Actin networks undergo rearrangements that influence cell shape. Actin network organization is regulated by a host of actin-binding proteins. The Drosophila synaptotagmin-like protein, bitesize (Btsz), organizes actin at epithelial cell apical junctions in a manner that depends on its interaction with the actin-binding protein, moesin. Using RNAi, we showed that Btsz functions at earlier, syncytial stages of Drosophila embryo development. Btsz is required to stabilize pseudo-cleavage furrows, preventing metaphase spindle collisions and nuclear fallout prior to cellularization. While previous studies have focused on Btsz function through moesin, we find that phosphorylated moesin localized to the nuclear envelope and was not enriched at pseudo-cleavage furrows, suggesting a moesin-independent function for Btsz in syncytial embryos. Consistent with this, mutants that affected all moesin-binding domain isoforms did not recapitulate pan-isoform Btsz depletion and we find that the C-terminal half of Btsz cooperatively binds to and bundles F-actin. We propose that synaptotagmin-like proteins directly regulate actin organization during syncytial Drosophila development.
The rapid turnover of branched actin networks underlies key in vivo processes such as lamellipodial extension, endocytosis, phagocytosis, and intracellular transport. However, our understanding of the mechanisms used to dissociate, or "prune," branched filaments has remained limited. Glia maturation factor (GMF) is a cofilin family protein that binds to the Arp2/3 complex and catalyzes branch dissociation. Here, we show that another ligand of Arp2/3 complex, Saccharomyces cerevisiae coronin (Crn1), enhances Gmf1-mediated debranching by 8- to 10-fold, and that these effects depend on Arp2/3-binding "C" and "A" motifs in Crn1. Further, we show that Crn1 directly binds with high affinity (KD = 1.4 nM) to S. cerevisiae GMF (Gmf1), and together they form a stable ternary Crn1-Gmf1-Arp2/3 complex in solution. Using single-molecule analysis, we show that Gmf1 binds transiently and multiple times to F-actin branch junctions prior to debranching. These and other results suggest a mechanism of mutual recruitment, in which Crn1 increases the on-rate of Gmf1 for branch junctions and Gmf1 blocks Crn1 binding to actin filament sides, increasing its availability to bind branch junctions. Taken together, these observations reveal an unanticipated mechanism in which two distinct ligands of the Arp2/3 complex bind to each other and synergize to prune actin branches.
Septins are cytoskeletal filament-forming proteins that typically associate with membranes and perform critical functions in a variety of cellular processes. Septins often colocalize with actin and microtubule structures, yet our understanding of all the ways that septins contribute mechanistically to actin- and microtubule-based functions is incomplete. The Cdc42 effector protein Cdc42EP3 (also known as BORG2) promotes septin localization to actin structures in vivo, but little else is known about how Cdc42EP3 influences the interactions of septins and F-actin. Here, using purified components, we show that Cdc42EP3 binds directly to septins, actin filaments, and actin monomers. Moreover, septin-bound Cdc42EP3 accelerates actin filament polymerization. Thus, Cdc42EP3 is not merely a factor that crosslinks septins and F-actin, but one that promotes the formation of actin polymers along septin scaffolds.
In this study, we show that two fungal proteins, Aip5 (related to vertebrate SH3BGRL) and Bud6, directly interact to form a novel "composite nucleator," in which the pointed end of a nascent actin seed is bound by the thioredoxin-related domain of Aip5. The Aip5-Bud6 complex assembles F-actin seeds with free barbed ends and recruits formins to processively elongate and protect these ends from capping protein. The nucleation activities of Aip5 and Bud6 are critical for maintaining proper thickness of actin cable bundles in vivo, which prevents premature cable detachment from the bud neck and secretory traffic defects, as revealed by live imaging. In vitro single-molecule imaging reveals that after actin nucleation, Aip5 remains associated with a pointed end of the filament, and in vivo Aip5 puncta are observed directionally streaming inward from polarity sites by actin cable retrograde flow. Our findings expand the known diversity of actin nucleation mechanisms and reveal that Aip5 functions as a pointed-end capper in vivo.
Actin is a key cytoskeletal protein that forms filaments that bundle into linear structures in vivo , which are involved in motility, signaling, and cell division. Despite the rapid turnover of individual actin monomers, these structures are often maintained at a specific length, which is important for their function. Length control is commonly attributed to length-dependent assembly or disassembly of the structure, whereby a stable length is achieved when the two opposing processes are balanced. Here we show that regardless of the nature of the length-dependent feedback, such “balance point” models predict a Gaussian distribution of lengths with a variance that is proportional to the steady state length. Contrary to this prediction, a reexamination of experimental measurements on the lengths of stereocilia, microvilli, actin cables, and filopodia reveals that the variance scales with the square of the steady state length. We propose a model in which the individual filaments in bundles undergo independent assembly dynamics, and the length of the bundle is set by the length of the longest filament. This model predicts a non-Gaussian distribution of bundle lengths with a variance that scales with the square of the steady state length. Our theory underscores the importance of crosslinking filaments into networks for size control of cytoskeleton structures.
In vivo functions of the septin and actin cytoskeletons are closely intertwined, yet the mechanisms underlying septin-actin crosstalk have remained poorly understood. Here, we show that the yeast-bud-neck-associated Fes/CIP4 homology Bar-amphiphysin-Rvs (F-BAR) protein suppressor of yeast profilin 1 (Syp1)/FCHo uses its intrinsically disordered region (IDR) to directly bind and bundle filamentous actin (F-actin) and to physically link septins and F-actin. Interestingly, the only other F-BAR protein found at the neck during bud development, Hof1, has related activities and also potently inhibits the bud-neck-associated formin Bnr1. However, we find that Syp1 enhances rather than inhibits Bnr1-mediated actin assembly and fully overcomes Hof1-mediated inhibition of Bnr1. Further, during bud development, Syp1 and Hof1 show reciprocal patterns of arrival and departure from the bud neck, and in vitro Syp1 and Hof1 compete for septin binding. Together, our observations suggest that as the bud grows, the relative levels of these two F-BAR proteins at the bud neck invert, driving changes in septin organization, septin-actin linkage, and formin activity. More broadly, our findings expand the functional roles of Syp1/FCHo family proteins and our understanding of the working relationships among F-BAR proteins in cytoskeletal regulation.
For over 20 years, the most effective probe for live imaging of yeast actin cables has been Abp140-GFP. Here, we report that endogenously-tagged Abp140-GFP poorly decorates actin patches and cables in the bud compartment of yeast cells, while robustly decorating these structures in the mother cell. Using mutagenesis, we found that asymmetric decoration by Abp140 requires F-actin binding. By expressing integrated Bni1-Bnr1 and Bnr1-Bni1 chimeras, we demonstrate that asymmetric cable decoration by Abp140 also does not depend on which formin assembles the cables in each compartment. In contrast, the short actin-binding fragment of Abp140 (known as “Lifeact”), fused to 1x or 3xmNeonGreen and expressed from the endogenous ABP140 promoter, uniformly decorates patches and cables in both compartments. Further, this probe dramatically improves live imaging detection of cables (and patches) without altering their in vivo dynamics or cell growth. Improved detection allows us to visualize cables growing inward from the cell cortex and dynamically interacting with the vacuole. This probe also robustly decorates the cytokinetic actomyosin ring. Because Lifeact-3xmNeon expressed at relatively low levels provides intense labeling of cellular F-actin structures, this tool may improve live imaging in other organisms where higher levels of Lifeact expression are detrimental.
Many cytoskeletal networks consist of individual filaments that are organized into elaborate higher-order structures. While it is appreciated that the size and architecture of these networks are critical for their biological functions, much of the work investigating control over their assembly has focused on mechanisms that regulate the turnover of individual filaments through size-dependent feedback. Here, we propose a very different, feedback-independent mechanism to explain how yeast cells control the length of their actin cables. Our findings, supported by quantitative cell imaging and mathematical modeling, indicate that actin cable length control is an emergent property that arises from the cross-linked and bundled organization of the filaments within the cable. Using this model, we further dissect the mechanisms that allow cables to grow longer in larger cells and propose that cell length-dependent tuning of formin activity allows cells to scale cable length with cell length. This mechanism is a significant departure from prior models of cytoskeletal filament length control and presents a different paradigm to consider how cells control the size, shape, and dynamics of higher-order cytoskeletal structures.
How cells tightly control the formation and turnover of branched actin filament arrays to drive cell motility, endocytosis, and other cellular processes is still not well understood. Here, we investigated the mechanistic relationship between two binding partners of the Arp2/3 complex, glia maturation factor (GMF) and cortactin. Individually, GMF and cortactin have opposite effects on the stability of actin filament branches, but it is unknown how they work in concert with each other to govern branch turnover. Using TIRF microscopy, we observe that GMF's branch destabilizing activities are potently blocked by cortactin (IC50 = 1.3 nM) and that this inhibition requires direct interactions of cortactin with Arp2/3 complex. The simplest model that would explain these results is competition for binding Arp2/3 complex. However, we find that cortactin and GMF do not compete for free Arp2/3 complex in solution. Further, we use single molecule analysis to show that cortactin's on-rate (3 x107 s-1 M-1) and off-rate (0.03 s-1) at branch junctions are minimally affected by excess GMF. Together, these results show that cortactin binds with high affinity to branch junctions, where it blocks the destabilizing effects of GMF, possibly by a mechanism that is allosteric in nature. In addition, the affinities we measure for cortactin at actin filament branch junctions (Kd = 0.9 nM) and filament sides (Kd = 206 nM) are approximately 20-fold stronger than previously reported. These observations contribute to an emerging view of molecular complexity in how Arp2/3 complex is regulated through the integration of multiple inputs.
In response to pheromone Saccharomyces cerevisiae extend a mating projection. This process depends on the formation of polarized actin cables which direct secretion to the mating tip and translocate the nucleus for karyogamy. Here, we demonstrate that proper mating projection formation requires the formin Bni1, as well as the actin nucleation promoting activities of Bud6, but not the formin Bnr1. Further, Bni1 is required for pheromone gradient tracking. Our work also reveals unexpected new functions for Bil2 in the pheromone response. Previously we identified Bil2 as a direct inhibitor of Bnr1 during vegetative cell growth. Here, we show that Bil2 has Bnr1-independent functions in spatially focusing Bni1-GFP at mating projection tips, and in vitro Bil2 and its binding partner Bud6 organize Bni1 into clusters that nucleate actin assembly. bil2∆ cells also display entangled Bni1-generated actin cable arrays and defects in secretory vesicle transport and nuclear positioning. At low pheromone concentrations, bil2∆ cells are delayed in establishing a polarity axis, and at high concentrations they prematurely form a second and a third mating projection. Together, these results suggest that Bil2 promotes the proper formation and timing of mating projections by organizing Bni1 and maintaining a persistent axis of polarized growth.
How actin filaments are spatially organized and remodeled into diverse higher-order networks in vivo is still not well understood. Here, we report an unexpected F-actin "coalescence"activity driven by cyclase-asso-ciated protein (CAP) and enhanced by its interactions with actin-binding protein 1 (Abp1). We directly observe S. cerevisiae CAP and Abp1 rapidly transforming branched or linear actin networks by bundling and sliding filaments past each other, maximizing filament overlap, and promoting compaction into bundles. This activity does not require ATP and is conserved, as similar behaviors are observed for the mammalian homologs of CAP and Abp1. Coalescence depends on the CAP oligomerization domain but not the helical folded domain (HFD) that mediates its functions in F-actin severing and depolymerization. Coalescence by CAP-Abp1 further depends on interactions between CAP and Abp1 and interactions between Abp1 and F-actin. Our re-sults are consistent with a mechanism in which the formation of energetically favorable sliding CAP and CAP-Abp1 crosslinks drives F-actin bundle compaction. Roles for CAP and CAP-Abp1 in actin remodeling in vivo are supported by strong phenotypes arising from deletion of the CAP oligomerization domain and by genetic interactions between sac6D and an srv2-301 mutant that does not bind Abp1. Together, these observations identify a new actin filament remodeling function for CAP, which is further enhanced by its direct interactions with Abp1.
Understanding how numerous actin-binding proteins (ABPs) work in concert to control the assembly, organization, and turnover of the actin cytoskeleton requires quantitative information about the levels of each component. Here, we measured the cellular concentrations of actin and the majority of the conserved ABPs in Saccharomyces cerevisiae, as well as the free (cytosolic) fractions of each ABP. The cellular concentration of actin is estimated to be 13.2 µM, with approximately two-thirds in the F-actin form and one-third in the G-actin form. Cellular concentrations of ABPs range from 12.4 to 0.85 µM (Tpm1> Pfy1> Cof1> Abp1> Srv2> Abp140> Tpm2> Aip1> Cap1/2> Crn1> Sac6> Twf1> Arp2/3> Scp1). The cytosolic fractions of all ABPs are unexpectedly high (0.6–0.9) and remain so throughout the cell cycle. Based on these numbers, we speculate that F-actin binding sites are limited in vivo, which leads to high cytosolic levels of ABPs, and in turn helps drive the rapid assembly and turnover of cellular F-actin structures.
Cellular actin networks exhibit a wide range of sizes, shapes, and architectures tailored to their biological roles. Once assembled, these filamentous networks are either maintained in a state of polarized turnover or induced to undergo net disassembly. Further, the rates at which the networks are turned over and/or dismantled can vary greatly, from seconds to minutes to hours or even days. Here, we review the molecular machinery and mechanisms employed in cells to drive the disassembly and turnover of actin networks. In particular, we highlight recent discoveries showing that specific combinations of conserved actin disassembly-promoting proteins (cofilin, GMF, twinfilin, Srv2/CAP, coronin, AIP1, capping protein, and profilin) work in concert to debranch, sever, cap, and depolymerize actin filaments, and to recharge actin monomers for new rounds of assembly.
Dominant mutations in tyrosyl-tRNA synthetase (YARS1) and six other tRNA ligases cause Charcot-Marie-Tooth peripheral neuropathy (CMT). Loss of aminoacylation is not required for their pathogenicity, suggesting a gain-of-function disease mechanism. By an unbiased genetic screen in Drosophila , we link YARS1 dysfunction to actin cytoskeleton organization. Biochemical studies uncover yet unknown actin-bundling property of YARS1 to be enhanced by a CMT mutation, leading to actin disorganization in the Drosophila nervous system, human SH-SY5Y neuroblastoma cells, and patient-derived fibroblasts. Genetic modulation of F-actin organization improves hallmark electrophysiological and morphological features in neurons of flies expressing CMT-causing YARS1 mutations. Similar beneficial effects are observed in flies expressing a neuropathy-causing glycyl-tRNA synthetase. Hence, in this work, we show that YARS1 is an evolutionary-conserved F-actin organizer which links the actin cytoskeleton to tRNA-synthetase-induced neurodegeneration.