The aim was to establish the optimum finishing strategy (FS) for dairy bulls slaughtered at 15 months. Sixty spring-born calves were assigned to one of four FS. The FS were split into two phases; pasture (PAS) from mid-August to housing (P1) and finished indoors on concentrates ad libitum plus straw for 209 d (P2). Treatment 1 (T1) was offered PAS in P1 and 800 g kg(-1) barley (BAR), 140 g kg(-1) soya bean meal (SBM), 40 g kg(-1) molasses and 20 g kg(-1) minerals (B) in P2. Treatments 2 (T2) and 3 (T3) were offered 3 kg dry matter (DM) of B per head daily at PAS. In P2, T2 was offered B while T3 was offered 400 g kg(-1) BAR, 400 g kg(-1) maize meal, 140 g kg(-1) SBM, 40 g kg(-1) molasses and 20 g kg(-1) minerals (BM). In P1 treatment 4 (T4) was offered 3 kg DM of BM per head daily at PAS and 750 g kg(-1) BAR, 140 g kg(-1) SBM, 50 g kg(-1) rumen protected fat, 40 g kg(-1) molasses and 20 g kg(-1) minerals in P2. Finishing strategy did not affect lifetime average daily gain or carcass conformation. Fat score tended (p=0.0514) to be greater for T3 than T1 and T4.

The objectives of the current study were to investigate the effects of production system on Holstein-Frisian bulls and steers and also to evaluate the profitability and greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions of these production systems. Calves were assigned to one of five production systems; bulls finished indoors on a concentrate ad libitum diet for 200days and slaughtered at 15months of age (15MO); bulls finished indoors on a concentrate ad libitum diet for 100days and slaughtered at 19months of age (19AL); bulls supplemented with 5kg of concentrate dry matter (DM) per head daily at pasture for 100days and slaughtered at 19months of age (19PC); steers supplemented with 5kg DM of concentrate per head daily at pasture for 68days and slaughtered at 21months of age (21MO) and steers finished indoors on grass silage plus 5kg DM of concentrate per head daily for 92days and slaughtered at 24months of age (24MO). All calves were rotationally grazed at pasture, supplemented with 1kg DM of concentrates per head daily, during the first season. With the exception of 15MO all production systems were fed grass silage and 1.5kg DM of concentrate during the winter period and returned to pasture for a second season. The Grange Dairy Beef Systems Model was used to simulate whole-farm system effects of production systems while GHG emissions associated with production were simulated using the Beef Systems Greenhouse Gas Emissions Model. Carcass weight was lowest for 21MO, greatest for 19AL and 24MO with both 15MO and 19PC intermediate. Conformation score was greater for bull (15MO, 19AL and 19PC) compared to steer production systems (21MO and 24MO). Fat score was greatest for 24MO and lowest for both 15MO and 19PC; 19AL and 21MO were intermediate. Concentrate feed costs represented 68, 59, 47, 39 and 39% of the total variable costs for 15MO, 19AL, 19PC, 21MO and 24MO, respectively. The most profitable production system was 19PC, while the least profitable systems were 15MO and 24MO. Greenhouse gas emissions, on a per kg live weight and carcass weight basis were lowest for 15MO and 19AL and greatest for 21MO and 24MO. The current study showed that slaughtering bulls at 19months of age and finishing at pasture was the most profitable production system with moderate GHG emissions.

The objectives of this experiment were to investigate (i) the influence of varying levels of concentrate supplementation during the grazing season, (ii) alternative finishing strategies for dairy bulls slaughtered at 15 mo of age and (iii) economic implications of these management strategies. Bulls were assigned to a 2 (level of concentrate supplementation during the grazing season: 1 kg [LA] and 2 kg [HA] dry matter [DM]/head daily) x 2 (finishing strategies: concentrates ad libitum group [AL] or grass silage ad libitum plus 5 kg DM of concentrates/head daily group [SC]) factorial arrangement of treatments. Average daily gain (ADG) during the grazing season was greater (P < 0.01) for HA than for LA. Consequently, HA bulls were 16 kg heavier at housing: 214 and 230 kg, respectively (P < 0.05). During the finishing period, ADG tended (P = 0.09) to be greater for LA than for HA. Carcass weight tended (P = 0.08) to be greater for HA than for LA. Fat score was greater for HA. Live weight at slaughter (P < 0.001) and carcass weight (P < 0.001) were 41 and 23 kg greater for AL than for SC, respectively. Conformation (P < 0.05) and fat score (P < 0.05) were greater for AL than for SC. The Grange Dairy Beef Systems Model simulated whole-farm system effects of the production systems. Net margin/head was greater for LA than for HA and greater for SC than for AL. Sensitivity analysis of finishing concentrate price, calf purchase price and beef price showed no re-ranking of the systems on a net margin basis. Although greater animal performance was observed from the higher plane of nutrition, overall profitability was lower.