Introduction Different subclinical neurological dysfunction has been reported in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS), including poor postural control and asymmetric otolith vestibulo-ocular responses when compared with normal controls. The objective of this pilot study is to establish whether abnormal MRI morphoanatomical changes arise in the CNS (brain and vestibular system), among left-thoracic versus right-thoracic AIS when compared with normal adolescent controls, with use of advanced computerised statistical morphometry techniques. Methods We compared nine girls with left-thoracic AIS (mean age 14 years; mean Cobb angle 19°) with 11 matched controls, and 20 girls with right-thoracic AIS (mean age 15 years, mean Cobb angle 33·8°) with 17 matched controls. The statistical brain analysis was done with validated automatic segmentation and voxel-based morphometry (VBM). The T2W-MRI data for shape analysis of the vestibular system were obtained from 20 patients with right-thoracic AIS and 20 matched controls. A best-fit plane and a best-fit circle were calculated to approximate each semicircular canal. The shape of vestibular system was measured by: (1) the angle between each pair of best-fit planes; (2) the length; and (3) angle formed between the corresponding lines connecting the centres of each pair of circles. Statistical analysis was done with one-way ANOVA. Results Patients with left-thoracic AIS had significantly lower white matter density in corpus callosum, left internal capsule, and white matter underlying orbitofrontal cortex of left hemisphere, which were not observed in patients with right-thoracic AIS. In the right-thoracic AIS group, the distance between centres of lateral and superior canals (p=0·0264) and the angle with vertex at the centre of posterior canal (p=0·02) of left-side vestibular system were significantly smaller than in the control group (figure). For vestibular analysis, there were no data for left-thoracic AIS. Conclusions Findings from this pilot study have shown significant MRI morphoanatomical difference in CNS between patients with AIS and controls. In the brain analysis, corpus callosum (the principle commissural fibre bundle connecting left and right cerebral hemispheres, which might affect the coordination of left and right sides of the body), differed between left-thoracic and right-thoracic AIS. In the vestibular analysis, geometric morphological difference was detected on the left-side semicircular canals between right-thoracic AIS and healthy controls. These morphological changes are likely to be related to the subclinical postural, vestibular, and proprioceptive dysfunctions. Further association studies and longitudinal studies could help to further define the link between morphological and functional dysfunction, which might have important predictive and prognostic effect on curve development and progression.

Our prospective observational study of patients treated for Thoracolumbar Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis (AIS) by anterior instrumentation aimed at investigating the correlation between the radiographic outcome and the recently-developed scoliosis research society self-reported outcomes instrument (SRS-22) which has been validated as a tool for self-assessment in scoliosis patients. Previous patient based questionnaires demonstrated poor correlation with the radiological parameters. Materials and Methods Pre-operative, post-operative and two years follow-up radiographs of 30 patients were assessed. Thirteen radiographic parameters including Cobb angles and balance were recorded. The percentage improvements for each were noted. The SRS-22 questionnaire was completed by all patients at final follow-up. Correlation was sought between each radiographic parameter, total SRS score and each of the five domains by quantifying Pearson's Correlation Coefficient ( r ). Results Percentage improvement in primary Cobb angle (r = 0.052), secondary Cobb angle (r = 0.165), apical vertebra translation of the primary curve (r = -0.353), thoracic kyphosis (r = 0.043) and lumbar lordosis (r = 0.147) showed little or no correlation with the SRS-22 total score and its five individual domains. Significant inverse correlation was found between the upper instrumented vertebra angle and at follow-up and SRS-22 (r = -0.516). The same was true for Sagittal plumb line shift at final follow up (r = -0.447). Conclusion SRS-22 is a validated tool for the self-assessment of health status in spinal deformity patients; however, it does not seem to correlate with most of the radiographic parameters commonly used by clinicians to assess patient outcome with the exception of upper instrumented vertebra angle and sagittal plumb line which do correlate significantly with the SRS-22 outcomes instrument. A comprehensive system of assessing the success of surgery both from the patient and clinicians perspective is required in the spinal deformity patient.

We report a prospective case-series study to evaluate the results of non-operative and operative treatment of symptomatic unilateral lumbar spondylolysis. Non-operative treatment results in healing in most patients with symptomatic unilateral spondylolysis. Surgery however is indicated when symptoms persist beyond a reasonable time affecting the quality of life in young patients particularly the athletic population. We treated 41 patients [31 male, 10 female] with suspected unilateral lumbar spondylolysis. Thirty-one patients were actively involved in sports at various levels. Patients with a positive stress reaction on SPECT imaging underwent a strict protocol of activity restriction, bracing and physical therapy for 6 months. At the end of six months, patients who remained symptomatic underwent a Computed Tomography [CT] scan to confirm the persistence of a spondylolysis. Seven patients subsequently underwent a direct repair of the defect using the modified Buck9s Technique. Baseline Oswestry disability index [ODI] and Short-Form-36 [SF-36] scores were compared to two year ODI and SF-36 scores for all patients. In the non-operated group, the mean pre-treatment ODI was 36 [SD=10.5], improving to 6.2 [SD=8.2] at two years. In SF-36 scores, the physical component of health [PCS] improved from 30.7 [SD=3.2] to 53.5 [SD =6.5] [p The seven patients who remained symptomatic at six months underwent a unilateral modified Buck9s Repair. The most common level of repair was L5 (n=4). The mean pre-operative ODI was 39.4 (SD=3.6) improving to 4.4 (SD=4) at the latest follow-up. The mean score of PCS [SF-36] improved from 29.6 [SD=4.4] to 51.2 [SD=5.2] (SD=5.2) (p A specific protocol of conservative treatment for patients with a unilateral lumbar spondylolysis resulted in a high rate of success with 83% of patients avoiding surgery. If symptoms persist beyond a reasonable period (i.e. 6 months) and reverse gantry CT scan confirms a non-healing defect of the pars interarticularis one may consider a unilateral direct repair of the defect with good outcome ultimately.

Introduction: Intra-operative localisation of small nidus in osteoid osteoma & osteoblastoma is difficult resulting in failed excision. Wide resection is fraught with prolonged operative time, increased bleeding and instability. Methods: 8 patients (6M & 2F) with a diagnosis of osteoid osteoma(7) and osteoblastom(1) were operated at our centre between 1995–2005. The mean age at presentation was 20.9 years (9–31 yrs). The tumour was localised to cervical(2), thoracic(4) and lumbar(2) posterior elements respectively. All had back/neck pain of varying duration (mean 20 mo; range 6–48 mo). 2 patients presented with thoraco-lumbar scoliosis and 3 had failed treatments. All patients were worked-up with x-rays, CT/MRI and 99m technetium scan to localise lesion. 600 MBq Tech HMDP(hydroxy-methylene-di-phosphate) was administered intra-venously 3 hrs prior to surgery and fluoroscopy was used to confirm anatomical level. A 5 mm cadmium telluride (Cd Te) probe & rate meter were used to scan the area containing lesion and counts per second (cps) recorded. Background count from adjacent area was obtained for comparison purposes. The tumour nidus was then excised & cps from tumour bed and excised specimen recorded. Results: The mean follow-up was 5.85 years (2–12.33). The mean cps for osteoid osteoma pre-excision was 203.8 (60–515) which fell to 72.5 (10–220) post-excision. The cps reduced from 373 to 40.5 postoperatively for osteoblastoma. Complete excision was recorded every time and all patients reported characteristic disappearance of pre-operative pain. All had discontinued analgesic medication, returned back to normal activities by 3 months and were followed-up at regular intervals for 2 yrs when they filled NDI, ODI & SF-36 questionnaire. Discussion: Gamma probe guided surgical excision facilitates accurate localisation of lesion, is less invasive warranting minimal bone resection & resultant instability and perhaps most importantly confirmation of complete excision of the tumour nidus consistently every time (esp. failed surgeries).

Purpose: To review the existing practice of coding in spinal surgery and ascertain its accuracy for surgical procedures, co-morbidities and complications. Methods: A retrospective review of 70 cervical and 100 lumbar consecutive spinal surgeries performed since April 2006 was conducted. The clinical coding data and hospital notes were reviewed. Results: Coding data of 5 cervical spine surgeries were not available. Of the 165 cases, the accuracy of primary procedural codes was 93.9% (90.8% cervical & 96% lumbar). This reduced to 77.6% (75.4% cervical & 79% lumbar) when the accuracy for entire description of performed surgery was considered. Medical co-morbidities were coded appropriately in 64.2% of the patients (55% cervical & 70% lumbar). The procedural codes did not specifically reflect the surgery performed and lacked reproducibility. Surgical levels were coded incorrectly in 9% of the cases. Cervical surgeries were coded as lumbar in 4 and posterior surgery as anterior in 3 cases respectively. The commonly missed co-morbidities were drug allergies, hypercholesterolemia, smoking and alcoholism. Post-op adverse events were coded in 75% of the cases (16/20 cervical & 5/8 lumbar). The accuracy was better for lumbar as compared to cervical spinal surgeries. Conclusion: Coding is a universal language of communication and its accuracy is important not just for PbR, but for data quality, audit and research purposes too. The financial implications regarding PbR governed by HRG codes (dictated by OPCS 4.4 & ICD–10 codes) are discussed. Following this study, a clinical coding facilitation form has been introduced to improve data quality. Ethics approval: None Interest statement: None

Introduction: Historically segmental sublaminar wiring (SLW) fixation has been used for the correction of spinal deformity in neuromuscular scoliosis, however pedicle screw (PS) fixation is gaining popularity. We compared the results of both techniques in patients with Duchenne Muscular Dystrophy (DMD). Methods: Two groups of patients with DMD were matched according to the age at surgery, magnitude of deformity and vital capacity. Indications for surgery included loss of sitting balance, rapid decline of vital capacity and curve progression. In Group 1 (22 patients) SLW fixation was used from T2 to S1 with the Galveston technique. In Group 2 (18 patients) PS fixation was used from T2 to L5. Minimum follow-up was 2 years (range 2–13 years). Radiographs, SRS-22 and lung function tests were performed at standardised intervals. Results: Mean Cobb angle in Group 1 improved from 47° (range 26°–75°) to 23.5° (range10°–36°) and mean pelvic obliquity improved from 15° (range8°–25°) to 2.4° (range0°–8°). Mean Cobb angle in Group 2 improved from 46° (range28°–82°) to 8.5° (range 0°–18°) and mean pelvic obliquity improved from 15° (range7°–30°) to 1.1° (range 0°–6°) [p<0.05]. Mean operating time and blood loss were less in Group 2 [p<0.05]. In Group 1, the infection rate and instrumentation failure was higher, and SRS-22 outcomes showed no significant difference between the groups. Interestingly the mean Body Mass Index (BMI) in Group 2 was much higher than group 1. Conclusions: PS fixation resulted in superior correction and controlled pelvic obliquity to a large extent without the need for pelvic fixation. Lower rates of infection and failure of instrumentation were noted with PS fixation, despite high BMI of patients presumably due to steroid therapy. We recommend the use of PS instrumentation for the correction of spinal deformity in DMD.

Introduction: Accurate and ethical coding is challenging and directly impacts on Payment by Results (PbR). The aims & objectives of this study were to review the existing pattern of coding for spinal surgery and ascertain its appropriateness & accuracy for surgical procedures, medical co-morbidities and post-op complications. Methods: A retrospective review of 70 consecutive cervical and 100 consecutive lumbar spine patients who were operated from April 2006 onwards was conducted. The excel sheet provided by coding department, hospital notes – clinic letters, physicians’ entries, theatre notes and laboratory reports (biochemistry/microbiology/histology) – were reviewed. Of the 170 cases, 165 were available for analysis. Results: Coding data of 5 patients who underwent cervical spine surgeries were not available. Of the 165 cases, the accuracy of primary procedural codes was 93.9% (90.8% cervical & 96% lumbar). However this reduced to 77.6% (75.4% cervical & 79% lumbar) when the accuracy for entire description of performed surgery was considered. The procedural codes did not specifically reflect the surgery performed and lacked reproducibility. Surgical levels were coded incorrectly in 9% of the cases. Cervical surgeries were coded as lumbar in 4 and posterior surgery as anterior in 3 cases respectively. Harvest of iliac crest bone graft was not coded in 5 cases. Medical comorbidities were coded appropriately in 64.2% of the patients (55% cervical & 70% lumbar). The commonly missed comorbidities were drug allergies, hypercholesterolemia, smoking and alcoholism. Post-op adverse events were coded in 75% of the cases (16/20 cervical & 5/8 lumbar). The accuracy was better for lumbar as compared to cervical spinal surgeries. Conclusion: Coding is a universal language of communication amongst healthcare professionals. Its accuracy is important not just for PbR, but for data quality, audit and research purposes too. The financial implications regarding PbR governed by HRG codes (dictated by OPCS 4.4 & ICD–10 codes) are discussed. The awareness of clinical coding is low amongst junior doctors. Following this study, a clinical coding facilitation form has been introduced to improve data quality. Our plan is to close the audit loop and re-evaluate. Literature emphasises qualification of coders, legible documentation by physicians and interaction between coders and clinicians.

Introduction: Ronald McRae’s textbook clinical orthopaedic examination mentions “Capasso’s method1 of evaluation of coronal plane deformity to be the most sensitive tool of measuring cobb angle. However there is no study to date evaluating/comparing this method against popular & widely used tools viz. cobbometer and traditional protractor. Objectives: To evaluate Capasso’s method against commonly used measurement aids w.r.t measurement of cobb angle in scoliosis. Summary of background data: Studies of Cobb method of measurement have multiple sources of error and intra & inter-observer variability. The Capasso’s method which is based on “bi-uni-vocal principle” views the scoliosis curve to be an arc of circumference and to be a true reflection of angular values and hence geometrically more valid. Methods: 24 scoliosis curves were measured by three different examiners on three separate occasions one week apart by 1) Capasso’s method 2) Cobbometer and 3) Traditional protractor on same set of hard copies of digital x-rays. The three set of Cobb angle readings obtained were statistically analysed for intra & inter-observer reliability and assessed for agreement between the three methods of clinical measurement. Results: The mean intra observer variability for protractor, cobbometer & Capasso’s methods were 8.50, 5.50 10.00 respectively. The cobb angle readings obtained by Capas-so’s method was higher than the other two methods for all magnitudes of the curves ( 600) and was more than two times the conventional readings for curves Discussion: This study demonstrates that Capasso’s method significantly overestimates the magnitude of scoliotic deformity esp. for curves

Left-right skeletal length asymmetries in upper limbs related to curve side have been detected with adolescent thoracic idiopathic scoliosis (AIS). In school screening referrals with thoracic scoliosis we find apical vertebral rotation (AVR, Perdriolle) is associated significantly with upper arm length asymmetry. Sixty-nine of 218 consecutive adolescent patients referred routinely during 1988–1999 had idiopathic thoracic scoliosis of whom 61 had left and right upper arm lengths measured with a Holtain anthropometer (right curves 49, left curves 12, mean age 14.9 years, girls 38 postmenarcheal 34, boys 23). The controls are 278 normal girls and 281 boys (11–18 years, mean age 13.5 years). The mean value for Cobb angle is 18 degrees (range 4–42 degrees), AVR 13 (range 0–34 degrees), Cobb angle (CA) and AVR are each positively associated with upper arm length asymmetry (p=0.001 & p

In schoolchildren screened for scoliosis about 40% have minor, non-progressive, lumbar scolioses secondary to pelvic tilt with leg-length and/or sacral inequality [1] not reported with preoperative thoracic curves [2]. Forty-nine of 108 consecutive adolescent patients referred from routine scoliosis school screening during 1996–1999 had lower spinal scoliosis with measurable radiological sacral alar and hip tilt angles – lumbar scoliosis 18, thoracolumbar scoliosis 31 (girls 41, boys 8, mean Cobb angle 16 degrees, range 4–38 degrees). In standing full spine antero-posterior radiographs measurements were made of Cobb angle and pelvic asymmetries as sacral alar and iliac heights (left minus right). From anthropometric measurements derivatives were calculated as ilio-femoral length (total leg length minus tibial length) and several length asymmetries, namely: ilio-femoral length asymmetry, total leg length inequality and tibial length asymmetry (all left minus right). Ilio-femoral length asymmetry correlates significantly with sacral alar height asymmetry (girls negatively r= − 0.456, p=0.002, boys positively r=0.726 p=0.041) but not iliac height asymmetry (girls p=0.201) from which three types are identified. Total leg length inequality but not tibial length asymmetry in the girls is associated with sacral alar height asymmetry (r= − 0.367 p=0.017 & r=0.039 p=0.807 respectively). Interpretation is complicated by total leg lengths each including some ilium in which there is asymmetry [3]. But lack of association between ilio-femoral length asymmetry and iliac height asymmetry suggests that the femoral component is more important than iliac component in determining the associations between sacral alar height asymmetry and each of ilio-femoral length asymmetry and total leg length inequality. Conclusions: Sacral alar height asymmetry and leg length asymmetries. The evidence suggests that sacral alar height asymmetry is not secondary to the leg length inequalities at least in most girls (negative correlations) and is more likely to result from primary skeletal changes in femur(s) and sacrum. Sacral alar height asymmetry and Cobb angle. Scoliosis progression and iliac height asymmetry [3] appear to need factors additional to those that determine ilio-femoral length asymmetry – for in the girls Cobb angle is associated with both sacral alar height asymmetry and iliac height asymmetry (each p

Purpose: To investigate the potential value of titanium anterior interbody cages compared to morselized rib graft for anterior interbody fusion in combination with posterior instrumentation, correction and fusion for Scheuermann’s kyphosis. Methods and Materials: A Non-Randomised historic cohort study of two surgical techniques in matched subjects was carried out.15 patients with identical pre-operative radiographic and physical variables (age, gender, height, weight, BMI ) were managed with combined anterior release, interbody fusion, posterior instrumentation, correction and fusion . Group A (n=8) had morsilized rib graft inserted into each intervertebral disc space. Group B (n=7) had titanium interbody cages packed with bone graft inserted at each level. The posterior instrumentation extended from T2 to L2 in both groups. Pre- and post-operative curve morphometry was studied on plain radiographs by two independent observers. The indices studied included Cobb angle, Ferguson’s angle(FA) , Voutsinas index(VI), Sagittal Vertical Axis (SVA), Sacral Inclination (SI) and Lumbar Lordosis (LL). Interbody Fusion was assessed at final follow up. Each patient was reviewed at 3, 6, 12, 24, 48 and 60 months following surgery with standing radiographs. Wilcoxon-matched pairs test and Mann-Whit-ney test were used for statistical analysis. Results: The average follow-up for groups A was 70 and Group B,66 months. For the whole group, the pre-operative : postoperative median Cobb angle, FA, VI, SVA and SI were 86: 42degrees, 50 : 28.4degrees, 28.7 :13, −3.5 : −4.0 centimetres and 40 : 34 degrees respectively. There were significant differences for all variables [p Conclusion: There was no significant advantage in the use of anterior titanium interbody cages over the use of morselized rib graft in the surgical management of Scheuermann’s Kyphosis.

Aim: The clinical and radiological outcomes of a prospective randomised controlled trial comparing Femoral Ring Allografts (FRA) to Titanium Cages (TC) for circumferential fusion are presented. Methods: Eighty-three patients were recruited fulfilling strict entry requirements (>6 months chronic discogenic Low Back Pain (LBP), failure of conservative treatment, one or two level discographically-proven discogenic pain). Five patients were excluded on technical infringements (unable to insert TC or FRA). From 78 patients randomised, 37 received FRA and 41 received TC. Posterior stabilisation was achieved with translaminar or pedicle screws. Patients completed the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) for back and leg pain, the Short-Form 36 (SF-36) pre-operatively and 6, 12 and 24 months post-operatively. Assessment of fusion was made by a panel of 6 individuals examining radiographs taken at the same specified time points. Results: Clinical outcomes were available for all 83 patients (mean follow-up 28 months, range 24–75). Baseline demographic data showed no statistical difference between groups (p 11 points in 6 of 8 domains (p only two of eight domains. Revision procedures and complications were similar in both groups. For the FRA group, 27 levels were fused from a total of 42 assessed (64.2%). For the TC group, 33 levels were fused from a total of 55 assessed (60%). This difference was not statistically significant p>0.2. Conclusion: The use of FRA in circumferential lumbar fusion was associated with superior clinical outcomes when compared to those observed following the use of TC. Both groups had similar fusion rates.

The possibility that AIS aetiology involves undetected neuromuscular dysfunction is considered likely by several workers [1,2]. Yet in the extensive neuroscience research of idiopathic scoliosis certain neurodevelopmental concepts have been neglected. These include [3]: a CNS body schema (“body in the brain”) for posture and movement control generated during development and growth by establishing a long-lasting memory, and pruning of cortical synapses at puberty. During normal development the CNS has to adapt to the rapidly growing skeleton of adolescence, and in AIS to developing spinal asymmetry from whatever cause. Examination of publications relating to the CNS body schema, parietal lobe and temporo-parietal junction [4,5] led us to a new concept: namely, that a delay in maturation of the CNS body schema during adolescence with an early AIS deformity at a time of rapid spinal growth results in the CNS attempting to balance the deformity in a trunk that is larger than the information on personal space (self) already established in the brain by that time of development. It is postulated that this CNS maturational delay allows scoliosis curve progression to occur – unless the delay is temporary when curve progression would cease. The maturational delay may be primary in the brain or secondary to impaired sensory input from end-organs [6], nerve fibre tracts [2,7,8] or central processing [9,10]. The motor component of the concept could be evaluated using transcranial magnetic stimulation [11]. Conclusion: Any maturational delay of the CNS body schema could impair postural mechanisms in girls and boys with or without early AIS deformity. The “body in the brain” concept adds a particular CNS mechanism (maturational delay) to the neuro-osseous timing of maturation (NOTOM) hypothesis for the pathogenesis of AIS [12,13]. The NOTOM hypothesis states that there are more girls than boys with progressive AIS because of different developmental timing of skeletal maturation and postural maturation between the sexes in adolescence [12,13].

Patterns of extra-spinal skeletal length asymmetry have been reported for upper limbs [1] and ribcage [2] of patients with upper spine adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. This paper reports a third pattern in the ilia. Seventy of 108 consecutive adolescent patients referred from routine scoliosis school screening during 1996–1999 had lower spine scoliosis – lumbar (LS), thoracolumbar (TLS), or pelvic tilt scoliosis (PTS). Radiologic bi-iliac and hip tilt angles were both measurable in 60 subjects: LS 18, TLS 31, and PTS 11 (girls 44, boys 16, mean age 14.6 years). Cobb angle (CA), apical vertebral rotation (AVR) and apical vertebral translation from the T1-S1 line (AVT) were measured on standing full spine radiographs (mean Cobb angle 14 degrees, range 4–38 degrees, 33 left, 27 right curves). Bi-iliac tilt angle (BITA) and hip tilt angle (HTA) were measured trigonometrically and iliac height asymmetry calculated as BITA minus HTA (corrected BITA=CBITA) and directly as iliac height asymmetry. Iliac height is relatively taller on the concavity of these curves (p Conclusion: The relatively taller concave ilium may be 1) real from primary skeletal changes or asymmetric muscle traction on iliac apophyses [3], or 2) apparent from rotation/torsion at the sacro-iliac joint(s).

In subjects with lumbar, thoracolumbar or pelvic tilt scoliosis no pattern of structural leg length inequality has been reported [1]. Forty-seven girls of 108 consecutive adolescent patients referred from routine scoliosis school screening during 1996–1999 had lower spinal scoliosis – lumbar (LS) 17, or thoracolumbar (TLS) 30 (mean Cobb angle 16 degrees, range 4–38 degrees, mean age 14.8 years, left curves 25). The controls were 280 normal girls (11–18 years, mean age 13.4 years). Anthropometric measurements were made of total leg lengths (LL), tibiae (TL) and feet (FL) by one observer (RGB) and asymmetries calculated for LL, TL and FL, as absolutes and percentage asymmetries of right/left lengths. There are no detectable changes of absolute asymmetries with age for LL, TL or FL in scoliotic or normal girls. Asymmetries are found in scoliotic girls compared with normals with relative lengthening on the right for each of LL (0.95%) and TL (0.99%) (each p Conclusion: The relative lengthenings in the right leg are unrelated statistically to the severity or side of the lower spinal scoliosis; the cause is unknown and may be related to posture – free standing on the right leg [2] – to neuromuscular mechanisms, or to primary skeletal changes in growth plates of femur(s) and tibia(e).

In idiopathic scoliosis the detection of extra-spinal left-right skeletal length asymmetries in the upper limbs, ribs, ilia and lower limbs [1–7] begs the question: are these asymmetries unconnected with the pathogenesis, or are they an indicator of what may also be happening in immature vertebrae of the spine? The vertebrate body plan has mirror-image bilateral symmetries (mirror symmetrical, homologous morphologies) that are highly conserved culminating in the adult form [8]. The normal human body can be viewed as containing paired skeletal structures in the axial and appendicular skeleton as a) separate left and right paired forms (e.g. long limb bones, ribs, ilia), and b) united in paired forms (e.g. vertebrae, skull, mandible). Each of these separate and united pairs are mirror-image forms – enantiomorphs. In idiopathic scoliosis, genetic and epigenetic (environmental) mechanisms [9–11] may disturb the symmetry control of enantiomorphic immature bones [12–13] and, by creating left-right endochondral growth asymmetries, cause the extra-spinal bone length asymmetries, and within one or more vertebrae create growth conflict with distortion as deformities (= unsynchronised bone growth concept) [14]. Conclusion: This enantiomorphic disorder concept applied to the axial skeleton during infancy, juvenility and adolescence – through reductionism into the molecular mechanisms of growth plate responses to different hormones at successive phases of development – provides a new theoretical insight to explain the whole body deformity of AIS. The concept suggests preventive surgery on spine and ribs.

Introduction: Patient questionnaires permit a direct measure of the value of care as perceived by the recipient. The Scoliosis Research Society outcomes questionnaire (SRS-22) has been validated as a tool for self-assessment. We investigated the correlation between SRS-22 and a detailed radiological outcome two-years following anterior correction of ThoracoLumbar Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis (TL-AIS). Methods: The SRS-22 questionnaire was completed by 30 patients two-years following anterior correction of TL-AIS. Pre-operative, post-operative and two-year follow-up radiographs of all 30 patients were assessed. The following parameters were measured at each time point: 1) Primary Cobb angle, 2) Secondary Cobb angle, 3) Coronal C7-midsacral plumb line, 4) Apical Vertebra Translation (AVT) of primary curve, 5) AVT of the secondary curve, 6) Upper instrumented vertebra (UIV) translation, 7) UIV tilt angle, 8) Lower instrumented vertebra (LIV), 8) LIV tilt angle 9) Apical Vertebra Rotation (AVR) of the primary curve, 10) Sagittal C7-posterior corner of sacrum plumb line 11) T5–T12 angle, 12) T12-S1 angle, 13) shoulder height difference. The percentage improvements for each were noted. Correlation was sought between Total SRS score, each of the five individual domains and various radiographic parameters listed above by quantifying Pearson’s Correlation Coefficient ( r ). Results: Percentage improvement in primary Cobb angle ( r = 0.052), secondary Cobb angle ( r = 0.165) and AVT of the primary curve ( r = −0.353) showed little or no correlation with the SRS-22 total score or any of its five domains . Significant inverse correlation was found between the UIV tilt angle at two years and the SRS-22 ( r = −0.516). Lateral radiographs however showed little or no correlation between thoracic kyphosis ( r = 0.043) and SRS-22. Conclusion: The SRS-22 outcomes questionnaire does not correlate with most of the radiographic parameters commonly used by clinicians to assess patient outcome.

Background: In lumbar scoliosis curves of school screening referrals were evaluated (1) for the possible relation of pathomechanisms to standard and non-standard vertebral rotation (NSVR) [1], and (2) the relation between apical lumbar axial vertebral rotation and the frontal plane spinal offset angle (FPTA) [2]. Methods: Consecutive patients referred to hospital during routine school screening using the Scoliometer were examined in 1996–9. None had surgery for their scoliosis. There are 40 subjects with either pelvic tilt scoliosis (11), idiopathic lumbar scoliosis (19), or double curves (10)(girls 31, postmenarcheal 25, boys 9, mean age 15.3 years). One observer (RGB) measured: 1) in AP spinal radiographs Cobb angles (CAs), apical vertebral rotations (Perdriolle AVRs), and trigonometrically sacral alar tilt angle (SATA), and FPTA as the tilt of the T1–S1 line to the vertical; and 2) total leg lengths (tape). Results: Excluding the double curves there are 16 left and 14 right lumbar curves mean CA 11 degrees (range 4–24 degrees), mean AVR 9 degrees (concordant to CA in 18/30, discordant in 7/30), SATA 2.8 degrees (range 0.2–7.7 degrees associated with CA side and severity, p=0.0003), and leg-length inequality 0.7 cm (significantly shorter on left, p Conclusion: (1) It is hypothesized that different pathomechanisms may separately affect the frontal (CA) and transverse (AVR) planes: in discordant curves these mechanisms may neutralize each other and limit curve progression; concordant curves require these biplanar mechanisms to summate and facilitate curve progression. (2) The association of frontal plane spinal tilt angle and lumbar AVR may result from balance mechanisms affecting trunk muscles – mechanisms that may underlie the complication of post-operative frontal plane spinal imbalance or decompensation [2].

Introduction We report the two-year clinical outcome of a prospective randomised trial comparing Femoral Ring Allograft (FRA) to a Titanium Cage (TC) in circumferential lumbar spinal fusion. Methods 83 patients recruited to the study fulfilled strict entry requirements (> 6 months chronic discogenic low back pain, failure of conservative treatment, one or two-level discographically proven discogenic pain source). 38 patients were randomised to receive FRA, 45 patients were randomised to receive TC. Posterior stabilisation was achieved with translaminar or pedicle screws. Patients completed questionnaires including Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) and the Short-Form 36 (SF-36) pre-operatively and 6, 12 and 24 months post-operatively. Results Results were available for all 83 patients with a mean follow-up of 26.5 months (range 24–75 months). Baseline demographic data (age, sex, smoking history, number of operated levels, pre-operative outcome measures) showed no statistical difference between groups (p 11 points in all domains (p Discussion Clinical outcome following circumferential lumbar fusion with FRA readily achieves the accepted mean clinically important differences (MCID). Fusion with TC does not achieve the MCID. The use of TC for circumferential lumbar fusion appears not to be justified.

Background : Diagnosis of stress injuries of spine is very difficult with conventional radiography. Methods : In a observational study, 132 subjects were recruited (between 8 and 38 years of age), who had lumbar spondylolysis or posterior element stress injuries. All these patients underwent clinical examination followed by plain X-rays, planar bone scintigraphy and SPECT (single photon emission computerised tomography). SPECT scans can identify the posterior element lumbar stress injuries earlier than other imaging modalities. As the lesions evolve and the completed spondylolysis becomes chronic, the SPECT scans tend to revert to normal even though healing of the defect has not occurred. The aim of the study was to determine the time lag after which SPECT imaging tends to be negative. We divided the patients into two groups, one SPECT positive group and the other SPECT negative group. Pre treatment background variables such as age, gender, back pain in extension or flexion, sporting activities, time of onset of symptoms, Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) were used in a univariate logistic regression model to find the strong predictors of positive SPECT imaging results. Determinants of positivity versus negativity of SPECT were identified by discriminant analysis using multivariate logistic regression. Results : Seventy nine patients had positive SPECT scans whereas 53 patients had negative SPECT scans. Bilateral increased uptake was more common than unilateral uptake. Increased uptake at the L 5 lumbar spine was more common (70%) in SPECT positive group. Low back pain in extension was significantly more common in SPECT positive subjects. Active sporting individuals had higher probability of having a positive SPECT scan. The mean time lag from the onset of low back pain to SPECT imaging was 7 months in SPECT positive group and 25 months in the SPECT negative group. Multivariate analysis predicted that there is a significant difference in positivity of SPECT scans (reduced number of positive results) in subjects who had onset of pain more than six months. Conclusion : SPECT imaging performed within the first six months following the onset of symptoms could predict the mode of treatment in patients with lumbar spondylolysis or posterior lumbar spinal element stress injuries.