OBJECTIVES:MMF is a mainstay for the treatment of SSc. The occurrence and implications of MMF-related adverse events (AEs) on drug retention rates in real life remain poorly defined. We aimed to determine the MMF retention rate and to investigate the causes and patterns of discontinuation, AEs and treatment options used after discontinuation. METHODS:SSc patients who started MMF treatment underwent a retrospective longitudinal assessment for up to 5 years. We documented the incidence, predictors and impacts of MMF treatment on gastrointestinal intolerance, infections, laboratory abnormalities and cancer. Rescue strategies implemented after MMF discontinuation were recorded. RESULTS:The 5-year MMF retention rate of 554 patients stood at 70.7%, and 19.6% of them stopped MMF due to AEs. One out of every four patients experienced a dose reduction or discontinuation of MMF due to AEs, with gastrointestinal intolerance being the predominant cause. The 5-year cumulative incidence rates for gastrointestinal intolerance, cancer, severe infections and laboratory toxicity leading to MMF discontinuation were 6.4%, 4.1%, 3.1% and 2.1%, respectively. Lower respiratory tract was the most affected, with bacteria being the predominant causative agent. Intestinal and pulmonary circulation involvement were tied to elevated AE rates and MMF discontinuation. The most common approaches post-MMF cessation were 'watch and wait' and switch to rituximab. CONCLUSIONS:: MMF use in SSc appears to be limited by the occurrence of AEs, both in terms of persistence and dosing of the drug. Rescue options after MMF discontinuation are limited and many patients remain without immunosuppressant.

Background Mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) is the most widely used immunosuppressant in Systemic Sclerosis (SSc) since the Scleroderma Lung Study II demonstrated the safety and efficacy of this drug. Real-life evidence about long early and long-term adverse events (AEs) associated to the use of MMF is lacking, and SSc predictors of drug’s discontinuation are not identified yet. Objectives To evaluate the long-term persistence of MMF treatment and the adverse events (AEs) incidence in a multicentric cohort of SSc patients. Methods Medical records of SSc patients treated with MMF and followed up in 9 tertiary centers were retrospectively collected and evaluated. AEs occurrence (i.e. infections, gastrointestinal (GI) intolerance, laboratory abnormalities, new cancer diagnosis), and reasons for dosage reduction or discontinuation in the 5 five years after the MMF prescription were recorded. Infections were reported and classified according to the organ involved, the etiology, and the severity. Results Data from 494 SSc patients observed for 3.1 years (IQR 1.4-4.9) were analyzed. Combination therapy with steroids was reported in 37.0% of patients, while in 14.8% of cases MMF was associated with Rituximab or Tocilizumab treatment. Raw MMF therapy persistence at 12, 24 and 60 months was 91.37%, 88.37%, and 66.34%, respectively. MMF discontinuation incidence was 7.65 per 100 patient years due to any cause, 4.69 per 100 patient years due to drug-related AEs, 1.8 per 100 patient years due to GI intolerance, 1.01 per 100 patient years due to severe or recurrent infections, 0.79 per 100 patient years due to laboratory abnormalities, and 0.65 per 100 patient years due to new cancer diagnosis. Longer disease duration (p=0.003), low diffusing capacity for carbon monoxide (DLco) (p=0.003), late pattern at video-capillaroscopy (p=0.02), esophageal involvement (0.002), and intestinal involvement (p<0.001) were associated with MMF discontinuation. Of note, the most frequent recorded infections had a viral non-COVID19 and non-HZV etiology (21.7%), mostly affecting upper airways (7.1%), and were characterized as mildly severe (13.4%). During follow-up, 127 severe or moderately severe infections were reported, and they were associated with baseline low DLco (p=0.01), late capillaroscopy pattern (p=0.005), esophageal involvement (p=0.01), intestinal involvement (p=0.04), and smoking (p=0.005). Conclusion This real-life analysis of our multicenter cohort demonstrated that MMF is well tolerated with a high treatment persistence rate. The main reasons of MMF discontinuation were GI intolerance followed by infections and laboratory abnormalities. Advanced SSc microvascular damage on capillaroscopy and GI SSc involvement characterized the patients at higher risk of AEs during treatment. REFERENCES: NIL. Acknowledgements: NIL. Disclosure of Interests None Declared.

Introduction The use of Janus Kinase Inhibitors (JAK-Is) in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) has entered in daily practice. In consideration of ORAL-Surveillance trial and the new EULAR recommendations, real-world data are needed to assess Jak-Is safety and effectiveness. The multicenter study presented here aimed to evaluate effectiveness and safety of tofacitinib in a real-life cohort. Methods A retrospective analysis was performed from September 2021 to December 2022. Data were collected when tofacitinib was started (T0) and after 3 (T3), 6 (T6) and 12 (T12) months of treatment. The primary objective was to analyze the efficacy and safety of tofacitinib. Safety was assessed by recording adverse events (AEs) with and without discontinuation. The secondary objective was to assess the difference between Patient-Reported Outcomes (PROs) and Physician's Global Assessment of disease activity (PhGA). Results 122 patients were included in the study from the following rheumatology Centers: Pisa, Ancona, Florence (two Centers), Siena, and Sardinia. A statistically significant improvement in DAS-28-CRP, CDAI and SDAI score was observed at T3, T6, compared to baseline ( p < 0.001). Improvement was confirmed in patients who reach T12. Patients naïve to bDMARDs showed a shorter remission time and higher remission rates. There was also a statistically significant improvement in PROs compared to baseline ( p < 0.001). The improvement was rapid and was consistent with PhGA. The 12-month retention rate for tofacitinib was 89.35%. Reasons to stop tofacitinib were: insufficient response (7), gastrointestinal symptoms (2), infection (1), malignancy (1), Zoster (1), pruritus sine materia (1). Conclusions Tofacitinib is safe and effective in our RA cohort. It induces higher remission rates in patients naive to bDMARDs, suggesting that there may be a benefit using it as first-line therapy. Additionally, improvement in PROs was consistent with PhGA scores, demonstrating how tofacitinib affects both the objective and subjective components of disease activity. Key Points 1. JAK inhibitors are considered at a similar level as biologic agents in terms of effectiveness. 2. After ORAL-Surveillance results, real-world data are needed to assess the benefit/risk profile of Jaki. 3. Disagreement between patients and physicians has been previously reported with biologic therapy among patients with rheumatoid arthritis, with patients rating disease activity higher than physicians. 4. Jak inhibitors could reduce this discrepancy, due to their mechanism of action.

Background:Gastrointestinal involvement is one of the most frequent features of SSc, affecting nearly 90% of patients, with a great impact on quality of life and morbidity. One of the key pathological factors of SSc bowel involvement is vasculopathy (1), although little is known about its pathophysiology and no treatments are currently available.Objectives:to assess with abdominal US the superior mesenteric artery (SMA) and the inferior mesenteric artery (IMA) vessel characteristics and blood flow in SSc, compared to healthy controls (HC).Methods:we performed fasting abdominal US in SSc patients fulfilling the ACR/EULAR 2013 classification criteria and HC. Patients with a history of peripheral /coronary arterial disease were excluded. For both SMA and IMA, caliber (mm), Peak Systolic Velocity – PSV (cm/sec), Reverse Velocity – RV (cm/sec), End-Diastolic Velocity – EDV (cm/sec), Mean Velocity – mV (cm/sec), Blood-flow (cm/sec), Resistive Index – RI and Pulsatility Index – PI were measured.Results:28 SSc patients [25 females (89.3%), mean age 48.75 ± 12.39 years; 6 (22.22%) anti-centromere and 19 (70.37%) positive for anti-topoisomerase I antibodies] and 28 HC [18 females (64.3%), mean age 36.25 ± 12.08 years] were evaluated. In SSc, the SMA caliber was significantly smaller than in HC (5.75 ± 0.62 vs. 6.45 ± 0.60 mm, p<0.0001), while IMA dimensions did not differ.The SMA study revealed SSc patients had a significant reduction of RV (7.25 ± 6.37 vs. 18.52 ± 6.16 cm/sec, p<0.0001) and PI (3.33 ± 0.75 vs. 4.53 ± 1.03, p<0.0001) when compared to HC. In addition, in SSc the mV of SMA was significantly lower than in HC (38.03 ± 13.90 vs. 28.32 ±9.25 cm/sec, p=0.0035), as well as the RI (0.88 ± 0.04 vs. 0.91 ± 0.03, p=0.0034); EDV was significantly increased (16.34 ± 7.03 vs. 12.64 ± 5.46 cm/sec, p=0.0321). Similarly to SMA, also in IMA RV and PI were significantly lower that controls (RV: 2.69 ± 6.10 vs. 17.06 ± 5.75 cm/sec, p<0.0001; PI: 3.54 ± 0.95 vs. 6.08 ± 1.53, p<0.0001). Moreover SSc patients presented a significant reduction of PSV and RI of IMA (PSV: 72.27 ± 27.23 vs. 93.81 ± 25.73 cm/sec, p=0.0084; RI: 0.88 ± 0.04 vs. 0.91 ± 0.03, p=0.0132) when compared to HC. Although the HC group was significantly younger than the SSc group (p=0.0003), all the results were confirmed after adjustment for age (Table 1).Table 1.comparison of the characteristics of SMA and IMA between SSc patients and HC.SScHCp-valueAge adjusted p-valueSMANMean ± SDNMean ± SDCaliber (mm)285.75 ± 0.62286.45 ± 0.60<0.00010.0002PSV (cm/sec)28137.50 ± 34.5028135.26 ± 33.810.80750.7297RV (cm/sec)287.25 ± 6.372818.52 ± 6.16<0.0001<0.0001EDV (cm/sec)2816.34 ± 7.032812.64 ± 5.460.03210.0650mV (cm/sec)2838.03 ± 13.902828.32 ±9.250.00350.0150Blood-flow (cm/sec)281073.1 ± 831.1628913.36 ± 272.870.34090.4781PI283.33 ± 0.75284.53 ± 1.03<0.00010.0002RI280.88 ± 0.04280.91 ± 0.030.00340.0141IMACaliber (mm)262.71 ± 0.47242.79 ± 0.370.48720.5385PSV (cm/sec)2372.27 ± 27.232393.81 ± 25.730.00840.0044RV (cm/sec)232.69 ± 6.102317.06 ± 5.75<0.0001<0.0001EDV (cm/sec)237.87 ± 2.01237.95 ± 2.100.89210.9250mV (cm/sec)2317.83 ± 5.332314.75 ± 5.080.05140.3938Blood-flow (cm/sec)23106.70 ± 47.992084.00 ± 30.130.06760.3056PI233.54 ± 0.95236.08 ± 1.53<0.0001<0.0001RI230.88 ± 0.04230.91 ± 0.030.01320.0205SMA=superior mesentheric artery, IMA=inferior mesentheric artery, PSV=Peak Systolic Velocity, RV=Reverse Velocity, EDV=End-Diastolic Velocity, mV=Mean Velocity, PI=Pulsatility Index, RI=Resistive Index.Conclusion:this preliminary study shows, for the first time, the presence of a significant reduction of RV, PI and RI in the intestinal arteries of SSc patients when compared to HC. These data show an increased stiffness of the gastrointestinal arterial wall, in agreement with the typical SSc vasculopathy. A larger cohort is needed to confirm the results and explore the possible relationship with other clinical features of the disease.References:[1]Sjogren, RW.Gastrointestinal features of scleroderma. Curr Opin Rheumatol 1996;8:569-75.Disclosure of Interests:None declared

Background: Ultrasound (US) is useful in monitoring RA patients, with the US7 score allowing grey-scale and power-Doppler (PD) semi-quantitative evaluation of synovitis and teno-synovitis. We evaluated real-life efficacy and safety of Baricitinib, an oral selective JAK1-2 inhibitor, in RA patients using clinical, clinimetric, and US assessments. Methods: Disease activity score in 28 joints calculated with C-reactive protein (DAS28-CRP), disease activity score in 28 joints calculated with erythrocyte sedimentation rate (DAS28-ESR), clinical disease activity index (CDAI), simplified disease activity index (SDAI), visual analogue scale (VAS)-pain, health assessment questionnaire (HAQ), COCHIN scale, adverse events (AE), concomitant medications, laboratory parameters, and US7 were performed/recorded at baseline, 1, 3, and 6 months in RA patients starting Baricitinib. Responder/non-responder status was determined according to the EULAR Response Criteria at 3 months. SDAI clinical remission or low disease activity (LDA) were calculated at 3 and 6 months. Results: In 43 enrolled patients, a significant improvement in disease activity and US7 components (except tendon PD) and a reduction of steroid dosage were observed. Responders at 3 months showed a significantly higher reduction of CDAI, SDAI, COCHIN scale, VAS-pain, and US7 synovialPD, compared with non-responders. At 3 and 6 months, remission/LDA was achieved by 12.8/53.8% and 21.6/51.3% patients, respectively. The csDMARD co-treatment was independently associated with remission/LDA at 3 months. Safety-related drop-outs were in line with literature data. The steroid dosage was associated with AE development at 6 months. Conclusion: The real-life data, also obtained with US evaluation, confirmed the Baricitinib efficacy in RA disease control, as well as the utility of assessment during the follow up of disease activity.

Objective: In Systemic Sclerosis (SSc), vasculopathy is the background of major vascular complications (MVCs), like digital ulcers (DUs), pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) and scleroderma renal crisis (SRC). We aimed to identify the predictors and to test the primary preventive effect of vasoactive/vasodilating drugs (VVD) for the development of MVCs in SSc MVCs-naive patients. Methods: patients fulfilling the ACR/EULAR 2013 classification criteria for SSc without history of MVCs were eligible. Data about clinical manifestations, laboratory and instrumental assessments and treatments were retrospectively collected at baseline and latest available follow-up. Results: 134 SSc patients were enrolled (mean age 56.5 years +/- 14.2, females 88.1%, limited subset 61.9%, ACA positivity 60.4%). In a mean of 43 +/- 19 months of follow-up 12 (9.0%) patients developed at least 1 MVC (10 DU, 2 PAH and 1 SRC). Dyspnoea and arthritis at baseline were independent predictors for MVCs development (p = 0.012, and p = 0.002 respectively). No primary preventive effect of VVD on MVCs development was found. However, sildenafil reduced the renal resistive index increase (p = 0.042) and alprostadil slowed the DLco decline (p = 0.029). Both iloprost and angiotensin-receptor blockers (ARBs) delayed MVCs development, while angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEi) determined an earlier onset of such MCVs. Conclusions: in SSc patients, our data confirm the role of arthritis and dyspnea as independent predictors of major vascular complications, in particular in MVCs-naive patients. Prostanoids, sildenafil and ARBs, even in absence of a primary preventive action, might help in slowing disease progression and postponing the onset of MVCs.

Objective: Osteoporosis (OP) can complicate the course of rheumatic musculoskeletal diseases (RMDs) and connective tissue diseases (CTDs). Denosumab, a monoclonal antibody against RANK-L, showed beneficial effect in rheumatoid arthritis in inhibiting radiographic progression and erosive burden. We tested the efficacy, safety, and persistence on the treatment of the combination of biologic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (bDMARDs)/denosumab versus bDMARD in patients with RMD and CTD. Methods: This is a retrospective evaluation of a single center, including patients with RMD/CTD (including rheumatoid arthritis, ankylosing spondylitis, psoriatic arthritis, systemic sclerosis, and overlap syndromes) treatment with bDMARD/denosumab, compared to age, gender, disease, bDMARD, and conventional synthetic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs-matched controls. Results: Twenty-eight bDMARD/denosumab patients and 49 bDMARD patients were eligible. Despite a statistically significant difference during the first-year efficacy (due to the different baseline time-point), there was no difference in the efficacy profile in the second year of treatment and in the safety profile (including local, systemic, and serious adverse events). Moreover, no statistically significant difference in the persistence of bDMARD treatment over 2 years of evaluation was found. The combination of bDMARD and denosumab was not an independent predictor of disease flare or bDMARD treatment withdrawal. Conclusion: The combination of bDMARD and denosumab does not alter the efficacy and the safety profile of the bDMARD in patients with RMD/CTD. Future studies verifying the radiological disease inhibition could support denosumab use in RMD/CTD other than rheumatoid arthritis, when complicated by OP.

Aims: Medical and non-medical switching strategies have been adopted in Europe in the last few years. We aimed to investigate persistence on treatment with a SB5 Adalimumab (SB5) biosimilar after switching from Adalimumab (ADA) originator among patients with inflammatory rheumatic musculoskeletal diseases (iRMD), identifying possible predictors of drug interruption and describing adverse events. Method: iRMD patients previously switched to SB5 after at least 6 months of ADA were enrolled. Data on concomitant medications, disease flares, and persistence on SB5 up to the last available follow up were collected retrospectively. Kaplan–Meier and Cox regression models were used. Result: A total of 172 patients (106 females, ADA duration 5.8 ± 3.8 years) were enrolled, including 34 rheumatoid arthritis, 59 psoriatic arthritis, and 61 axial spondyloarthritis patients. In a 10 ± 3 months follow up, 65 (37.8%) patients presented with adverse events, with 46 (26.7%) showing a clinically defined disease flare (no disease activity and patient reported outcomes assessment were available); 24 patients interrupted SB5 permanently (among them, 11 back-switched to ADA and 8 were prescribed a different biological therapy). Probability of persistence on SB5 was 94.7% at 6 months and 85.1% at 12 months. Baseline corticosteroid [hazard ratio (HR) 3.209, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.193–8.635, p = 0.021] and therapy with nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) (HR 2.876, 95% CI 1.229–6.727, p = 0.015), as well as the baseline corticosteroid dose (HR 1.200, 95%CI 1.026–1.403, p = 0.022) were predictors of drug interruption. Conclusion: Our data on persistence of treatment and adverse events are in line with previous reports. Further large cohort studies may confirm baseline corticosteroid and NSAIDs use as predictors of SB5 interruption, helping to identify patients at higher risk of failure after switching.

In systemic sclerosis (SSc), the gastrointestinal tract (GIT) plays a central role in the patient’s quality of life. The microbiome populates the GIT, where a relationship between the Lactobacillus and gastrointestinal motility has been suggested. In this study, the analysis of oral Lactobacillus species in SSc patients and healthy subjects using culture-independent molecular techniques, together with a review of the literature on microbiota and lactobacilli in SSc, has been carried out. Twenty-nine SSc female patients (mean age 62) and twenty-three female healthy subjects (HS, mean age 57.6) were enrolled and underwent tongue and gum swab sampling. Quantitative PCR was conducted in triplicate using Lactobacillus specific primers rpoB1, rpoB1o and rpoB2 for the RNA-polymerase β subunit gene. Our data show significantly (p = 0.0211) lower LactobacillusspprpoB sequences on the tongue of patients with SSc compared to HS. The mean value of the amount of Lactobacillus ssprpoB gene on the gumsofSSc patients was minor compared to HS. A significant difference between tongue and gums (p = 0.0421) was found in HS but not in SSc patients. In conclusion, our results show a lower presence of Lactobacillus in the oral cavity of SSc patients. This strengthens the hypothesis that Lactobacillus may have both a protective and therapeutic role in SSc patients.

Patients and health workers were at high risk of infection during the Sars-Cov-2 pandemic lockdown. For this reason, other medical and clinical approaches such as Telemedicine were necessary. Despite Telemedicine was born before COVID-19, the pandemic was the opportunity to accelerate a process already underway for at least a decade and to blow all the barriers away. Our aim is to describe the experience of Telemedicine during and immediately after the first lockdown to assure the follow-up in a 'virtual' outpatient clinic dedicated to Rheumatic and Musculoskeletal Diseases (RMDs) and to give an overview of Telemedicine in the rheumatology field. We retrospectively evaluated the patient flow to our rheumatology division from March to September 2020 and, in accordance with local restrictions, three periods were selected. In the 1st period, 96.96% of the outpatient clinic cases were shifted to Telemedicine; these decreased to 52.45% in the 2nd period, while the 3rd period was characterized by the return of the patients at the clinic (97.6%). Diagnostic procedures were postponed during the 1st period, reduced drastically during the 2nd and performed regularly during the third period. Intravenous infusions were maintained as much as possible during the three periods, to assure therapeutic continuity. Shifting stable patients to Telemedicine has the potential to allow continuity of care, while reducing the risk of contagion during a pandemic. In the next future, the integration of Telemedicine as standard of care for specific clinical applications might assure assistance for RMDs patients also in non-pandemic conditions.

Aims: Switching from originator to biosimilar is part of current practice in inflammatory rheumatic musculoskeletal diseases (iRMDs) such as rheumatoid arthritis (RA), psoriatic arthritis (PsA) and axial spondylarthritis (axSpA), with evidences derived from both etanercept (ETN) to SB4-switching randomized controlled trials and real-life registries. We investigated the safety and treatment persistence of ETN/SB4 in a multi-iRMD cohort derived from two rheumatology departments in our region. Methods: Adult patients with iRMDs, treated with ETN for at least 6 months and switched to SB4 in stable clinical condition, were eligible for this retrospective evaluation. Retrospective data on adverse events, loss of efficacy and persistence on treatment were collected until latest available follow-up. Results: A total of 220 patients (85 RA, 81 PsA, 33 axSpA, 14 juvenile idiopathic arthritis and seven other conditions; 142 females, mean age 58 ± 7 years, disease duration 12 ± 4 years, ETN duration 7 ± 4 years) were enrolled, with median follow-up of 12.1 (9.7–15.8) months. A total of 50 patients (22.7%) presented with at least one adverse event, with 36 (16.4%) disease flares and 30 (13.6%: 11 for safety and 19 loss of efficacy) SB4 withdrawals. Cumulative SB4 treatment persistence was 99.1%, 88.6% and 64.6% at 6, 12 and 18 months respectively. Back-switch to ETN was performed in 17/30 cases, the remaining cases were managed with change of biologic disease modifying or conventional synthetic anti-rheumatic drug. Age was the only significant predictor of SB4 interruption at 6 months. Conclusion: Our real-life data confirm the safety profile of switching from ETN to SB4, with slightly higher treatment persistence rates compared with other real-life registries.

COVID-19 is a world health emergency which may inevitably affect the management of a complex autoimmune disease such as systemic sclerosis (SSc). Several SSc patients are frail and, in this pandemic, need a careful protection. The COVID-19 infection might complicate the clinical scenario of interstitial lung disease (ILD) in SSc because it determines a severe pneumonia characterized by radiological features similar to SSc-ILD. The striking CT similarities between the 2 diseases make it difficult to distinguish a worsening of SSc-ILD from COVID-19-ILD superinfection. Moreover, other aspects, like isolation during lock down, may cause a significant psychological stress which will pile up on the already difficult contact with the patients for a routine check-up. Moreover, the drug shortage is a real problem in these times. For these reasons, the rheumatologist in daily clinical practice should carefully differentiate the possible COVID-19 infection in order to optimize the patient management. Therefore, the challenge in everyday life will be to achieve in due time the differential diagnosis as well as the long-term psychological impact.Key Points• SSc patients should be encouraged to continue their chronic therapy; in case of immunosuppressive therapy it must be discontinued for safety in case of COVID-19 infection.• Psychological support must be guaranteed to every SSc patients.• COVID-19 pneuminia is hard to distinguish from an interstitial lung disease due to SSc lung involvment.• Data sharing is fundamental for an optimal managment of SSc patients during COVID-19 pandemia.

In the present study we evaluated how systemic arterial hypertension (SAH), dyslipidemia and diabetes mellitus influence the efficacy, safety and retention rate of biological disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drug (bDMARD) treatment in rheumatic musculoskeletal disorders (RMDs). The charts of RMD patients treated with the first-line bDMARD were reviewed, collecting data on safety, efficacy and comorbidities at prescription (baseline, BL), after 6 months (6M) and at last observation on bDMARD (last observation time, LoT). In 383 RMD patients, a higher rate of adverse events at 6M (p = 0.0402) and at LoT (p = 0.0462) was present in dyslipidemic patients. Patients who developed dyslipidemia or SAH during bDMARD treatment had similar results (dyslipidemia p = 0.0007; SAH p = 0.0319) with a longer bDMARD retention as well (dyslipidemia p < 0.0001; SAH p < 0.0001). SAH patients on angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEis) or angiotensin-II receptor blockers (ARBs) continued bDMARDs for longer than non-exposed patients (p = 0.001), with higher frequency of drug interruption for long-standing remission rather than inefficacy or adverse reactions (p = 0.0258). Similarly, dyslipidemic patients on statins had a better bDMARD retention than not-exposed patients (p = 0.0420). In conclusion, SAH and dyslipidemia may be associated with higher frequency of adverse events but a better drug retention of first-line bDMARD in RMDs, suggesting an additional effect of ACEis /ARBs or statins on the inflammatory process and supporting their use in RMD bDMARD patients with SAH/dyslipidemia.

Objectives:Biologic disease modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (bDMARDs) have significantly improved the care of patients with rheumatic muscle-skeletal disorders (RMDs). Considering their immunosuppressive action, a theoretical increase of malignancy risk has been a major concern in the last few decades. The objective of this study is to analyze the incidence of malignancies in a cohort of patients affected by rheumatoid arthritis (RA), psoriathic arthritis (PsA), and ankylosing spondylitis (AS) treated with bDMARDs. Methods:The charts of bDMARD-treated RMD patients were reviewed, and data about bDMARD exposure and malignant cancers (excluding non-melanoma skin cancer) were collected. Results:921 patients were included (median age: 50.59 years, 66.67% females); 1374 bDMARD treatments were administered, 87.12% were tumor necrosis factor inhibitors. A total of 21 malignant neoplasms were detected in 21 patients (61.90% females, median age at cancer diagnosis: 64.99 years), 66.67% in RA patients, 19.05% in PsA, and 14.28% in AS. Among them, 10 patients (47.62%) were treated with etanercept, 6 patients (28.57%) with adalimumab, and 1 case each with tocilizumab, certolizumab, golimumab, infliximab, and abatacept. The most common malignancies that we found were lung cancers, ductal mammary carcinomas, melanomas, and lymphomas. The incidence rate (IR) of malignancies in our cohort was 3.47 per 1000 person-years (p-y); the higher IRs were in RA patients (5.13 per 1000 p-y), in males (4.21 per 1000 p-y), and in patients aged >70 years (10.14 per 1000 p-y). Conclusions:The results of our study showed IR of malignancies in RMD patients treated with bDMARDs that is in agreement with literature data.

SB5 showed comparable efficacy and safety profile in respect to adalimumab originator (ADA) in randomized clinical trials of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and psoriasis. We aimed to describe the efficacy and safety of SB5 after switching from ADA in RA, axial spondyloarthritis (axSpA), psoriatic arthritis (PsA) and juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA) patients. Adult RA, PsA, axSpA, JIA patients treated with ADA for at least 6 months, switched to SB5 in stable clinical conditions, were eligible. Data on safety, activity indexes and patient-reported outcomes were collected at baseline, 3 and 6 months after switching. Eighty-two patients (19 RA, 28 PsA, 32 axSpA and 3 JIA; 45 females, mean age 54 ± 14 years, disease duration 13 ± 7 years, ADA duration 6 ± 3 years) were enrolled. RA patients showed stable conditions, while PsA patients showed an increase in both HAQ, DAS28(CRP) and DAPSA and axSpA patients an increase in VAS pain, VAS patient disease activity and ASDAS, both at 3 months. There were changes in the concomitant medications profile, with regression of activity indexes increases at 6 months. Adverse events were reported by 33.7% patients at 3 months and 16.6% patients at 6 months, mostly disease flares and infectious events. Two patients stopped SB5. Despite temporary changes in the concomitant medication profile for mild disease flares, our real-life data replicate the safety profile of switching from ADA to SB5 in RA, with additional data for its applicability in PsA and axSpA patients, further supporting switching to biosimilars in treating inflammatory rheumatic conditions.

Objective: Stressful life events, such as Childhood Adverse Events (CAE) and Recent Stressful Events (RSE) may play a role in the pathogenesis of autoimmune disorders. The present study investigated their occurrence in Systemic Sclerosis (SSc). Methods: 110 SSc patients and 110 controls were enrolled. Stressful events assessment included a semi-structured interview and the Childhood Experience of Care and Abuse Questionnaire (CECA-Q). A normative evaluation of RSE was made by means of the Paykel’s scoring of life events. The clinical status of patients with a very early diagnosis of Systemic Sclerosis (VEDOSS) during the first year after the diagnosis was evaluated in order to detect patients with a significant clinical worsening. Results: All investigated CAE were more frequently reported in SSc patients compared to controls, although with a significant difference only for the events “loss of mother” (p<0.05) and “sexual abuse” (p<0.05). SSc patients reported higher occurrence of at least one RSE (p<0.01), number of RSE (p<0.01), and stress load (mean total Paykel’s score) (p<0.01) in the year prior to the diagnosis compared to the year prior to the interview for controls. This was particularly true for severe and independent RSE (p<0.001). VEDOSS subjects who worsened during the first year after the diagnosis, compared to those who did not, reported a higher impact of severe and independent RSE in the same year (p<0.05). Conclusions: CAE may represent potential predisposing factors for SSc, while the occurrence of RSE may play a role in the onset and worsening of the disease.

Introduction: Interleukin-6 (IL-6) is well-known for its pro-inflammatory properties, has been proven to target a wide range of cells in the joint, and has been implicated in extra-articular and articular manifestations in rheumatoid arthritis (RA). Tocilizumab (TCZ) is now widely used in patients with active RA and a number of additional agents that target the IL-6 pathways are under development, including sirukumab (SRK).Areas covered: SRK is an IgG1 human anti-IL-6 monoclonal antibody which binds to IL-6 and prevents IL-6-mediated downstream effects. Initial trial results in phase-III studies in patients with RA seemed promising, showing improved results in patients with moderate-to-severe RA. Data derive from the phase-II study and the various SIRROUND studies (phase III).Expert commentary: The available data show that SRK50mg every 4weeks or 100mg every 2weeks will be effective in treating the RA population, with clinical improvements as early as week 2 and sustained over time. The adverse-event profile seems to be similar to TCZ, except for an increased mortality post open-label studies due to infections and cardiovascular events, our knowledge of which will be deepened with post-marketing surveillance and registry data.

Purpose There is a lack of a valid definition for skin ulcers in systemic sclerosis (SSc) to be used in clinical trials. Our aim was to develop a consensus definition for SSc skin ulcers based on the results of a systematic literature review (SLR) for skin ulcer definitions and expert opinion; and to evaluate its face validity, reliability and feasibility. Methods SLR for skin ulcer definitions was conducted using PubMed, Web of Science, and Cochrane library for articles published from inception to January 1st, 2016. SSc experts were to discuss the definition categories and vote for the relevant terms. Reliability of the definition was tested in a second expert meeting, seven SSc experts evaluated 7 SSc patients with skin lesions twice. Face validity and feasibility were evaluated by sending out case report forms (CRFs) to four SSc experts, who were each asked to use the definition in five patients. Results A total of 3464 abstracts and titles were screened, and 446 articles were fully evaluated. Of these, 66 met eligibility criteria and skin ulcer definitions were extracted. SSc experts discussed, refined, and voted on the consensus definition using nominal process. Kappa for inter-rater agreement was 0.51 and for intra-rater agreement was 0.90. The mean time to decide if the lesion is an ulcer was 7.4 seconds. All investigators endorsed the face validity of the new definition in the CRFs. Conclusions Using an SLR and a nominal technique, we developed a preliminary consensus-based definition of SSc skin ulcers. Face validity, feasibility and reliability were demonstrated for the developed definition.