ABSTRACT This guide begins with an overview of the internal structure and petrology of the Catalina Schist terrane as exposed on Santa Catalina Island, California, followed by a discussion of the tectonic setting and exhumational history of the terrane, and the Cenozoic tectonic and geological evolution of the Inner Borderland, within which it lies. The guide then presents an itinerary for a three-day field trip from 9–11 May 2020. Next, we present a tectonic model for the formation of the Catalina Schist, followed by a discussion of its relationship to the Pelona, Orocopia, Rand, and related schists in southern California. This field trip generally follows the GSA guide published in GSA Field Guide 59 (available at https://pubs.geoscienceworld.org/gsa): Platt, J.P., Grove, M., Kimbrough, D.L., and Jacobson, C.E., 2020, Structure, metamorphism, and geodynamic significance of the Catalina Schist terrane, in Heermance, R.V., and Schwartz, J.J., eds., From the Islands to the Mountains: A 2020 View of Geologic Excursions in Southern California: Geological Society of America Field Guide 59, p. 165–195, https://doi.org/10.1130/2020.0059(05).

The provocative hypothesis that the Shinumo Sandstone in the depths of Grand Canyon was the source for clasts of orthoquartzite in conglomerate of the Sespe Formation of coastal California, if verified, would indicate that a major river system flowed southwest from the Colorado Plateau to the Pacific Ocean prior to opening of the Gulf of California, and would imply that Grand Canyon had been carved to within a few hundred meters of its modern depth at the time of this drainage connection. The proposed Eocene Shinumo-Sespe connection, however, is not supported by detrital zircon nor paleomagneticinclination data and is refuted by thermochronology that shows that the Shinumo Sandstone of eastern Grand Canyon was >60 degrees C (similar to 1.8 km deep) and hence not incised at this time. A proposed 20 Ma (Miocene) Shinumo-Sespe drainage connection based on clasts in the Sespe Formation is also refuted. We point out numerous caveats and non-unique interpretations of paleomagnetic data from clasts. Further, our detrital zircon analysis requires diverse sources for Sespe clasts, with better statistical matches for the four "most-Shinumo-like" Sespe clasts with quartzites of the Big Bear Group and Ontario Ridge metasedimentary succession of the Transverse Ranges, Horse Thief Springs Formation from Death Valley, and Troy Quartzite of central Arizona. Diverse thermochronologic and geologic data also refute a Miocene river pathway through western Grand Canyon and Grand Wash trough. Thus, Sespe clasts do not require a drainage connection from Grand Canyon or the Colorado Plateau and provide no constraints for the history of carving of Grand Canyon. Instead, abundant evidence refutes the "old" (70-17 Ma) Grand Canyon models and supports a <6 Ma Grand Canyon.

Metasedimentary rocks in the mid-to lower crust of exhumed continental arcs preserve information about both sedimentary provenance and metamorphic pressure-temperature paths, providing a unique perspective on the tectonic history of an arc, including margin-parallel translation and sediment-burial mechanisms. The Swakane Biotite Gneiss (Washington State, USA) and the Pelona, Orocopia, Rand, Sierra de Salinas, and related schists (PORS) (California and Arizona) represent metasedimentary rocks that were incorporated into the deep levels of North American Cordilleran arc systems. We evaluated the provenances for the sedimentary protoliths of these units by detrital zircon U-Pb and Hf-isotope analyses to assess paleogeographic reconstructions for western North America. All samples have similar Mesozoic peaks, and Proterozoic age populations (1.38 Ga and 1.6-1.8 Ga) are present in samples with maximum depositional ages younger than ca. 86 Ma. Zircon Hf-isotope results are similar for these Proterozoic populations, but the Swakane Mesozoic zircon samples reveal slight differences in comparison to PORS samples. Similar detrital zircon patterns, timing of emplacement, lithology, and structural setting suggest that these two distinct units formed at the same latitude and are consistent with recent interpretations of paleomagnetic data that indicate "moderate" (similar to 1600 km) northward translation for the North Cascades arc. This study provides an example of how sediment provenance signatures combined with interpreted metamorphic histories can be used to track vertical displacement and horizontal translation within a complex, long-lived, convergent-margin system.

In the Caborca–Altar area of northwest Sonora, variably deformed and metamorphosed sedimentary and volcanic rocks crop out in a northwest-southeast–trending belt (El Batamote belt) at least 70 km long. We obtained detrital zircon U-Pb ages from two distinctive components of the belt near Altar, here termed the Altar complex and Carnero complex. Zircon ages for metasandstone and metaconglomerate matrix from the Altar complex indicate a Late Cretaceous maximum age of sedimentation, with at least part of the complex no older than 77.5 ± 2.5 (2σ). Pre-Cretaceous detrital zircons in the complex were derived largely from local sources, including Proterozoic basement, the Neoproterozoic–Cambrian miogeocline and the Jurassic arc. The detrital zircon ages and lithologic character of the Altar complex suggest correlation with the Escalante Formation, the uppermost unit of the Upper Cretaceous El Chanate Group. In contrast, one sample from the Carnero complex yielded a Middle Jurassic maximum depositional age and a detrital zircon age distribution like that of the Jurassic eolianites of the North American Cordillera. The Carnero complex may correlate with the Middle Jurassic Rancho San Martín Formation but could also be a metamorphosed equivalent of the Upper Jurassic Cucurpe Formation, Upper Jurassic to Lower Cretaceous Bisbee Group, or El Chanate Group derived by recycling of Jurassic erg sandstones. The Late Cretaceous age for the Altar complex protolith contradicts models that relate deposition of the entire El Batamote protolith to a basin formed by oblique slip along the Late Jurassic Mojave-Sonora megashear. Instead, the belt is best explained as an assemblage of Middle Jurassic to Upper Cretaceous formations deformed and locally metamorphosed beneath a northeast-directed Laramide thrust complex. Potassium-argon and 40Ar/39Ar ages confirm previous inferences that deformation of El Batamote belt occurred between the Late Cretaceous and late Eocene. A second phase of deformation, involving low-angle normal faults, occurred during and/or after intrusion of the ~22-21 Ma Rancho Herradura granodiorite.

Conglomerate-clast analysis, sandstone petrology, and detrital zircon age data determine the provenance and correlation of the Middle Miocene Mint Canyon and Caliente Formations. Detrital zircon age assemblages and sandstone compositions confirm that the Mint Canyon Formation is the upstream equivalent of the southern Caliente Formation and that both are dissimilar to the Punchbowl Formation. The Mint Canyon and Caliente Formations are remnants of an axial drainage system that was likely confined by the ancestral Sierra Pelona/Blue Ridge to the north and ancestral San Gabriel Mountains to the south; sediments derived from these local highlands dominate in the Mint Canyon Formation. This study highlights the importance of integrated-methods analysis. Sandstone detrital modes capture the variability in sandstone composition and the degree of overlap between formations; conglomerate-clast compositional data show differences within the drainage system; distinct detrital zircon age assemblages implicate particular source terranes. Analysis of all these data sets provides a robust and complete characterization of the provenance of this confined drainage system.