BACKGROUND:Testing for germline pathogenic variants (GPVs) in cancer predisposition genes is increasingly offered as part of routine care for patients with cancer. This is often urgent in oncology clinics due to potential implications on treatment and surgical decisions. This also allows identification of family members who should be offered predictive genetic testing. In the UK, it is common practice for healthcare professionals to provide a patient information leaflet (PIL) at point of care for diagnostic genetic testing in patients with cancer, after results disclosure when a GPV is identified, and for predictive testing of at-risk relatives. Services usually create their own PIL, resulting in duplication of effort and wide variability regarding format, content, signposting and patient input in co-design and evaluation. METHODS:Representatives from UK Cancer Genetics Group (UKCGG), Cancer Research UK (CRUK) funded CanGene-CanVar programme and Association of Genetic Nurse Counsellors (AGNC) held a 2-day meeting with the aim of making recommendations for clinical practice regarding co-design of PIL for germline cancer susceptibility genetic testing. Lynch syndrome and haematological malignancies were chosen as exemplar conditions. RESULTS:Meeting participants included patient representatives including as co-chair, multidisciplinary clinicians and other experts from across the UK. High-level consensus for UK recommendations for clinical practice was reached on several aspects of PIL using digital polling, including that PIL should be offered, accessible, co-designed and evaluated with patients. CONCLUSIONS:Recommendations from the meeting are likely to be applicable for PIL co-design for a wide range of germline genetic testing scenarios.

The COVID-19 pandemic changed the delivery of healthcare within the United Kingdom. A virtual model of care, utilising telephone and video consultations, was rapidly imposed upon cancer genetics teams. This large-scale change in service delivery has led to new opportunities that can be harnessed to improve patient care. There is a clear potential to mitigate geographical barriers, meet increasing patient expectations of implementing virtual consultations, reduce hospital carbon footprints, and decrease hospital costs while increasing efficiency. However, there are also significant challenges introduced by this model of care. Virtual healthcare consultations introduce another new level of digital exclusion for patients and clinicians. There are also potential challenges for maintaining patient confidentiality, and limited utility in circumstances where a physical exam may be warranted. For clinicians, there may be impacts on empathetic responses delivered and challenges in workflow and workload. Virtual consultations are likely to continue being a feature of cancer genetics services. A flexible approach is needed to allow for virtual and traditional models of care to work together and best meet patients’ needs. Cancer genetics services should harness the opportunities provided by virtual processes to improve patient care, whilst collaborating with patient groups and other stakeholders to carefully examine and address the challenges that virtual consultations introduce.

Germline predisposition to haematological cancers is increasingly being recognised. Widespread adoption of high-throughput and whole genome sequencing is identifying large numbers of causative germline mutations. Constitutional pathogenic variants in six genes (DEAD-box helicase 41 [DDX41], ETS variant transcription factor 6 [ETV6], CCAAT enhancer binding protein alpha [CEBPA], RUNX family transcription factor 1 [RUNX1], ankyrin repeat domain containing 26 [ANKRD26] and GATA binding protein 2 [GATA2]) are particularly significant in increasing the risk of haematological cancers, with variants in some of these genes also associated with non-malignant syndromic features. Allogeneic blood and marrow transplantation (BMT) is central to management in many haematological cancers. Identification of germline variants may have implications for the patient and potential family donors. Beyond selection of an appropriate haematopoietic stem cell donor there may be sensitive issues surrounding identification and counselling of hitherto asymptomatic relatives. If BMT is needed, there is frequently a clinical urgency that demands a rapid integrated multidisciplinary approach to testing and decision making involving haematologists in collaboration with Clinical and Laboratory Geneticists. Here, we present best practice consensus guidelines arrived at following a meeting convened by the UK Cancer Genetics Group (UKCGG), the Cancer Research UK (CRUK) funded CanGene-CanVar research programme (CGCV), NHS England Genomic Laboratory Hub (GLH) Haematological Oncology Malignancies Working Group and the British Society of Blood and Marrow Transplantation and Cellular Therapy (BSBMTCT).

Germline pathogenic variants in BRCA1 and BRCA2 cause hereditary breast and ovarian cancer. The vast majority of these variants are inherited from a parent. De novo constitutional pathogenic variants are rare. Even fewer cases of constitutional mosaicism have been reported and these have mostly been described in women with breast cancer. Here we report low-level constitutional mosaicism identified by Next Generation Sequencing in two women with ovarian cancer. A BRCA1 c.5074G > A p.(Asp1692Asn) variant detected in the first female at 42 years, classed as likely pathogenic, was found in ~ 52% of reads in DNA extracted from tumour, ~ 10% of reads in DNA extracted from peripheral blood leukocytes and ~ 10% of reads in DNA extracted from buccal mucosa. The second BRCA1 c.2755_2758dupCCTG p.(Val920AlafsTer6) variant was detected in a female aged 53 years, classed as pathogenic, and was found in ~ 59% of reads in DNA extracted from tumour, ~ 14% of reads in DNA extracted from peripheral blood leukocytes and similarly in ~ 14% of reads in both DNA extracted from buccal mucosa and urine sample. Sanger sequencing confirmed the presence of these variants at a corresponding low level consistent with mosaicism that may not have been detected by this method alone. This report demonstrates the clinical benefit for two women of BRCA1/BRCA2 germline NGS testing at a depth that can detect low-level mosaicism. As well as informing appropriate treatments, tumour sequencing results may facilitate the detection and interpretation of low-level mosaic variants in the germline. Both results have implications for other cancer risks and for relatives when providing a family cancer risk assessment and reproductive risk. The implications for laboratory practice, clinical genetics management and genetic counselling for constitutional mosaicism of BRCA1/BRCA2 are discussed.

How to parse uncertainty: a review of Advanced Genetic Counseling: Theory and Practice By Barbara B. Biesecker, Kathryn F. Peters and Robert Resta. Oxford University Press, 2019. 216 pages. Price £45.99. ISBN: 9780190626426. - Volume 102

Germline mutations in BRCA1/BRCA2 significantly increase the risk of breast and ovarian cancer in women. This case report describes a BRCA1 germline mutation identified in a woman with stage IV epithelial ovarian cancer and the provision of genetic counseling about BRCA1-associated breast cancer risk in the three years following diagnosis. The report centers on the patient's enquiry about risk-reducing breast surgery. We focus on the challenges for health professionals and patients in understanding and balancing the risks and benefits of major prophylactic surgery in the context of a potentially life-limiting cancer diagnosis. Breast cancer risk management in BRCA1/BRCA2 carriers with advanced ovarian cancer is an under-explored area of genetic counseling research. This article includes a case report, a review of the relevant literature and considers some implications for practice.