We noted with great interest Davis et al.'s report of their placebo-controlled trial assessing colchicine as a potential treatment for hand osteoarthritis (OA): ‘Colchicine is not effective for reducing osteoarthritic hand pain compared to placebo: a randomised, placebo-controlled trial (COLAH)’1. No treatments have been proven to prevent or slow progression of OA, while the majority of OA research and clinical trials have focused on weight-bearing joints like the knee.

ObjectiveTo evaluate seroreactivity and disease flares after COVID‐19 vaccination in a multiethnic/multiracial cohort of patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE).MethodsNinety SLE patients and 20 healthy controls receiving a complete COVID‐19 vaccine regimen were included. IgG seroreactivity to the SARS–CoV‐2 spike receptor‐binding domain (RBD) and SARS–CoV‐2 microneutralization were used to evaluate B cell responses; interferon‐γ (IFNγ) production was measured by enzyme‐linked immunospot (ELISpot) assay in order to assess T cell responses. Disease activity was measured by the hybrid SLE Disease Activity Index (SLEDAI), and flares were identified according to the Safety of Estrogens in Lupus Erythematosus National Assessment–SLEDAI flare index.ResultsOverall, fully vaccinated SLE patients produced significantly lower IgG antibodies against SARS–CoV‐2 spike RBD compared to fully vaccinated controls. Twenty‐six SLE patients (28.8%) generated an IgG response below that of the lowest control (<100 units/ml). In logistic regression analyses, the use of any immunosuppressant or prednisone and a normal anti–double‐stranded DNA antibody level prior to vaccination were associated with decreased vaccine responses. IgG seroreactivity to the SARS–CoV‐2 spike RBD strongly correlated with the SARS–CoV‐2 microneutralization titers and correlated with antigen‐specific IFNγ production determined by ELISpot. In a subset of patients with poor antibody responses, IFNγ production was similarly diminished. Pre‐ and postvaccination SLEDAI scores were similar in both groups. Postvaccination flares occurred in 11.4% of patients; 1.3% of these were severe.ConclusionIn a multiethnic/multiracial study of SLE patients, 29% had a low response to the COVID‐19 vaccine which was associated with receiving immunosuppressive therapy. Reassuringly, severe disease flares were rare. While minimal protective levels remain unknown, these data suggest that protocol development is needed to assess the efficacy of booster vaccination.

ObjectiveTo define the prevalence and clinical phenotype of anti‐cortactin autoantibodies in adult and juvenile myositis.MethodsIn this longitudinal cohort study, anti‐cortactin autoantibody titers were assessed by enzyme‐linked immunosorbent assay in 670 adult myositis patients and 343 juvenile myositis patients as well as in 202 adult healthy controls and 90 juvenile healthy controls. The prevalence of anti‐cortactin autoantibodies was compared among groups. Clinical features of patients with and those without anti‐cortactin autoantibodies were also compared.ResultsAnti‐cortactin autoantibodies were more common in adult dermatomyositis (DM) patients (15%; P = 0.005), particularly those with coexisting anti–Mi‐2 autoantibodies (24%; P = 0.03) or anti–NXP‐2 autoantibodies (23%; P = 0.04). In adult myositis, anti‐cortactin was associated with DM skin involvement (62% of patients with anti‐cortactin versus 38% of patients without anti‐cortactin; P = 0.03), dysphagia (36% versus 17%; P = 0.02) and coexisting anti–Ro 52 autoantibodies (47% versus 26%; P = 0.001) or anti‐NT5c1a autoantibodies (59% versus 33%; P = 0.001). Moreover, the titers of anti‐cortactin antibodies were higher in patients with interstitial lung disease (0.15 versus 0.12 arbitrary units; P = 0.03). The prevalence of anti‐cortactin autoantibodies was not different in juvenile myositis patients (2%) or in any juvenile myositis subgroup compared to juvenile healthy controls (4%). Nonetheless, juvenile myositis patients with these autoantibodies had a higher prevalence of “mechanic's hands” (25% versus 7%; P = 0.03), a higher number of hospitalizations (2.9 versus 1.3; P = 0.04), and lower peak creatine kinase values (368 versus 818 IU/liter; P = 0.02) than those without anti‐cortactin.ConclusionThe prevalence of anti‐cortactin autoantibodies is increased in adult DM patients with coexisting anti–Mi‐2 or anti–NXP‐2 autoantibodies. In adults, anti‐cortactin autoantibodies are associated with dysphagia and interstitial lung disease.

Hand osteoarthritis (hand OA), the most common peripheral arthritis in the world, is less studied than osteoarthritis (OA) of the knee and hip. However, it is uniquely situated to offer novel insight into OA as a disease process by removing weight-bearing as a confounder of systemic disease mechanisms. Here we review the epidemiology of hand OA and key risk factors for its development. Mounting evidence points to obesity as an important risk factor for hand OA development, with new evidence implicating a role for leptin and serum fatty acids. Disease progression in hand OA and specifically the erosive OA subtype may be associated with diabetes. New evidence supports an association between cardiovascular disease progression and symptomatic hand OA. Alcohol use may be associated with increased synovitis and erosive hand OA. Differences in ethnical distributions of hand OA have become more apparent, with a lower prevalence in Black patients compared to White patients. Novel genetic insights implicating the WNT gene pathway and IL-1β have led to novel potential targets in hand OA pathogenesis. Hand OA is a heterogeneous disease with many modifiable and non-modifiable risk factors that can determine disease severity and shed light on disease pathogenesis.