BACKGROUND:The delivery of cataract surgery during the COVID-19 pandemic is challenging because of the risk of nosocomial SARS-CoV-2 infection when patients attend hospital for elective care. In order to ascertain the risk to patients awaiting cataract surgery, this study aimed to identify the presence of systemic comorbidities that are associated with a high risk of severe disease or death due to COVID-19.METHODS:A prospective study of 315 patients (630 eyes) was conducted from 3rd June to 31st July 2020. An electronic health record was used to identify any systemic comorbidities that would render a patient 'clinically extremely vulnerable' to COVID-19, as outlined by the Department of Health for Northern Ireland. Patient demographics, best-corrected visual acuity (VA) and risk of postoperative anisometropia were also recorded.RESULTS:The median age of patients awaiting cataract surgery was 76 years (range 22-97). Of the 315 patients, 72% were aged over 70 and 16% were aged over 85. A systemic comorbidity that would confer high risk status was identified in 21% of patients. This high risk status was attributable to severe respiratory disease, cancer, and immunosuppression therapies in the majority of cases. The high risk group were younger than those deemed non-high risk, but there were no significant differences with respect to gender, anticipated degree of surgical difficulty, VA, or whether the patient was undergoing first or second eye surgery. Of those patients awaiting first eye cataract surgery, the mean VA in the listed eye was 0.84 logMAR and 39% (70/179) had a VA <0.3 logMAR (6/12 Snellen acuity) in their fellow eye. 57% of patients were awaiting first eye surgery, and 32% of those patients would be at risk of symptomatic anisometropia postoperatively.CONCLUSION:One-fifth of patients awaiting cataract surgery were found to be at high risk of severe disease or death from COVID-19 and these patients may experience delays in their surgical care. Additional planning is required in order to minimise the morbidity associated with delayed cataract surgery.

Aims There is an emerging interest in ‘decolonising global health’ by examining the power imbalances between the Global North and South. One key area to scrutinise is the local representation in the authorship of published research carried out in low-resource settings. To date this has focused on published manuscripts; to our knowledge conference presentations and publications have not yet been explored. First and last author are generally regarded as the lead and senior or responsible persons for a published project. This initial audit aimed to retrospectively review first and last authors of global paediatric research presented at an international conference. Methods We analysed authorship from published abstracts presented at the section of the Royal College of Paediatrics and Child Health Annual Conferences from 2016 to 2021. Studies were included if performed in low and middle-income countries (LMICs). Studies conducted primarily in high-income countries (HICs), secondary data analysis, and reviews, were excluded. The first and last author of each conference abstract were classified as being primarily affiliated with either the same country as the paper’s focus or a HIC. For an author with affiliations in multiple countries, we used the following classification; if any country of affiliation was a HIC, then the author was classified as being primarily affiliated with a HIC. Results 129 published abstracts were reviewed representing six years of submissions. Training interventions were the most common type of study presented (n=24, 18.6%), followed by descriptive studies (n=19, 14.7%), audits (n=17, 13.2%), qualitative studies (n=13, 10.1%), cohort studies (n=12, 9.3%), and cross-sectional studies (n=10, 7.8%). Studies were carried out across 33 countries, most commonly Malawi (n=19), Myanmar (n=12), Kenya (n=12), and Rwanda (n=10). Most were carried out in the WHO African Region (n=83, 64.3%), with 34 (26.4%) carried out in the South-East Asian Region. Seventy percent of first authors were from a HIC i.e., not primarily affiliated with the country where the research was conducted. An average of 40% of last authors had a primary affiliation within the country the research was performed in. Findings were similar across all six years. In total, more than half (53%, n=69) of abstracts did not have a local author as either the first or last author. Conclusion Global paediatric conference abstracts to ICHG conform to the broader pattern of citations being heavily dominated by academics from HICs. Local leadership, knowledge, understanding and input are fundamental to informing research design, performing research and the interpretation of results, as well as the success and sustainability of quality improvement and training interventions. We recognise this audit is limited in its focus to a UK-based conference and restricted to first and last authorship only. However, further research is needed to understand the reasons behind the low rates of representative first and last authorship, and inform development of authorship guidance for conference submissions. We advocate that conference committees, like academic journals, should encourage global health research to reflect the equal partnership and leadership from research institutions and academics from the Global South.

Background Cash transfers, payments provided by formal or informal institutions to recipients, are increasingly used in emergencies. While increasing autonomy and being supportive of local economies, cash transfers are a cost-effective method in some settings to cover basic needs and extend benefits of limited humanitarian aid budgets. Yet, the extent to which cash transfers impact health in humanitarian settings remains largely unexplored. This systematic review evaluates the evidence on the effect of cash transfers on health outcomes and health service utilisation in humanitarian contexts. Methods Studies eligible for inclusion were peer reviewed (quantitative,qualitative and mixed-methods). Nine databases (PubMed, EMBAS, Medline, CINAHL, Global Health, Scopus, Web of Science Core Collection, SciELO and LiLACS) were searched without language and without a lower bound time restriction through 24 February 2021. The search was updated to include articles published through 8 December 2021. Data were extracted using a piloted extraction tool and quality was assessed using The Joanna Briggs Critical Appraisal Tool. Due to heterogeneity in study designs and outcomes, results were synthesised narratively and no meta-analysis was performed. Results 30 673 records were identified. After removing duplicates, 17 715 were double screened by abstract and title, and 201 in full text. Twenty-three articles from 16 countries were included reporting on nutrition outcomes, psychosocial and mental health, general/subjective health and well-being, acute illness (eg, diarrhoea, respiratory infection), diabetes control (eg, blood glucose self-monitoring, haemoglobin A1C levels) and gender-based violence. Nineteen studies reported some positive impacts on various health outcomes and use of health services, 11 reported no statistically significant impact on outcomes assessed and 4 reported potential negative impacts on health outcomes. Discussion Although there is evidence to suggest a positive relationship between cash transfers and health outcomes in humanitarian settings, high-quality empirical evidence, that is methodologically robust, investigates a range of humanitarian settings and is conducted over longer time periods is needed. This should consider factors influencing programme implementation and the differential impact of cash transfers designed to improve health versus multipurpose cash transfers. PROSPERO registration number CRD42021237275.

INTRODUCTION:Ensuring that surgical training programmes in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) provide high quality training, including adequate operative experience, is of crucial importance in meeting the goals set out in the Lancet Global Surgery 2030. Electronic logbooks (eLogbooks) have been adopted to monitor both individual trainee progression and the performance of surgical training programmes.METHODS:We performed a thematic review of the current evidence base surrounding the use of eLogbooks for the assessment of surgeons in training in sub-Saharan Africa, with a view to identifying the learning to date and areas for future research.RESULTS:Whilst there are multiple papers highlighting the use of surgical eLogbooks in high-income countries, we identified only three papers which discussed their use in sub-Saharan Africa. Four common themes emerged which related to the use of surgical eLogbooks throughout sub-Saharan Africa: ease of analysis, centralised databases, discrepancies in reporting and technology limitations.CONCLUSIONS:Robust data to demonstrate trainee progression and the quality of surgical training programmes are of crucial importance in ensuring that surgical training programmes can rapidly scale up to deliver large numbers of well-trained surgical providers to address the unmet patient need in LMICs in the next decade. The limited data on the use of well designed, centralised electronic surgical logbooks indicate that this tool may play an important role in providing key data to underpin these training programmes.

Despite achieving relatively high rates of antenatal care, institutional delivery, and HIV antiretroviral therapy for women during pregnancy, neonatal mortality has remained stubbornly high in Zimbabwe. Clearer understanding of causal pathways is required to inform effective interventions. This study was a secondary analysis of data from the Sanitation Hygiene Infant Nutrition Efficacy (SHINE) trial, a cluster-randomized community-based trial among pregnant women and their infants, to examine care during institutional and non-institutional deliveries in rural Zimbabwe and associated birth outcomes. Among 4423 pregnant women, 529 (11.9

Objectives: Radiotherapy is a key cancer treatment modality but is poorly understood by doctors. We sought to evaluate radiation oncology (RO) teaching in medical schools within the United Kingdom (UK) and Republic of Ireland (RoI), as well as any impacts on RO teaching delivery from the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic. Methods: A bespoke online survey instrument was developed, piloted and distributed to oncology teaching leads at all UK and RoI medical schools. Questions were designed to capture information on the structure, format, content and faculty for RO teaching, as well as both the actual and the predicted short- and long-term impacts of COVID-19. Results: Responses were received from 29/41 (71%) UK and 5/6 (83%) RoI medical schools. Pre-clinical and clinical oncology teaching was delivered over a median of 2 weeks (IQR 1–6), although only 9 (27%) of 34 responding medical schools had a standalone RO module. RO teaching was most commonly delivered in clinics or wards (n = 26 and 25 respectively). Few medical schools provided teaching on the biological basis for radiotherapy (n = 11) or the RO career pathway (n = 8), and few provide teaching delivered by non-medical RO multidisciplinary team members. There was evidence of short- and long-term disruption to RO teaching from COVID-19. Conclusions: RO teaching in the UK and RoI is limited with minimal coverage of relevant theoretical principles and little exposure to radiotherapy departments and their non-medical team members. The COVID-19 pandemic risks exacerbating trainee doctors’ already constrained exposure to radiotherapy. Advances in knowledge: This study provides the first analysis of radiotherapy-related teaching in the UK and RoI, and the first to explore the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on radiationoncology teaching.

The expansion of local training programmes is crucial to address the shortages of specialist paediatric surgeons across Sub-Saharan Africa. This study assesses whether the current training programme for paediatric surgery at the College of Surgeons of East, Central and Southern Africa (COSECSA) is exposing trainees to adequate numbers and types of surgical procedures, as defined by local and international guidelines. Using data from the COSECSA web-based logbook, we retrospectively analysed numbers and types of operations carried out by paediatric surgical trainees at each stage of training between 2015 and 2019, comparing results with indicative case numbers from regional (COSECSA) and international (Joint Commission on Surgical Training) guidelines. A total of 7,616 paediatric surgical operations were recorded by 15 trainees, at different stages of training, working across five countries in Sub-Saharan Africa. Each trainee recorded a median number of 456 operations (range 56–1111), with operative experience increasing between the first and final year of training. The most commonly recorded operation was inguinal hernia (n = 1051, 13.8%). Trainees performed the majority (n = 5607, 73.6%) of operations recorded in the eLogbook themselves, assisting in the remainder. Trainees exceeded both local and international recommended case numbers for general surgical procedures, with little exposure to sub-specialities. Trainees obtain a wide experience in common and general paediatric surgical procedures, the number of which increases during training. Post-certification may be required for those who wish to sub-specialise. The data from the logbook are useful in identifying individuals who may require additional experience and centres which should be offering increased levels of supervised surgical exposure.