Background: Wheat ingestion can lead to disorders such as IgE-mediated food allergy and wheat-dependent exercise-induced anaphylaxis (WDEIA), both of which are associated with impaired quality of life and significant morbidity. Allergy to wheat is relatively benign in children, although its natural history in adults is still unknown. Objective: We used placebo-controlled challenge to evaluate the natural history of wheat hypersensitivity in atopic patients with adult-onset wheat allergy. Methods: We enrolled 13 patients from an initial cohort of adult patients with IgE-mediated wheat allergy (mean age, 40 years). After diagnosis, the patients observed a wheat-free diet and were followed as outpatients for 5 years to evaluate wheat exposure. Wheat-IgE titers were determined at the end of follow-up, and a second wheat-challenge was performed. Results: Ten out of 13 patients took part in the study. The mean period of wheat avoidance was 4.2 years. Three patients had spontaneously reintroduced wheat before the second evaluation, after a mean (IQR) of 28 (18-36) months, with only mild gastrointestinal discomfort at reintroduction. At the end of follow-up, 9 of the 10 patients were wheat-tolerant. Two patients had a history of WDEIA. We observed a reduction in IgE levels, with median (IQR) IgE falling from 2.77 (0.35-100) kU/L at diagnosis to 0.88 (0.1-20.8) kU/L. The association between IgE and a negative challenge result was not statistically significant. Conclusion: IgE-mediated wheat allergy in adults is benign and represents a temporary break in gastrointestinal tolerance. Future studies may improve our knowledge of wheat allergens, routes of and factors leading to sensitization, and prognostic biomarkers.

UNLABELLED:Background: The role of allergens in the severity of tomato allergy symptoms has not yet been studied.OBJECTIVES:To evaluate the relationship between severe allergic reactions to peach and tomato and between tomato allergy symptoms and the pattern of IgE positivity for rPru p 1, rPru p 3, rPru p 4, rBetv 1, rBetv 2, rBetv4, rPhl p 1, and rPhl p 12 in order to identify the role of recombinant allergens in the severity of reactions to tomato.METHODS:We studied peach-allergic patients with clinical reactions to tomato by performing an open food challenge, skin prick test, and determination of serum specific IgE to tomato and to recombinant peach, birch, and grass allergens. Statistical analysis was carried out to evaluate the relationship between the severity of tomato symptoms and IgE positivity to the different allergens and to peach-induced symptoms.RESULTS:We found a significant association between severe reactions to tomato and severe reactions to peach (P = .01 7) and levels of IgE to rPru p3 (P = .029) and between mild tomato allergy symptoms and levels of IgE to rPru p1 (P = .047), anti-rBetv 1 (P = .0414), anti-rBetv 2 (P = .0457), and Phleum pratense (P = .0022).CONCLUSION:We observed a significant relationship between peach and symptoms of tomato allergy. IgE positivity for rPru p3 seems to be a surrogate biochemical marker for severe tomato allergy, whereas the presence of anti-rPru p 1 IgE may be an indicator of mild tomato allergy.

SummaryBackground The allergological relevance of Ambrosia in Europe is growing but the efficacy of the injective immunotherapy for this allergen has been documented only in Northern America.Objective We sought to study the safety and efficacy of injective immunotherapy in European patients sensitized to Ambrosia artemisiifolia.Methods Thirty‐two patients (18 M/14 F, mean age 36.78, range 23–60 years) suffering from rhinoconjunctivitis and/or asthma and sensitized to Ambrosia were enrolled and randomized in a double‐blind, placebo‐controlled (DBPC) study lasting 1 year. A maintenance dose corresponding to 7.2 μg of Amb a 1 was administered at 4‐week intervals after the build‐up. During the second and the third year, all patients were under active therapy in an open fashion. Symptom and medication scores, skin reactivity to Ambrosia (parallel line biological assay), and pollen counts were assessed throughout the trial.Results Twenty‐three patients completed the trial. No severe adverse event was observed. During the DBPC phase, actively treated patients showed an improvement in asthmatic symptoms (P=0.02) and drug (P=0.0068) scores days with asthmatic symptoms (P=0.003), days with rhinitis symptoms (P=0.05), and days with intake of drugs (P=0.0058), as compared to before therapy. No improvement for any of these parameters was detected in the placebo group. Moreover, the number of days with rhinitis and asthma was significantly higher in the placebo as compared to the active group (P=0.048 and P<0.0001, respectively). Patients who switched from placebo to active therapy improved in rhinoconjunctivitis, asthma, and drug intake. The skin reactivity decreased significantly (12.2‐fold, P=0.0001) in the active group whereas a slight increase (1.07‐fold, P=0.87) was observed in the placebo group after the DBPC phase. After switching to active therapy, patients previously under placebo showed a significant decrease of this parameter (4.78‐fold, P=0.002).Conclusion Injective immunotherapy is safe and clinically effective in European patients sensitized to Ambrosia.

Fluticasone propionate aqueous nasal spray (FPANS) is a topically active glucocorticoid which has been successfully used for the treatment of seasonal allergic rhinitis (SAR). Topical levocabastine is a highly selective H1 antagonist which has been proposed as an alternative treatment of SAR. The purpose of this study was to compare the clinical efficacy of two topical nasal treatments, FPANS and levocabastine, in the treatment of SAR. Additionally, the effect of treatments on nasal inflammation was examined during natural pollen exposure. A group of 288 adolescent and adult patients with at least a 2‐year history of SAR to seasonal pollens participated in a multicenter, double‐blind, double‐dummy, and placebo‐controlled study. Patients were treated with either FPANS 200 μg, once daily (n=97), or topical levocabastine, 200 μg, given twice daily (n=96), or matched placebo (n=95) for a period of 6 weeks, starting from the expected beginning of the pollen season. Clinically relevant pollens included Parietaria, olive, and grass. Assessment of efficacy was based on scores of daily nasal symptoms and on nasal cytology of nasal lavage. Nasal lavage was performed immediately before, during, and at the end of treatment in 39 patients. FPANS significantly increased the percentage of symptom‐free days for nasal obstruction on waking and during the day, rhinorrhea, sneezing, and itching. FPANS provided a better control for night and day nasal obstruction (P<0.02 and P<0.01) and rhinorrhea (P<0.01) than levocabastine. In addition, fewer patients treated with FPANS used rescue medication (P<0.025). The percentage of eosinophils in nasal lavage was reduced only during treatment with FPANS. The results of this study indicate that FPANS 200 μg, once daily, provides a better clinical effect than levocabastine 200 μg, twice daily, in patients with SAR. Unlike levocabastine, FPANS significantly attenuates nasal eosinophilia during pollen exposure, a feature which may explain its therapeutic efficacy.

SummaryThe aim of this study was to assess the ability of nedocromil sodium (NS) to prevent the immediate asthmatic reaction and the increase in the scrum level of heal stable neutrophil chemotactie activity (HS‐NCA) induced by antigen inhalation. In a double‐blind, cross‐over study. 13 atopic subjects affected with seasonal asthma underwent a bronchial provocation lest with a preselected dose of grass pollen allergen (enough to cause a decrease of ≥ 20% in FEV1:FEV1 PD20) after pre‐treatment with 4 mg NS or placebo. Serum samples were withdrawn from 11 subjects for HS‐NCA determination. After NS administration the decrease in FEV1 was significantly less than after placebo administration at all lime points after challenge (2 min P= 0.0004; 7 min, P= 0.0005; 17 min P= 0.0002 and 27 min P= 0.0005). The percentage increase in HS‐NCA was significantly higher after placebo than after NS inhalation, both 10 (P= 0.0048) and 2d (P= 0.0068) min after challenge. Our study confirms previous investigations, showing that NS inhibits the immediate asthmatic response to allergen inhalation in atopic, asthmatic subjects and moreover it shows that this drug prevents in vivo the increase of the serum HS‐NCA. This last finding has not been previously reported.

Nasal histamine (H), leukotriene C4 (I-LTC4) and SRS-A activity were studied in seven aspirin-(ASA)-intolerant patients (AIR) with rhinitis and in five ASA-tolerant control patients with chronic rhinitis after nasal provocation (NP) with a lysine acetylsalicylate solution. The same parameters were also studied after metabisulfite (MBS) NP in four sulfite-intolerant patients with rhinitis and in six control patients with chronic rhinitis. In six ASA-intolerant subjects and in four controls, we studied the PGD2 levels in nasal washes after ASA NP 0.2 mL of lysine acetylsalicylate solution (10 mg/mL) was sprayed intranasally in ASA-intolerant patients and controls and a 25-mg/mL MBS solution in sulfite intolerant patients and controls. Nasal wash fluids were obtained using 5 mL of 0.15 M saline before and 7 1/2, 15, 30, and 60 minutes after nasal provocation. The nasal provocation with ASA induced itching and sneezing in four out of seven intolerant subjects. In this subgroup histamine values in nasal wash fluids were significantly higher versus the remaining ASA-intolerant patients at 30 and 60 minutes (P less than .05 and P less than .01, respectively) and versus controls at 60 minutes (P less than .01). We found significantly higher I-LTC4 (P less than .01) and SRS-A levels in nasal washes collected from ASA-intolerant subjects versus controls at 60 minutes after nasal provocation. There was no significant increase in the mean PGD2 values in either the ASA-intolerant or control groups.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)