Abstract Introduction: PrBC is an uncommon malignancy with aggressive behavior. Its pathogenesis involves distinct immune mechanisms associated with maternal-fetal tolerance and tumor-host immunoediting. PrBC displays specific patterns of TILs with increased CD8+ cells. Gaining a comprehensive understanding of the molecular processes underlying this immune synergy is crucial for enhancing PrBC patients’ clinical management. Here, we sought to identify dysregulated immune-related genes in PrBC and explore their association with HR status and TILs. Methods: A total of n=75 PrBC (age range 26-43 years) and n=67 age-matched early-onset breast cancer (EOBC) in non-pregnant women (controls; age range 28-43 years) were selected from our Institutional registry. For all cases TILs were quantified according to the International TILs Working Group recommendations and profiled by IHC for CD4 and CD8. RNA was extracted from representative FFPE tissue blocks to perform the expression analysis of 395 genes involved in tumor-immune interactions using a targeted NGS panel (Oncomine™ Immune Response Research Assay, Thermofisher). Samples with >1,000,000 mapped reads and >800,000 valid reads were considered adequate. R package DESeq2 software 1.38.3 was used for sequencing depth differences normalization and differential gene expression analysis. Differentially expressed genes (DEGs) were identified based on a significant p-value (p< 0.05). Results: The comparison between PrBC and EOBC revealed a total of n=7 DEGs. All of these genes were upregulated and belonged to distinct superfamilies, including Cancer/Testis (CT) Antigen (MAGEA1/3, XAGE1B), Interferons/Cytokines (IFNA17, IFNB1), Chemokines (CXCL13), and Immunoglobulin (PECAM1/CD31). Notably, the upregulation of Chemokines in respect to EOBC was observed exclusively in HR+ PrBC, whereas triple-negative (TN) PrBC did not exhibit this pattern compared to the control group. Hence, the upregulation of ALOX15B, an enzyme involved in fatty acid peroxidation, was specific to TN PrBC. The immune signatures showed significant variations between PrBC and EOBC also based on TILs density and subpopulations. Indeed, the upregulation of CT genes (MAGEA1, XAGE1B) was exclusively observed in PrBC cases characterized by low TILs levels and prevalence of CD8+ or CD4+ cells. Finally, CD4+ TILs were absent or low in PrBC with upregulated Interferons, Cytokines, Chemokines, and Immunoglobulin genes, but present in cases with increased expression of CT and KLRF1 (NK cells). Conclusion: These findings highlight the heterogeneity and distinct molecular characteristics of PrBC and EOBC. The upregulation of specific immune-related gene families, such as CT and Chemokines, in different PrBC subtypes may suggest their potential role as actionable biomarkers (e.g. MAGEA, a well-known oncogene and potential immunotherapy target). The differences in immune signatures and TILs subpopulations further emphasize the importance of the immune microenvironment in PrBC biology and behavior. Future studies could delve deeper into the clinical implications of these gene expression patterns and explore their relevance in personalized treatment strategies for PrBC. Citation Format: Konstantinos Venetis, Elham Sajjadi, Chiara Frascarelli, Mariia Ivanova, Marianna D'Ercole, Concetta Blundo, Massimo Giroda, Eugenia Di Loreto, Giovanna Scarfone, Stefano Ferrero, Paolo Veronesi, Viviana Galimberti, Fedro Alessandro Peccatori, Nicola Fusco, Elena Guerini-Rocco. Decoding the immune landscape of breast cancer (BC) during pregnancy (PrBC): Impact of hormone receptors (HR) and tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) phenotype on gene expression signatures [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2023 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2023 Dec 5-9; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2024;84(9 Suppl):Abstract nr PO4-16-04.
Introduction/BackgroundCancer in pregnancy (CIP) is a rare complication which can occur during pregnancy or within 12 months after delivery. An early diagnosis is crucial to ensure optimal maternal and fetal outcomes. The aim of this study is to evaluate hematological toxicity of chemotherapy during CIP, since myelosuppression could be an important side effect.MethodologyThis is a retrospective single-center cohort study of 59 patients treated for CIP in 'IRCCS Policlinico Milano', between 2016 and 2023. Chemotherapy was the treatment of choice in 47 patients (79.6%), alone or after surgery. Among these, we considered only the 40 patients with breast cancer, the most common of CIP (67.8%). We divided our population in two groups: 18 patients who received up to 4 cycles (1st group); 22 patients who received at least 5 cycles (2nd group). Most of the patients were treated with Epirubicin and Cyclophosphamide, followed by weekly Taxol.ResultsBlood tests were made after every cycle of chemotherapy. Analyzing the results, we focused on the value of neutrophils, platelets and hemoglobin. Neutrophils values remained stably within normal ranges in both groups. Regarding platelets, the 2nd group showed a reduction at the end of the cycles, but the values never dropped below the normal threshold. Hemoglobin is the only parameter of which a reduction was marked in the second group (11.3%), but anemia is a very common problem during pregnancy, affecting 37% of pregnant women with a reduction of 30% of the starting value at the end of pregnancy. For this reason, the only finding of anemia is not indicative of toxicity. No others adverse effects were observed.ConclusionTherapeutic standards for treatment of breast CIP seem to be safe: our experience shows a similar trend in the two groups of patients, not causing myelosuppression as the number of cycles increases.DisclosuresNo conflict of interest.
BackgroundBreast cancer during pregnancy (PrBC) is a rare condition known for its aggressive clinical behavior. The presence of tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) has been shown to have a significant impact on the prognosis of these patients. Despite some biological characteristics of the tumor that may differ depending on the gestational age, little is known about the dynamics of the immune landscape within the tumor microenvironment (TME) in PrBC. Therefore, in this study, our objective was to gain comprehensive insights into the relationship between gestational age at breast cancer diagnosis and the composition of the TME.Methodsn = 108 PrBC were selected from our institutional registry and categorized based on the gestational age by trimester. For all cases, TILs were profiled according to the International TILs Working Group recommendations, and subtyped by CD4, CD8, and forkhead box P3 (FOXP3) immunohistochemistry. PD-L1 was tested according to the combined positive score (CPS) using the IHC 22C3 pharmDx assay, with a cutoff value of ≥10 for positivity. The statistical approach encompassed Fisher’s and Chi-squared tests, with appropriate adjustments for multiple comparisons, logistic regression models, and survival analyses based on the Kaplan–Meier method.ResultsThe proportion of patients with poorly differentiated (G3) neoplasms increased as the gestational age advanced (first trimester, n = 25, 56.8%; second trimester, n = 27, 69.2%; third trimester, n = 21, 87.5%; p = 0.03). The histologic subtypes as well as the hormone receptor (HR) and HER2 status did not show significant changes across different pregnancy trimesters. In the HR+/HER2– subtype, there was a higher proportion of tumors with high/moderate TILs in the early phases of pregnancy, similar to FOXP3 expression (TILs: first trimester, n = 10, 35.7%; second trimester, n = 2, 10.5%; third trimester, n = 0; p = 0.02; FOXP3: first trimester, n = 10, 40%; second trimester, n = 3, 15.8%; third trimester, n = 0; p = 0.03). The median follow-up for our cohort was 81 months. Patients who relapsed after a breast cancer diagnosis during the first trimester were more frequently PD-L1-negative, unlike those with no disease recurrence (n = 9, 100% vs. n = 9, 56.3%; p = 0.03; hormone therapy and n = 9, 100% vs. n = 7, 53.9%; p = 0.02; chemotherapy). No statistically significant differences were seen among the three trimesters in terms of survival outcome.ConclusionThe TME dynamics of HR+/HER2− PrBC vary based on gestational age, suggesting that immune tolerance expression during later gestational age could explain the increased aggressiveness of tumors diagnosed at that stage.
Introduction: Breast cancer (BC) during pregnancy (PrBC) is an uncommon malignancy characterized by a more aggressive clinical course compared to pregnancy-unrelated BC. Specific patterns of tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) subpopulations have been observed in these patients, with significant prognostic roles. Previous studies demonstrated the varying histopathologic and prognostic profiles of PrBC by gestational age. However, the underlying immune landscape dynamics has never been investigated. Here, we sought to provide comprehensive insights into the association between gestational age at breast cancer diagnosis and tumor immune microenvironment (TIME) composition. Materials and Methods: A total of 110 PrBC were selected from our Institutional registry and categorized based on the trimester in which they were diagnosed. All cases were subjected to TILs profiling according to the International TILs Working Group recommendations. Immunohistochemistry for CD4, CD8, forkhead box P3 (FOXP3), and PD-L1 (clone 22C3) on a Dako Omnis platform was performed. Fisher’s and Chi-squared tests, multinomial logistic regression models, ROC curve, and survival analyses were performed. Results: The proportion of patients with high histologic grades incremented with the increase in gestational age (1st, n=24, 53%; 2nd, n=27, 69.2%; 3rd trimester, n=20, 87.0%; p=0.02). Neither breast cancer subtypes nor the hormone receptor (HR) and HER2 status changed significantly according to the pregnancy trimester. In HR+/HER2- subtype, the proportion of TILs+ tumors were higher in the early phases of pregnancy (1st, n=29, 100%; 2nd, n=17, 89.5%; 3rd trimester, n=9, 81.8%; p=0.04) imprinted by FOXP3 positivity where more FOXP3+ TILs were seen in the first months and decreased progressively (1st, n=10, 55.6%; 2nd, n=2, 11.8%; 3rd trimester, n=0, 0%; p< 0.01)). While in the triple negative breast cancer (TNBC) population, the proportion of PD-L1+ tumors (i.e. CPS>1) was significantly higher in the later stages of pregnancy (1st, n=2, 16.7%; 2nd, n=2, 18.2%; 3rd trimester, n=5, 71.4%; p=0.03). Patients who relapsed after a BC diagnosis during the 1st and 2nd trimesters lacked more frequently FOXP3+ and CD8+ cells, unlike those with no disease recurrence (n=21, 77.8% vs. n=17, 48.6%; p=0.02 and n=18, 66.7% vs. n=10, 28.6%; p< 0.01, respectively). Conclusions: TIME dynamics of PrBC are different according to the gestational age in both HR+ and TNBC PrBC. Our results suggest that immune tolerance events are likely to involve PrBC at later gestational age. Specific escape mechanisms (i.e., TILs and FOXP3 decrease in HR+ and PD-L1 expression in TNBC) might explain the aggressiveness of PrBC diagnosed during the later gestational age. Citation Format: Elham Sajjadi, Konstantinos Venetis, Mariia Ivanova, Marianna Noale, Concetta Blundo, Giovanna Scarfone, Eugenia Di Loreto, Stefano Ferrero, Stefania Maggi, Paolo Veronesi, Viviana Enrica Galimbreti, Giuseppe Viale, Fedro Alessandro A. Peccatori, Elena Guerini-Rocco, Nicola Fusco. The tumor immune microenvironment composition and prognostic value in breast cancer during pregnancy is dynamic during the gestation period [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2022 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2022 Dec 6-10; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2023;83(5 Suppl):Abstract nr P2-21-04.
Breast cancer during pregnancy (PrBC) is a rare tumor with only a little information on its immune landscape. Here, we sought to characterize the cellular composition of the tumor microenvironment (TME) of PrBC and identify its differences from early-onset breast cancer (EOBC) in non-pregnant women. A total of 83 PrBC and 89 EOBC were selected from our Institutional registry and subjected to tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) profiling and immunohistochemistry for CD4, CD8, forkhead box P3 (FOXP3), and programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) (clone 22C3). A significantly lower frequency of hormone receptor (HR)-positive tumors was observed in PrBC. The prevalence of low/null PD-L1 and CD8+TILs was higher in PrBC than in the controls, specifically in HR+/HER2– breast cancers. PrBC had a significantly higher risk of relapse and disease-related death, compared to EOBC. The presence of TILs and each TIL subpopulation were significantly associated with disease relapse. Moreover, the death rate was higher in PrBC with CD8+ TILs. The TME of PrBC is characterized by specific patterns of TIL subpopulations with significant biological and prognostic roles. Routine assessment of TILs and TILs subtyping in these patients would be a valid addition to the pathology report that might help identify clinically relevant subsets of women with PrBC.
Breast cancer is the most common malignancy occurring during gestation. In early-stage breast cancer during pregnancy (PrBC), breast-conserving surgery (BCS) with delayed RT is a rational alternative to mastectomy, for long considered the standard-of-care. Regrettably, no specific guidelines on the surgical management of these patients are available. In this study, we investigated the feasibility and safety of BCS during the first trimester of pregnancy in women with early-stage PrBC. All patients with a diagnosis of PrBC during the first trimester of pregnancy jointly managed in two PrBC-specialized Centers were included in this study. All patients underwent BCS followed by adjuvant radiotherapy to the ipsilateral breast after delivery. Histopathological features and biomarkers were first profiled on pre-surgical biopsies. The primary outcome was the isolated local recurrence (ILR). Among 168 PrBC patients, 67 (39.9%) were diagnosed during the first trimester of gestation. Of these, 30 patients (age range, 23-43 years; median=36 years; gestational age, 2-12 weeks; median=7 weeks; median follow-up time=6.5 years) met the inclusion criteria. The patients that were subjected to radical surgery (n=14) served as controls. None of the patients experienced perioperative surgical complications. No ILR were observed within three months (n=30), 1 year (n=27), and 5 years (n=18) after surgery. Among the study group, 4 (12.3%) patients experienced ILR or new carcinomas after 6-13 years, the same number (n=4) had metastatic dissemination after 3-7 years. These patients are still alive and disease-free after 14-17 years of follow-up. The rate of recurrences and metastasis in the controls were not significantly different. The findings provide evidence that BCS in the first trimester PrBC is feasible and reasonably safe for both the mother and the baby.
Introduction: Breast cancer during pregnancy (PrBC) accounts for ~4% of breast cancer cases in young women and its intrinsic biology is still largely undetermined. Tumor microenvironment (TME) of PrBC has been recently characterized with low levels of stromal tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) and high relative expression of programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1), suggesting an increased immune evasion. The underlying immune landscape, however, has not been unveiled. Given the significant alterations of the immune system during gestation, we hypothesized that the TME of PrBC might have distinct biological traits. Here, we sought to evaluate the outcome of PrBC according to the TME characteristics and to assess whether pathogenic mechanisms of immune evasion are involved. Methods: Representative formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded tissue blocks of 83 consecutive PrBC and 89 age-matched early-onset pregnancy-unrelated breast cancers (controls) were subjected to immunohistochemistry (IHC) using antibodies against CD4, CD8, forkhead box P3 (FOXP3), and PD-L1 (clone 22C3) on a Dako Omnis platform. For all cases, TILs were evaluated according to the International TILs Working Group recommendations. Next-generation sequencing gene expression of 395 genes involved in tumor-immune interactions (Oncomine™ Immune Response Research Assay) was performed on RNA extracted from PrBC (n=20) and controls (n=16). Samples with mapped reads >1,000,000 and valid reads >800,000 were considered adequate. Fisher’s and Chi-squared tests, multinomial logistic regression models, ROC curve, and survival analyses were performed. Results: The fraction of tumors with CD8+TILs was significantly higher in PrBC than in the controls (n=71(85.0%) vs. n=61(68.5%); p=0.02), being mirrored by less cases with CD4+TILs (n=27 (32.5%) vs. n=43 (48.3%); p=0.03). Even higher differences were observed in hormone receptor (HR)+/HER2-negative tumors (CD8: n=39 (88.6%) vs. n=39 (66.1%); p=0.01). After a median follow-up of 78 (range, 1-247), 66/83 women (79.5%) with PrBC were alive and 53/83 (63.8%) relapse-free. Overall, PrBC with CD8+TILs had a better outcome compared to CD8-negative PrBC (OS 81 vs 69 months p=0.05) and CD8 expression was associated with better outcomes in HR+/HER2-negative tumors (OS p=0.02; DFS p=0.04). The overall comparison of immune-related genes in the 34 cases (PrBC, n=18; controls, n=16) that reached the quality parameters revealed significant differences in the expression of 63 immune-related genes. Of these, 4 genes (IFNA17, IFNB1, FUT4, and PECAM1) were upregulated, while 59 genes were downregulated in PrBC compared to the controls. Interestingly, IFNA17, IFNB1, and FUT4 remained upregulated in HR+ PrBC, where a slightly reduced number of differentially expressed genes was observed (n=60). In HR-/HER2- PrBC, only 25 genes were differentially expressed, of which 9, including IFNA17 and PECAM1, were significantly upregulated. Discussion: These data have the potential of improving our knowledge of the immunobiology that characterizes PrBC, suggesting that in these tumors the higher frequency of CD8+TILs might be related to an enhanced anti-tumor immune response, as CD8 expression was associated with better outcomes in PrBC. On the other hand, given that interferons (IFNs) may also trigger immune suppressive mechanisms in cancer cells, the activation of type I IFNs encoded by IFNA17 and IFNB1 seen in our RNA-seq analysis, combined with the lower frequency of CD4+TILs observed, suggest CD4+ cell suppression as a possible mechanism of immune evasion. Conclusion: PrBC TME is characterized by specific patterns of TILs subpopulations due to the possible activation of type I IFNs and its assessment might help in identifying women at high risk of death and recurrence. Citation Format: Nicola Fusco, Elham Sajjadi, Konstantinos Venetis, Barbara Buonomo, Concetta Blundo, Massimo Giroda, Eugenia Di Loreto, Giovanna Scarfone, Stefano Ferrero, Paolo Veronesi, Viviana E. Galimberti, Massimo Barberis, Giuseppe Viale, Elena Guerini-Rocco, Fedro A. Peccatori. Tumor microenvironment characteristics and prognosis in breast cancer during pregnancy: The role of differentially expressed immune-related genes [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2021 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2021 Dec 7-10; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2022;82(4 Suppl):Abstract nr P4-07-02.
Background Phosphatase and tensin homolog (PTEN) loss is associated with tumorigenesis, tumor progression, and therapy resistance in breast cancer. However, the clinical value of PTEN as a biomarker in these patients is controversial. We sought to determine whether the benefit of traditional biomarkers testing is improved by the analysis of PTEN status for the identification of high-risk breast cancer. Methods A cohort of 608 patients with breast cancer was included in this study. Based on the expression on the neoplastic cells compared to the normal internal controls by immunohistochemistry (IHC), cases were classified as PTEN-low (PTEN-L) or PTEN-retained (PTEN-WT). The former constituted the study group, while the latter the control group. Analysis of gene expression was performed on publicly available genomic data and included 4265 patients from the METABRIC and MSK cohorts retrieved from cBioPortal. The Shapiro-Wilk test was used to analyze the normal distributions of continuous variables. Relationships between PTEN status and the clinicopathologic and molecular features of the patient population were assessed using Fisher’s exact test or Chi-squared/Wilcoxon rank-sum test. Survival curves were built according to the Kaplan-Meier method. Results Alteration in PTEN status was significantly different at protein and gene levels, where the reduced protein expression was observed in 280/608 cases (46.1%) from our group, while genetic aberrations in only 315/4265 (7.4%) cases of the METABRIC and MSK cohorts. PTEN-L tumors were significantly enriched for hormone receptors (HR) and HER2 negativity ( n = 48, 17.1%) compared to PTEN-WT tumors ( n = 22, 6.7%; p = 0.0008). Lack of HR with or without HER2 overexpression/amplification was significantly associated with worse overall survival (OS) in PTEN-L but not in PTEN-WT breast cancers ( p < .0001). Moreover, PTEN-L protein expression but not gene alterations was related to the outcome, in terms of both OS and disease-free survival ( p = 0.002). Conclusions The combined analysis of PTEN, HER2, and HR status offers relevant information for a more precise risk assessment of patients with breast cancer.
BACKGROUND:Bladder cancer (BC) usually metastasizes to the lymph nodes, bone, lung, liver and peritoneum, but rarely in the breast.CASE REPORT:We present a case of a 66-year-old female diagnosed with a massive bladder tumor, who presented a right mammary nodule after neo-adjuvant chemotherapy. A biopsy of the nodule did not permit a definite diagnosis of metastatic spread, which was confirmed by excision of the nodule. In the literature, we found only 7 other similar cases of BC metastasis to the breast. Currently, a non-invasive method for differentiating a breast metastasis from primary cancer is lacking, although there are some clinical and radiological aspects that may help the diagnosis. Histological examination provides diagnostic certainty.CONCLUSION:Breast metastases from BC are unusual and consequently difficult to identify without non-invasive tools. Clinical history and histological study play a pivotal role in determining the correct diagnosis.
Breast cancer related lymphedema (BCRL) is a detrimental condition characterized by fluid accumulation in the upper limb in breast cancer patients subjected to axillary surgery and/or radiations. Its etiology is multifactorial and include also tumor-specific pathological features, such as lymphovascular invasion (LVI) and extranodal extension (ENE). To date, no widely employed guidelines for the early diagnosis of BCRL are available. Here, we illustrate a protocol for a digitally assisted BCRL assessment using a 3D laser scanner (3DLS) and a tablet computer. It has been specifically optimized in a discovery cohort of high-risk breast cancer patients. This study provides a proof-of-principle that augmented reality tools, such as 3DLS, can be incorporated into the clinical workup of BCRL to allow for a precise, reproducible, reliable, and cheap diagnosis.
Abstract Introduction: Breast cancer (BC) occurring during gestation or lactation is rare, yet highly challenging under both biological and clinical standpoints. This condition, referred to as pregnancy-associated (PA) BC (PABC), shows enrichment in mismatch repair (MMR) deficiency mutational signature, higher expression of immune-checkpoint genes, and less tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) compared to non-PA BCs. Despite these insights, no comprehensive data on MMR protein status, immune checkpoints, and immune microenvironment are currently available for these tumors. The aim of this study was to characterize the MMR status and immunologic milieu of PABC. Methods: Among a multi-Institutional database comprising 142 PABCs, we conducted a comparative analysis of a cohort of PABC (n=29) and a control group of age-matched non-PA BCs (n=74). Distinct areas of each tumor and the corresponding normal breast tissue were incorporated into a tissue microarray (4-6 cores per case, mean 4.5). For all cases, both stromal and intratumoral TILs were quantified according to the International TILs Working Group recommendations. Representative slides were subjected to immunohistochemical (IHC) analysis of the MMR proteins (i.e. MLH1, MSH2, MSH6, and PMS2), programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1), CD4, and CD8. Cases were classified as MMR-proficient (pMMR), MMR-deficient (dMMR), and, when the protein was expressed only in a part of the tumor, MMR-heterogeneous (hMMR). PD-L1 expression was evaluated separately in the tumor cells, stromal TILs, and intratumoral TILs. Finally, the relative proportion of CD4+ and CD8+ cells was assessed in both stromal and intratumoral TILs. Results: The study group included 4 (14%) Luminal A, 10 (35%) Luminal B, 4 (14%) non-luminal HER2+, and 11 (37%) triple-negative (TN) PABCs. Taken together, both the dMMR and hMMR status were more common in PABCs than in non-PA BC (n=3/29, 19% vs. n=6/74, 8% and n=7/29, 24% vs. 14/74, 19%, respectively). Specifically, dMMR was seen in Luminal A (n=2, 50%) and in TN (n=1, 9%) PABCs. Conversely, in non-PA BCs, all Luminal A (n=15, 100%) were pMMR, while 5/45(11%) Luminal B and 1/13 (7%) TNBC were dMMR. Despite no differences were observed in intratumoral TILs, PABCs showed significantly higher levels of stromal TILs (p=0.01). Compared to the control group, PD-L1 expression in PABCs was significantly higher in the tumor cells and in stromal TILs (p<0.01) but not in intratumoral TILs. Hence, 9 (31%) PABCs were PD-L1+, with tumor proportion scores (TPS) ranging from 2 to 10 (mean 5), while only 4 (5%) non-PA BCs were PD-L1+ (TPS 2-20, mean 8)(p=0.01). The expression of PD-L1 in stromal TILs was higher in PABCs (n=9, 31%) than in the controls (n=19, 26%)(p=0.005). In Luminal tumors, both the CD4+ and CD8+ populations were more represented than in non-PA BCs (p=0.01), while in TNBC only the relative proportion of CD4+ cells was significantly higher (p=0.02). Discussion: This study is the first to investigate the immune response alongside the MMR status by IHC in PABCs. Our findings broaden the understanding of the immunobiology underpinning PABC, suggesting that in these tumors i) MMR protein alterations occur at higher frequency than in non-PA BCs; ii) the tumor cells and tumor microenvironment may be capable to suppress the adaptive arm of immune system through the expression of PD-L1; and iii) lymphocytes located at the periphery rather than those inside of the tumor are likely to be implicated in the immune modulation. Conclusion: The MMR system and immune microenvironment may play a consistent role in the natural history of PABCs. An intimate knowledge of the multifaceted interplay between tumor and tumor immune microenvironment is likely to unveil clinically relevant mechanisms that may have a positive net health impact for women with BC during gestation or lactation. Citation Format: Nicola Fusco, Elena Guerini-Rocco, Barbara Buonomo, Roberto Croci, Caterina Fumagalli, Gianluca Lopez, Giorgio A Croci, Letterio Runza, Elham Sajjadi, Concetta Blundo, Luca Despini, Massimo Giroda, Viviana E Galimberti, Paolo Veronesi, Massimo Barberis, Stefano Ferrero, Giovanna Scarfone, Silvano Bosari, Giuseppe Viale, Fedro Peccatori. Integrated analysis of mismatch repair, PD-L1, and immune microenvironment status in pregnancy-associated breast cancers [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2019 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2019 Dec 10-14; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2020;80(4 Suppl):Abstract nr P2-05-03.
Noninvasive breast lesions encompass a heterogeneous group of risk indicators and nonobligate precursors of breast cancer, such as apocrine hyperplasia (AH) and columnar cell lesions (CCLs). Given the different expression of ER and ER-regulated genes in AH and CCL, these two alterations are currently considered discrete conditions. However, whether they share early biologic changes is not clear to date. Here, we sought to define the clinicopathologic and immunohistochemical features of a prospective series of combined lesions made up by CCLs and AH forming a continuum within single terminal duct-lobular units. The study group included 19 cases, whereas 25 cases of synchronous contiguous CCLs and AH served as control group. The different components of each case were subjected to immunohistochemical analysis for ER, PR, AR, HER2, BCL2, CCND1, MUC1, and PIP. Although CCLs and AHs arising in continuity showed opposite patterns of ER expression, the PIP-positive apocrine signature was consistently present in both components. In conclusion, apocrine changes are highly recurrent in CCLs growing within foci of AH, regardless of the ER activation. Our results suggest that PIP-positive and PIP-negative CCLs are likely to represent biologically distinct conditions and that apocrine changes might occur earlier than ER activation in the natural history of breast precursor lesions.
Breast cancer related lymphedema (BCRL) is frequent but strategies for an individualized risk assessment are lacking. We aimed to define whether tumor-specific pathological features, coupled with clinical and therapeutic data, could help identify patients at risk. Data from 368 patients with node-positive breast cancers were retrospectively collected, including 75 patients with BCRL (0.4⁻25.6 years follow-up). BCRL was assessed during the standard follow-up oncology visits using the circumferential measurement. Clinicopathologic and therapeutic factors associated with BCRL were integrated into a Cox proportional hazards regression model. Lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was more common in BCRL patients (n = 33, 44% vs. n = 85, 29%, p = 0.01), akin extra nodal extension (ENE) of the metastasis (n = 57, 76% vs. n = 180, 61%, p = 0.02). Sentinel lymph node excision without axillary dissection and extra-axillary radiotherapy were BCRL-unrelated. A higher number of BCRL-positive patients were treated with taxane-based chemotherapy with or without trastuzumab, compared to BCRL-negative patients (p < 0.01). Treatment with trastuzumab and/or taxanes, adjusted for systemic infections, laterality, therapy, and pathological features (i.e., LVI and ENE), had a significant impact in BCRL-free survival (p < 0.01). This work offers new insights on BCRL risk stratification, where the integration of clinical, therapeutic, and tumor-specific pathological data suggests a possible role of anti-human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) therapy in BCRL pathogenesis.
Introduction/Background The maternal diagnosis of cancer complicates approximately 0,1% of all pregnancies. The most frequently diagnosed malignancies are breast cancer, cervical cancer, lymphoma, ovarian cancer and melanoma. Although chemotherapy can be administered during pregnancy, its effects on obstetric and neonatal outcome are still largely unknown. The aim of this study is to describe the oncologic management as well as the obstetric and perinatal outcomes in a consecutive series of patients with cancer during pregnancy. Methodology We provided descriptive oncologic, obstetric and neonatal data from a cohort of pregnant patients diagnosed with primary invasive cancer between August 2004 and April 2019, retrospectively collected from clinical databases of IRCCS Policlinico di Milano and Istituto Europeo Di Oncologia (Milan, Italy). Results We observed 86 consecutive patients with a diagnosis of malignancy during pregnancy: breast cancer was the most common type (70,9%), followed by lymphomas (11,6%). Patients with ongoing or missing oncological, obstetrical or neonatal data were excluded. Of the 62 eligible patients, 12,9% received surgical treatment, 24% chemotherapy and 54,8% a combination of both. For almost all pregnancies, timing of delivery was previously planned: 38% with labor inductions and 54% with elective cesarean sections, at a mean gestational age of 36 weeks. All pregnancies ended in a livebirth. Half of deliveries were preterm, mainly iatrogenic due to obstetric or oncologic indications: 3.2% were very low preterm, 6,4% moderate preterm and 45% late preterm. The frequency of small for gestational age (birthweight <10° percentile) was 11.2%. Conclusion This study confirms a high overall frequency of premature birth in pregnant patients with cancer, showing a lower rate of small for gestational age than described in literature. In order to have a better assessment of the toxicity of chemotherapy during pregnancy, we are currently investigating its fetal sequelae through histologic analysis of placental tissue and pediatric follow-up. Disclosure Nothing to disclose.
Abstract Background Breast cancers that harbor mismatch-repair (MMR) deficiency and/or microsatellite instability (MSI) might be sensitive to immune checkpoint blockade, but there are currently no specific guidelines for assessing MMR status in breast cancer. Here, we sought to define the clinical value of MMR immunohistochemistry (IHC) and MSI analysis in breast cancers. Methods We subjected 444 breast cancers to MMR IHC and MSI analysis. Cases were classified as MMR-proficient (pMMR), MMR-deficient (dMMR), and MMR-heterogeneous (hMMR) based on the loss of immunoreactivity; MSI was defined by instability in the five indicators recommended by the National Cancer Institute for endometrial and colorectal cancers. Correlation of MMR status with patients’ survival was assessed using the Kaplan-Meier estimator. Statistical tests were two-sided. Results Loss of MMR proteins was homogeneous (dMMR) in 75 patients (17%) and heterogeneous (hMMR) in 55 (12%). Among luminal breast cancers, there were similar frequencies of dMMR and hMMR tumors. Overall, the rate of discrepancy between IHC and MSI analysis was high (91%). Women with Luminal B-like dMMR carcinomas (n = 44) showed shorter overall survival (median = 77 months, range = 0–115 months) than those with pMMR (n = 205) or hMMR (n = 35) tumors (median = 84 months, range = 0–127 months) (P = .008). On the contrary, patients with estrogen receptor-negative breast cancers treated with chemotherapy lived longer in cases of dMMR (n = 9) than pMMR (n = 33) or hMMR (n = 7) tumors, with 87 months of median survival (range = 73–123 months) for the former compared with 79 months (range = 8–113 months) for the latter two categories (P < .001). Conclusions Immunohistochemistry and MSI are not interchangeable tests in breast carcinomas. MMR protein loss is a more common event than MSI and shows intra-tumor heterogeneity. MMR IHC allows the identification of clinically relevant subclasses of breast cancer patients, provided that multiple areas of the tumor are analyzed.
Targeted therapies against the human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) have radically changed the outcome of patients with HER2-positive breast cancers. However, a minority of cases displays a heterogeneous distribution of HER2-positive cells, which generates major clinical challenges. To date, no reliable and standardized protocols for the characterization and quantification of HER2 heterogeneous gene amplification in large cohorts have been proposed. Here, we present a high-throughput methodology to simultaneously assess the HER2 status across different topographic areas of multiple breast cancers. In particular, we illustrate the laboratory procedure to construct enhanced tissue microarrays (TMAs) incorporating a targeted mapping of the tumors. All TMA parameters have been specifically optimized for the silver in situ hybridization (SISH) of formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded (FFPE) breast tissues. Immunohistochemical analysis of the prognostic and predictive biomarkers (i.e., ER, PR, Ki67, and HER2) should be performed using automated procedures. A customized SISH protocol has been implemented to allow a high-quality molecular analysis across multiple tissues that underwent different fixation, processing, and storage procedures. In this study, we provide a proof-of-principle that specific DNA sequences could be localized simultaneously in distinct topographic areas of multiple and heterogeneously processed breast cancers using an efficient and cost-effective method.
Introduction/ Background Loss of phosphatase and tensin homolog (PTEN) expression and alterations in mismatch repair (MMR) genes are regarded as early oncogenic events in breast cancer. It has recently been hypothesized that the polyadenosine tract in PTEN might be a target for mutation in MMR-deficient endometrial tumors. However, the frequency and significance of MMR alterations in breast cancer is debated, and their relationship with PTEN status has not been investigated in the breast. Aims In this study, we sought to explore the relationships between PTEN expression and MMR alterations and to define whether PTEN immunohistochemistry is a predictor of MMR status in breast cancer. Methods 309 cases, including 261 invasive ductal carcinomas, no special type, 32 invasive lobular carcinomas, and 16 invasive ductal carcinomas, mixed types, carefully characterized from clinical and pathological standpoints, were reviewed and used to construct 11 tissue microarrays (TMAs). For each case, a mean of 4.5 tumor tissue cores (range 3 to 6 cores) was sampled, incorporating distinct topographic areas of the tumor, as well as matched non-neoplastic breast tissue, and, when present, associated in situ carcinoma. Taken together, 1381 spots were generated. Each TMA was subjected to immunohistochemical analysis of PTEN and the DNA MMR proteins MLH1, MSH2, MSH6 and PMS2. In order to allow a quick navigation within each TMA, and to minimize human-related biases, each stained slide was digitalized and blindly analyzed by two pathologists using a dedicated software able to segment TMA cores. The pattern of expression was therefore annotated manually on a digital database using a specific add-on module. Results According to clinicopathologic surrogate definition of intrinsic subtypes, PTEN protein loss was more frequent in luminal A-like and triple negative groups compared to luminal B-like carcinomas, as recently observed in other studies. MMR status in Luminal B-like tumors did not differ significantly between PTEN-retained and PTEN-loss groups, regardless HER2 amplification. In particular, retained PTEN expression was a predictor of MMR proficiency in approximately 35% of cases for this group. However, in luminal A-like and triple negative breast cancer groups, retained positive expression of MMR proteins was observed in 100% of cases showing PTEN wild-type immunohistochemical expression. Discussion: The present study is the first to investigate PTEN protein loss in a large set of breast carcinomas based on DNA MMR status by immunohistochemistry. Our findings broaden the understanding of the biology underpinning breast cancer, suggesting that MMR alterations are likely to be independent of PTEN status in the majority of luminal B-like breast cancers and that, in a way akin to endometrial carcinoma, MMR deficiency could play a part in the development of PTEN alterations in luminal A-like and triple negative breast cancers. The integration of traditional pathology with cutting-edge digital tools allowed a rapid quantification of immunohistochemistry and effective data organization in this wide cohort multi-variable study. Conclusion: PTEN immunohistochemistry is a useful adjunct in the clinical evaluation of breast cancer patients, being able to capture all MMR-proficient luminal A-like and triple negative tumors.
The Breast JournalVolume 23, Issue 1 p. 104-105 Breast Images Hibernation in Unusual Places: A Pure Typical Hibernoma of the Breast Letterio Runza MD, Letterio Runza MD Division of Pathology, Fondazione IRCCS Ca' Granda – Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Milan, ItalySearch for more papers by this authorConcetta Blundo MD, Concetta Blundo MD Breast Surgery Unit, Fondazione IRCCS Ca' Granda – Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Milan, ItalySearch for more papers by this authorElena Guerini-Rocco MD, Elena Guerini-Rocco MD Department of Pathology, European Institute of Oncology, Milan, ItalySearch for more papers by this authorIrene Forno PhD, Irene Forno PhD Department of Pathophysiology and Organ Transplantation, University of Milan, Milan, ItalySearch for more papers by this authorNicola Fusco MD, Corresponding Author Nicola Fusco MD nicola.fusco@outlook.com nicola.fusco@unimi.it Division of Pathology, Fondazione IRCCS Ca' Granda – Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Milan, Italy Department of Pathophysiology and Organ Transplantation, University of Milan, Milan, ItalyAddress correspondence and reprint requests to: Nicola Fusco, MD, Division of Pathology, Fondazione IRCCS Ca' Granda – Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, via Francesco Sforza, 35, 20122, Milan, Italy, or e-mails: nicola.fusco@outlook.com or nicola.fusco@unimi.itSearch for more papers by this author Letterio Runza MD, Letterio Runza MD Division of Pathology, Fondazione IRCCS Ca' Granda – Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Milan, ItalySearch for more papers by this authorConcetta Blundo MD, Concetta Blundo MD Breast Surgery Unit, Fondazione IRCCS Ca' Granda – Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Milan, ItalySearch for more papers by this authorElena Guerini-Rocco MD, Elena Guerini-Rocco MD Department of Pathology, European Institute of Oncology, Milan, ItalySearch for more papers by this authorIrene Forno PhD, Irene Forno PhD Department of Pathophysiology and Organ Transplantation, University of Milan, Milan, ItalySearch for more papers by this authorNicola Fusco MD, Corresponding Author Nicola Fusco MD nicola.fusco@outlook.com nicola.fusco@unimi.it Division of Pathology, Fondazione IRCCS Ca' Granda – Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Milan, Italy Department of Pathophysiology and Organ Transplantation, University of Milan, Milan, ItalyAddress correspondence and reprint requests to: Nicola Fusco, MD, Division of Pathology, Fondazione IRCCS Ca' Granda – Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, via Francesco Sforza, 35, 20122, Milan, Italy, or e-mails: nicola.fusco@outlook.com or nicola.fusco@unimi.itSearch for more papers by this author First published: 31 October 2016 https://doi.org/10.1111/tbj.12694Read the full textAboutPDF ToolsRequest permissionExport citationAdd to favoritesTrack citation ShareShare Give accessShare full text accessShare full-text accessPlease review our Terms and Conditions of Use and check box below to share full-text version of article.I have read and accept the Wiley Online Library Terms and Conditions of UseShareable LinkUse the link below to share a full-text version of this article with your friends and colleagues. Learn more.Copy URL Share a linkShare onFacebookTwitterLinkedInRedditWechat No abstract is available for this article. Volume23, Issue1January/February 2017Pages 104-105 RelatedInformation