The period of adaptation to the extrauterine life is commonly complicated by disorders in the microecological system of the large intestine (MSLI) that diminish the physiological resistance of the premature infants. A comparison of Lactulose syrop (LS; Inalko, Italy) and lyophilized Bifidumbacterine (LB; Russia, 1 dose is 108 B. bifidum 1) effects on 75 premature infants at the gestational age 32.7 ± 0.2 weeks with the disturbances in MSLI was made. The Group 1 of 35 neonates received everyday 1.0 ml of LS/kg. The Group 2 of 40 infants received 2.5 doses of LB/3 times a day. The course of the treatment lasted for 14 days. All the babies were fed with native breast milk. The study of the infants included a general clinical examination; bacteriological examination of the feces; the study of the coprogramm, immunoglobulin A, G, M in coprofiltrates, and fecal pH / p < 0.05 was considered to be significant. After the treatment dyspeptic disorders disappeared in 90% and intestinal microflora normalized in 85% of neonates of Group 1. Normalization of above mentioned disorders after LB treatment was observed respectively only in 56% and 25% of neonates of Group 2. LS treatment led also to coprogramm normalization as well as to the significant decrease in immunoglobulin A content in coprofiltrates and fecal pH values. Thus utilization of LS in the treatment of the premature infants with disturbances in MSLI was more effective than that of LB.
No scientific journal survives without excellent peer review, and The American Journal of Digestive Diseases is no exception. Indeed, the uncertainties of a new Editorial Office make the reliance on reviewers even greater. Often criticized by authors, occasionally even prodded by Editors, most reviewers receive little praise. Our reviewers have provided us with great support for which we are most grateful. Thank you:
The Editors wish to express their deep and sincere gratitude to the large group of colleagues who functioned as expert reviewers for the journal during 1981. Some reviewed one paper, but others were asked to review many of your contributions; all performed willingly and were of great help to us. Your efforts are irreplaceable," without you a scientific journal cannot function, and this recognition is a small token of our thanks.
INTRODUCTION:In recent years, many advances have been made in the diagnosis and treatment of acute pancreatitis that have lead to a significant reduction in both morbidity and mortality; however, knowledge of the etiology and of the relation between etiology and mortality is far from complete.AIM:To obtain a more comprehensive view of the etiology and mortality of acute pancreatitis in Europe than has been given by previous single-center studies.METHODOLOGY:The study comprised 1,068 patients in five European countries who were admitted to hospitals for acute pancreatitis from January 1990 to December 1994. Data for each patient were collected on a standardized form.RESULTS:Of the 1,068 patients (692 men, 376 women; mean age, 52.8 years; range, 10-95 years), 589 had edematous pancreatitis, and 479 the necrotic form. Cholelithiasis (37.1%) and alcohol (41.0%) were the most frequent etiologic factors. In Germany, cholelithiasis and alcohol occurred with similar frequency (34.9 and 37.9%, respectively); in Hungary, alcohol predominates over cholelithiasis (60.7 vs. 24.0%); in France, a small predominance of alcohol was seen (38.5 vs. 24.6%); and in Greece and Italy, there was a clear predominance of cholelithiasis over alcohol (71.4 vs. 6.0% and 60.3 vs. 13.2%, respectively). The differences in the frequency of cholelithiasis and alcohol between Greece and Italy and the other countries were statistically significant (p < 0.01). Eighty-three patients (7.8%) died of acute pancreatitis; 77 (16.1%) had necrotic disease and 6 (1.0%) edematous. There was no statistically significant difference in mortality among the etiologic groups, and no relation was found between mortality and age.CONCLUSION:Both cholelithiasis and alcohol were main etiologic factors in the more northern countries studied, whereas cholelithiasis alone predominated in the more southern ones. Mortality was high for necrotic pancreatitis; it was similar among the various etiologic groups, and there was no relationship between mortality and age.
OBJECTIVE:A great number of studies have been published on acute pancreatitis, but few have focused on the recurrent form. In this study, we have sought to determine the relative frequency and mortality of recurrent acute pancreatitis, and also to update our knowledge of its etiological factors.METHODS:Patients were selected from a total of 1068 persons included in a previous European study of acute pancreatitis. All were admitted to a hospital with an attack of acute pancreatitis between January, 1990 and December, 1994. Data for each patient was recorded on a standardized form.RESULTS:Of the 1068 with acute pancreatitis, 288 (27%) had recurrent pancreatitis; the majority (78.8%) were men, with a mean age of 43 yr (range 16-95 yr). Regarding etiology, alcohol was the most frequent factor (57%), followed by gallstones (25%), other factors (7.6%), and no identified factor (10.4%). Of the 288 patients, 17 (5.9%) died, all of whom had necrotizing pancreatitis; among all of the patients with necrotizing pancreatitis (141 of 288), the mortality was 12.1%. These percentages are lower than those for patients who had a single attack (8.5% and 18.6%, respectively), but not to a statistically significant degree. Mortality was significantly lower among patients with alcoholic pancreatitis (6.9%) than among those with biliary (30%) (p < 0.002) or idiopathic pancreatitis (25%) (p < 0.04). Most of the deaths (82.4%) occurred at the second attack of pancreatitis.CONCLUSION:Acute recurrent pancreatitis remains a frequent disease, with alcohol being the most frequent etiological factor. Mortality is similar to that of a single episode of acute pancreatitis, and it is significantly lower among patients with alcohol as the etiology.
Forty patients with gastro-oesophageal reflux disease and oesophagitis, documented by endoscopy (grades I to III by the Savary-Miller classification) were randomized to participate in a comparative double-blind trial to receive cisapride (10 mg q.d.s.) or ranitidine (150 mg b.d.) for an 8-week period. Upper gastrointestinal endoscopy was performed immediately before the entry to the trial and after the 8-week period at the completion of the trial. The evaluable cohort included 37 patients who completed the trial, 18 in the cisapride group and 19 in the ranitidine group. Three patients were withdrawn from the trial; one on ranitidine developed severe anaphylactic reaction, one on cisapride severe dizziness and one on cisapride did not wish to continue on the trial. The results of the trial, regarding symptomatic and endoscopic improvement were comparable in the two groups. Both drugs were effective in controlling symptoms, such as acid regurgitation, retrosternal pain, retrosternal burning, epigastric fullness and discomfort (pain, burning, sense of pressure) and resulted in endoscopic healing of oesophagitis. With few exceptions, symptoms remained in remission 1 month after treatment in the majority of patients. Globally, both drugs were tolerated comparably, and adverse effects other than those which resulted in the withdrawal from the trial were minimal in both groups. The results of this trial indicate that cisapride and ranitidine, although of different pharmacological action, are comparable in their therapeutic effect in symptomatic improvement and endoscopic healing in patients with mild to moderate gastro-oesophageal reflux disease.
The purpose of this study is to evaluate the diagnostic value of the following tests in the assessment of patients with chronic liver disease (CLD) and cholestatic syndrome (CS):(1) aminopyrine breath test, measuring14CO2 excretion in the expired air, (2) peripheral clearance of [99mTc]EHIDA, and (3) postprandial levels of glycocholic acid (GCA) and glycochenodeoxycholic acid (GCDCA). The results indicate that: (1)14CO2 2-hr excretion rate is a specific and sensitive marker of liver function, with good correlation with postprandial bile acid levels, [99mTc]EHIDA retention, and the conventional tests of serum albumin and prothrombin time. (2) Peripheral clearance and retention of [99mTc]EHIDA increased in both groups of CLD and CS vs controls, but it does not discriminate between the two. (3) Postprandial bile acids were elevated in CLD, particularly those of GCDCA, whereas GCA levels were significantly elevated in CS compared with CLD. This may be due to increased synthesis and entry into the blood. (4) The combination of [14C]aminopyrine breath test and postprandial levels of GCDCA enhance the diagnostic value, specificity, and sensitivity in the assessment of patients with CLD.
The purpose of this study was to investigate the reasons for delayed diagnosis of gastric cancer in the Greek population and correlate survival with early or late diagnosis. We studied 100 patients with gastric cancer proven at endoscopy. Early diagnosis (less than 3 months from the onset of symptoms) was established in 28 patients (28%), while the diagnosis was late (greater than 3 months) in 72 patients (72%). The reasons for late diagnosis were: 1. delayed consultation on the part of the patient, 2. incorrect medical diagnosis at a) initial evaluation, b) radiological evaluation and, as a result, c) failure to refer for endoscopy and biopsy. Patient survival correlated well with tumor resectability, irrespective of early or late diagnosis. In patients with early diagnosis and resectable tumor survival was 9.9 +/- 4.8 months (mean +/- SD) whereas with non-resectable tumor 4.8 +/- 4.0 months (p less than 0.01). In patients with late diagnosis, survival in resectable tumor was 13.5 +/- 11.7 months compared with 8.5 +/- 6.9 months in non-resectable tumor. No correlation was noted between survival and anatomic location of tumor or degree of histologic differentiation. Early diagnosis of gastric cancer is associated with a higher degree of resectability and therefore of better survival.
The efficacy and safety of two dosage regimens of cimetidine were compared in a single-blind study of 50 adults with endoscopically proven duodenal ulcers. Patients were randomly allocated to receive 800 mg cimetidine taken once nightly or 400 mg cimetidine taken twice daily for 4 weeks. Following 4 weeks' treatment patients again underwent endoscopy and, if healing was incomplete, they received a further 4 weeks' treatment. At 4 weeks, healing occurred in 21/25 (84%) patients on the once-daily regimen and in 15/25 (60%) patients treated twice daily (P less than 0.05). Cumulative healing rates after 8 weeks' treatment were 92% and 96%, respectively. Symptomatic improvement was obtained to the same degree with both regimens. No adverse effects were recorded and laboratory values remained normal during both treatments. The results indicate that cimetidine given as one dose each night was superior to the twice-daily regimen.
We studied 24 patients with end-stage chronic renal failure not treated with hemodialysis (CRF1) and 16 patients on regular hemodialysis (CRF2), to investigate the digestive, absorptive and morphological aspects of the small intestinal mucosa. Serum d-xylose test and biochemical parameters of absorption (serum calcium and proteins) were determined. Jejunal mucosal biopsies were obtained and tissue homogenates assayed for disaccharidases (sucrase, maltase and lactase) and dipeptidases (glycyl-glycinase, leucyl-glycinase and leucyl-aminopeptidase). Histological changes were classified according to the severity of abnormality and compared with biopsies obtained from control subjects. Serum d-xylose test, calcium and proteins were normal in patients with CRF. Maltase specific activity was higher in CRF1 than in controls (p less than 0.05). Lactase and leucyl-aminopeptidase showed a tendency to decrease in CRF, but this difference did not reach statistical significance. Sucrase, glycyl-glycinase and leucyl-glycinase specific activity in CRF was similar to the control group. Histological changes of the small intestinal mucosa of mild to moderate degree were noted in 68% of patients with CRF vs 36% in control subjects (p less than 0.01). No significant difference was noted in the incidence of absorptive, enzymatic (with the exception of maltase) and histological changes between the two groups of patients with CRF. These changes are not influenced by hemodialysis, a long-term treatment averaging 6 months, they appear to represent primary manifestations of CRF and may be related to the nutritional status of patients with CRF.
Strongyloidiasis is a human intestinal parasitosis caused by the nematode Strongyloides stercoralis. In most cases the infection is subclinical, but rarely, disseminated strongyloidiasis may occur in debilitated or immunocompromised patients, and in those who receive immunosuppressive agents. In this report, we describe an unusual case of severe disseminated strongyloidiasis, with intestinal, pulmonary and neurological manifestations, in a previously healthy male. The onset of the disease was acute with headache and neck stiffness, due to subarachnoid-ventricular haemorrhage. During a protracted clinical course the patient developed diarrhoea, abdominal pain, recurrent paralytic ileus, pneumonitis and respiratory distress, malabsorption and weight loss, diagnosis was delayed due to the complicated course and rarity of the disease. The diagnosis finally established during evaluation for malabsorption by demonstrating larvae of S. stercoralis in the jejunal mucosal biopsy and faeces. Response to mebendazole treatment was prompt with complete recovery and resolution of all systemic manifestations. Early diagnosis and treatment of strongyloidiasis in the intestinal phase is critical in the prevention of dissemination, which may prove lethal due to life-threatening complications.
17 consecutive patients who underwent renal transplantation during the period 1979-1981 and were at risk of gastrointestinal hemorrhage were treated prophylactically with the histamine H2-blocker cimetidine without antacids. The incidence of gastrointestinal bleeding, the number of rejection episodes and graft survival were compared with 17 patients, who had received renal transplant during the period 1976-1978 and had not received cimetidine. The incidence of gastrointestinal hemorrhage was not reduced in the cimetidine-treated patients. In addition, cimetidine treatment neither increased the total number of rejection episodes nor changed the long-term graft survival. The results of this study indicate that cimetidine does not appear to be superior to antacids in the prevention of gastrointestinal bleeding in renal transplant recipients.
The diagnostic value of serum ferritin levels was evaluated in 19 patients with biopsy-proven primary hepatocellular carcinoma (PHC) and 26 patients with chronic liver disease (CLD). Serum ferritin levels were significantly elevated in PHC, as compared with CLD and controls (p less than 0.0005). Similarly, serum ferritin/SGOT ratio, an index of increased ferritin production, was significantly higher in PHC than in CLD and controls. Serum alpha-fetoprotein (alpha-FP) was higher in PHC than in CLD (p less than 0.0025). No significant correlation was noted between serum ferritin and alpha-fetoprotein or SGOT in PHC and CLD. 17 of 19 patients with PHC had serum ferritin values over 450 ng/ml (sensitivity 88%). By contrast, only 10 of 17 patients with PHC (59%) demonstrated alpha-FP levels over 25 ng/ml, compatible with the diagnosis of PHC. 9 of these 10 patients had ferritin levels over 450 ng/ml, within the distribution of values for PHC. Conversely, 7 of 17 patients with PHC (40%) had normal levels of alpha-FP (false-negative). However, 6 of these patients (86%) had ferritin levels over 450 ng/ml, consistent with values in PHC. In this study, the overall sensitivity of serum ferritin in PHC was higher than that of alpha-FP (88 versus 59%) and its specificity 85 versus 68% for alpha-FP. These data indicate that serum ferritin may be utilized as a useful diagnostic marker in the evaluation of patients with PHC.