Background In 2021, WHO recommended dapivirine vaginal rings (DVRs) for HIV prevention, but noted evidence gaps for breastfeeding populations. This trial aimed to describe safety profiles associated with DVRs and oral pre- exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) use during breastfeeding and to summarise study-drug quantification and concentrations for mothers and infants. Methods Microbicide Trials Network (MTN)-043 was a phase 3b, open-label, randomised trial in which mother-infant pairs were recruited from local health facilities and enrolled at four HIV clinical trial sites in Malawi, South Africa, Uganda, and Zimbabwe. Eligible mothers (aged >= 18 years) were HIV-negative, exclusively breastfeeding one infant (aged 6-12 weeks, birthweight >= 2000 g), and had not been exposed to HIV post-exposure prophylaxis in the previous 6 months. Mother-infant pairs were randomly assigned (3:1) via a computer-generated sequence to 12 weeks of 25 mg monthly DVR or daily oral PrEP (200 mg emtricitabine and 300 mg tenofovir disoproxil fumarate), with stratification by site using a permuted block design. Participants and staff were aware of study product assignment. Primary outcomes were maternal and infant safety (all serious adverse events and grade 3 or worse adverse events) and drug concentrations, which were measured in maternal plasma, maternal blood, breastmilk, infant plasma, and infant blood. All mother-infant pairs who received at least one dose of study product were included in the primary safety analysis, and those with at least one post-enrolment drug concentration result were included in the drug quantification analysis. The trial was registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT04140266). Findings Between Sept 24, 2020, and July 29, 2021, 197 mother-infant pairs enrolled (148 on DVR and 49 on PrEP), all of whom received at least one dose of study product and were included in the primary safety analysis. Two (1%) of 148 mothers in the DVR group had serious adverse events, and three (2%) in the DVR group and two (4%) in the oral PrEP group had a grade 3 or worse adverse event; four (3%) of 148 infants in the DVR group had a serious adverse event, and ten (7%) in the DVR group and one (2%) in the oral PrEP group had a grade 3 or worse adverse event. No mother or infant in the oral PrEP group had a serious adverse event. No HIV infections were detected. 144 participants in the DVR group and 48 in the oral PrEP group had at least one post-enrolment drug concentration result. Quantifiable median dapivirine concentrations ranged from 6560 (IQR 4070-8780) pg/mL at week 1 to 5585 (2820-7780) pg/mL at month 3, but were observed infrequently (5-15%) in specimens from infants, with median concentrations below the limit of quantification at all visits. Median tenofovir diphosphate concentrations ranged from 2630 (1930-3630) fmol/punch at week 1 to 7770 (3810-12410) fmol/punch at month 3, but were not observed in specimens from infants, with all concentrations below the limit of quantification at all visits. Interpretation Increased risk of HIV acquisition in the postnatal period, favourable product safety profile, and low drug exposures among infants support the recommendation for DVRs as an additional HIV prevention choice during breastfeeding. Copyright (c) 2025 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved, including those for text and data mining, AI training, and similar technologies.

End-user feedback early in product development is important for optimizing multipurpose prevention technologies for HIV and pregnancy prevention. We evaluated the acceptability of the 90-day dapivirine levonorgestrel ring (DPV-LNG ring) used for 14 days compared to a dapivirine-only ring (DVR-200mg) in MTN-030/IPM 041 (n = 23), and when used for 90 days cyclically or continuously in MTN-044/IPM 053/CCN019 (n = 25). We enrolled healthy, non-pregnant, HIV-negative women aged 18-45 in Pittsburgh, PA and Birmingham, AL (MTN-030 only). Self-reports of vaginal bleeding and adherence (ring removals, expulsions) were collected via daily short message service. Acceptability data were recorded in face-to-face interviews at study exit. We assessed differences in acceptability by product characteristics and adherence; and associations between baseline characteristics/demographics, number of bleeding days, adherence, and overall acceptability. Most (21/23) women in the 14-day MTN-030 study and about half (13/25) in the 90-day MTN-044 study liked their assigned rings. In MTN-030 there were no significant associations between any variables and overall acceptability of either ring. In MTN-044, women who disliked the DPV-LNG ring had a significantly higher incidence of unanticipated vaginal bleeding, and reporting that vaginal bleeding changes were unacceptable than those who liked it. Although we found no overall association between adherence and acceptability, significantly more women who disliked (versus liked) the DPV-LNG ring reported expulsions during toileting. The DPV-LNG ring could meet the needs of women seeking simultaneous protection from HIV and unintended pregnancy. Addressing issues related to vaginal bleeding and expulsions early in product development will likely enhance acceptability of the DPV-LNG ring. Trial registration: Clinical Trial Registration: MTN-030/IPM 041: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02855346; MTN-044/IPM 053/CCN019: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT03467347.

Background Despite highly effective HIV preexposure prophylaxis (PrEP) options, no options provide on-demand, nonsystemic, behaviorally congruent PrEP that many desire. A tenofovir-medicated rectal douche before receptive anal intercourse may provide this option.Methods Three tenofovir rectal douches-220 mg iso-osmolar product A, 660 mg iso-osmolar product B, and 660 mg hypo-osmolar product C-were studied in 21 HIV-negative men who have sex with men. We sampled blood and colorectal tissue to assess safety, acceptability, pharmacokinetics, and pharmacodynamics.Results The douches had high acceptability without toxicity. Median plasma tenofovir peak concentrations for all products were several-fold below trough concentrations associated with oral tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (TDF). Median colon tissue mucosal mononuclear cell (MMC) tenofovir-diphosphate concentrations exceeded target concentrations from 1 hour through 3 to 7 days after dosing. For 6-7 days after a single product C dose, MMC tenofovir-diphosphate exceeded concentrations expected with steady-state oral TDF 300 mg on-demand 2-1-1 dosing. Compared to predrug baseline, HIV replication after ex vivo colon tissue HIV challenge demonstrated a concentration-response relationship with 1.9 log10 maximal effect.Conclusions All 3 tenofovir douches achieved tissue tenofovir-diphosphate concentrations and colorectal antiviral effect exceeding oral TDF and with lower systemic tenofovir. Tenofovir douches may provide a single-dose, on-demand, behaviorally congruent PrEP option, and warrant continued development. Clinical Trials Registration . NCT02750540.Conclusions All 3 tenofovir douches achieved tissue tenofovir-diphosphate concentrations and colorectal antiviral effect exceeding oral TDF and with lower systemic tenofovir. Tenofovir douches may provide a single-dose, on-demand, behaviorally congruent PrEP option, and warrant continued development. Clinical Trials Registration . NCT02750540. Tenofovir formulated as a rectal douche offers the potential for a single-dose, on-demand, acceptable, and behaviorally congruent option for HIV preexposure prophylaxis supported by colorectal tissue tenofovir diphosphate and antiviral effect exceeding similar measures associated with oral tenofovir disoproxil fumarate.

IntroductionEnd-user perspectives are vital to the design of new biomedical HIV prevention products. Conjoint analysis can support the integration of end-user perspectives by examining their preferences of potential pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) products. The Microbicides Trial Network (MTN) 035 protocol examined three placebo rectal dosage forms (insert, enema and suppository) that could deliver PrEP prior to receptive anal sex (RAS).MethodsBetween April 2019 and July 2020, we enrolled 217 HIV-negative, cisgender men who have sex with men (MSM; n = 172; 79.3%) and transgender people (n = 47; 20.7%) ages 18-35 into a randomized cross-over trial across Malawi, Peru, South Africa, Thailand and the United States. Participants used each product prior to RAS over 4-week periods. Participants completed a conjoint experiment where they selected between random profiles using seven features (dosage form, timing of use before sex, side effects, duration of protection, effectiveness, frequency of use and need for a prescription).ResultsEffectiveness was the strongest determinant of choice (30.4%), followed by modality (18.0%), potential side effects (17.2%), frequency of use (10.8%), duration of protection (10.4%), timing of use before sex (7.4%) and need for a prescription (5.9%). Relative utility scores indicated that the most desirable combination of attributes was a product with 95% efficacy, used 30 minutes before sex, offering a 3- to 5-day protection window, used weekly, having no side effects, in the form of an enema and available over-the-counter.ConclusionsChoice in next-generation PrEP products is highly desired by MSM and transgender people, as no one-size-fits-all approach satisfies all the preferences. MTN-035 participants weighed product features differently, recognizing the need for diverse, behaviourally congruent biomedical options that fit the needs of intended end-users.

The DESIRE Study (MTN-035) explored product preference among three placebo rectal microbicide (RM) formulations, a rectal douche (RD), a suppository, and an insert, among 210 sexually active transgender people and men who have sex with men in five counties: the United States, Peru, Thailand, South Africa, and Malawi. Participants used each product prior to receptive anal sex (RAS) for 1 month, following a randomly assigned sequence, then selected their preferred product via computer assisted self-interview. In-depth interviews examined reasons for preference. We compared product preference and prior product use by country to explore whether geographic location and experience with the similar products impacted preference. A majority in the United States (56

AbstractIntroductionTenofovir‐based oral pre‐exposure prophylaxis is currently approved for HIV prevention; however, adherence in women has been low. A vaginal gel containing tenofovir (TFV) demonstrated partial protection to HIV but protection was not confirmed in additional studies. Vaginal rings offer user‐controlled long‐acting HIV prevention that could overcome adherence and protection challenges. TFV may also help prevent herpes simplex virus type 2 acquisition when delivered intravaginally. We evaluated the pharmacokinetics, safety, adherence and acceptability of a 90‐day TFV ring.MethodsBetween January and June 2019, Microbicide Trials Network (MTN)‐038 enrolled 49 HIV‐negative participants into a phase 1, randomized (2:1) trial comparing a 90‐day ring containing 1.4 grams (g) TFV to a placebo ring. TFV concentrations were quantified in plasma, cervicovaginal fluid (CVF), rectal fluid and cervical tissue, and TFV‐diphosphate (TFV‐DP) in cervical tissue. Used rings were analysed for residual TFV. Safety was assessed by adverse events (AEs); acceptability and adherence by self‐report.ResultsMean age was 29.5; 46 identified as cisgender‐female and three gender non‐conforming. There were no differences in the proportion of participants with grade ≥2 genitourinary AEs in the TFV versus placebo arms (p = 0.41); no grade ≥3 AEs were reported. Geometric mean TFV concentrations increased through day 34 in CVF/rectal fluid and day 59 in plasma, but declined across compartments by day 91. Geometric mean TFV‐DP tissue concentrations exceeded the 1000 fmol/mg target through day 56, but fell to 456 fmol/mg at day 91. Among 32 rings returned at the end of the study, 13 had no or low (<0.1 g) residual TFV. Residual TFV did not differ by socio‐demographics, sexual activity, Nugent Score or vaginal microbiota. Most participants reported being fully adherent to ring use: 85% and 81% in the TFV and placebo arms, respectively (p = 1.00). A majority of participants reported liking the ring (median 8 on a 10‐point Likert scale) and reported a high likelihood of using the ring in the future, if effective (median 9).ConclusionsThe 90‐day TFV ring was well‐tolerated, acceptable and exceeded target cervical tissue concentrations through day 56, but declined thereafter. Additional studies are needed to characterize the higher release from TFV rings in some participants and the optimal duration of use.

Efforts to develop a range of HIV prevention products that can serve as behaviorally congruent viable alternatives to consistent condom use and oral pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) remain crucial. MTN-035 was a randomized crossover trial seeking to evaluate the safety, acceptability, and adherence to three placebo modalities (insert, suppository, enema) prior to receptive anal intercourse (RAI). If participants had no RAI in a week, they were asked to use their assigned product without sex. We hypothesized that the modalities would be acceptable and safe for use prior to RAI, and that participants would report high adherence given their behavioral congruence with cleansing practices (e.g., douches and/or enemas) and their existing use to deliver medications (e.g., suppositories; fast-dissolving inserts) via the rectum. Participants (N = 217) were sexual and gender minorities enrolled in five different countries (Malawi, Peru, South Africa, Thailand, and the United States of America). Mean age was 24.9 years (range 18–35 years). 204 adverse events were reported by 98 participants (45.2%); 37 (18.1%) were deemed related to the study products. The proportion of participants reporting “high acceptability” was 72% (95%CI: 65% - 78%) for inserts, 66% (95%CI: 59% - 73%) for suppositories, and 73% (95%CI: 66% - 79%) for enemas. The proportion of participants reporting fully adherent per protocol (i.e., at least one use per week) was 75% (95%CI: 69% - 81%) for inserts, 74% (95%CI: 68% - 80%) for suppositories, and 83% (95%CI: 77% - 88%) for enemas. Participants fully adherent per RAI-act was similar among the three products: insert (n = 99; 58.9%), suppository (n = 101; 58.0%) and enema (n = 107; 58.8%). The efficacy and effectiveness of emerging HIV prevention drug depends on safe and acceptable delivery modalities that are easy to use consistently. Our findings demonstrate the safety and acceptability of, and adherence to, enemas, inserts, and suppositories as potential modalities through which to deliver a rectal microbicide.

Background Half of new HIV acquisitions in Africa occur in adolescent girls and young women. Pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) with oral tenofovir disoproxil fumarate plus emtricitabine or the monthly dapivirine vaginal ring is efficacious but has lower adherence and effectiveness among adolescent girls and young women. We aimed to assess product adherence, safety, and choice of oral PrEP compared with the dapivirine ring among African adolescent girls and young women.Methods MTN-034/REACH was a randomised, open-label, phase 2a crossover trial among HIV-seronegative, nonpregnant adolescent girls and young women aged 16-21 years at four clinical research sites in South Africa, Uganda, and Zimbabwe. Participants were randomly assigned (1:1) to either the dapivirine ring or daily oral PrEP (200 mg of emtricitabine and 300 mg of tenofovir disoproxil fumarate) for 6 months, then switched to the other product option for 6 months, followed by a third 6-month period in which participants were given a choice of oral PrEP, the dapivirine ring, or neither. Fixed block randomisation was used, stratified by site. The primary adherence endpoint was use of each product during the randomised periods, with high use defined as tenofovir-diphosphate concentrations greater than or equal to 700 fmol/punch (associated with taking an average of four or more tablets per week in the previous month) and greater than or equal to 4 mg dapivirine released from the returned ring (continuous use for 28 days in the previous month) based on residual drug concentrations. The primary safety endpoint was grade 2 or higher adverse events during each randomised period of 24 weeks of ring and oral PrEP. This trial is registered at ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03593655.Findings From Feb 6, 2019 to Sept 9, 2021, 396 adolescent girls and young women were screened, 247 of whom were enrolled and randomly assigned (6 months of the ring followed by 6 months of oral PrEP n=124; 6 months of oral PrEP followed by 6 months of the ring n=123). Median age was 18 years (IQR 17-19). 54 grade 2 or higher product related adverse events were reported during oral PrEP and five during dapivirine ring use, with no product-related serious adverse events. High adherence was observed in 753 (57%) of the 1316 oral PrEP visits and 806 (57%) of the 1407 dapivirine ring visits. Four women acquired HIV during follow-up.Interpretation Adherence was moderately high and similar between oral PrEP and the dapivirine ring with favourable safety and tolerability. Oral PrEP and the dapivirine ring are effective, safe, and well tolerated HIV prevention options for adolescent girls and young women who would benefit from a choice of PrEP formulations to meet their needs and preferences.Funding National Institutes of Health.Copyright (c) 2023 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

The Combination HIV Antiretroviral Rectal Microbicide-3 (CHARM-03) study was a randomized, open-label, crossover Phase 1 safety and pharmacokinetic (PK) study of oral maraviroc (MVC) and MVC 1% gel. At a single site, healthy HIV-uninfected men and women were enrolled and randomized to an open label crossover sequence of eight consecutive daily exposures to MVC 300 mg dosed orally, MCV 1% gel dosed rectally, and MVC 1% gel dosed vaginally. Male participants received oral and rectal dosing and female participants received oral, rectal, and vaginal dosing. Assessments were undertaken at baseline and following each 8-day period and included collection of plasma, rectal/cervical tissue (CT), and rectal/endocervical/vaginal fluids. Eleven men and nine women were enrolled. Two participants withdrew from the study before receiving study product. There were 25 adverse events, of which 24 were Grade 1 (G1) and one was G2 (unrelated). After eight doses, MVC was quantifiable in all samples following oral, rectal, or vaginal product administration. The highest drug concentrations in plasma, rectal tissue (RT), and CT were associated with oral, rectal, and vaginal drug delivery, respectively. There were significant reductions in tissue drug concentrations when rectal and cervical biopsies were incubated in media before tissue processing for PK (p < .0001). Only oral MVC was associated with limited protection in the rectal explant HIV challenge model (p < .05). There were no immunological changes in RT, and all products were acceptable to participants. In conclusion, all products were found to be safe and acceptable and did not induce local inflammation. The lack of ex vivo efficacy demonstrated in study samples may be due to rapid disassociation of MVC from the explant tissue. ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02346084.

Data to inform behaviorally congruent delivery of rectal microbicides as lubricants are scant. Dapivirine (DPV) is a nonnucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor which has been demonstrated to be well-tolerated and efficacious in multiple clinical trials when used in a vaginal ring formulation. DPV gel administered rectally with an applicator was found to be well-tolerated in a phase 1 clinical trial. MTN-033, a single site, open label, sequence randomized, crossover study, enrolled HIV-negative men to receive 0.05% DPV gel intrarectally using an applicator (2.5 g) and self-administered on an artificial phallus as lubricant (up to 10 g). The study evaluated the pharmacokinetics (in plasma, rectal fluid, and mucosal rectal tissue), safety, acceptability, and pharmacodynamics of DPV gel when applied rectally. Statistical comparisons between methods of application were performed using mixed effects models or Wilcoxon's signed rank tests. Sixteen participants used DPV gel by applicator and 15/16 participants used gel as lubricant (mean, 1.8 g; SD, 0.8). DPV plasma AUC0-24h after use as lubricant was estimated to be 0.41 times the AUC0-24h (95% CI 0.24, 0.88) after use with applicator. While DPV was quantifiable in plasma and luminal fluid, it was not quantifiable in tissue for both applicator and as lubricant administration. No related adverse events (AE) were reported, and 15/15 participants felt the gel was easy to use. Evidence of local delivery and systemic absorption of DPV when dosed as an anal lubricant supports the feasibility and potential for development of lubricant-delivered rectal microbicides. There were no safety concerns associated with use of DPV gel and participants reported finding it easy to use. However, lower DPV exposure in plasma and lack of quantifiable DPV in rectal tissue indicate that higher potency, concentration, and longer half-life antiretrovirals with optimized formulations will be needed to achieve protective tissue concentrations.

Dapivirine (DPV), formulated as vaginal ring, demonstrated HIV risk reduction. MTN-026 explored DPV, formulated as rectal gel, for safety, pharmacokinetics (PK), and acceptability. HIV-uninfected men and women aged 18-45 years were enrolled at United States and Thailand sites and randomized 2:1 to receive DPV 0.05% or placebo gel via rectal applicator. A single-dose phase was followed by seven observed daily doses. Plasma and fluid and tissue from both rectum and cervix were collected at baseline and after the final dose over 72 h for PK, ex-vivo HIV-1 biopsy challenge, histology, and flow cytometry. Twenty-eight participants were randomized; 2 terminated early; 9 were female and 19 male; 12 were white, 11 Asian, 4 black, and 1 other race/ethnicity. Mean age was 28.5 and 34.2 years in the DPV and placebo arms, respectively. Thirty adverse events occurred (all Grade 1 or 2, except one unrelated Grade 3) without study arm differences. DPV rectal tissue concentrations [median (interquartile range)] 0.5-1 and 2 h after a single dose were 256 ng/g [below the lower limit of quantification (BLQ)-666] and BLQ (BLQ-600), respectively, then BLQ (BLQ-BLQ) from 24 to 72 h; concentrations following multiple doses were similar. The largest median DPV plasma concentrations were 0.33 ng/mL (0.15-0.48) after one dose and 0.40 (0.33-0.49) after seven doses. The DPV rectal gel was acceptable and without safety concerns. While DPV plasma concentrations were similar to the vaginal ring, rectal tissue concentrations were well below vaginal ring tissue concentrations, suggesting need for reformulation.Clinical trial number: NCT03239483.

Clinical trials often depend on participants receiving study product to meet objectives of the protocol. Vitally important are considerations for how sites receive and dispense study product during a study while ensuring appropriate handling, accountability and compliance. The process for provision of study product is detailed in Standard Operating Procedures (SOPs) which are adhered to by the research site throughout the trial. The COVID-19 pandemic unexpectedly affected the ability of study participants to receive study product. We report on the various methods implemented by trial sites to ensure timely provision of study product to participants during this unprecedented pandemic. In MTN-035, participants received 3 potential rectal microbicide formulations in randomized sequences to understand user preferences. Trial sites were permitted to revise dispensing methods to enable participants to continue to receive study product during COVID-19 restrictions. These actions mitigated disruption of study product administration and preserved the integrity of the trial. Out of the 78 participants expecting to receive study products on or after the onset of restrictions due to COVID-19, only four participants (5%) did not receive all three products. Adopting alternative methods to provide product to study participants in extraordinary circumstances was key to successful study completion and maintaining study integrity.

Safe practices for dispensing investigational product (IP) during clinical trials are not standardized and information in this regard is often limited. ASPIRE was a Phase 3 safety and effectiveness trial of a vaginal matrix ring containing 25 mg of dapivirine for the prevention of HIV-1 in women. The study enrolled 2629 women at 15 clinical research sites in Malawi, Uganda, South Africa and Zimbabwe who were randomized in a 1:1 ratio to receive either a vaginal ring containing 25 mg of dapivirine or a matching placebo vaginal ring. The vaginal rings and packaging were identical in appearance in order to maintain the study blind. A real-time, documented second check of the dispensing process was conducted by a second pharmacy staff. Frequent inventory counts and real time accountability audits were also useful for rapidly identifying a dispensing error. A total of 52,625 vaginal rings were dispensed with only three documented pharmacy dispensing errors. There were zero dispensing errors at 13 of the 15 sites with an overall rate of <1.0 per 10,000 rings dispensed. Our study findings support the implementation of a double check dispensing process and real time accountability audits as standard practice in clinical trials.

Background Two phase 3 clinical trials showed that use of a monthly vaginal ring containing 25 mg dapivirine was well tolerated and reduced HIV-1 incidence in women by approximately 30% compared with placebo. We aimed to evaluate use and safety of the dapivirine vaginal ring (DVR) in open-label settings with high background rates of HIV-1 infection, an important step for future implementation. Methods We did a phase 3B open-label extension trial of the DVR (MTN-025/HIV Open-label Prevention Extension [HOPE]). Women who were HIV-1-negative and had participated in the MTN-020/ASPIRE phase 3 trial were offered 12 months of access to the DVR at 14 clinical research centres in Malawi, South Africa, Uganda, and Zimbabwe. At each visit (monthly for 3 months, then once every 3 months), women chose whether or not to accept the offer of the ring. Used, returned rings were tested for residual amounts of dapivirine as a surrogate marker for adherence. HIV-1 serological testing was done at each visit. Dapivirine amounts in returned rings and HIV-1 incidence were compared with data from the ASPIRE trial, and safety was assessed. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02858037. Findings Between July 16, 2016, and Oct 10, 2018, of 1756 women assessed for eligibility, 1456 were enrolled and participated in the study. Median age was 31 years (IQR 27-37). At baseline, 1342 (92.2%) women chose to take the DVR; ring acceptance was more than 79% at each visit up until 12 months and 936 (73.2%) of 1279 chose to take the ring at all visits. 12 530 (89.3%) of 14 034 returned rings had residual dapivirine amounts consistent with some use during the previous month (>0.9 mg released) and the mean dapivirine amount released was greater than in the ASPIRE trial (by 0.21 mg; p<0.0001). HIV-1 incidence was 2.7 per 100 person-years (95% CI 1.9-3.8, 35 infections), compared with an expected incidence of 4.4 per 100 person-years (3.2-5.8) among a population matched on age, site, and presence of a sexually transmitted infection from the placebo group of ASPIRE. No serious adverse events or grade 3 or higher adverse events observed were assessed as related to the DVR. Interpretation High uptake and persistent use in this open-label extension study support the DVR as an HIV-1 prevention option for women. With an increasing number of HIV-1 prophylaxis choices on the horizon, these results suggest that the DVR will be an acceptable and practical option for women in Africa. Copyright (C) 2021 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

We triangulated quantitative and qualitative assessments to evaluate participants’ acceptability of 0.05% dapivirine rectal microbicide (RM) gel administered via two separate modalities (a rectal applicator and an artificial phallus for use as a coital simulation device) as part of a Phase I trial (N = 14) among men who have sex with men (MSM) randomized using a 1:1 ratio. Overall, participants reported favorable acceptability of the gel (n = 11; 78.6%), the same or more at the end of the study compared to when they started the study. Additionally, when discussing their preferred administration modality, they noted that both methods had positive qualities but also potential areas of improvement. Our findings underscore the need to create multiple delivery methods for a future microbicide gel (i.e., with and without the need for an applicator) and highlight the importance of offering MSM choices in how biomedical HIV prevention strategies are delivered.

Introduction Vaginal rings are a promising approach to provide a woman-centred, long-acting HIV prevention strategy. Prior trials of a 25 mg dapivirine (DPV) ring have shown a favourable safety profile and approximately 30% risk reduction of HIV-1 infection. Extended duration rings replaced every three months may encourage user adherence, improve health service efficiency and reduce cost overall. We evaluated safety, pharmacokinetics, adherence and acceptability of two three-month rings with different DPV dosages, compared with the monthly DPV ring. Methods From December 2017 to October 2018, MTN-036/IPM-047 enrolled 49 HIV-negative participant in Birmingham, Alabama and San Francisco, California into a phase 1, randomized trial comparing two extended duration (three-month) rings (100 or 200 mg DPV) to a monthly 25 mg DPV ring, each used over 13 weeks, with follow-up completed in January 2019. Safety was assessed by recording adverse events (AEs). DPV concentrations were quantified in plasma, cervicovaginal fluid (CVF) and cervical tissue, at nominal timepoints. Geometric mean ratios (GMRs) relative to the comparator ring were estimated from a regression model. Results There were no differences in the proportion of participants with grade >= 2 genitourinary AEs or grade >= 3 AEs in the extended duration versus monthly ring arms (p = 1.0). Plasma and CVF DPV concentrations were higher in the extended duration rings compared to the monthly ring. Plasma GMRs were 1.31 to 1.85 and 1.41 to 1.86 and CVF GMRs were 1.45 to 2.87 and 1.74 to 2.60 for the 100 and 200 mg ring respectively. Cervical tissue concentrations were consistently higher in the 200 mg ring (GMRs 2.36 to 3.97). The majority of participants (82%) were fully adherent (ring inserted at all times, with no product discontinuations/outages) with no differences between the monthly versus three-month rings. Most participants found the ring acceptable (median = 8 on 10-point Likert scale), with a greater proportion of participants reporting high acceptability (9 or 10) in the 25 mg arm (73%) compared with the 100 mg (25%) and 200 mg (44%) arms (p = 0.01 and p = 0.15 respectively). Conclusions The extended duration DPV rings were well-tolerated and achieved higher DPV concentrations compared with the monthly DPV ring. These findings support further evaluation of three-month DPV rings for HIV prevention.

This study describes the acceptability of a rectal microbicide gel formulation using dapivirine (DPV) among men and women from two countries (United States and Thailand) participating in the Microbicide Trials Network-026 trial. We evaluated participants' acceptability of a rectal DPV/placebo gel as part of a Phase I trial (N = 26; 18 male, 8 female). Participants reported favorable acceptability of the study gel, with most participants reporting that they liked the gel the same (n = 14; 53.8%) or more (n = 11; 42.4%) than when they started the trial. Over half of participants noted that they would prefer the gel over condoms (n = 13; 50%) or that they liked condoms and the gel equally (n = 8; 30.8%). Side effects across products included leakage (n = 8; 30.8%), diarrhea (n = 4; 15.4%), or soiling (n = 1; 3.8%). The high acceptability of a rectal gel underscores its promise as a short-acting biomedical prevention, warranting future research for HIV prevention. Trial Registration: NCT03239483.

Intravaginal rings (IVR) containing antiretroviral drugs are a promising method for HIV prevention. We triangulated quantitative and qualitative assessments to evaluate the acceptability of four IVRs used continuously for 28 days as part of a Phase I trial (N = 48 HIV-negative women; ages 18–45). Adherence was high throughout the trial, yet 30% of participants reported involuntary IVR expulsions followed by re-insertion. Most participants (93.6%) felt comfortable with the IVR being inside their body. Participants reported liking the IVR more (36.2%) or the same amount (55.3%) since starting the study. When given the option of choosing between the IVR and/or a male condom for HIV-prevention, most reported preferring the IVR (n = 29, 63.0%), and over a quarter of the sample reported liking them equally (n = 12, 26.1%). We observed no differences in IVR acceptability across the study arms. High adherence and acceptability underscores the promise of an IVR as a female-controlled, sustained mechanism for HIV prevention.

BACKGROUNDVaginal rings (VR) containing antiretroviral (ARV) drugs can be utilized for prevention of human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) with potential for improved adherence compared to daily pills. Combination ARV VRs could improve efficacy.METHODSMTN-027, a single-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trial in 48 women, evaluated VRs containing MK-2048 (30 mg) and vicriviroc (VCV, 182 mg), alone or in combination, and placebo used continuously for 28 days. Safety was assessed by recording adverse events. Drug concentrations were quantified in plasma, vaginal fluid, cervical tissue, and rectal fluid. Cervical tissue was utilized for ex vivo HIV inhibition analysis.RESULTSThere was no difference in related genitourinary adverse events between treatment arms compared to placebo. VCV and MK-2048 released from single or combination VRs both achieved peak concentrations in vaginal fluids, which were substantially higher compared to plasma (200× for VCV, 30× for MK-2048) and rectal fluid. In an ex vivo challenge assay, the antiviral activity of VCV and/or MK-2048 was not correlated with tissue-associated drug concentrations. Most women (77%) were fully adherent to 28 days of continuous VR use and found the VR acceptable.CONCLUSIONSVCV and/or MK-2048 containing VRs were safe and acceptable. Both VCV and MK-2048 were quantifiable in all matrixes tested with peak compartmental drug concentrations similar for single and combination drug VRs. Tissue-associated VCV and/or MK-2048 did not correlate with inhibition of HIV infection. These data highlight the need to assess adequacy of drug dosing in the VR and measuring genital tissue drug concentrations to develop more precise concentration-response relationships.

BACKGROUND Vaginal rings (VRs) are a promising approach for sustained delivery of antiretroviral (ARV) medication to prevent human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection in women. Combination ARV VRs could increase efficacy. METHODS MTN-028, a phase 1 trial in 19 HIV-uninfected women, evaluated 2 VRs containing vicriviroc (VCV) and MK-2048. Participants were randomized 2:1 to a low-dose (VCV, 91 mg; MK-2048, 10 mg) or original-dose (VCV, 182 mg; MK-2048, 30 mg) ring used for 28 days. Safety was assessed by documenting adverse events (AEs). Drug concentrations were evaluated in plasma, cervicovaginal fluid (CVF), and cervical tissue samples. RESULTS All AEs reported were grade 1 or 2, with no statistically significant differences in related genitourinary AEs or grade ≥2 AEs observed between arms (P = >.99). VCV/MK-2048 concentrations rose rapidly, with higher plasma area under the concentration-time curve (AUC) in the original-dose arm (geometric mean ratio, 3.29 for VCV and 1.49 for MK-2048) and similar AUCs across arms for CVF samples. Cervical tissue concentrations were higher in the original-dose arm (geometric mean ratio, 7.94 for VCV and 6.45 for MK-2048), with greater drug released based on residual drug levels. Plasma and CVF concentrations for both drugs fell rapidly after ring removal. CONCLUSIONS In this first study evaluating 2 doses of a combination VCV/MK-2048 VR, both rings were found to be safe and well tolerated. VCV and MK-2048 were detectable in plasma, CVF, and cervical tissue samples, and drug release and plasma drug exposure were higher for the original-dose than for the low-dose ring.