but not with the downregulation of c-Myc messenger RNA (mRNA) in the DU145 AIPC cells. We hypothesized that Lin28B regul-ates the expression of c-Myc protein by altering intermediate c-Myc suppressors. Therefore, a microRNA profile of DU145 cells was performed after Lin28B siRNA silencing. Nineteen microRNAs were upregulated and eleven microRNAs were downregulated. The most upregulated microRNAs were miR-212 and miR-2278. Prior reports have found that miR-212 is suppressed in prostate cancer. We then ran TargetScan software to find potential target mRNAs of miR-212 and miR-2278, and it predicted Lin28B mRNA as a potential target of miR-212, but not miR-2278. TargetScan also predicted that c-Myc mRNA is not a potential target of miR-212 or miR-2278. These observations suggest that Lin28B:miR-212 may work as a regulatory loop in androgen-independent prostate cancer. Furthermore, we report a predictive 2-fold symmetric model generated by the superposition of the Lin28A structure onto the I-TASSER model of Lin28B. This structural model of Lin28B suggests that it shows unique microRNA binding characteristics. Thus, if Lin28B were to bind miRNAs in a manner similar to Lin28A, conformational changes would be necessary to prevent steric clashes in the C-terminal and linker regions between the CSD and ZNF domains.

The epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) plays an important role in the development of many cancers, including non-small cell lung cancer. Epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitors (EGFR TKIs) are a class of novel biologically-targeted agents widely used in the management of recurrent non-small cell lung cancer. Erlotinib, one of the EGFR TKIs, is currently FDA approved in second and third line therapy. However, recent studies showed that erlotinib is also effective as maintenance therapy after initial chemotherapy, improving disease free survival and possibly overall survival. Our current understanding of erlotinib's mechanism of action, with the discovery that EGFR mutation confers higher response rate, has propelled this agent into the first line setting. Advances in molecular testing and clinical research of this agent and other agents in this class will eventually change the way we utilize EGFR TKIs in the near future.