Purpose: To determine the outcome of patients who received phototherapeutic keratectomy (PTK) for recurrent erosion syndrome due to anterior basement membrane dystrophy (ABMD),Design: A retrospective, noncomparative case series.Participants: Forty-eight eyes of 43 consecutive patients who underwent PTK for recurrent erosions occurring in ABMD at the Hunkeler Eye Center from 1991 to April 1995. All patients had previously failed at least one method of medical or surgical treatment for recurrent erosions and had slit-lamp findings of ABMD on initial evaluation.Intervention: The eyes each underwent manual superficial keratectomy and PTK with the Summit Omnimed excimer laser.Main Outcome Measures: Data were analyzed by a retrospective chart review for 1, 3, 6, and 12 months for the 36 eyes with at least 12 months of follow-up data available. They were analyzed for preoperative and postoperative visual acuity, change in spherical equivalent, recurrence rate, and patient satisfaction.Results: The preoperative mean visual acuity was not statistically significantly different at 1 month after PTK. Statistically significant improvement in mean visual acuity was present at 3, 6, and 12 months. Recurrence of symptoms of recurrent erosion was present in 5 (13.8%) of 36 eyes during the 12-month follow-up period, which was managed with repeat PTK over the area of the cornea initially treated with PTK; 1 of 5 required a third PTK treatment. All recurrences presented within 6 months of PTK or repeat PTK, The mean dioptric change in spherical equivalent was not statistically significant. Patient satisfaction levels after PTK for recurrent erosions in ABMD were assessed in 21 (58%) of 36 patients on a scale of 0 to 5 (5 = most satisfied); the mean response was 4.14 of 5,Conclusions: Phototherapeutic keratectomy is an effective treatment for recurrent erosions occurring in the setting of ABMD, is well tolerated, and may improve visual acuity, The rate of recurrence of erosions in ABMD treated with PTK is low during a 12-month follow-up period.
Seven nursery reared chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes), 7.5 to 10.5 months of age, were studied to determine the effects of a short period of separation from their peers on behavior and heart rate. The chimpanzees were separated from their mothers at birth, and reared in the nursery in a group living environment. The experiment encompassed a 13-day period, including 4 days of normative baseline, 5 days during which three of the infants were separated and housed in isolation while the other four controls remained together, and 4 days in which all of the animals were reunited. Six quantified behavioral observations and five heart rate measurements were obtained daily. Following separation, the isolated infants were behaviorally agitated, and exhibited increases in vocalizations, rocking and self-clasp behaviors, as well as changes in facial expression including cry face, whimper face and pout face. Time spent locomoting decreased in all seven animals during the separation period. Agitated behavior in the separated and isolated infants alternated with stationary withdrawn behavior. Individual differences were prominent. Heart rate was notable by the generally poorly developed circadian rhythmicity throughout the 13 day period; significant HR changes did not appear otherwise associated with separation. Day three of separation appeared to represent a point of transition with stereotyped motor behaviors developing in the three isolated infants and in one control infant.
American Journal of PrimatologyVolume 1, Issue 1 p. 99-101 Brief Communication Editorial report: A national chimpanzee breeding plan Charles E. Graham, Charles E. Graham Associate Editor American Journal of Primatology, New Mexico State University, Primate Research Institute, Holloman Air Force Base, New MexicoSearch for more papers by this author Charles E. Graham, Charles E. Graham Associate Editor American Journal of Primatology, New Mexico State University, Primate Research Institute, Holloman Air Force Base, New MexicoSearch for more papers by this author First published: 1981 https://doi.org/10.1002/ajp.1350010113Citations: 4AboutPDF ToolsRequest permissionExport citationAdd to favoritesTrack citation ShareShare Give accessShare full text accessShare full-text accessPlease review our Terms and Conditions of Use and check box below to share full-text version of article.I have read and accept the Wiley Online Library Terms and Conditions of UseShareable LinkUse the link below to share a full-text version of this article with your friends and colleagues. Learn more.Copy URL Share a linkShare onFacebookTwitterLinked InRedditWechat Citing Literature Volume1, Issue11981Pages 99-101 RelatedInformation