The multidrug resistance-associated protein 2 (MRP2/ABCC2) plays an important role in hepatobiliary efflux of many drugs and drug metabolites and has been reported to account for dramatic interspecies differences in the aspects of pharmacokinetics. In the present study, an absolute quantification method was developed to quantitatively measure MRP2/ABCC2 using LC-MS/MS for detection of a selective tryptic peptide. A unique 16-mer tryptic peptide was identified by conducting capillary LC nanospray ESI-Q-TOF analysis of the immunoprecipitation-enriched samples of MRP2/ABCC2 following proteolysis with trypsin. The lower limit of quantification was established to be 31.25pM with the linearity of the standard curve spanned to 2500pM. Both the accuracy (relative error) and the precision (coefficient of variation) of the method were below 15%. Using this method, we successfully determined the absolute amount of MRP2/ABCC2 protein in MRP2/ABCC2 gene-transfected MDCK cells as well as the basal levels of canine Mrp2/Abcc2 protein in MDCK cells. Our findings also demonstrate that the sensitivity of this method exceeds the sensitivity of immunoblotting assay which was not able to detect the basal levels of canine Mrp2/Abcc2 in MDCK cells. The method could be directly applicable to many current research needs related to MRP2/ABCC2 protein.

Separating closely related peptides (those differing by one or two amino acids or the chirality of a single amino acid) can be challenging using reversed-phase liquid chromatography (LC), ion-exchange LC, or using ion-pairing agents. Also, the mobile phases that give the best separations in these modes may not be electrospray ionization mass spectrometry (ESI-MS) compatible. Forty-two peptides from 11 peptide families were separated on three macrocyclic glycopeptide stationary phases in reverse-phase mode using ESI-MS-compatible mobile phases. The peptide classes studied were angiotensin, bradykinin, α-bag cell factor, β,γ-bag cell factor, β-casomorphin, dynorphin, enkephalin, leucokinin, lutinizing hormone releasing hormone, neurotinsin, substance P, and vasopressin. High selectivity was observed for single amino acid substitutions (achiral and chiral) regardless of the position of the substitution in the sequence. Mobile phase optimization, its effect on peptide elution behavior, and chromatographic efficiency is also discussed. Using LC–ESI-MS, a 2ng limit of detection was obtained, two orders of magnitude lower than the UV detection limit.

The chiral recognition capabilities of three macrocyclic glycopeptide chiral selectors, namely teicoplanin (Chirobiotic T), its aglycone (Chirobiotic TAG) and ristocetin (Chirobiotic R), were evaluated with supercritical and subcritical fluid mobile phases. A set of 111 chiral compounds including heterocycles, analgesics (nonsteroidal antiinflamatory compounds), β-blockers, sulfoxides, N-protected amino acids and native amino acids was separated on the three chiral stationary phases (CSPs). All separations were done with an outlet pressure regulated at 100 bar, 31°C and at 4 ml/min. Various amounts of methanol ranging from 7 to 67% (v/v) were added to the carbon dioxide along with small amounts (0.1 to 0.5%, v/v) of triethylamine and/or trifluoroacetic acid. The Chirobiotic TAG CSP was the most effective closely followed by the Chirobiotic T column. Both columns were able to separate, partially or fully, 92% of the enantiomers of the compound set. The ristocetin chiral selector could partially or baseline resolve only 60% of the enantiomers tested. All separations were done in less than 15 min and 70% were done in less than 4 min. The speed of the separations is the main advantage of the use of SFC compared to normal-phase HPLC. In addition, SFC is advantageous for preparative separations with easy solute recovery and solvent disposal.

ADVERTISEMENT RETURN TO ISSUEPREVDepartmentsNEXTProduct Review: Chiral Stationary Phases for HPLCChoosing the right stationary phase can be daunting.Daniel W. Armstrong and Bo ZhangCite this: Anal. Chem. 2001, 73, 19, 557 A–561 APublication Date (Web):October 1, 2001Publication History Published online1 October 2001Published inissue 1 October 2001https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/ac012526nhttps://doi.org/10.1021/ac012526nnewsACS Publications. This publication is available under these Terms of Use. Request reuse permissions This publication is free to access through this site. Learn MoreArticle Views2879Altmetric-Citations72LEARN ABOUT THESE METRICSArticle Views are the COUNTER-compliant sum of full text article downloads since November 2008 (both PDF and HTML) across all institutions and individuals. These metrics are regularly updated to reflect usage leading up to the last few days.Citations are the number of other articles citing this article, calculated by Crossref and updated daily. Find more information about Crossref citation counts.The Altmetric Attention Score is a quantitative measure of the attention that a research article has received online. Clicking on the donut icon will load a page at altmetric.com with additional details about the score and the social media presence for the given article. Find more information on the Altmetric Attention Score and how the score is calculated. Share Add toView InAdd Full Text with ReferenceAdd Description ExportRISCitationCitation and abstractCitation and referencesMore Options Share onFacebookTwitterWechatLinked InRedditEmail PDF (38 MB) Get e-Alertsclose SUBJECTS:High-performance liquid chromatography Get e-Alerts