Abstract Background Extragenital gonococcal infections are common among men who have sex with men (MSM); however, data comparing antimicrobial susceptibilities of urogenital and extragenital Neisseria gonorrhoeae isolates are limited. We investigated differences in gonococcal antimicrobial susceptibility by anatomic site among cisgender MSM using specimens collected through CDC’s enhanced Gonococcal Isolate Surveillance Project (eGISP) and Strengthening the U.S. Response to Resistant Gonorrhea (SURRG). Methods During January 1, 2018–December 31, 2019, 12 eGISP and 8 SURRG sites collected urogenital, pharyngeal, and rectal isolates from cisgender MSM in STD clinics. Gonococcal isolates were sent to regional laboratories for antimicrobial susceptibility testing by agar dilution. To account for correlated observations, linear mixed-effects models were used to calculate geometric mean minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) and mixed-effects logistic regression models were used to calculate the proportion of isolates with elevated or resistant MICs; comparisons were made across anatomic sites. Results Participating clinics collected 3,974 urethral, 1,553 rectal, and 1,049 pharyngeal isolates from 5,456 unique cisgender MSM. There were no significant differences in the geometric mean MICs for azithromycin, ciprofloxacin, penicillin, and tetracycline by anatomic site. For cefixime and ceftriaxone, geometric mean MICs for pharyngeal isolates were higher compared to anogenital isolates (p< 0.05). The proportion of isolates with elevated ceftriaxone MICs (≥ 0.125 µg/ml) at the pharynx (0.67%) was higher than at rectal (0.13%) and urethral (0.18%) sites (p< 0.05). Conclusion Based on data collected from multi-jurisdictional sentinel surveillance projects, antimicrobial susceptibility patterns of N. gonorrhoeae isolates may differ among MSM at extragenital sites, particularly at the pharynx. Continued investigation into gonococcal susceptibility patterns by anatomic site may be an important strategy to monitor and detect the emergence of antimicrobial resistant gonorrhea over time. Disclosures Olusegun O. Soge, PhD, Hologic Inc. (Grant/Research Support)SpeeDx Inc. (Grant/Research Support) Stephanie N. Taylor, MD, GARDP - GC Antibiotic Development (Scientific Research Study Investigator, To my institution.)GlaxoSmithKline (Grant/Research Support, Funds to my institution.)

Background We investigated differences in gonococcal antimicrobial susceptibility by anatomic site among cisgender men who have sex with men (MSM) using specimens collected through the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention's enhanced Gonococcal Isolate Surveillance Project and Strengthening the US Response to Resistant Gonorrhea. Methods During the period January 1, 2018-December 31, 2019, 12 enhanced Gonococcal Isolate Surveillance Project and 8 Strengthening the US Response to Resistant Gonorrhea sites collected urogenital, pharyngeal, and rectal isolates from cisgender MSM in sexually transmitted disease clinics. Gonococcal isolates were sent to regional laboratories for antimicrobial susceptibility testing by agar dilution. To account for correlated observations, linear mixed-effects models were used to calculate geometric mean minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs), and mixed-effects logistic regression models were used to calculate the proportion of isolates with elevated or resistant MICs; comparisons were made across anatomic sites. Results Participating clinics collected 3974 urethral, 1553 rectal, and 1049 pharyngeal isolates from 5456 unique cisgender MSM. There were no significant differences in the geometric mean MICs for azithromycin, ciprofloxacin, penicillin, and tetracycline by anatomic site. For cefixime and ceftriaxone, geometric mean MICs for pharyngeal isolates were higher compared with anogenital isolates (P < 0.05). The proportion of isolates with elevated ceftriaxone MICs (>= 0.125 mu g/mL) at the pharynx (0.67%) was higher than at rectal (0.13%) and urethral (0.18%) sites (P < 0.05). Conclusions Based on data collected from multijurisdictional sentinel surveillance projects, antimicrobial susceptibility patterns of Neisseria gonorrhoeae isolates may differ among MSM at extragenital sites, particularly at the pharynx. Continued investigation into gonococcal susceptibility patterns by anatomic site may be an important strategy to monitor and detect the emergence of antimicrobial resistant gonorrhea over time.

In 2014, the California Department of Public Health was notified by a local health department of a diagnosis of acute human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection* and rectal gonorrhea in a male adult film industry performer, aged 25 years (patient A). Patient A had a 6-day history of rash, fever, and sore throat suggestive of acute retroviral syndrome at the time of examination. He was informed of his positive HIV and gonorrhea test results 6 days after his examination. Patient A had a negative HIV-1 RNA qualitative nucleic acid amplification test (NAAT)(†) 10 days before symptom onset. This investigation found that during the 22 days between the negative NAAT and being informed of his positive HIV test results, two different production companies directed patient A to have condomless sex with a total of 12 male performers. Patient A also provided contact information for five male non-work-related sexual partners during the month before and after his symptom onset. Patient A had additional partners during this time period for which no locating information was provided. Neither patient A nor any of his interviewed sexual partners reported taking HIV preexposure prophylaxis (PrEP). Contact tracing and phylogenetic analysis of HIV sequences amplified from pretreatment plasma revealed that a non-work-related partner likely infected patient A, and that patient A likely subsequently infected both a coworker during the second film production and a non-work-related partner during the interval between his negative test and receipt of his positive HIV results. Adult film performers and production companies, medical providers, and all persons at risk for HIV should be aware that testing alone is not sufficient to prevent HIV transmission. Condom use provides additional protection from HIV and sexually transmitted infections (STIs). Performers and all persons at risk for HIV infection in their professional and personal lives should discuss the use of PrEP with their medical providers.