Journal of Regional ScienceVolume 10, Issue 2 p. 135-152 INTERREGIONAL INPUT-OUTPUT: AN EMPIRICAL CALIFORNIA-WASHINGTON MODEL Roger Riefler, Roger Riefler Assistant Professor of Economics, University of Pittsburgh and deceased, former Professor of Economics, University of Washington, respectively.Search for more papers by this authorCharles M. Tiebout, Charles M. Tiebout Assistant Professor of Economics, University of Pittsburgh and deceased, former Professor of Economics, University of Washington, respectively.Search for more papers by this author Roger Riefler, Roger Riefler Assistant Professor of Economics, University of Pittsburgh and deceased, former Professor of Economics, University of Washington, respectively.Search for more papers by this authorCharles M. Tiebout, Charles M. Tiebout Assistant Professor of Economics, University of Pittsburgh and deceased, former Professor of Economics, University of Washington, respectively.Search for more papers by this author First published: August 1970 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9787.1970.tb00042.xCitations: 35AboutPDF ToolsRequest permissionExport citationAdd to favoritesTrack citation ShareShare Give accessShare full text accessShare full-text accessPlease review our Terms and Conditions of Use and check box below to share full-text version of article.I have read and accept the Wiley Online Library Terms and Conditions of UseShareable LinkUse the link below to share a full-text version of this article with your friends and colleagues. Learn more.Copy URL Citing Literature Volume10, Issue2August 1970Pages 135-152 RelatedInformation

R EGIONAL input-output tables have long been acclaimed as useful tools in regional forecasting, especially long-run forecasts, yet surprisingly few regional projections have made a serious attempt to use them. This paper reports on one effort in this direction an inputoutput based projection for the State of Washington for the year 1980. Because of the time constraints no effort will be made to describe how the 1963 State of Washington table was developed. Rather, it is given as datum [3]. In addition, again because of time, not all of the details in the projection process are included. Finally, because few are interested in the results, no bulky tables have been included.

CONSIDERATIONS of the impact of changes in the volume and composition of expenditures by the defense and space agencies will be misleading if they ignore the regional component. In considering disarmament, traditional monetary and fiscal policy responses produce an effect which is nationwide in scope. Such policies may not be of much help to states and communities, such as California or Wichita, whose economies are heavily dependent upon defense expenditures. In addition, shifts in the regional pattern of these expenditures can produce similar stresses in local economies. A major problem in this connection has been the measurement of the defense-space expenditure impact in a region. Aside from an induced impact operating through regional consumption and business investment functions, the impact on income and employment can be divided into two components: (1) the direct impact through prime contract awards to firms, and (2) the indirect or inter-industry impact through subcontracts and purchases of supplies by prime contractors. While there have been some attempts to measure the direct impact, little work has been done which also accounts for the indirect impact. This paper reports on an effort to measure both the direct and indirect impact of defense-space expenditures on the manufacturing sector of the Los Angeles-Long Beach Standard Metropolitan Statistical Area (SMSA). The task is an empirical one. Hence, we shall briefly review some of the various techniques of measurement and present the results of a short-cut method to measure the impact on Los Angeles manufacturers. Empirical Difficulties Almost all approaches to the measurement of the regional impact of defense-space expenditure involve variations of an input-output framework.1 Unfortunately, given the present state of data availability, they are not operational, at least without extended research effort. National data from the 1947 table, while useful, are somewhat out of date.2 Regional data are all but nonexistent. Pending the development of more adequate data, some short cuts need to be examined. In the search for short cuts, it is useful to keep in mind what the gross flows data of an interregional input-output table reveal. Row information reflects where sales are made in terms of industries, final demand sectors, and regions. Column information indicates the source of inputs from other industries both inside and outside of the region. Short cuts, essentially, involve something less than the complete cross-check of independent estimates of the row and column entries. Most regional input-output studies, in fact, get these estimates sometimes from row information and sometimes from column information, but rarely from independent estimates of both. A column-oriented approach, which has a good deal of appeal, simply traces down the subcontractors. There is some evidence to suggest, as an order of magnitude, that half of a specific defense or space program prime contract is subcontracted.3 It would seem that tracing down a few layers of subcontractors would account for most of the impact. Unfortunately, this is not the case. When a prime

OUR empirical knowledge of the demand and structural interrelationships of the economy at the regional level is indeed limited. Some understanding of these interrelationships can be gained through (1) the economic baseforeign trade multiplier approach, (2) the regional interindustry (input-output) approach, and (3) various other approaches, involving linear programming and the like, which are not of concern here.' Although the interindustry approach seems superior to the base-multiplier approach for most, though not all, purposes, the real difficulty lies in translating either approach into an operational one so that meaningful estimates of these interrelationships can be generated at a reasonable cost. This is a rather unfortunate state of affairs because it means that decision makers have no firm guidelines to use in attempting to assess the impact of autonomous demand forces upon regional economies or specific sectors within them. In an attempt to at least partially remedy this situation, we have developed an alternative type of framework which, for the lack of a better name, can be called an intersectoral flows model. This model incorporates certain features of the base-multiplier approach in addition to certain features of a regional interindustry approach hopefully some of the best features of each in terms of our objectives. In designing the model, one of the main concerns was that it be operational, in the sense that the necessary data could be obtained at a reasonable cost. Thus, to the extent that this objective is achieved, the restrictions on making such studies and repeating them may no longer be so formidable. The particular region chosen for study is California and the three major subregions within the State. Since the interest here is in the model and its implementation, as contrasted with the implications for the California economy, major attention will be focused on these topics.

HE current chaos in metropolitan fiT nance stems from two different sets of problems. The first, which we label traditional, are exemplified by such expressions as: ever-increasing demands for service, inadequate tax base, archaic tax structure, lack of planning, and other familiar expressions. Without doubting that these problems are acute and in need of attention, we wish to consider an overlooked second set of problems. The second set of problems arises when the budget functions of governments are placed within the context of the newly developed theory of public finance.' Here, governments are seen as performing certain overall budget functions provision of goods and services, income redistribution, and economic stabilization. However, except for the provision of one class of goods and services, namely, social goods, little attention has been focused on the budget problems involved in applying the newer theory to lower levels of government and the attendant problems of fiscal federalism which arise. We will argue that much of the chaos in metropolitan finance arises from a misunderstanding of the budget functions to be performed. The heart of the problem, it will be shown, lies in the vertical relations between governmental units. Under fiscal federalism the failure to solve problems of vertical relations, in turn, gives rise to certain horizontal conflicts between governmental units. While our discussion applies to lower-level governments in general, we focus attention on metropolitan areas where the problems are more vividly illustrated. The analysis will be structured in terms of the various budget functions which governments perform. The provision of social goods will be considered briefly. Next, we look into certain interferences with consumer sovereignty (merit goods) which governments undertake. Finally, issues involved when governments redistribute income will be considered.2 For each function we postulate a set of vertical rules ordering the relations between governments. This ordering will enable us to highlight the issues involved.

Journal of Regional ScienceVolume 2, Issue 1 p. 75-84 COMMUNITY INCOME MULTIPLIERS: A POPULATION GROWTH MODEL‡ Charles M. Tiebout, Charles M. Tiebout The author is Professor of Economics at the University of California, Los Angeles.Search for more papers by this author Charles M. Tiebout, Charles M. Tiebout The author is Professor of Economics at the University of California, Los Angeles.Search for more papers by this author First published: June 1960 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9787.1960.tb00836.xCitations: 10 ‡ I am grateful for the comments of Charles Leven, Robert Strotz, Daniel Suits, and especially to the late Stefan Valavanis. The errors are my responsibility. AboutPDF ToolsRequest permissionExport citationAdd to favoritesTrack citation ShareShare Give accessShare full text accessShare full-text accessPlease review our Terms and Conditions of Use and check box below to share full-text version of article.I have read and accept the Wiley Online Library Terms and Conditions of UseShareable LinkUse the link below to share a full-text version of this article with your friends and colleagues. Learn more.Copy URL Share a linkShare onFacebookTwitterLinked InRedditWechat Citing Literature Volume2, Issue1June 1960Pages 75-84 RelatedInformation

It is not much of an overstatement to say that post World War II regional research has been almost completely dominated by regional applications of input-output models. Whatever the form of the variations, the basic input-output theme is present. While users of, and writers on, input-output techniques are quite honest in admitting its limitations, one does sense a feeling that this approach is clearly preferable to other frameworks in attacking regional problems. Indeed, one leading writer in the field of regional analysis notes that, too many of (the economists) tools represent transfers of concepts and methods traditionally used by the national-international type of economist.' It is not the function of this paper to put forth the case for the Keynesian-style nationalinternational framework in regional analysis as an alternative form of or supplement to input-output. This has been done elsewhere.2 Rather it is the purpose of this paper to review the various operational uses of regional input-output analysis. Such a review will not only give the reader some idea of the current uses of input-output in regional analysis, but will also enable him to more adequately judge its possibilities and limitations.

Previous articleNext article No AccessA Pure Theory of Local ExpendituresCharles M. TieboutCharles M. Tiebout Search for more articles by this author PDFPDF PLUS Add to favoritesDownload CitationTrack CitationsPermissionsReprints Share onFacebookTwitterLinkedInRedditEmail SectionsMoreDetailsFiguresReferencesCited by Journal of Political Economy Volume 64, Number 5Oct., 1956 Article DOIhttps://doi.org/10.1086/257839 Views: 5732Total views on this site Citations: 6300Citations are reported from Crossref Copyright 1956 The University of ChicagoPDF download Crossref reports the following articles citing this article:Richard W. Tresch Optimal Federalism, (Jan 2023): 481–499.https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-822864-7.00027-0Kumba Digdowiseiso, GOODNESS Aye Are fiscal decentralization and institutional quality poverty abating? Empirical evidence from developing countries, Cogent Economics & Finance 10, no.11 (Jul 2022).https://doi.org/10.1080/23322039.2022.2095769Nguyen Thanh Hung, Su Dinh Thanh, David McMillan Fiscal decentralization, economic growth, and human development: Empirical evidence, Cogent Economics & Finance 10, no.11 (Aug 2022).https://doi.org/10.1080/23322039.2022.2109279Bangkit A. Wiryawan, Christian Otchia The legacy of the reformasi: the role of local government spending on industrial development in a decentralized Indonesia, Journal of Economic Structures 11, no.11 (Mar 2022).https://doi.org/10.1186/s40008-022-00262-yXin Lao, Hengyu Gu, Qiang Gao, Guoju Ai, Junhui Wang Unraveling the Geography of Intercity Flows of Migrants’ Hukou Conversion Intentions: A Spatial Econometric Origin-Destination Flow Analysis, Journal of Urban Planning and Development 148, no.44 (Dec 2022).https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)UP.1943-5444.0000875Junsong Wang, Guihua Li Pursuing educational equality and divergence in the housing market: How do educational equality policies affect housing prices in Shanghai?, Cities 131 (Dec 2022): 104001.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2022.104001Roland Azibo Balgah, Jude Ndzifon Kimengsi A review of drivers of environmental non-migration decisions in Africa, Regional Environmental Change 22, no.44 (Oct 2022).https://doi.org/10.1007/s10113-022-01970-8Anna Piil Damm, Elena Mattana, Helena Skyt Nielsen Effects of school displacement on academic achievement and wellbeing of ethnic minorities, Labour Economics 79 (Dec 2022): 102266.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.labeco.2022.102266Cristian Barra, Marinella Boccia What matters in educational performance? Evidence from OECD and non-OECD countries, Quality & Quantity 56, no.66 (Jan 2022): 4335–4394.https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-022-01322-yBo Wang, Shuling Xu, Kaining Sun, Xiqiang Chang, Zhaohua Wang, Wenhui Zhao Government responsive selectivity and public limited mediation role in air pollution governance: Evidence from large scale text data content mining, Resources, Conservation and Recycling 187 (Dec 2022): 106553.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2022.106553Kangoh Lee Federalism and primary-income inequality, Applied Economics 54, no.5454 (Jun 2022): 6303–6321.https://doi.org/10.1080/00036846.2022.2083568Jing Zhang, Wei Yan The Economic Impact of Public Capital: Evidence from Chinese Prefectures and Firms, Regional Science and Urban Economics 97 (Nov 2022): 103818.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.regsciurbeco.2022.103818Antonella Rita Ferrara, Lewis Dijkstra, Philip McCann, Rosanna Nisticó The response of regional well-being to place-based policy interventions, Regional Science and Urban Economics 97 (Nov 2022): 103830.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.regsciurbeco.2022.103830Naveen Bharathi, Deepak Malghan, Sumit Mishra, Andaleeb Rahman Residential segregation and public services in urban India, Urban Studies 59, no.1414 (Feb 2022): 2912–2932.https://doi.org/10.1177/00420980211072855David M. Brasington Cutting Funding for Police Protection: The Consequences for the Size of Newly-Constructed Housing, The Journal of Real Estate Finance and Economics 65, no.44 (Sep 2021): 549–571.https://doi.org/10.1007/s11146-021-09870-0Andrés Rodríguez-Pose, Vinko Muštra The economic returns of decentralisation: Government quality and the role of space, Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space 54, no.88 (Aug 2022): 1604–1622.https://doi.org/10.1177/0308518X221118913Yue Xiao, Haizhen Wen, Eddie C.M. Hui, Ganghua Zhou Dynamic capitalization effects of educational facilities during different market stages: An empirical study in Hangzhou, China, Land Use Policy 122 (Nov 2022): 106342.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2022.106342Pengyu Zhu, Xinying Tan, Songnian Zhao, Shuai Shi, Mingshu Wang Land use regulations, transit investment, and commuting preferences, Land Use Policy 122 (Nov 2022): 106343.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2022.106343Thai V Le, Matthew M Young Regressive revenue sourcing by local governments, Urban Studies 18 (Oct 2022): 004209802211244.https://doi.org/10.1177/00420980221124456Brian C. Albrecht, Shruti Rajagopalan Inframarginal externalities: COVID-19, vaccines, and universal mandates, Public Choice 111 (Oct 2022).https://doi.org/10.1007/s11127-022-01006-zRamesh Ghimire, Jim Skinner Perceived reasons for paying more for housing in metro Atlanta: Results from the 2018 Metro Atlanta Speaks survey, Journal of Urban Affairs 44, no.99 (Nov 2020): 1289–1310.https://doi.org/10.1080/07352166.2020.1814154Jennifer Candipan, Noli Brazil The neighborhood context of school openings: Charter school expansion and socioeconomic ascent in the United States, Journal of Urban Affairs 44, no.99 (Oct 2020): 1244–1269.https://doi.org/10.1080/07352166.2020.1814153Shouwu Jing, Liping Liao, Minzhe Du, Enyi Shi Assessing the effect of the joint governance of transboundary pollution on water quality: Evidence from China, Frontiers in Environmental Science 10 (Oct 2022).https://doi.org/10.3389/fenvs.2022.989106Daniel G. Lindberg The price elasticity of senior housing demand: is it a necessity or a luxury?, Business Economics 5 (Oct 2022).https://doi.org/10.1057/s11369-022-00282-3Vassilis Tselios, Andrés Rodríguez-Pose Can decentralization help address poverty and social exclusion in Europe?, Territory, Politics, Governance 19 (Oct 2022): 1–24.https://doi.org/10.1080/21622671.2022.2098174Vassilis Tselios Does political decentralization affect income inequality? The role of governance quality, Regional Studies 1 (Oct 2022): 1–15.https://doi.org/10.1080/00343404.2022.2101634Sebastian Rosenberg, Kenny Lawson, Ian Hickie Centralisation versus regionalisation: Designing the Sixth National Mental Health Plan, Australian Journal of Public Administration 15 (Oct 2022).https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8500.12560John Paul Clifford, Justin Doran, Frank Crowley, Declan Jordan The relationship between city size, decentralisation and economic growth, Journal of Economic Studies 5 (Oct 2022).https://doi.org/10.1108/JES-03-2022-0146David P. Baron Ideological sorting, Journal of Theoretical Politics 49 (Oct 2022): 095162982211302.https://doi.org/10.1177/09516298221130261Jason Shumberger, Akheil Singla Are tax and expenditure limitations constraining institutions or institutionally irrelevant? Evidence from Minnesota, Public Budgeting & Finance 9 (Oct 2022).https://doi.org/10.1111/pbaf.12334Anna Bykova, Dennis Coates Professional team sporting success: do economic and personal freedom provide competitive advantages?, Economics of Governance 106 (Oct 2022).https://doi.org/10.1007/s10101-022-00280-3Jongho Won Exploring the spatial distribution of community resources focusing on municipalities: A multilevel analysis of the greater Los Angeles area, Journal of Urban Affairs 27 (Oct 2022): 1–20.https://doi.org/10.1080/07352166.2022.2103425Maryam Dilmaghani Ethnoracial disparities in commute duration and mode among Canadian-born millennials, Travel Behaviour and Society 29 (Oct 2022): 266–278.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tbs.2022.07.007Manabu Nose Decentralized provision of disaster aid: aid fragmentation and the poverty implications, International Tax and Public Finance 29, no.55 (Nov 2021): 1098–1127.https://doi.org/10.1007/s10797-021-09698-7Steven Samford Decentralization and local industrial policy in Mexico, World Development 158 (Oct 2022): 105971.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2022.105971J. Vernon Henderson, Dongling Su, Qinghua Zhang, Siqi Zheng Political manipulation of urban land markets: Evidence from China, Journal of Public Economics 214 (Oct 2022): 104730.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpubeco.2022.104730Ulrich B. Morawetz, H. Allen Klaiber Does housing policy impact income sorting near urban amenities? Evidence from Vienna, Austria, The Annals of Regional Science 69, no.22 (Jun 2022): 411–454.https://doi.org/10.1007/s00168-022-01142-wYunpeng Sun, Asif Razzaq Composite fiscal decentralisation and green innovation: Imperative strategy for institutional reforms and sustainable development in OECD countries, Sustainable Development 30, no.55 (Feb 2022): 944–957.https://doi.org/10.1002/sd.2292Mengting Ruan, Xiaolu Zhao Fiscal Pressure, Policy Choices and Regional Economic Disparity: Evidence from a Natural Experiment in China, Sustainability 14, no.1919 (Sep 2022): 12402.https://doi.org/10.3390/su141912402Jinliao He, Yanjiao Song, Xianjin Huang, Jingxia Lin An amenity‐based approach to excellent returning scientists' location choice in China, Papers in Regional Science 101, no.55 (Jul 2022): 1181–1197.https://doi.org/10.1111/pirs.12695Muhammad Habibur Rahman, Nejat Anbarci, Mehmet A. Ulubaşoğlu “Storm autocracies”: Islands as natural experiments, Journal of Development Economics 1 (Oct 2022): 102982.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdeveco.2022.102982Ka Shing Cheung, Chung Yim Yiu Touristification, Airbnb and the tourism-led rent gap: Evidence from a revealed preference approach, Tourism Management 92 (Oct 2022): 104567.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tourman.2022.104567Ade Paranata The miracle of anti-corruption efforts and regional fiscal independence in plugging budget leakage: Evidence from western and eastern Indonesia, Heliyon (Oct 2022): e11153.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2022.e11153Yingya Yang, Yun Tian, Xuhui Peng, Minhao Yin, Wei Wang, Haiwen Yang Research on Environmental Governance, Local Government Competition, and Agricultural Carbon Emissions under the Goal of Carbon Peak, Agriculture 12, no.1010 (Oct 2022): 1703.https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture12101703Csaba Lentner, Szilárd Hegedűs, Vitéz Nagy Correlations of Taxation and Macroeconomic Indicators in the OECD Member Countries from 2014 to the First Year of the Crisis Caused by COVID-19, Journal of Risk and Financial Management 15, no.1010 (Oct 2022): 464.https://doi.org/10.3390/jrfm15100464Qijun Liu, Lijie Song Do intergovernmental transfers boost intergenerational income mobility? Evidence from China, Structural Change and Economic Dynamics 43 (Oct 2022).https://doi.org/10.1016/j.strueco.2022.10.006Stanley L. Winer, J. Stephen Ferris Political Competition and the Study of Public Economics, 72 (Sep 2022).https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009006149Simon Berset, Mark Schelker Decentralization and Progressive Taxation, Public Finance Review 85 (Sep 2022): 109114212211210.https://doi.org/10.1177/10911421221121029Frank Daumann Potential Negative Externalities of Private Military Entrepreneurs from an Economic Perspective, Defence and Peace Economics 30 (Sep 2022): 1–21.https://doi.org/10.1080/10242694.2022.2126213Sean Richey The Influence of Local Patriotism on Participation in Local Politics, Civic participation, Trust in Local Government and Collective Action, American Politics Research 9 (Sep 2022): 1532673X2211254.https://doi.org/10.1177/1532673X221125449Tanu Kumar, Matthew Stenberg Why Political Scientists Should Study Smaller Cities 1, Urban Affairs Review 97 (Sep 2022): 107808742211246.https://doi.org/10.1177/10780874221124610Yancui Han Promoting green economy efficiency through fiscal decentralization and environmental regulation, Environmental Science and Pollution Research 12 (Sep 2022).https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-022-22952-7Kyle Chan The Organizational Roots of State Capacity, Asian Survey 24 (Sep 2022): 1–31.https://doi.org/10.1525/as.2022.1720395Jaramillo Rodríguez Eneis, Aguirre Franco Sandra Lucia, Hernández Trujillo Yanier Alberto Competitiveness and Productivity of the Colombian Economy by Means of Competitive Routes and Clusters, WSEAS TRANSACTIONS ON BUSINESS AND ECONOMICS 19 (Sep 2022): 1584–1599.https://doi.org/10.37394/23207.2022.19.143Rolando E. Ñañez Loza Gasto regional y crecimiento económico en el Perú, 1999-2020, Revista de la Universidad del Zulia 13, no.3838 (Sep 2022): 307–339.https://doi.org/10.46925//rdluz.38.21John Charles Bradbury, Dennis Coates, Brad R. Humphreys The impact of professional sports franchises and venues on local economies: A comprehensive survey, Journal of Economic Surveys 2 (Sep 2022).https://doi.org/10.1111/joes.12533Junfeng Zhao, Jinling Yan, Xiaodong Yang, Chunxia Nie, Hui Sun, Qiying Ran Government competition, corruption and green total factor energy efficiency: An empirical analysis from china, Frontiers in Environmental Science 10 (Sep 2022).https://doi.org/10.3389/fenvs.2022.976451Juan Milán‐García, Nuria Rueda‐López, Jaime De Pablo‐Valenciano Local government efficiency: reviewing determinants and setting new trends, International Transactions in Operational Research 29, no.55 (Jul 2021): 2871–2898.https://doi.org/10.1111/itor.13032Hongzheng Wang, Xinhai Lu, Mengxuan Wang, Yifeng Tang Determining Existence of Three-Dimensional Intergovernmental Competition: Spatial Econometric Analysis Based on China’s Land-Leasing Behavior, Journal of Urban Planning and Development 148, no.33 (Sep 2022).https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)UP.1943-5444.0000845Jeremy E. Fiel Opportunity Seeking Across Segregated Schools: Unintended Effects of Automatic Admission Policies on High School Segregation, Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis 44, no.33 (Apr 2022): 485–504.https://doi.org/10.3102/01623737221078286Bhaskar Dutta, Anirban Kar, John A. Weymark Strategy-proof club formation with indivisible club facilities, Review of Economic Design 26, no.33 (May 2021): 261–284.https://doi.org/10.1007/s10058-021-00251-wWenchi Wei Fiscal Slack, Rule Constraints, and Government Corruption, Public Administration Review 82, no.55 (Oct 2020): 850–865.https://doi.org/10.1111/puar.13299Dingqing Wang, Enqi Zhang, Hongwei Liao Does Fiscal Decentralization Affect Regional High-Quality Development by Changing Peoples’ Livelihood Expenditure Preferences: Provincial Evidence from China, Land 11, no.99 (Aug 2022): 1407.https://doi.org/10.3390/land11091407Hakyeon Lee, J. S. Butler The Determinants of Tax-Based Incentives: An Empirical Analysis of State Governments, Public Performance & Management Review 85 (Sep 2022): 1–30.https://doi.org/10.1080/15309576.2022.2115089Kevin Berry, Alexander James, Brock Smith, Brett Watson Geography, Geology, and Regional Economic Development, Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 115 (Sep 2022): 102715.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeem.2022.102715Craig E. Jones Does a mayor matter? Gentrification, land use policy, and the 2018 mayoral election in Burnaby, BC, The Canadian Geographer / Le Géographe canadien 66, no.33 (Mar 2022): 581–594.https://doi.org/10.1111/cag.12759Shi Chen, Xun Liu, Chong Lu Fiscal Decentralization, Local Government Behavior, and Macroeconomic Effects of Environmental Policy, Sustainability 14, no.1717 (Sep 2022): 11069.https://doi.org/10.3390/su141711069Wenjian Luo, Yujie Liu Research on the Impact of Fiscal Decentralization on Governance Performance of Air Pollution—Empirical Evidence of 30 Provinces from China, Sustainability 14, no.1818 (Sep 2022): 11313.https://doi.org/10.3390/su141811313Sabyasachi Tripathi, Arup Mitra Shedding light on unnoticed gems in India: A small town’s growth perspective, Land Use Policy 120 (Sep 2022): 106239.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2022.106239John E. Anderson, Seth H. Giertz, Shafiun N. Shimul Reducing property taxes for agriculture: Diffusion of use-value assessment policy across the United States, Land Use Policy 120 (Sep 2022): 106298.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2022.106298Yuzhe Wu, Huiqiong Zhu, Sheng Zheng The Local Land Finance Transformation with the Synergy of Increment and Inventory: A Case Study in China, Land 11, no.99 (Sep 2022): 1529.https://doi.org/10.3390/land11091529Xiao Tian, Jin Liu, Yong Liu How Does the Quality of Junior High Schools Affect Housing Prices? A Quasi-Natural Experiment Based on the Admission Reform in Chengdu, China, Land 11, no.99 (Sep 2022): 1532.https://doi.org/10.3390/land11091532Salomon Bennour, Anita Manatschal Voting with Their Feet by Staying? The Political Drivers of Noncitizens' (Im‐)mobility, Swiss Political Science Review 28, no.33 (Apr 2022): 536–556.https://doi.org/10.1111/spsr.12515Junxue Jia, Jing Ning, Jing Zhang Information Transparency, Monitoring, and Incentives under Decentralization: Evidence from China's Fiscal Reform of “Province Managing County”, Journal of Regional Science (Sep 2022).https://doi.org/10.1111/jors.12615Quan Guo, Jun Hong, Jing Rong, Haiyan Ma, Mengnan Lv, Mengyang Wu Impact of Environmental Regulations on High-Quality Development of Energy: From the Perspective of Provincial Differences, Sustainability 14, no.1818 (Sep 2022): 11712.https://doi.org/10.3390/su141811712Ran Liu, Richard Greene, Ying Yu, Hangtian Lv Are migration and settlement environment-driven? Environment-related residential preferences of migrants in China, Journal of Cleaner Production 27 (Sep 2022): 134263.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.134263THORBJØRN SEJR GUUL Political Solutions to Discriminatory Behavior, American Political Science Review 626 (Aug 2022): 1–15.https://doi.org/10.1017/S0003055422000648Juan S. Mora‐Sanguinetti, Rok Spruk Economic Effects of Recent Experiences of Federalism: Analysis of the Regionalization Process in Spain, Journal of Regional Science (Aug 2022).https://doi.org/10.1111/jors.12616Marie-Estelle Binet, Ewen Lebrun, Matthieu Leprince Does intermunicipal cooperation favor higher firm creation? French evidence from a natural experiment, The Annals of Regional Science 28 (Aug 2022).https://doi.org/10.1007/s00168-022-01177-zCraig A. Depken, Adam J. Hoffer, Abdul H. Kidwai An artefactual field experiment of group discrimination between sports fans, Economics of Governance 87 (Aug 2022).https://doi.org/10.1007/s10101-022-00278-xBingbing Wang, Fengshuo Liu, Siying Yang Green economic development under the fiscal decentralization system: Evidence from china, Frontiers in Environmental Science 10 (Aug 2022).https://doi.org/10.3389/fenvs.2022.955121Diana W. Thomas, Michael D. Thomas Regulation, competition, and the social control of business, Public Choice 107 (Aug 2022).https://doi.org/10.1007/s11127-022-00989-zNadiia Matsiuk Thrive, survive, or perish: The impact of regional autonomy on the demographic dynamics of Italian Alpine territories, Journal of Regional Science 17 (Aug 2022).https://doi.org/10.1111/jors.12613Harold Wolman, William Barnes, Jennifer Clark, Samantha Friedman, Richard Harris, Jeffrey Lin, Thomas Ogorzalek The state of urban research: Views across the disciplines, Journal of Urban Affairs 5 (Aug 2022): 1–38.https://doi.org/10.1080/07352166.2022.2080073Ling Guo, Xiaoni Jiang Decentralization of environmental management and enterprises’ environmental technology innovation: evidence from China, Applied Economics 54, no.3636 (Jan 2022): 4170–4186.https://doi.org/10.1080/00036846.2021.2022093Melissa Heil Debtor spaces: Austerity, space, and dispossession in Michigan’s emergency management system, Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space 54, no.55 (Dec 2021): 966–983.https://doi.org/10.1177/0308518X211070302Christian Dippel Political Parties Do Matter in US Cities … for Their Unfunded Pensions, American Economic Journal: Economic Policy 14, no.33 (Aug 2022): 33–54.https://doi.org/10.1257/pol.20190480Charmaine B. Distor, Odkhuu Khaltar What Motivates Local Governments to Be Efficient? Evidence from Philippine Cities, Sustainability 14, no.1515 (Aug 2022): 9426.https://doi.org/10.3390/su14159426Minahil Asim, Thomas S. Dee Mobile Phones, Civic Engagement, and School Performance in Pakistan, Economics of Education Review 89 (Aug 2022): 102254.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econedurev.2022.102254Samia Zahra, Ramez Abubakr Badeeb The impact of fiscal decentralization, green energy, and economic policy uncertainty on sustainable environment: a new perspective from ecological footprint in five OECD countries, Environmental Science and Pollution Research 29, no.3636 (Mar 2022): 54698–54717.https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-022-19669-yXianpu Xu, Shan Li Neighbor-Companion or Neighbor-Beggar? Estimating the Spatial Spillover Effects of Fiscal Decentralization on China’s Carbon Emissions Based on Spatial Econometric Analysis, Sustainability 14, no.1616 (Aug 2022): 9884.https://doi.org/10.3390/su14169884Si Guo, Yun Pei, Zoe Xie A dynamic model of fiscal decentralization and public debt accumulation, Journal of Public Economics 212 (Aug 2022): 104692.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpubeco.2022.104692Oliver Meza Punctuated equilibrium in multilevel contexts: How federal and state level forces feedback into shaping the local policy agenda in Mexico, Policy Studies Journal 50, no.33 (Jul 2021): 575–594.https://doi.org/10.1111/psj.12438Ran Wei, Xin Feng, Sergio Rey, Elijah Knaap Reducing racial segregation of public school districts, Socio-Economic Planning Sciences 16 (Aug 2022): 101415.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.seps.2022.101415Nives Dolšak, Aseem Prakash NGO Failure: A Theoretical Synthesis, VOLUNTAS: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations 33, no.44 (Sep 2021): 661–671.https://doi.org/10.1007/s11266-021-00416-9Marta Wojciechowska Understanding megacities. An argument on the role of democratic ideals, Political Geography 97 (Aug 2022): 102693.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polgeo.2022.102693Naomi Ehrich Leonard, Simon A Levin Collective intelligence as a public good, Collective Intelligence 1, no.11 (Sep 2022): 263391372210832.https://doi.org/10.1177/26339137221083293Haoyang Liu, Yang Song, Xiaohan Zhang Moving to better opportunities? Housing market responses to the top 4% policy, Regional Science and Urban Economics 61 (Aug 2022): 103829.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.regsciurbeco.2022.103829Uwe Neumann, Lisa Taruttis Sorting in an urban housing market—is there a response to demographic change?, Review of Regional Research 42, no.22 (Oct 2021): 111–139.https://doi.org/10.1007/s10037-021-00158-7Chuanyong Zhang, Qimeng Cai, Xiaohan Zhou, Lufa Zhang The spatiotemporal impact of urban elderly care facilities on residential value and the resulting governance implications, Journal of Housing and the Built Environment 425 (Jul 2022).https://doi.org/10.1007/s10901-022-09961-1Michael Andrea Strebel Who supports metropolitan integration? Citizens’ perceptions of city-regional governance in Western Europe, West European Politics 45, no.55 (Jun 2021): 1081–1106.https://doi.org/10.1080/01402382.2021.1929688Flora Yselle Malah Kuété, Dieudonné Mignamissi, Brice Nguimo Kuete Political Decentralization and Subjective Well-Being: Evidence from Propensity Score Matching Estimates, Revue d'économie politique Vol. 132, no.44 (Jul 2022): 583–613.https://doi.org/10.3917/redp.324.0583Julius A. Nukpezah, Aisha S. Ahmadu Political Fragmentation, Interlocal Expenditures, and the Adoption of Bond Banks for Joint Debt Issue, International Journal of Public Administration 45, no.1010 (Mar 2021): 773–783.https://doi.org/10.1080/01900692.2021.1891426Jing Xia, Rita Yi Man Li, Xuegang Zhan, Lingxi Song, Weijia Bai A study on the impact of fiscal decentralization on carbon emissions with U-shape and regulatory effect, Frontiers in Environmental Science 10 (Jul 2022).https://doi.org/10.3389/fenvs.2022.964327Takeshi Miyazaki Does ethnic diversity affect public goods provision? Evidence from boundary reform of local governments, Applied Economics 54, no.3434 (Jan 2022): 3903–3923.https://doi.org/10.1080/00036846.2021.2017401Salomon Bennour, Anita Manatschal, Didier Ruedin How political reception contexts shape location decisions of immigrants, Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies 6 (Jul 2022): 1–24.https://doi.org/10.1080/1369183X.2022.2098468Jiancai Pi, Kaiqi Zhang, Xiangyu Huang Financial globalization and wage inequality, Scottish Journal of Political Economy (Jul 2022).https://doi.org/10.1111/sjpe.12333Josh Matti, Amir B. Ferreira Neto Consolidated city–county governments and economic stability, Economics of Governance 27 (Jul 2022).https://doi.org/10.1007/s10101-022-00273-2Lulu Zhao, Kaichao Shao, Jingjing Ye The impact of fiscal decentralization on environmental pollution and the transmission mechanism based on promotion incentive perspective, Environmental Science and Pollution Research 10 (Jul 2022).https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-022-21762-1A. Vl. Odintsova Reforming the Institutional Space for The Development of Municipalities, Federalism 27, no.22 (Jul 2022): 82–97.https://doi.org/10.21686/2073-1051-2022-2-82-97Jinbo Song, Hehui Yuan Multi-source strategic interaction in China’s public services: a spatial econometric analysis, Regional Studies 56, no.77 (Oct 2021): 1113–1124.https://doi.org/10.1080/00343404.2021.1984422James Tuttle Inequality, concentrated disadvantage, and homicide: towards a multi-level theory of economic inequality and crime, International Journal of Comparative and Applied Criminal Justice 46, no.33 (Jun 2021): 215–232.https://doi.org/10.1080/01924036.2021.1942103Sidra Sohail, Sana Ullah, Attiya Yasmin Javid Fiscal decentralization, institutional quality, and government size: an asymmetry analysis for Asian economies, Transnational Corporations Review 14, no.33 (Aug 2021): 256–270.https://doi.org/10.1080/19186444.2021.1956855Pankaj C. Patel Recentralization and self‐employment: A quasi‐natural experiment in Switzerland, Managerial and Decision Economics 43, no.55 (Sep 2021): 1379–1402.https://doi.org/10.1002/mde.3461Alessio Mitra, Athanasios Chymis Federalism, but how? The impact of vertical fiscal imbalance on economic growth. Evidence from Belgium*, Economics & Politics 34, no.22 (Sep 2021): 322–350.https://doi.org/10.1111/ecpo.12200Yonsu Kim, Jae Hong Kim What drives variations in public health and social services expenditures? the association between political fragmentation and local expenditure patterns, The European Journal of Health Economics 23, no.55 (Nov 2021): 781–789.https://doi.org/10.1007/s10198-021-01394-xShihyun Noh, Ji-Hyung Park Does Medicaid expansion influence county health spending? A case of New York counties, Health Economics, Policy and Law 17, no.33 (Oct 2021): 332–347.https://doi.org/10.1017/S174413312100030XJinze Li, Rijia Ding Financial Decentralization and Environmental Pollution Research—An Empirical Test Based on Data from 279 Cities in China, Sustainability 14, no.1313 (Jun 2022): 7576.https://doi.org/10.3390/su14137576Austin M. Mitchell, Weiwen Yin Political centralization, career incentives, and local economic growth in Edo Japan, Explorations in Economic History 85 (Jul 2022): 101446.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eeh.2022.101446Weimin Zhang, Wangrong Ma, Qiwei Chen Does Regional Development Policy Promote Industrial Structure Upgrading? Evidence from the Yangtze River Delta in China, Sustainability 14, no.1313 (Jul 2022): 8127.https://doi.org/10.3390/su14138127Fei Liu, Ting Nan, Xinliang Wang Causes and Evolution Characteristics of Green Innovation Efficiency Loss: The Perspective of Factor Mismatch under Local Government Competition, Sustainability 14, no.1414 (Jul 2022): 8338.https://doi.org/10.3390/su14148338Di Wang, Zhiyuan Zhang, Ruyi Shi Fiscal Decentralization, Green Technology Innovation, and Regional Air Pollution in China: An Investigation from the Perspective of Intergovernmental Competition, International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 19, no.1414 (Jul 2022): 8456.https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19148456Yuping Shang, Malin Song, Xin Zhao The development of China's Circular Economy: From the perspective of environmental regulation, Waste Management 149 (Jul 2022): 186–198.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2022.05.027Omer Kimhi, Itai Beeri, Yaniv Reingewertz The Political Economy of Local Governments’ Requests for Permission to Override Central Fiscal Limitations: Insights from Israel, Publius: The Journal of Federalism 49 (Jul 2022).https://doi.org/10.1093/publius/pjac021Fei Guo, Eric Evans Osei Opoku, Kate Hynes, Isabel Kit-Ming Yan Fiscal Decentralization and Fiscal Multiplier in China, The B.E. Journal of Macroeconomics 22, no.22 (Nov 2021): 729–763.https://doi.org/10.1515/bejm-2020-0275Federico Guerrero, Elliott Parker Immigration, ethnic fractionalization, and the fiscal burden in the OECD, European Journal of Government and Economics 11, no.11 (Jun 2022): 7–30.https://doi.org/10.17979/ejge.2022.11.1.8601Xufeng Su, Guangliang Liu, Yang Xu, Wenfeng Ge, Bing Shen, Qiying Ran, Hui Zhou How Multi-Dimensional Local Government Competition Impacts Green Economic Growth? A Case Study of 272 Chinese Cities, Frontiers in Environmental Science 10 (Jun 2022).https://doi.org/10.3389/fenvs.2022.911004Kristine Canales, Martha Kropf, Suzanne Leland, Cherie Maestas Revisiting the Micro-Foundations of the Tiebout Theory of Local Expenditures: Are Private Community Amenities Substitutes for Local Public Services in Residential Choices?, Urban Affairs Review 59 (Jun 2022): 107808742211037.https://doi.org/10.1177/10780874221103765Na Zhang, Jinqian Deng, Fayyaz Ahmad, Muhammad Umar Draz, Nabila Abid The dynamic association between public environmental demands, government environmental governance, and green technology innovation in China: evidence from panel VAR model, Environment, Development