Background: Readmission is considered as a surgical quality indicator. More data regarding predictors of readmission and outcomes after surgery for colorectal liver metastasis are needed. Using a propensity score match to create a 1:2 match of cases:controls for 90-day. Readmission, the matching variables used for balance included age, tumor size, estimated blood loss, and type of resection (minor or major). T-tests were used for continuous measures, Fisher's exact test was used for categorical data, and the Kaplan-Meier method was used to estimate survival. p < 0.05 was considered significant. Methods: Retrospectively examined 935 patients with CLM from 2000 to 2018. Using a propensity score match to create a 1:2 match of cases:controls for 90-day. Readmission, the matching variables used for balance included age, tumor size, estimated blood loss, and type of resection (minor or major). T-tests were used for continuous measures, Fisher's exact test was used for categorical data, and the Kaplan-Meier method was used to estimate survival. p < 0.05 was considered significant. Results: 935 patients were included in the initial sample with 896 eligible for inclusion in the propensity matching. The average age of the population was 59% and 59% male. Overall readmission rate was 8.0%. Median time to readmission was 14 days. In the propensity score matched sample, readmitted patients had higher rates of organ space infection (28% vs 2% and p < 0.0001), bile leak (26% vs 1% and p < 0.0001), and liver failure (9% vs 2% and p = 0.042). There was no difference in LOS (7 days versus six days and p = 0.40), overall survival (median 39.7 vs 41.0 months and p = 0.79), or rate of adjuvant therapy (68% for both and p > 0.99). Conclusion: Patients readmitted for intermediate and late complications after surgery for CLM can recover and receive adjuvant therapy with no adverse effect on overall survival. Organ space infection, bile leak, and liver failure are highly associated with readmission.

BackgroundThis study investigates the impact of margin status after colorectal liver metastasis (CLM) resection on outcomes of patients after neoadjuvant treatment versus those who underwent upfront resection.MethodsAn international collaborative database of CLM patients who underwent surgical resection was used. Proportional hazard regression models were created for single and multivariable models to assess the relationship between independent measures and median overall survival (mOS).ResultsR1 was associated with worse OS in the neoadjuvant group (mOS: 51.8 m for R0 vs. 26.0 m for R1; HR: 2.18). In the patients who underwent upfront surgery, R1 was not associated with OS. (mOS: 46.7 m for R0 vs. 42.6 m for R1). When patients with R1 in each group were stratified by adjuvant treatment, there was no significant difference in the neoadjuvant group, while in the upfront surgery group with R1, adjuvant treatment was associated with significant improvement in OS (mOS: 42.6 m for adjuvant vs. 25.0 m for no adjuvant treatment; HR: 0.21).ConclusionR1 is associated with worse outcomes in the patients who receive neoadjuvant treatment with no significant improvement with the addition of adjuvant therapy, likely representing an aggressive tumor biology. R1 did not impact OS in patients with upfront surgery who received postoperative chemotherapy.

Abstract Introduction: Advances in adjuvant chemotherapy with 5-fluorouracil, irinotecan, and oxaliplatin (FFX) have improved survival for patients (pts) with resectable PDAC yet few are cured by the current standard of care. Neoadjuvant FFX may lead to early control of micrometastasis and enhance cure rates for this aggressive malignancy. Methods: We performed a single-arm phase-2 clinical trial for resectable PDAC evaluating 6 months of perioperative modified (m) FFX (NCT02047474). Patients underwent baseline pancreatic protocol CT and were reviewed for resectability by a multidisciplinary panel. Enrolled pts received 6 cycles of neoadjuvant mFFX followed by surgery and 6 cycles of adjuvant mFFX. The primary endpoint was a ≥ 66% 12-month progression-free survival (PFS). Additional endpoints included overall survival (OS), circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA), tumor molecular features and tumor Keratin 17 levels. Whole blood was prospectively collected and processed to stored plasma (median volume 5.4 mL, range: 2.6 – 10.2) for retrospective ctDNA analysis using a personalized, tumor-informed ctDNA assay (SignateraTM). Survival rates were estimated by Kaplan-Meier. Results: Forty-six pts enrolled with 63 months median follow up, median age of 65 [R 46–80], 36 (78%) were ECOG 0, 30 (65%) had an endobiliary stent and no pts had staging laparoscopy. All pts started mFFX, and 37 pts (80%) completed all 6 preop cycles. Thirty-three pts (72%) underwent surgery with 3 pts developing investigator-assessed progression during neoadjuvant mFFX. Six pts were unresectable intraoperatively, and 27 pts (59%) underwent resection per protocol (25 R0, 2 R1). Ten additional pts underwent surgery off protocol. The 12-month PFS was 78% (95% CI: 64.2–94.4), median PFS and OS were 36.5 months (95% CI: 16.6–74.5) and 37.2 months (95% CI 17.5–not reached), respectively. Two-year OS was 59% (95% CI: 45.8–74.7). Baseline ctDNA was detected in 16/22 (73%) pts, and after 6 cycles of mFFX ctDNA was detected in 3/17 (18%) of pts. Patients with a positive ctDNA test 4 weeks post-resection had worsened PFS (HR 34.0, 95% CI: 2.6-4758.6; P = 0.006) and OS (HR: 11.7, 95% CI: 1.5–129.9; P = 0.021) compared to ctDNA negative. Mutational signature analysis revealed predominant signatures to be COSMIC signatures SBS1 and SBS5 (age related), and SBS15 (mismatch repair deficiency associated) which was associated with improved OS. Using Keratin 17 as a biomarker of the basal molecular subtype, either in diagnostic needle aspirates or surgical specimens, we found that high K17 expression was associated with worse survival. Conclusion: The perioperative mFFX clinical trial for resectable PDAC met its primary endpoint with a promising survival rate, and R0 resection rate of 93%. These findings warrant further evaluation in a randomized clinical trial. Most pts with detectable ctDNA at baseline experience ctDNA clearance after 6 cycles of neoadjuvant mFFX. In the post-operative setting, ctDNA positivity was strongly associated with recurrence. Signature SBS15 and low K17 were associated with improved OS. Citation Format: Michael Cecchini, Ronald Salem, Marie Robert, Suzanne Czerniak, Moein Rajaei, Jeffrey Townsend, Ondrej Blaha, Daniel Zelterman, Jaykumar Thumar, Jeremy Kortmansky, Wajih Zaheer, Neal Fischbach, Justin Persico, Stacey Stein, Sajid Khan, Charles Cha, Kevin Billingsley, John Kunstman, Sumedha Chowdhury, Robert Tseng, Carlos Mauricio, Deanne Yugawa, Luisa Escobar-Hoyos, Kimberly Johung, Christina Wiess, Erik Spickard, Vasily N. Aushev, George Laliotis, Adham Jurdi, Minetta C. Liu, Jill Lacy. A phase II study of peri-operative modified FOLFIRINOX in localized pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the AACR Special Conference in Cancer Research: Pancreatic Cancer; 2023 Sep 27-30; Boston, Massachusetts. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2024;84(2 Suppl):Abstract nr A002.

Background Thermal ablation has recently become a key therapy for the treatment of colorectal liver metastasis (CLM). However, the role of ablation in combination with resection has not yet been firmly established. We hypothesize that in patients with CLM, those who undergo liver resection with ablation (RA) have similar outcomes compared with those who undergo liver resection only. Methods We reviewed a multicenter international database of 906 surgical procedures for CLM from 5 high volume hepatobiliary surgical units. Patients undergoing RA (n = 63) were matched based on the number of lesions and tumor size using a 1:1 balanced propensity score analysis with those having resection only (n = 63). Our primary outcomes were overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS). Results The mean age of our cohort was 58 +/- 11 years, with 43% females. With a median follow-up of 70.8 months, patients in the resection and RA group had a median OS of 45.1 and 54.8 months (p = 0.71), respectively. The median DFS was 22.7 and 14.2 months (p = 0.045), respectively. Using a multivariate Cox proportional hazards regression model, the treatment approach was not associated with OS (p = 0.94) or DFS (p = 0.059). A higher number of lesions is independently associated with worse DFS (hazard ratio: 1.12, p < 0.01). When there was disease recurrence, the region of recurrence was similar between the RA versus resection only groups (p = 0.27), but there was a shorter time to recurrence in the RA group (p = 0.002). Conclusion For CLM, the treatment approach was not significantly associated with OS or DFS, while tumor biology likely played an important role. Prospective research on the quality and effectiveness of thermal ablation combined with hepatic resection is warranted.

Importance:Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is an aggressive malignant tumor, and durable disease control is rare with the current standard of care, even for patients who undergo surgical resection. Objective:To assess whether neoadjuvant modified 5-fluorouracil, leucovorin, oxaliplatin, and irinotecan (mFOLFIRINOX) leads to early control of micrometastasis and improves survival. Design, Setting, and Participants:This open-label, single-arm, phase 2 nonrandomized controlled trial for resectable PDAC was conducted at the Yale Smilow Cancer Hospital from April 3, 2014, to August 16, 2021. Pancreatic protocol computed tomography was performed at diagnosis to assess surgical candidacy. Data were analyzed from January to July 2023. Interventions:Patients received 6 cycles of neoadjuvant mFOLFIRINOX before surgery and 6 cycles of adjuvant mFOLFIRINOX. Whole blood was collected and processed to stored plasma for analysis of circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) levels. Tumors were evaluated for treatment response and keratin 17 (K17) expression. Main Outcomes and Measures:The primary end point was 12-month progression-free survival (PFS) rate. Additional end points included overall survival (OS), ctDNA level, tumor molecular features, and K17 tumor levels. Survival curves were summarized using Kaplan-Meier estimator. Results:Of 46 patients who received mFOLFIRINOX, 31 (67%) were male, and the median (range) age was 65 (46-80) years. A total of 37 (80%) completed 6 preoperative cycles and 33 (72%) underwent surgery. A total of 27 patients (59%) underwent resection per protocol (25 with R0 disease and 2 with R1 disease); metastatic or unresectable disease was identified in 6 patients during exploration. Ten patients underwent surgery off protocol. The 12-month PFS was 67% (90% CI, 56.9-100); the median PFS and OS were 16.6 months (95% CI, 13.3-40.6) and 37.2 months (95% CI, 17.5-not reached), respectively. Baseline ctDNA levels were detected in 16 of 22 patients (73%) and in 3 of 17 (18%) after 6 cycles of mFOLFIRINOX. Those with detectable ctDNA levels 4 weeks postresection had worse PFS (hazard ratio [HR], 34.0; 95% CI, 2.6-4758.6; P = .006) and OS (HR, 11.7; 95% CI, 1.5-129.9; P = .02) compared with those with undetectable levels. Patients with high K17 expression had nonsignificantly worse PFS (HR, 2.7; 95% CI, 0.7-10.9; P = .09) and OS (HR, 3.2; 95% CI, 0.8-13.6; P = .07). Conclusions and Relevance:This nonrandomized controlled trial met its primary end point, and perioperative mFOLFIRINOX warrants further evaluation in randomized clinical trials. Postoperative ctDNA positivity was strongly associated with recurrence. K17 and ctDNA are promising biomarkers that require additional validation in future prospective studies. Trial Registration:ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02047474.

Medicaid expansion (ME) has undoubtedly had noticeable effects on access to cancer screening and treatment across several solid organ malignancies.For patients with breast, colon, and lung cancer, findings show that ME is associated with increased cancer screening, earlier detection, lower disease-related mortality, and overall improved access to care. 1,2ccess to care is paramount in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), the mainstay of treatment is surgical management.Hepatocellular carcinoma represents about 70% to 90% of all primary hepatic malignancies, and patients with HCC face an overall poor prognosis unless the disease is found at early stages when surgical management is possible. 3vidence suggests that timely receipt of treatment for HCC improves survival, but the effect of increasing access to care via Medicaid expansion on HCC has not been well established. 4,5This is the question that Henrique et al. 6 sought to address with their study entitled "The Impact of Medicaid Expansion in Early-Stage Hepatocellular Carcinoma Care."This retrospective study collected data from the National Cancer Database (NCDB) and identified 19,745 early HCC patients from 2004 to 2017 by American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) staging.Additionally, patients from states that participated in ME were identified, and outcomes from surgical procedures including ablation, resection, and transplantation in HCC were evaluated. 6,7he study identified 61% of the patient population as living in a pre-expansion state, with no differences in surgical

INTRODUCTION:Complete resection of colorectal liver metastasis (CLM) improves long-term survival in colorectal cancer. However, there is limited recent data on conditional survival (CS) as postoperative survival milestones are achieved post-hepatectomy.METHODS:A retrospective analysis was performed on the penta-institutional Colorectal Liver Operative Metastasis International Collaborative (COLOMIC), with 906 consecutive CLM hepatectomy cases. CS was calculated using Bayes' theorem and Kaplan-Meier analysis. Additional CS analyses were performed on additional clinicopathologic risk factors, including colon cancer laterality, KRAS mutation status, and extrahepatic disease.RESULTS:The 5-year CS was 40.6%, 45.3%, 52.8%, and 65.3% at 0, 1, 2, and 3 years postoperatively, with significant improvements each year (p < 0.005). CS was not significantly different between right-sided and left-sided colorectal cancers by 3 years postoperatively. Patients with KRAS mutations had worse CS at all timepoints (p < 0.001). Extrahepatic disease was a poor prognostic factor for OS and CS (p < 0.001). However, CS for patients with KRAS mutations or extrahepatic disease improved significantly as 2-year, postoperative survival was achieved (p < 0.05).CONCLUSIONS:Five-year CS after hepatectomy for CLM improved with each passing year of survival postoperatively. Although extrahepatic disease and KRAS mutations are poor prognostic factors for OS, these populations still had improved CS after 2 years postoperatively.

BACKGROUND:Surgical intervention remains the cornerstone of a multidisciplinary approach in the treatment of colorectal liver metastases (CLM). Nevertheless, patient outcomes vary greatly. While predictive tools can assist decision-making and patient counseling, decades of efforts have yet to result in generating a universally adopted tool in clinical practice.STUDY DESIGN:An international collaborative database of CLM patients who underwent surgical therapy between 2000 and 2018 was used to select 1,004 operations for this study. Two different machine learning methods were applied to construct 2 predictive models for recurrence and death, using 128 clinicopathologic variables: gradient-boosted trees (GBTs) and logistic regression with bootstrapping (LRB) in a leave-one-out cross-validation.RESULTS:Median survival after resection was 47.2 months, and disease-free survival was 19.0 months, with a median follow-up of 32.0 months in the cohort. Both models had good predictive power, with GBT demonstrating a superior performance in predicting overall survival (area under the receiver operating curve [AUC] 0.773, 95% CI 0.743 to 0.801 vs LRB: AUC 0.648, 95% CI 0.614 to 0.682) and recurrence (AUC 0.635, 95% CI 0.599 to 0.669 vs LRB: AUC 0.570, 95% CI 0.535 to 0.601). Similarly, better performances were observed predicting 3- and 5-year survival, as well as 3- and 5-year recurrence, with GBT methods generating higher AUCs.CONCLUSIONS:Machine learning provides powerful tools to create predictive models of survival and recurrence after surgery for CLM. The effectiveness of both machine learning models varies, but on most occasions, GBT outperforms LRB. Prospective validation of these models lays the groundwork to adopt them in clinical practice.

More detailed description of some of the methods.

Although colorectal hepatic metastases (HM) and peritoneal surface disease (PSD) are distinct biologic diseases, they may have similar long-term survival when optimally treated with surgery. This study retrospectively reviewed prospectively managed databases. Patients undergoing R0 or R1 resections were analyzed with descriptive statistics, the Kaplan–Meier method, and Cox regression. Survival was compared over time for the following periods: 1993–2006, 2007–2012, and 2013–2020. The study enrolled 783 HM patients undergoing liver resection and 204 PSD patients undergoing cytoreduction and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC). Compared with PSD patients, HM patients more often had R0 resections (90.3% vs. 32.4%), less often had pre-procedure chemotherapy (52.4% vs. 92.1%), and less often were functionally independent (79.7% vs. 95.6%). The 5-year overall survival for HM was 40.9%, with a median survival period of 45.8 months versus 25.8% and 33.4 months, respectively, for PSD (p < 0.05). When stratified by resection status, R0 HM and R0 PSD did not differ significantly in median survival (49.0 vs. 45.4 months; p = 0.83). The median survival after R1 resection also was similar between HM and PSD (32.6 vs. 26.9 months; p = 0.59). Survival between the two groups again was similar over time when stratified by resection status. The predictors of survival for HM patients were R0 resection, number of lesions, intraoperative transfusion, age, and adjuvant chemotherapy. For the PSD patients, the predictors were peritoneal cancer index (PCI) score, estimated blood loss (EBL), and female gender. The study showed that R0 resections are associated with improved outcomes and that median survival is similar between HM and PSD patients when it is achieved. Surveillance and treatment strategies that facilitate R0 resections are needed to improve results, particularly for PSD.

Introduction: Laterality of colorectal cancers appears to affect outcomes after surgical treatment for Colorectal Liver Metastases (CLM). KRAS mutations are thought to play a role. We hypothesized a differential effect of primary tumor laterality on long-term outcomes after surgical treatment of CLM, and that KRAS mutations influence this effect. Methods: Consecutive CLM hepatectomy cases from 2000-2018 were compiled from an international collaborative (Wake Forest, Mayo Clinic Jacksonville, University of California San Francisco, Yale, and University of Hong Kong). Patient and treatment characteristics, recurrences, and median overall survival were measured from time of hepatectomy. Results: Colorectal primaries were right-sided in 251 patients, left-sided in 608 patients, and bilateral in 13. Median overall survival (OS) from time of hepatectomy was significantly better for left-sided (49.4 months) versus right-sided primary cancers with CLM (41.8 months; p<0.05). Patients with KRAS mutations had significantly worse median OS compared to KRAS-wild-type (43.6 months vs 56.6 months; p<0.01). For patients with left-sided primary tumors, KRAS mutations also associated with significantly worse median OS (44.7 months vs 60.0 months; p=0.003), but not for right-sided primary tumors (p=0.204). Conclusion: Median OS in CLM is significantly better after hepatectomy for left-sided compared to right-sided primary colorectal cancers. KRAS mutations are significantly associated with worse outcomes in patients with left-sided primary tumors, but have a diminished effect in right-sided primary tumors. Understanding associations between primary tumor laterality and KRAS status on survival is important for patients with CLM being considered for hepatectomy.

BACKGROUND:Primary laterality of colorectal cancer is thought to be associated with differences in outcomes. Liver metastasis is the most common site of solitary colorectal cancer spread. However, how primary colorectal cancer laterality affects outcomes in colorectal liver metastasis remains unclear. METHODS:The Colorectal Liver Operative Metastasis International Collaborative (COLOMIC) of operative hepatectomy cases for colorectal liver metastasis was compiled from five participating institutions. This included consecutive cases from 2000 to 2018 at all sites. A total of 884 patients were included in this study. Univariate, multivariate, and Kaplan-Meier analyses were performed. RESULTS:Patients with left-sided versus right-sided cancers had significantly better overall survival: 49.4 vs. 41.8 months (p < 0.05). Patients with KRAS mutations had significantly worse median overall survival compared to KRAS wild-type (43.6 vs 56.1 months; p < 0.001). In left-sided cancers, KRAS mutations were associated with significantly worse median overall survival compared to KRAS wild-type cancers (43.6 vs 56.6 months; p < 0.01). This association was absent in patients with right-sided primary tumors. Multivariate Cox regression analysis revealed different variable sets (non-overlapping) were associated with overall survival, when comparing left-sided and right-sided cancers. CONCLUSION:Understanding how primary tumor laterality and related biological aspects affect long-term outcomes can potentially inform treatment decisions for patients with colorectal liver metastases.

Background: Although programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1) inhibitors have re-volutionised treatment for advanced melanoma, not all patients respond. We previously showed that inhibition of the flavoprotein renalase (RNLS) in preclinical melanoma models decreases tumour growth. We hypothesised that RNLS inhibition promotes tumour rejection by effects on the tumour microenvironment (TME). Methods: We used two distinct murine melanoma models, studied in RNLS knockout (KO) or wild-type (WT) mice. WT mice were treated with the anti-RNLS antibody, m28, with or without anti-PD-1. 10X single-cell RNA-sequencing was used to identify transcriptional dif-ferences between treatment groups, and tumour cell content was interrogated by flow cytome-try. Samples from patients treated with immunotherapy were examined for RNLS expression by quantitative immunofluorescence. Results: RNLS KO mice injected with wild-type melanoma cells reject their tumours, support -ing the importance of RNLS in cells in the TME. This effect was blunted by anti-cluster of differentiation 3. However, M & Oslash;-specific RNLS ablation was insufficient to abrogate tumour formation. Anti-RNLS antibody treatment of melanoma-bearing mice resulted in enhanced T cell infiltration and activation and resulted in immune memory on rechallenging mice with injection of melanoma cells. At the single-cell level, treatment with anti-RNLS antibodies resulted in increased tumour density of M & Oslash;, neutrophils and lymphocytes and increased expression of IFNg and granzyme B in natural killer cells and T cells. Intratumoural Fork head Box P3 CD4 cells were decreased. In two distinct murine melanoma models, we showed that melanoma-bearing mice treated with anti-RNLS antibodies plus anti-PD-1 had superior tumour shrinkage and survival than with either treatment alone. Importantly, in pretreatment samples from patients treated with PD-1 inhibitors, high RNLS expression was associated with decreased survival (log-rank P Z 0.006), independent of other prognostic variables. Conclusions: RNLS KO results in melanoma tumour regression in a T-cell-dependent fashion. Anti-RNLS antibodies enhance anti-PD-1 activity in two distinct aggressive murine melanoma models resistant to PD-1 inhibitors, supporting the development of anti-RNLS antibodies with PD-1 inhibitors as a novel approach for melanomas poorly responsive to anti PD-1. (c) 2022 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd. This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).

Renalase is a secreted flavoprotein with anti-inflammatory and pro-cell survival properties. COVID-19 is associated with disordered inflammation and apoptosis. We hypothesized that blood renalase levels would correspond to severe COVID-19 and survival. In this retrospective cohort study, clinicopathologic data and blood samples were collected from hospitalized COVID-19 subjects (March—June 2020) at a single institution tertiary hospital. Plasma renalase and cytokine levels were measured and clinical data abstracted from health records. Of 3,450 COVID-19 patients, 458 patients were enrolled. Patients were excluded if <18 years, or opted out of research. The primary composite outcome was intubation or death within 180 days. Secondary outcomes included mortality alone, intensive care unit admission, use of vasopressors, and CPR. Enrolled patients had mean age 64 years (SD±17), were 53% males, and 48% non-whites. Mean renalase levels was 14,108·4 ng/ml (SD±8,137 ng/ml). Compared to patients with high renalase, those with low renalase (< 8,922 ng/ml) were more likely to present with hypoxia, increased ICU admission (54% vs. 33%, p < 0.001), and cardiopulmonary resuscitation (10% vs. 4%, p = 0·023). In Cox proportional hazard model, every 1000 ng/ml increase in renalase decreased the risk of death or intubation by 5% (HR 0·95; 95% CI 0·91–0·98) and increased survival alone by 6% (HR 0·95; CI 0·90–0·98), after adjusting for socio-demographics, initial disease severity, comorbidities and inflammation. Patients with high renalase-low IL-6 levels had the best survival compared to other groups (p = 0·04). Renalase was independently associated with reduced intubation and mortality in hospitalized COVID-19 patients. Future studies should assess the pathophysiological relevance of renalase in COVID-19 disease.

BACKGROUND:Resection of colorectal liver metastasis (CLM) is beneficial when feasible. However, the benefit of second hepatectomy for hepatic recurrence in CLM remains unclear. METHODS:The Colorectal Liver Operative Metastasis International Collaborative retrospectively examined 1004 CLM cases from 2000 to 2018 from a total of 953 patients. Hepatic recurrence after initial hepatectomy was identified in 218 patients. Kaplan-Meier analysis was performed for overall survival (OS) and recurrence-free survival (RFS). Propensity score matching (PSM) was performed to offset selection bias. Cox proportional-hazards regression was performed to identify risk factors associated with OS. RESULTS:A total of 51 patients underwent second hepatectomy. Unadjusted median OS was 60.1 months in repeat-hepatectomy versus 38.3 months in the single-hepatectomy group (p = 0.015). In the PSM population, median OS remained significantly better in the repeat-hepatectomy group (60.1 vs. 33.1 months; p = 0.0023); median RFS was 12.4 months for the repeat-hepatectomy group, versus 9.8 months in the single-hepatectomy group (p = 0.0050). Repeat hepatectomy was associated with lower risk of death (hazard ratio: 0.283; p = 0.000012). Obesity, tobacco use, and high intraoperative blood loss were associated with significant risk of death (p < 0.05). CONCLUSION:In CLM with hepatic recurrence, second hepatectomy was beneficial for OS. With PSM, the OS benefit of performing a second hepatectomy remained significant.