Long-acting injectable antiretroviral therapy (LAI-ART) offers an alternative to daily oral treatment but is typically administered in clinics, which can create barriers for some people with HIV (PWH). Home-based administration by trained treatment buddies (TBYs)-trusted partners, friends, or family members-has not been systematically studied. We conducted semi-structured interviews with 31 participants (16 PWH and 15 TBYs) across 4 HIV clinics in the San Francisco Bay Area between June 2024 and April 2025. Guided by the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR), interviews explored anticipated facilitators, barriers, and training needs for home-based LAI-ART. Participants identified several anticipated benefits of home-based LAI-ART, including increased convenience, reduced transportation burdens, enhanced privacy, comforting and emotionally supportive care, and opportunities to foster empowerment and shared responsibility between PWH and TBYs. Key barriers included concerns about medication storage and delivery logistics, maintaining reliable injection schedules, needlestick safety, and the readiness and confidence of TBYs. Participants emphasized the need for hands-on training, ongoing support, and clear protocols to ensure safe, acceptable, and effective home-based administration. These findings underscore the importance of proactive planning and tailored support in addressing both the technical and emotional dimensions of home-based LAI-ART. Anticipating these needs can facilitate the successful implementation and expand access to person-centered HIV care.

The Innovative Administration of Long-Acting Injectables for HIV Treatment Enhancement at Home (INVITE-Home) study is the first to examine the implementation of home-based long-acting injectable antiretroviral therapy (LAI-ART) administered by a trained treatment buddy, such as a family member, partner, or friend. We conducted semi-structured qualitative interviews with 19 clinicians from four HIV clinics in the San Francisco Bay Area between June and December 2024 to explore perceived facilitators, barriers, and training needs related to home-based LAI-ART. Participants included physicians (n = 7), pharmacists (n = 4), nurses (n = 4), nurse practitioners (n = 2), and social workers (n = 2). Using an Implementation Research Logic Model to guide analysis, clinicians identified anticipated benefits of home-based administration, including reduced transportation and scheduling barriers, increased convenience and flexibility, and greater privacy. They emphasized the potential for home administration to foster patient-centered care, reduce stigma, and support treatment in familiar environments. Empowerment and autonomy were viewed as central to enhancing patient engagement and adherence, while some noted the opportunity to improve clinic efficiency by alleviating capacity constraints and freeing up provider time. Reported barriers included concerns about injection accuracy, the complexity of insurance and billing systems, communication gaps between clinical teams and patients or buddies, and the availability and reliability of treatment buddies. These findings highlight the need for comprehensive planning, structured training for treatment buddies, and sustained clinical support to address logistical and interpersonal challenges. Successful implementation will require balancing these challenges while maximizing the benefits of convenience, patient-centered care, and expanded access to LAI-ART.

BackgroundClinic-based administration of long-acting injectable antiretroviral therapy (LAI-ART) is resource-intensive and may exacerbate disparities in access to care. Home-based administration by trained layperson injectors, or treatment buddies (TBYs), could expand access to LAI-ART; however, maintaining high-quality clinical care requires selecting suitable TBYs for its implementation. This paper describes the development of the TBY Selection Tool to support people with HIV (PWH) in identifying appropriate TBYs.MethodsThe tool development process consisted of 5 phases. In Phase 1, semi-structured interviews were conducted with 19 clinicians, 16 PWH, and 15 candidate TBYs. Transcripts were thematically coded to identify domains influencing TBY suitability. In Phase 2, draft items were developed and refined into a structured survey. In Phase 3, 7 PWH completed the tool during a 2-month pilot. In Phase 4, a Community Advisory Panel (CAP) (n = 10) reviewed items for clarity, relevance, and comprehensiveness. In Phase 5, feedback was incorporated to finalize the tool.ResultsClinicians emphasized the reliability of TBYs, the confidentiality of home-based injections, and the importance of adhering to injection schedules. PWH prioritized trust in the TBYs, TBY availability, and comfort with bodily intimacy. TBYs highlighted emotional steadiness, willingness to learn, and responsibility for continuity of care. These domains were operationalized into a survey assessing relationship history, reliability, confidentiality, availability, proximity, and comfort with injections. Pilot testing showed 100% completion without difficulties. CAP feedback led to refined wording, expanded response options, and clearer phrasing, which were used to finalize a 12-item survey.ConclusionsThe TBY Selection Tool provides a structured framework to support PWH in identifying appropriate TBYs for home-based LAI-ART. By integrating clinical, individual, and community perspectives, the tool addresses factors important for the safe, acceptable, and feasible implementation of home-based LAI-ART. Psychometric assessment, scoring, and further validation in larger, more diverse populations is needed.

Current standards advise starting HIV antiretroviral therapy (ART) as soon as possible with the goal of achieving viral suppression. Applying the domains of a sustainability framework as a roadmap, we examine factors and strategies impacting readiness to sustain Rapid Start ART (RS-ART) across 14 sites participating in a national initiative that successfully implemented this intervention to link people with HIV to initiate ART treatment within seven days after linkage or re-engagement in care. While sustainability entails the ongoing delivery of a previously implemented intervention, factors and strategies for sustaining RS-ART have not been well-defined or studied. We conducted one-on-one semi-structured interviews with a purposeful sample of key informants from each of the 14 sites. Data were organized using Dedoose and analyzed using thematic analysis. We conducted a total of 27 interviews with decision-makers and key staff implementing RS-ART. We identified a continuum across the sites, reflecting three different stages of readiness to sustain RS-ART. “Well-oiled machine” sites had comprehensive sustainability plans in place with RS-ART established as their current standard practice, supported by secured funding and organizational capacity. “On track” sites demonstrated a clear vision toward sustaining RS-ART, with progress contingent on securing funding and finalizing staffing plans. “To be determined” sites faced challenges, expressing uncertainty about obtaining necessary funding and determining sufficient human resources to sustain RS-ART. While feasibility and acceptability of RS-ART, driven by improved service and patient outcomes, were high across all sites, available funding and the necessary human resources were the two critical, interrelated factors impacting readiness to sustain RS-ART. Sites positioned to sustain RS-ART were able to secure funding for the necessary staff positions to effectively integrate it as standard of care. Future funding of HIV care programs must provide sufficient resources for all individuals to be offered RS-ART services to improve life expectancy, manage HIV as a chronic disease and prevent transmission to others. Given the dynamic nature of sustainability, future longitudinal studies are needed to evaluate RS-ART sustainability outcomes and its long-term effectiveness after it has been sustained.

Long-acting injectable antiretroviral therapy (LAI-ART) has the potential to transform HIV treatment by improving adherence, reducing stigma, and expanding access through decentralized care. The INVITE-Home study evaluates home-based LAI-ART administration by trained nonmedical treatment buddies (TBYs) selected by people with HIV (PWH). This article describes the development of a TBY training curriculum guided by Adult Learning Theory and refined through iterative stakeholder input. The five-phase process included review of existing materials, qualitative interviews with clinicians, PWH, and TBYs (n = 50), curriculum development, community advisory panel feedback (n = 9), and final refinement. Stakeholders emphasized structured hands-on practice, multimodal learning resources, and accessible language to build technical skills and confidence. The resulting curriculum integrates synchronous and asynchronous learning tailored to diverse learning preferences. Home-based LAI-ART may enhance privacy, reduce clinic burden, and support equitable, person-centered HIV care while maintaining safe administration and clinical oversight.

In 2017, the Health Resources and Services Administration's HIV/AIDS Bureau funded an Evaluation Center (EC) to assess the rapid implementation of 11 evidence-informed interventions at 25 HIV care and treatment providers across the U.S. The EC conducted an implementation science-based evaluation, including longitudinal assessment of implementation outcomes as defined by Implementation Outcome Framework (IOF) of the Conceptual Model for Implementation Research. The EC adapted a measure originally designed for implementation readiness to capture seven implementation outcomes and administered the measure to site leadership every six months, from intervention launch through the end of the initiative. The adapted measure demonstrated adequate internal consistency within and across time periods. Individual outcomes changed over the course of implementation, with the greatest period of growth during the first six months. Longitudinal relationships between outcomes posited to be most relevant at early, mid- or late-implementation were not evident in these analyses; rather, relationships between the outcomes were significant within time periods. Finally, there were differences in the trajectory of outcomes based on characteristics of the site's larger context. The use of this adapted measure across multiple implementation settings, assessing multiple interventions, is an important step forward in the comparability of implementation outcomes more broadly.

Interventions that leverage telehealth technologies have the potential to improve health outcomes among people with HIV who experience multiple complex barriers to care. To assess the current state of knowledge on telehealth interventions for people with HIV in the United States, we searched the literature for recent (2019-2023) telehealth interventions designed to improve outcomes along the HIV care continuum, including linkage to care, retention in care, antiretroviral therapy adherence, and viral suppression. Our search identified 23 interventions. Text messaging was the most common telehealth delivery mode, followed by videoconferencing, commercially available applications, and novel applications. Nine interventions used more than one delivery mode. Common features across interventions to address barriers along the HIV care continuum included: HIV care self-management and monitoring tools; HIV treatment and adherence education; resources and referrals provision; live messaging for ongoing support or urgent issues; videoconference-based coaching, counseling, case management, or care; online peer-to-peer support; ecological momentary assessments to monitor and address barriers; and game-based elements to increase engagement. Interventions were reported as acceptable and feasible, with several showing an effect on antiretroviral therapy adherence. Further research is needed to fully leverage the potential of telehealth for ending the HIV epidemic in the United States.

Introduction There is high interest in long-acting injectable antiretroviral therapy (LAI-ART) among people with HIV (PWH), with many conveniences for uptake and persistence. However, both patients and clinicians have expressed important barriers to effective implementation, including concerns about frequent clinic visits and strain on clinic resources. Administration of LAI-ART by a trained layperson injector (such as family, friend or partner of the patient) can help mitigate some of these patient-identified and clinician-identified barriers. Alternative LAI-ART delivery methods have the potential to increase the PWH and layperson injector’s confidence, empowerment, convenience, privacy and self-management skills and ultimately facilitate LAI-ART uptake and persistence.Methods and analysis INVITE-Home (innovative administration of long-acting injectables for HIV treatment enhancement at home) will support the expansion of LAI-ART in non-clinical settings by developing, implementing and evaluating a comprehensive, theory-informed training to support the administration of LAI-ART by a trained layperson injector. First, INVITE-Home will design and develop an innovative, theory-based layperson injector training to improve acceptability and uptake of LAI-ART in home-based settings, grounded in qualitative evaluation of training barriers and needs of PWH, layperson injectors and clinicians to develop the training. In Aim 2, INVITE-Home will enhance understanding of home-based LAI-ART using the training, by examining implementation and effectiveness of home-based LAI-ART injections.Ethics and dissemination This study and its protocols have been approved by the University of California, San Francisco (UCSF) Institutional Review Board and the scientific staff of HIV Research Branch, Division of HIV Prevention, National Center for HIV/AIDS, Viral Hepatitis, STD and TB Prevention, at the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Study staff will disseminate findings locally (eg, to partnering clinics, via the UCSF Center for AIDS Prevention Studies’ Community Engagement Core), statewide (eg, the California Department of Public Health’s Office of AIDS) and nationally at conferences related to HIV.Trial registration number NCT06488846.

As HIV diagnoses continue to decrease and rates of viral suppression increase in the United States, key populations of underserved individuals represent a disproportionate share of those left undiagnosed, unengaged in care, and not virally suppressed. In 2021, the Health Resources and Services Administration's HIV/AIDS Bureau funded 20 HIV care organizations across the United States to implement seven innovative evidence-based interventions to engage individuals in the following four focus areas: LGBTQ+ youth, people with substance-use disorder, individuals with incarceration experience, and those for whom telehealth may reduce barriers to care. This article explores themes of implementer experiences common across interventions serving the four focus areas. Data sources include key informant interviews (n = 94) with members of the implementation teams, observation, and document review. Thematic analytic methods were first inductive, identifying semantic themes from observation and document review, then deductive, selecting coded interview data for analysis of latent themes present and salient across focus areas. We identified three main themes as follows: (1) challenging by design, (2) enhanced client-centered care, and (3) leveraging relationships. We present these themes as distinct concepts and discuss how they operate in relation to one another using the Exploration, Preparation, Implementation, Sustainment framework. Teams implementing interventions to engage people with HIV who remain out of care may benefit from adopting the following: an enhanced client-centered orientation with a focus on understanding the context of clients' lives; a high level of organizational and programmatic flexibility; an individualized, trauma-informed approach to enrollment and intervention delivery; and thoughtfully cultivated relationships among implementers, clients, and organizational partners.

Despite advances in HIV care and treatment in the U.S., disparities in outcomes along the HIV care continuum persist. The widespread replication of effective and sustainable interventions that prioritize the engagement of underserved populations has been identified as a promising path to ending the HIV epidemic in the U.S. Intervention dissemination products, however, rarely provide the comprehensive and accessible information needed to replicate interventions within community settings. To bridge the divide between research and community-based implementation, the Using Evidence-informed Interventions to Improve Health Outcomes among People Living with HIV (E2i) initiative-grounded in the HIV/AIDS Bureau Implementation Science Framework-created a suite of tools to promote the rapid replication of interventions focused on transgender women, Black men who have sex with men, behavioral health integration, and identifying and addressing trauma. The resulting dissemination products are detailed and digestible multimedia toolkits that follow adult learning theory principles and align with the Template for Intervention Description and Replication criteria for adapting non-pharmacological interventions. Each E2i toolkit consists of five components: implementation guides, narrative videos of site implementation, best practice demonstration videos, interactive learning modules, and recruitment posters and brochures. Over 2 years (2022-2024), the E2i toolkit webpages amassed 7703 unique users and 17,666 pageviews. These toolkits can serve as a blueprint for designing comprehensive and accessible dissemination products for replication of HIV interventions in care settings. Dissemination products that bridge the gap between intervention research and replication in community settings are a crucial missing tool for ending the HIV epidemic.

Background: Health misinformation, which was particularly prevalent during the COVID-19 pandemic, hampers public health initiatives. Spanish-speaking communities in the San Francisco Bay Area may be especially affected due to low digital health literacy and skepticism towards science and healthcare experts. Our study aims to develop a checklist to counter misinformation, grounded in community insights. Methods: We adopted a multistage approach to understanding barriers to COVID-19 vaccine uptake in Spanish-speaking populations in Alameda and San Francisco counties. Initial work included key informant and community interviews. Partnering with a community-based organization (CBO), we organized co-design workshops in July 2022 to develop a practical tool for identifying misinformation. Template analysis identified key themes for actionable steps, such as source evaluation and content assessment. From this, we developed a Spanish-language checklist. Findings: During formative interviews, misinformation was identified as a major obstacle to vaccine uptake. Three co-design workshops with 15 Spanish-speaking women resulted in a 10-step checklist for tackling health misinformation. Participants highlighted the need for scrutinizing sources and assessing messenger credibility, and cues in visual content that could instill fear. The checklist offers a pragmatic approach to source verification and information assessment, supplemented by resources from local CBOs. Conclusion: We have co-created a targeted checklist for Spanish-speaking communities to identify and counter health misinformation. Such specialized tools are essential for populations that are more susceptible to misinformation, enabling them to differentiate between credible and non-credible information.

The nationwide scale-up of evidence-based and evidence-informed interventions has been widely recognized as a crucial step in ending the HIV epidemic. Although the successful delivery of interventions may involve intensive expert training, technical assistance (TA), and dedicated funding, most organizations attempt to replicate interventions without access to focused expert guidance. Thus, there is a grave need for initiatives that meaningfully address HIV health disparities while addressing these inherent limitations. Here, the Health Resources and Services Administration HIV/AIDS Bureau (HRSA HAB) initiative Using Evidence-Informed Interventions to Improve HIV Health Outcomes among People Living with HIV (E2i) piloted an alternative approach to implementation that de-emphasized expert training to naturalistically simulate the experience of future HIV service organizations with limited access to TA. The E2i approach combined the HAB-adapted Institute for Healthcare Improvement’s Breakthrough Series Collaborative Learning Model with HRSA HAB’s Implementation Science Framework, to create an innovative multi-tiered system of peer-to-peer learning that was piloted across 11 evidence-informed interventions at 25 Ryan White HIV/AIDS Program sites. Four key types of peer-to-peer learning exchanges (i.e., intervention, site, staff role, and organization specific) took place at biannual peer learning sessions, while quarterly intervention cohort calls and E2i monthly calls with site staff occurred during the action periods between learning sessions. Peer-to-peer learning fostered both experiential learning and community building and allowed site staff to formulate robust site-specific action plans for rapid cycle testing between learning sessions. Strategies that increase the effectiveness of interventions while decreasing TA could provide a blueprint for the rapid uptake and integration of HIV interventions nationwide.

BackgroundIn 2020, the Health Resources and Services Administration's HIV/AIDS Bureau funded an initiative to promote implementation of rapid antiretroviral therapy initiation in 14 HIV treatment settings across the U.S. The goal of this initiative is to accelerate uptake of this evidence-based strategy and provide an implementation blueprint for other HIV care settings to reduce the time from HIV diagnosis to entry into care, for re-engagement in care for those out of care, initiation of treatment, and viral suppression. As part of the effort, an evaluation and technical assistance provider (ETAP) was funded to study implementation of the model in the 14 implementation sites.MethodThe ETAP has used implementation science methods framed by the Dynamic Capabilities Model integrated with the Conceptual Model of Implementation Research to develop a Hybrid Type II, multi-site mixed-methods evaluation, described in this paper. The results of the evaluation will describe strategies associated with uptake, implementation outcomes, and HIV-related health outcomes for patients.DiscussionThis approach will allow us to understand in detail the processes that sites to implement and integrate rapid initiation of antiretroviral therapy as standard of care as a means of achieving equity in HIV care.

The HIV epidemic remains a public health threat in the U.S., and the dissemination and implementation of evidence-based prevention and care programs are critical to addressing significant HIV health disparities. The provision of technical assistance (TA) to program providers and evaluators is key for uptake of these programs. The University of California San Francisco Prevention Research Center (UCSF PRC) model for TA delivery uses topics and strategies adapted to address HIV health disparities for a global audience. This model specifically matches TA requests to a TA provider who has expertise in that area upon receiving a request through various communication channels. Areas of expertise include research methods, community engagement strategies, interventions, and Implementation Sciences. Our evaluation of diverse TA services indicates that on-demand TA is effective for light-touch requests and well-suited for moderate to intensive requests. The model is a promising, broad-reaching, and responsive alternative for providing TA to a multitude of HIV workforce recipients.

The integration of behavioral health services within human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) care settings holds promise for improving substance use, mental health, and HIV-related health outcomes for people with HIV. As part of an initiative funded by the Health Resources and Services Administration's HIV/AIDS Bureau, we conducted a narrative review of interventions focused on behavioral health integration (BHI) in HIV care in the United States (US). Our literature search yielded 19 intervention studies published between 2010 and 2021. We categorized the interventions under 6 approaches: collaborative care; screening, brief intervention, and referral to treatment (SBIRT); patient-reported outcomes (PROs); onsite psychological consultation; integration of addiction specialists; and integration of buprenorphine/naloxone (BUP/NX) treatment. All intervention approaches appeared feasible to implement in diverse HIV care settings and most showed improvements in behavioral health outcomes; however, measurement of HIV outcomes was limited. Future research studies of BHI interventions should evaluate HIV outcomes and assess facilitators and barriers to intervention uptake.

BackgroundThere is a need for interventions that promote healthy decision making among adolescents and leverage the ongoing impact of parental relationships through older adolescence and young adulthood. These interventions should maximize adolescent engagement and be easily accessible to families in terms of cost, duration, and logistics related to participation. ObjectiveThis study aims to test the efficacy of the healthy relationships and sexual decision-making component of a web-based intervention for older adolescents and their parents, ascertain whether the efficacy varies by gender, and assess its efficacy over time. MethodsA randomized controlled trial was conducted for the web-based, self-paced intervention Smart Choices 4 Teens from 2014 to 2015. Families (N=411) with adolescents aged 16-17 years were randomly assigned to the intervention or control condition. Surveys assessing aspects of sexual communication were administered at baseline and at 6, 12, and 18 months. Generalized estimating equations were used to determine the impact of exposure to the relationships component of the intervention on sexual communication by parents, as reported by adolescents. ResultsLess than half (88/206, 42.7%) of the intervention group participated in the third and final intervention component, which was focused on relationships and sexual decision making. Participation in the relationships component increased the frequency of parental sexual communication and increased the number of dating rules after accounting for other significant adolescent characteristics. The impact of the intervention varied little by gender, although it did demonstrate an impact on communication reports over the follow-up survey administrations. ConclusionsSmart Choices 4 Teens demonstrated efficacy in increasing the frequency of sexual communication between parents and adolescents in the long term. Trial RegistrationClinicalTrials.gov NCT03521115; https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03521115

In 2017, the Health Resources and Services Administration's HIV/AIDS Bureau funded an Evaluation Center (EC) and a Coordinating Center for Technical Assistance (CCTA) to oversee the rapid implementation of 11 evidence-informed interventions at 26 HIV care and treatment providers across the U.S. This initiative aims to address persistent gaps in HIV-related health outcomes emerging from social determinants of health that negatively impact access to and retention in care. The EC adapted the Conceptual Model of Implementation Research to develop a Hybrid Type III, multi-site mixed-methods evaluation, described in this paper. The results of the evaluation will describe strategies associated with uptake, implementation outcomes, as well as HIV-related health outcomes for clients engaged in the evidence-informed interventions. This approach will allow us to understand in detail the processes that sites undergo to implement these important intervention strategies for high priority populations.

Objective: Electronic music dance events (EMDEs) at nightclubs attract young adults engaging in high-risk alcohol and other drug (AOD) use. Studies show that most patrons arrive at clubs in groups and that these peer groups influence drinking. Therefore, peer groups are a natural context for preventing risk behaviors. This article examined outcomes of a randomized controlled trial of a group-based mobile intervention at nightclubs, Nightlife Safety Plans (NSP). Method: The sample comprised 352 groups, consisting of 959 participants (45.3% female) at 41 events across seven nightclubs hosting EMDEs. Club patrons were surveyed anonymously and completed breath tests as they entered and exited clubs. Oral fluid samples collected from patrons at exit assessed drug use. Analyses examining assignment to NSP versus a control condition on fire safety predicted individual- and group-level protective strategy use and AOD use, controlling for background variables. Results: At the individual level, participation in NSP was related to increased protective actions to keep group members safe. No effects were found on actions to keep oneself safe or in response to overuse. At the group level, assignment to NSP was related to a higher average number of group safety strategies. Participation in NSP was associated with lower blood alcohol concentration but unrelated to tetrahydrocannabinol and cocaine. Conclusions: NSP appears to be efficacious for increased protective actions to keep group members safe from overuse and for reduced blood alcohol concentration among EMDE patrons. The findings support the use of an intervention utilizing group-based strategies presented proximal to risk settings.

Although protective strategies are implemented within drinking groups, alcohol and other drugs (AOD) use may increase when protective strategies are in place. Being in a cohesive group could lead to a false sense of security, leading to more risk taking. This study examines whether club patrons perceiving greater group cohesion implement fewer protective strategies and use more AOD. The sample includes 815 club patrons (44.2% female; M age = 27.7, SD = 6.0 years) arriving in 324 groups, from seven clubs hosting electronic music dance events, across 30 evenings. Anonymous surveys, biological measures of alcohol (entry and exit) and drugs (exit only), were used. Results show that group cohesion relates to fewer strategies to keep themselves and their group safe and fewer actions responding to group AOD problems. Group cohesion was unrelated to AOD use. Findings suggest that prevention strategies should incorporate influences of group cohesion in engaging patrons in group safety strategies at clubs.