This guideline is the result of a consensus reached during a panel discussion at the second International Consensus Meeting on Urticara, Urticaria 2004, a joint initiative of the EAACI Dermatology Section and GA2LEN. Urticaria has a profound impact on the quality of life, and effective treatment is therefore required. The recommended first line treatment are nonsedating H1 antihistamines. They have proven to be effective in double-blind controlled studies, but dosages increased up to fourfold over the recommended doses may be necessary. However, for different urticaria subtypes and in view of individual variation in the course of the disease and response to treatment, additional or alternative therapies may be required. Immunosuppressive drugs like cyclosporin A and corticosteroids are not recommended for long-term treatment due to unavoidable severe adverse effects. This guideline was, in addition, accepted by the European Dermatology Forum (EDF) and formally approved by the European Union of Medical Specialists (UEMS).

This guideline is the result of a consensus reached during a panel discussion at the 2nd International Consensus Meeting on Urticaria, Urticaria 2004, a joint initiative of the European Academy of Allergology and Clinical Immunology Dermatology Section and the European Union (EU)-funded network of excellence, GA2LEN. It covers the definition and classification of urticaria, taking into account the recent progress in identifying causes, eliciting factors and pathomechanisms of this disease. We have outlined useful diagnostic approaches for different subtypes of urticaria. This guideline was, in addition, accepted by the European Dermatology Forum (EDF) and was formally approved by the European Union of Medical Specialists (UEMS).

BACKGROUND:Endogenous histamine-releasing factors (HRFs) are involved in 30-60% of patients with chronic urticaria (CU). Evidence for their existence comes from in vivo studies of autoreactivity with the autologous serum skin test (ASST), in vitro immunoassays demonstrating autoantibodies against the immunoglobulin E (IgE) or the high affinity IgE receptor (FcepsilonRI) and serum-induced histamine release (HR) from basophils and mast cells. We have examined the correlation between the ASST and a new basophil histamine-releasing assay (the HR-Urtikaria test) in a group of well-characterized CU patients and subsequently determined the frequency of HR-Urticaria-positive sera from a larger population of CU patients.SUBJECTS:Group 1 consisted of 28 patients with CU (16 were ASST-positive) 20 patients with atopic dermatitis, 24 patients with allergy to birch and nine healthy controls. Group 2 consisted of 873 unselected CU patients.METHODS:White blood cells containing 1-2% basophils from a healthy nonatopic donor were incubated with patients sera in the presence of interleukin (IL)-3. Histamine was measured by the glass fibre method.RESULTS:Using the ASST as the true outcome, the HR-Urticaria test showed a sensitivity and specificity of 75% in group 1 using a cut-off value for HR of >16.5%. None of the controls was positive in the HR-Urticaria test. In group 2, we found no difference in the frequency of positives between male (34.6%, n = 254) and female adults (35.1%, n = 576) but twice as many females as males were tested.CONCLUSIONS:Our studies have shown that the HR-Urticaria test has a good sensitivity and specificity for endogenous HRFs demonstrated by the ASST in patients with CU and that about one-third of unselected patients with CU have a positive result.

A growing body of evidence shows that at least 40% of patients with unexplained (idiopathic) chronic urticaria have clinically relevant functional autoantibodies to the high-affinity IgE receptor on basophils and mast cells. The term "autoimmune urticaria" is used for this subgroup of patients presenting with continuous ordinary urticaria. This article reviews the evidence for the autoimmune hypothesis and other nonantibody serum histamine-releasing factors in the etiopathogenesis of urticaria; defines autoimmune urticaria; looks at how autoimmune urticaria fits into existing classifications of urticaria; proposes diagnostic criteria that may be useful to the clinician; and reviews the management implications for patients with this subset of chronic disease.

Summary Background The basopenia of chronic urticaria relates to histamine releasing autoantibodies in the serum of patients with autoimmune urticaria. This reduction in circulating basophils may be due to active recruitment into weals. If so, it might be expected that numbers in blood would be reduced when urticaria is active and increased after treatment. The primary aim of this study was to look at diurnal variation of basophil numbers in patients with chronic ordinary urticaria (not physical or vasculitic) in relation to disease activity and the effect of treatment with antihistamines and corticosteroids, and to compare the results with healthy controls. A secondary aim was to compare a standard manual counting method with automated basophil counts and to look at numbers of other circulating leucocytes that might be relevant to urticaria pathogenesis. Methods Manual basophil counts using a toluidine blue stain and automated 5‐part differentials (Coulter ® Gen. S™) were performed at 4‐hourly intervals from 08.00 to 20.00 in 10 healthy controls (six women, age 24 to 63 years) and seven chronic urticaria patients (five women, 24 to 50 years). All chronic urticaria patients had severe daily or almost daily urticaria. Only one of six chronic urticaria sera showed in vitro basophil histamine releasing activity. Counts were performed without treatment, after a week of taking loratadine 10 mg daily and after 3 days of adding prednisolone at 0.6 mg/kg/day (maximum 40 mg). Daily urticarial activity scores (UAS) were derived from weal numbers and itch, maximum 7. Results There was no significant overall diurnal variation of basophil numbers in healthy controls or chronic urticaria patients. Mean (SE) manually counted basophil were higher in healthy controls than chronic urticaria (43.4/µL (2.1) vs. 4.4 (0.8), P < 0.001). Basophil counts were reduced in healthy controls on steroids (19.2 (1.9), P < 0.001) but increased in chronic urticaria (8.9 (1.9), P < 0.001). Loratadine did not influence them. UAS fell on treatment (3.3 (0.4) baseline, 1.4 (0.5) on loratadine and 0.5 (0.2) on prednisolone with loratadine, P < 0.001). There was a negative linear correlation between basophil numbers and UAS in untreated chronic urticaria patients ( P = 0.001, Spearman rank correlation). Manual and automated basophil counts showed poor agreement. Lymphocyte numbers were lower in chronic urticaria than healthy controls. Neutrophils increased whereas lymphocytes and eosinophils decreased in all subjects on prednisolone. They were unaffected by loratadine. Conclusion The results are consistent with the hypothesis that circulating basophils may be recruited from blood into urticarial weals during disease activity. Automated counts are not suitable for assessing basophil numbers in chronic urticaria. The relevance of reduced lymphocyte numbers in chronic urticaria needs to be explored.

The relationship of aspirin sensitivity to urticaria is complex. Aspirin sensitivity can cause acute urticaria in some individuals, aggravate pre-existing chronic urticaria in others or, rarely, act as a cofactor with food or exercise to provoke anaphylaxis. Individuals who react with urticaria appear to come from a different population to those who react with asthma, although there is some overlap. Aspirin-sensitive chronic urticaria patients may also react adversely to some food additives. The pharmacological mechanisms of aspirin-sensitive urticaria are not fully understood but probably involve diversion of arachidonic acid metabolism from prostaglandin to cysteinyl leukotriene formation leading to direct effects on blood vessels and delayed mast cell degranulation with release of histamine. Cross-reactivity amongst all nonsteroidal drugs is common in aspirin-aggravated chronic urticaria but appears not to occur with selective cyclo-oxygenase 2 inhibitors.

Clinical and Experimental DermatologyVolume 27, Issue 1 p. 84-85 Case 4 R. K. Mehta, R. K. Mehta Departments of Dermatology,Search for more papers by this authorN. Shah, N. Shah Departments of Dermatology,Search for more papers by this authorD. G. I. Scott, D. G. I. Scott Rheumatology andSearch for more papers by this authorC. E. H. Grattan, C. E. H. Grattan Departments of Dermatology,Search for more papers by this authorT. H. W. Barker, T. H. W. Barker Histopathology, Norfolk and Norwich University Hospital NHS Trust, Norwich, UKSearch for more papers by this author R. K. Mehta, R. K. Mehta Departments of Dermatology,Search for more papers by this authorN. Shah, N. Shah Departments of Dermatology,Search for more papers by this authorD. G. I. Scott, D. G. I. Scott Rheumatology andSearch for more papers by this authorC. E. H. Grattan, C. E. H. Grattan Departments of Dermatology,Search for more papers by this authorT. H. W. Barker, T. H. W. Barker Histopathology, Norfolk and Norwich University Hospital NHS Trust, Norwich, UKSearch for more papers by this author First published: 08 April 2002 https://doi.org/10.1046/j.0307-6938.2001.00951.xCitations: 10 : Dr R. K. Mehta, Department of Dermatology, Norfolk and Norwich University Hospital NHS Trust, Norwich, UK. Tel.: 01603 286286, Ext 4225, Bleep 173. Fax: 01603 288601. E-mail: rokmehta@netscapeonline.co.uk Read the full textAboutPDF ToolsRequest permissionExport citationAdd to favoritesTrack citation ShareShare Give accessShare full text accessShare full-text accessPlease review our Terms and Conditions of Use and check box below to share full-text version of article.I have read and accept the Wiley Online Library Terms and Conditions of UseShareable LinkUse the link below to share a full-text version of this article with your friends and colleagues. Learn more.Copy URL Share a linkShare onFacebookTwitterLinked InRedditWechat No abstract is available for this article.Citing Literature Volume27, Issue1January 2002Pages 84-85 RelatedInformation

Background: Circulating autoantibodies against FcϵRI, IgE, or both occur in approximately one third of patients with chronic idiopathic urticaria (CIU), but not all autoantibodies initiate histamine release. Objective: We sought to classify patients with CIU into subsets on the basis of serum bioactivity and immunoreactivity and to examine the relationship between newly defined subtype and disease severity. Methods: Sera from patients with CIU (n = 78), dermog-raphism (n = 15), and cholinergic urticaria (n = 10) and sera from healthy subjects (n = 39) were analyzed by means of Western blot analysis for anti-FcϵRI autoantibodies and for histamine release from basophils and dermal mast cells. In vivo reactivity of autologous serum was tested by means of intradermal injection, and CIU severity was determined on the basis of clinical interview. Results: We classified sera from patients with CIU into 5 subsets: immunoreactive histamine-releasing anti-FcϵRI autoantibodies (n = 20 [26%]); immunoreactive anti-FcϵRI autoantibodies without histamine-releasing activity (n = 12 [15%]); anti-IgE-like autoantibodies (n = 7 [9%]); serum containing a mast cell-specific histamine-releasing factor (n = 7 [9%]); and sera with no identifiable factor (n = 32 [41%]). Patients with serum histamine-releasing activity had more severe urticaria than patients without such activity. Positive skin test responses to autologous sera were associated with histamine-releasing anti-FcϵRI autoantibodies but not with non-histamine-releasing anti-FcϵRI autoantibodies. Neither healthy subjects nor patients with dermographism or cholinergic urticaria had his-tamine-releasing anti-FcϵRI autoantibodies. Conclusion: These data support the specificity of functional anti-FcϵRI autoantibodies to CIU. The identification of distinctive subsets of patients suggests that other pathogenic mechanisms occur in CIU in addition to direct ligation of FcϵRI by autoantibodies causing dermal mast cell degranulation. Elucidating these mechanisms might lead to new treatments for CIU. (J Allergy Clin Immunol 2002;110:492-9.)

BACKGROUND:Histamine-releasing activity (HRA) is detectable in up to 50% of patients with chronic ordinary urticaria. OBJECTIVES:To determine the effect of cyclosporin on clinical features and HRA in patients with chronic urticaria. METHODS:Thirty patients with severe unremitting disease, responding poorly to antihistamines and showing a positive autologous serum skin test (ASST) as a marker of HRA, were randomized to 4 mg kg-1 daily of cyclosporin (Sandimmun, n = 20) or placebo (n = 10) for 4 weeks. Non-responders were offered open-label cyclosporin for 4 weeks. All were followed for up to 20 weeks or until clinical relapse; all took cetirizine 20 mg daily throughout the study. The primary measure of efficacy was a daily urticaria activity score (UAS) of weal numbers and itch (maximum score 42 per week). A positive response was defined as a reduction to < 25% of baseline weekly UAS and relapse as a return to > 75%. The effect of cyclosporin on serum HRA was assessed by in vitro basophil histamine release assays and ASSTs before and after treatment. RESULTS:Twenty-nine patients (19 active, 10 controls) completed the randomized trial medication. Eight of 19 on active treatment but none on placebo had responded at 4 weeks (P < 0.05). Three others on active drug met the criterion for response at 2 weeks but not at 4 weeks. Mean reduction in UAS between weeks 0 and 4 was 12.7 (95% confidence interval, CI 6.6-18.8) for active and 2.3 (95% CI - 3.3-7.9) for placebo (P = 0.005). Seventeen non-responders (seven randomized to active and 10 to placebo) chose open-label cyclosporin and 11 responded after 4 weeks. Six of the eight randomized active drug responders relapsed within 6 weeks. Of the 19 responders to randomized and open-label cyclosporin, five (26%) had not relapsed by the study end-point. Mean in vitro serum HRA fell from 36% (95% CI 22-49%) to 5% (95% CI 1-8%) after cyclosporin treatment (n = 11, P < 0.0001). The ASST response to post-treatment serum was also reduced (P < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS:This study shows that cyclosporin is effective for chronic urticaria and provides further evidence for a role of histamine-releasing autoantibodies in the pathogenesis of this chronic 'idiopathic' disease.

One-third of patients with chronic idiopathic urticaria (CIU) have circulating functional autoantibodies against the high affinity IgE receptor FcepsilonRI, or IgE. The intradermal injection of autologous serum causes a weal and flare reaction in many patients with CIU, and this reaction forms the basis of the autologous serum skin test (ASST). We have determined the parameters of the ASST which define the optimal sensitivity and specificity for the identification of patients with autoantibodies. Two physicians (R.A. S. and C.E.H.G.) performed ASSTs in a total of 155 patients with CIU, 40 healthy control subjects, 15 patients with dermographism, nine with cholinergic urticaria and 10 with atopic eczema. Patients were classified as having functional autoantibodies by demonstrating in vitro serum-evoked histamine release from the basophils of two healthy donors. There were significant differences (P < 0.001) in the mean weal diameter, weal volume, weal redness and flare area of the intradermal serum-induced cutaneous responses at 30 min between patients with CIU with autoantibodies and either those without autoantibodies or control subjects. The optimum combined sensitivity and specificity of the ASST was obtained if a positive test was defined as a red serum-induced weal with a diameter of >/= 1.5 mm than the saline-induced response at 30 min. For R.A.S. and C.E.H.G., the ASST sensitivity was 65% and 71% and specificity was 81% and 78%, respectively. Using these criteria, the following subjects had positive ASSTs: none of 15 dermographics, none of 10 atopics, one of nine cholinergics and one of 40 controls.

BACKGROUND:Peripheral blood basophils are reduced in some chronic urticaria patients when counted with granule stains. Approximately 30% of patients with severe chronic urticaria have functional autoantibodies which release histamine from healthy donor basophils in vitro but the relationship between basophil numbers in vivo and serum histamine releasing activity has not been studied. OBJECTIVE:To determine the relationship between basophil numbers and serum basophil histamine releasing activity and to assess whether basophils are present, but undetectable, in peripheral blood with granule stains by using a new flow cytometric method based on surface immunophenotype. METHODS:Basophils were counted manually by a chamber method using a granule stain and by flow cytometry using dual staining with anti-IgE and anti-Fc epsilonRI in 25 chronic idiopathic urticaria patients and 25 healthy controls. Serum histamine releasing activity was assessed on healthy donor basophils in vitro and by the weal response to autologous serum skin testing in vivo (patients only). RESULTS:Basophils were significantly reduced in chronic urticaria by manual counting and flow cytometry. A subgroup of seven patients with in vitro histamine releasing activity showed a marked reduction or absence of basophils by both methods. There were no obvious distinguishing clinical characteristics between these patients and the others; six of them showed positive autologous serum skin-test responses. On comparing the two methods, the manual basophil counts were generally lower than flow cytometric counts. Agreement over the full range of values was not strong and therefore counts obtained by the two methods are not directly interchangeable. CONCLUSION:Basopenia in chronic idiopathic urticaria is associated with serum basophil histamine releasing activity in a subgroup of patients. The lack of granule and surface immunophenotype staining suggests a reduction in numbers rather than an inability to detect circulating degranulated cells by conventional counting methods.

Histamine-releasing autoantibodies have been identified in chronic idiopathic urticaria. 8 patients with severe disease and histamine-releasing activity in their sera underwent plasmapheresis. Symptoms were abolished for 2 months in 1 patient and for 3 weeks in another, 2 showed almost complete resolution of symptoms, 2 had temporary relief, and the other 2 showed little change. Further investigation in 4 of the patients showed significantly reduced skin-test responses to fresh post-exchange autologous sera after plasmapheresis compared with stored pre-exchange sera, but the response to intradermal histamine remained unchanged. Blood cellular histamine increased as in-vitro serum histamine-releasing activity fell after plasmapheresis. These results favour a pathogenetic role for histamine-releasing autoantibodies in patients with chronic urticaria.

British Journal of DermatologyVolume 123, Issue s37 p. 45-46 A histamine releasing factor in serum of chronic urticaria with anti-IgE autoantibody-like properties C.E.H. Grattan, C.E.H. Grattan Institute of Dermatology, St. Thomas's Hospital, LondonSearch for more papers by this authorD.M. Francis, D.M. Francis Institute of Dermatology, St. Thomas's Hospital, LondonSearch for more papers by this authorM.W. Greaves, M.W. Greaves Institute of Dermatology, St. Thomas's Hospital, LondonSearch for more papers by this author C.E.H. Grattan, C.E.H. Grattan Institute of Dermatology, St. Thomas's Hospital, LondonSearch for more papers by this authorD.M. Francis, D.M. Francis Institute of Dermatology, St. Thomas's Hospital, LondonSearch for more papers by this authorM.W. Greaves, M.W. Greaves Institute of Dermatology, St. Thomas's Hospital, LondonSearch for more papers by this author First published: July 1990 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2133.1990.tb04454.xCitations: 1AboutPDF ToolsRequest permissionExport citationAdd to favoritesTrack citation ShareShare Give accessShare full text accessShare full-text accessPlease review our Terms and Conditions of Use and check box below to share full-text version of article.I have read and accept the Wiley Online Library Terms and Conditions of UseShareable LinkUse the link below to share a full-text version of this article with your friends and colleagues. Learn more.Copy URL Share a linkShare onFacebookTwitterLinked InRedditWechat No abstract is available for this article.Citing Literature Volume123, Issues37July 1990Pages 45-46 RelatedInformation