The clinical treatment of patients with anorectal and pelvic floor dysfunction is often difficult. Dynamic cystocolpoproctography (DCP) has evolved from a method of evaluating the anorectum for functional disorders to its current status as a functional method of evaluating the global pelvic floor for defecatory disorders and pelvic organ prolapse. It has both high observer accuracy and a high yield of positive diagnoses. Clinicians find it a useful diagnostic tool that can alter management decisions from surgical to medical and vice versa in many cases. Functional radiography provides the maximum stress to the pelvic floor, resulting in levator ani relaxation accompanied by rectal emptying-which is needed to diagnose defecatory disorders. It also provides organ-specific quantificative information about female pelvic organ prolapse-information that usually can only be inferred by means of physical examination. The application of functional radiography to the assessment of defecatory disorders and pelvic organ prolapse has highlighted the limitations of physical examination. It has become clear that pelvic floor disorders rarely occur in isolation and that global pelvic floor assessment is necessary. Despite the advances in other imaging methods, DCP has remained a practical, cost-effective procedure for the evaluation of anorectal and pelvic floor dysfunction. In this article, the authors describe the technique they use when performing DCP, define the radiographic criteria used for diagnosis, and discuss the limitations and clinical utility of DCP.

AIMS:Optimal urethrovesical positioning (UVP) may be important for continence. Pelvic floor muscle contraction (PFMC) influences UVP. PFMC instruction cues vary and often encourage anterior PFM recruitment that may result in sub-maximal posterior facilitation. STUDY HYPOTHESIS:posterior or combined cues are more influential in optimizing UVP during PFMC following a brief practice period than anterior cue. METHODS:Seventeen pre-menopausal, nulliparous, continent women were taught selective PFMC using different cues: anterior; posterior; anterior and posterior combined. Perineal ultrasound images of three PFMC for each cue were captured in supine and standing twice, 5  min apart. For reliability two raters measured data using angle of urethral inclination (AUI). Data analysis was undertaken using a customized General Linear Model ANOVA testing for interactions between all variables; subject, cue, posture, and test. Post hoc Bonferroni correction was used with a significance level of 0.05. RESULTS:The ANOVA showed significant differences between variables (P = 0.000). Post hoc analysis indicated significant differences between posterior and anterior cues 4.240° (P = 0.003); combined and anterior 3.756° (P = 0.009) but not between posterior and combined cues -0.484° (P = 1.00). Mean difference in AUI between supine and standing was 9.496° (P = 0.000); however, the interaction of cues and postures was not significant. CONCLUSIONS:AUI was significantly more acute/optimal when PFMC instruction included a posterior cue. This may be due to optimal recruitment of puborectalis and other posterior regional muscles which may be sub-maximally recruited with anterior cue. Investigation of the potential impact of these findings and possible usefulness of standardized instructions in PFM training is required.

Pelvic floor prolapse occurs with decompensation of the support mechanisms, notably the levator ani muscle and pelvic floor fascia, which may be secondary to local trauma, diffuse weakening from menopause or ageing, and, above all, muscle atrophy. Muscle weakness exposes the pelvic ligaments to persistent stretching, for which they are not designed, and once they give way organ prolapse results. The etiology of prolapse is therefore complex. Imaging, particularly with modalities giving an overview of the pelvis, such as magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), and to a lesser extent ultrasound, are ideally suited to establish the extent and severity of organ prolapse and specific damage to the support structures that may be more extensive than clinically apparent, and to show the underlying weakness of pelvic floor musculature. Imaging is therefore a key to our understanding and management of pelvic floor prolapse.

is >3.5 mm even so in patients with no endoscopic lesions.1.

BACKGROUND AND STUDY AIMS:Video capsule endoscopy has shown promise for the surveillance of significant small-bowel polyps in patients with Peutz-Jeghers syndrome. In this study the yield of significant small-bowel polyps by capsule endoscopy was compared to the yield of these polyps by barium follow-through in adults with Peutz-Jeghers syndrome.PATIENTS AND METHODS:A total of 19 adults with Peutz-Jeghers syndrome who were undergoing surveillance underwent both capsule endoscopy and barium follow-through examinations, and the number of small-bowel polyps of at least 1 cm in diameter that were detected was recorded for each method. The two methods were assessed in terms of comfort and convenience for the patients and their preferred future surveillance method, using a questionnaire.RESULTS:Capsule endoscopy detected a median of four significant small-bowel polyps while barium follow-through detected a median of one (P = 0.008). There was a trend towards more participants having at least one significant small-bowel polyp detected by capsule endoscopy than was the case with barium follow-through, though capsule endoscopy seemed to be less reliable for accurate sizing of polyps that were at the limit of clinical significance. Most participants expressed a preference for capsule endoscopy for future surveillance.CONCLUSIONS:Capsule endoscopy should replace barium follow-through for the surveillance of small-bowel polyps in adults with Peutz-Jeghers syndrome, but the findings of this study should be interpreted with caution until a more reliable means of sizing polyps by capsule endoscopy is available.

We aimed to determine whether perfusion CT measurements at colorectal cancer staging may predict for subsequent metastatic relapse. Fifty two prospective patients underwent perfusion CT at staging to estimate tumour blood flow, blood volume, mean transit time, and permeability surface area product. Patients considered metastasis free and suitable for surgery underwent curative resection subsequently. At final analysis, a median of 48.6 months post-surgery, patients were divided into those who remained disease free, and those with subsequent metastases. Vascular parameters for these two groups were compared using t-testing, and receiver operator curve analysis was performed to determine the sensitivity and specificity of these vascular parameters for predicting metastases. Thirty seven (71%) patients underwent curative surgery; data were available for 35: 26 (74%) remained disease free; 9 (26%) recurred (8 metastatic, 1 local). Tumour blood flow differed significantly between disease-free and metastatic patients (76.0 versus 45.7 ml/min/100 g tissue; p = 0.008). With blood flow <64 ml/min/100 g tissue, sensitivity and specificity (95% CI) for development of metastases were 100% (60-100%) and 73% (53-87%), respectively. Our preliminary findings suggest that primary tumour blood flow might potentially be a useful predictor warranting further study.

OBJECTIVE. The purpose of this study was to determine how the temporal interval between scan acquisitions influences quantitative perfusion CT vascular parameters in colorectal cancer.SUBJECTS AND METHODS. Forty-five patients with colorectal adenocarcinoma prospectively underwent a 65-second single-anatomic-level perfusion CT study. Blood flow, blood volume, transit time, and permeability-surface area product for a 2-cm tumor coverage were determined with commercial software based on distributed parameter analysis for four temporal intervals ( 1, 2, 3, and 4 seconds) between acquisitions. Mean vascular values obtained for these intervals were compared by use of analysis of variance with posttesting by the Bonferroni method. Statistical significance was set at 5%.RESULTS. Mean +/- SD blood flow, volume, transit, and permeability-surface area product were 71.5 +/- 34.8 mL/min/100 g tissue, 6.33 +/- 1.96 mL/100 g tissue, 10.8 +/- 5.54 seconds, and 14.9 +/- 3.51 mL/min/100 g tissue, respectively, at 1 second; 86.6 +/- 40.6 mL/min/100 g tissue, 6.30 +/- 2.53 mL/100 g tissue, 10.7 +/- 7.12 seconds, and 14.5 +/- 3.55 mL/min/100 g tissue at 2 seconds; 97.8 +/- 42.7 mL/min/100 g tissue, 5.98 +/- 1.72 mL/100 g tissue, 8.11 +/- 4.37 seconds, and 14.5 +/- 3.58 mL/min/100 g tissue at 3 seconds; and 108.8 +/- 46.0 mL/min/100 g tissue, 6.69 +/- 3.46 mL/100 g tissue, 7.12 +/- 3.54 seconds, and 13.9 +/- 3.49 mL/min/100 g tissue at 4 seconds. Blood flow was overestimated (p = 0.0002) and transit underestimated ( p = 0.03) with lengthening acquisition interval. Posttesting revealed that in a comparison with 1-second data, this difference was significant for 3- and 4-second data for blood flow and 4-second data for transit.CONCLUSION. Increasing the temporal interval from 1 to 4 seconds leads to overestimation of tumor blood flow and underestimation of blood transit in distributed parameter analysis. Use of the helical perfusion CT techniques being developed may lead to inaccurate assessment unless the acquisition interval is shorter than 3 seconds.

PURPOSETo prospectively determine whether position and size of tumor region of interest (ROI) influence estimates of colorectal cancer vascular parameters at computed tomography (CT).MATERIALS AND METHODSAfter institutional review board approval and informed consent, 25 men and 22 women (mean age, 65.8 years) with colorectal adenocarcinoma underwent 65-second CT perfusion study. Blood volume, blood flow, and permeability-surface area product were determined for 40- or 120-mm(2) circular ROIs placed at the tumor edge and center and around (outlining) visible tumor. ROI analysis was repeated by two observers in different subsets of patients to assess intra- and interobserver variation. Measurements were compared by using analysis of variance; a difference with P = .002 was significant.RESULTSBlood volume, blood flow, and permeability-surface area product measurements were substantially higher at the edge than at the center for both 40- and 120-mm(2) ROIs. For 40-mm(2) ROI, means of the three measurements were 6.9 mL/100 g (standard deviation [SD], 1.4), 108.7 mL/100 g per minute (SD, 39.2), and 16.9 mL/100 g per minute (SD, 4.2), respectively, at the edge versus 5.1 mL/100 g (SD, 1.5), 56.3 mL/100 g per minute (SD, 33.1), and 13.9 mL/100 g per minute (SD, 4.6), respectively, at the center. For 120-mm(2) ROI, means of the three measurements were 6.6 mL/100 g (SD, 1.3), 96.7 mL/100 g per minute (SD, 42.5), and 16.3 mL/100 g per minute (SD, 5.6), respectively, at the edge versus 5.1 mL/100 g (SD, 1.4), 58.3 mL/100 g per minute (SD, 32.5), and 13.4 mL/100 g per minute (SD, 4.3) at the center (P < .0001). Measurements varied substantially depending on the ROI size; values for the ROI for outlined tumor were intermediate between those at the tumor edge and center. Inter- and intraobserver agreement was poor for both 40- and 120-mm(2) ROIs.CONCLUSIONPosition and size of tumor ROI and observer variation substantially influence ultimate perfusion values. ROI for outlined entire tumor is more reliable for perfusion measurements and more appropriate clinically than use of arbitrarily determined smaller ROIs.

PURPOSE:To establish the relationships between quantitative perfusion computed tomography (CT) parameters-specifically, primary tumor blood flow, blood volume, transit time, and permeability surface-area product-and immunohistologic markers of angiogenesis in colorectal cancer. MATERIALS AND METHODS:After institutional review board approval and informed patient consent were obtained for this prospective study, 23 patients (11 men, 12 women; mean age, 68.4 years; age range, 34.8-87.1 years) with colorectal adenocarcinoma underwent a 65-second perfusion CT examination, and tumor blood flow, blood volume, mean transit time, and permeability surface-area product were determined. After surgery, resected specimens were sectioned and stained immunohistochemically to identify CD34 for quantification of microvessel density (MVD), to identify smooth muscle actin for assessment of pericyte coverage index, to identify vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), and to identify glucose transporter protein (GLUT-1). Perfusion CT measurements were correlated with MVD, pericyte coverage index, VEGF expression, and GLUT-1 expression by using Pearson or Spearman rank correlation analysis, with significance assigned at the 5% level. RESULTS:Mean blood flow, blood volume, transit time, and permeability surface-area product values were 72.1 mL/min/100 g of tissue +/- 28.4 (standard deviation), 6.2 mL/100 g of tissue +/- 1.4, 9.3 seconds +/- 3.9, and 13.9 mL/min/100 g of tissue +/- 3.2, respectively. Blood volume (r = 0.59, P = .002) and permeability surface-area product (r = 0.46, P = .03) correlated positively with MVD, but blood flow (r = 0.27, P = .22) and transit time (r = -0.18, P = .44) did not. There were no significant associations between any perfusion CT parameter and pericyte coverage index (r .05), VEGF score (rho or= .15), or GLUT-1 score (rho < 0.21, P >or= .33). CONCLUSION:Tumor permeability surface-area product and blood volume correlate positively with MVD and may reflect the microvascularity of colorectal tumors.

Purpose: To define the interpretative performance of radiologists experienced in computed tomographic (CT) colonography and to compare it with that of novice observers who had undergone directed training, with colonoscopy as the reference standard.Materials and Methods: Physicians at each participating center received ethical committee approval and followed the committees' requests regarding informed consent. Nine experienced radiologists, nine trained radiologists, and 10 trained technologists from nine centers read 40 CT colonographic studies selected from a data set of 51 studies and modeled to simulate a population with positive fecal occult blood test results: Studies were obtained in eight patients with cancer, 12 patients with large polyp, four patient's with medium polyp, and 27 patients without colonic lesions. Findings were verified with colonoscopy. An experienced radiologist used 50 endoscopically validated Studies to train novice observers before they were allowed to participate. Observers used one software platform to read Studies over 2 days. Responses were collated and compared with the known diagnostic category for each subject. The number of correctly classified subjects was determined for each observer, and differences between groups were examined with bootstrap analysis.Results: Overall, 28 observers read 1084 studies and detected 121 cancers, 134 large polyps, and 33 medium polyps; 448 healthy subjects were categorized correctly. Experienced radiologists detected 116 lesions; trained radiologists and technologists detected 85 and 87 lesions, respectively. Overall accuracy of experienced observers (74.2%) was significantly better than that of trained radiologists (66.6%) and technologists (63.2%). There was no significant. difference (P = .33) between overall accuracy of trained radiologists and that of technologists; however, some trainees reached the mean performance achieved by experienced observers.Conclusion: Experienced observers interpreted CT colonographic images significantly better than did novices trained with 50 studies. On average, no difference between trained radiologists and trained technologists was found; however, individual performance was variable and some trainees out-performed some experienced observers. (c) RSNA, 2007.

PURPOSE:To determine whether computed tomographic (CT) perfusion measurements in prospectively recruited patients can be used to differentiate between diverticulitis and colorectal cancer and to compare this discrimination with that of standard morphologic criteria.MATERIALS AND METHODS:After institutional review board approval and written informed consent were obtained, 60 patients (24 men, 36 women; mean age, 69 years; range, 33.5-90.4 years; 20 patients with cancer, 20 with diverticulitis, and 20 with inactive diverticular disease) underwent CT perfusion imaging at the level of the colonic abnormality, and perfusion parameters were calculated. Analysis of variance was used to investigate any differences in perfusion between the patient groups. Two independent observers also analyzed an abdominopelvic CT study obtained immediately after the CT perfusion study and noted standard morphologic criteria for differential diagnosis. The sensitivity and specificity of CT perfusion measurements for determining the diagnostic category were compared with morphologic criteria by means of multivariate analysis to identify the most discriminatory criteria.RESULTS:Mean blood volume, blood flow, transit time, and permeability were significantly different between patients with cancer and those with diverticulitis (P < .0001); patients with cancer had the highest blood volume, blood flow, and permeability and the shortest transit time. The most discriminatory criteria for determining diagnostic category were blood volume, transit time, permeability, and presence of pericolonic nodes (P = .05, .02, .04, and .02, respectively). Blood volume and blood flow each had a sensitivity of 80% and had specificity of 70% and 75%, respectively, for cancer in comparison with standard morphologic criteria: less than 5 cm of bowel involvement (45% sensitivity, 95% specificity), presence of a mass (85% sensitivity, 90% specificity), pericolonic inflammation (75% sensitivity, 5% specificity), and pericolonic nodes (90% sensitivity, 45% specificity).CONCLUSION:CT perfusion measurements enable differentiation and better discrimination, in comparison with morphologic criteria, between cancer and diverticulitis.

The clinical management of patients with anorectal and pelvic floor dysfunction is often difficult. Evacuation proctography has evolved from a method to evaluate the anorectum for functional disorders to its current status as a practical method for evaluating anorectal dysfunction and pelvic floor prolapse. It has a high observer accuracy and yield of positive diagnosis. Clinicians find it of major benefit and has altered management from surgical to medical and vice versa in a significant number of cases.

OBJECTIVE:The purposes of this study were to determine the reproducibility of quantitative colorectal cancer perfusion measurements using dynamic contrast-enhanced MDCT, and to compare this with measurements from skeletal muscle.SUBJECTS AND METHODS:Ten patients (mean age, 67 years; six men, four women) with histologically proven colorectal cancer were examined prospectively using 4-MDCT. Perfusion studies (cine mode; 4 x 5 mm collimation; 1 acquisition/s; 65 seconds total) were performed through the tumor epicenter after IV bolus contrast administration (iopamidol 340, 100 mL; 5 mL/s) and repeated within 48 hours. Quantitative values for blood volume, blood flow, mean transit time, and permeability were determined using commercial software. Two regions of interest were studied on the axial image: one within the tumor and another within the left gluteal muscle. Measurement reproducibility was assessed using Bland-Altman statistics.RESULTS:For the tumor, the mean difference (95% limits of agreement) was -0.04 mL/100 g tissue (-2.50, 2.42); 8.80 (-50.5, 68.0) mL/100 g tissue/min; -0.99 (-8.19, 6.20) seconds; and 1.20 (-5.42, 7.83) mL/100 g tissue/min for blood volume, blood flow, mean transit time, and permeability, respectively. For muscle, the mean difference (95% limits of agreement) was 0.02 (-1.40, 1.43), 6.60 (-11.2, 24.3), -3.76 (-16.87, 9.35), and 1.30 (-4.68, 7.28), respectively.CONCLUSION:Quantitative perfusion measurements are reproducible. Measurements from tumor are less variable than from skeletal muscle.

Our purpose was to assess the effect of reader experience, fatigue, and scan findings on interpretation time for CT colonography. Nine radiologists (experienced in CT colonography); nine radiologists and ten technicians (both groups trained using 50 validated examinations) read 40 cases (50% abnormal) under controlled conditions. Individual interpretation times for each case were recorded, and differences between groups determined. Multi-level linear regression was used to investigate effect of scan category (normal or abnormal) and observer fatigue on interpretation times. Experienced radiologists (mean time 10.9 min, SD 5.2) reported significantly faster than less experienced radiologists and technicians; odds ratios of reporting times 1.4 (CI 1.1, 1.8) and 1.6 (1.3, 2.0), respectively (P≤0.001). Experienced and less-experienced radiologists took longer to report abnormal cases; ratio 1.2 (CI 1.1,1.4, P<0.001) and 1.2 (1.0, 1.3, P=0.03), respectively. All groups took 70% as long to report the final five cases as they did with an initial five; ratio 0.7 (CI 0.6 to 0.8), P<0.001. For technicians only, accuracy increased with longer reporting times (P=0.04). Experienced radiologists report faster than do less-experienced observers and proportionally spend less time interpreting normal cases. Technicians who report more slowly are more accurate. All groups reported faster as the study period progressed.

The extent measurement error on CT colonography influences polyp categorisation according to established management guidelines is studied using twenty-eight observers of varying experience to classify polyps seen at CT colonography as either 'medium' (maximal diameter 6-9 mm) or 'large' (maximal diameter 10 mm or larger). Comparison was then made with the reference diameter obtained in each patient via colonoscopy. The Bland-Altman method was used to assess agreement between observer measurements and colonoscopy, and differences in measurement and categorisation was assessed using Kruskal-Wallis and Chi-squared test statistics respectively. Observer measurements on average underestimated the diameter of polyps when compared to the reference value, by approximately 2-3 mm, irrespective of observer experience. Ninety-five percent limits of agreement were relatively wide for all observer groups, and had sufficient span to encompass different size categories for polyps. There were 167 polyp observations and 135 (81%) were correctly categorised. Of the 32 observations that were miscategorised, 5 (16%) were overestimations and 27 (84%) were underestimations (i.e. large polyps misclassified as medium). Caution should be exercised for polyps whose colonographic diameter is below but close to the 1-cm boundary threshold in order to avoid potential miscategorisation of advanced adenomas.

Computed tomographic colonography (CTC) is a relatively noninvasive technique for large bowel imaging that has the ability to detect colorectal neoplasia. Already well established as a reliable diagnostic tool in symptomatic patients who are unable to undergo complete colonoscopy, it is now being considered as a viable method for population screening. Advances in technique over the past 10 yr make this an attractive alternative, including reduced bowel preparation and stool tagging, three-dimensional (3D) image reconstruction, computer-aided detection software, and low-radiation dose protocols. CTC may be favored by patients compared to other available screening tests due to the ease of performance and comfort. Although published studies vary in relation to the sensitivity of this test for the detection of polyps, in the best hands a sensitivity of greater than 90% for detection of polyps at least 10 mm in diameter may be obtained. Although not yet endorsed for widespread use by major gastroenterological societies, CTC shows promise as a screening tool.

PURPOSE: This study was designed to create and evaluate an experimental porcine model of fistula-in-ano. METHODS: Initial cadaveric dissection enabled refinement of the technique for fistula formation and histoanatomical study of the porcine anal canal. Subsequently, three surgically created fistulas were treated by seton drainage in each of eight male pigs (weight, 38-41 kg). After 26 days, magnetic resonance imaging at 1.5 Tesla was performed and setons removed under general anesthesia, enabling clinical and microbiologic track assessment. Two pigs were killed for histologic fistula track assessment. RESULTS: Histoanatomical assessment noted a rudimentary internal anal sphincter, together with structures resembling anal glands. Artificial fistulas persisted during seton drainage and were more often associated with fecal than skin-derived organisms compared with both perineal and anal canal swabs (P= 0.002). All six fistulas assessed histologically had a lumen, and abundant surrounding granulation tissue similar to that seen in human fistula-in-ano. Epithelialization was not evident in any track. Fistulas were visualized as high signal tracks using magnetic resonance imaging. CONCLUSIONS: Porcine anal anatomy resembles that of humans, and an experimental model proved suitable when assessed by magnetic resonance imaging, microbiology, and histologically, which demonstrated abundant granulation tissue. This model could be further used to investigate fistula treatments.