Background: Intestinal intussusception in the adult is a rare entity that differs greatly in etiology from its pediatric counterpart. Controversy remains regarding the optimal management of this problem in the adult patient. The purpose of this study was to determine the cause(s) of intussusception and to determine the role of intestinal reduction in the management of intussusception in adults.Study Design: A retrospective review performed at The Mount Sinai Medical Center identified 27 patients, 16 years and older, with a diagnosis of intestinal intussusception. Data related to presentation, diagnosis, treatment, and pathology were analyzed.Results: There were 13 males and 14 females. The median age of the group was 52 years with a range of 16 to 90 years. Abdominal pain was the most common presenting complaint. A preoperative diagnosis was suspected in 11 of 27 patients (40%). There were 22 small bowel lesions and 5 colonic lesions. A pathologic cause was identified in 85% of patients with 8 of 22 (36%) small bowel and 4 of 5 (80%) of large bowel lesions being malignant. All small bowel cancers represented metastatic disease and all large bowel malignancies were primary adenocarcinomas. The median age of patients with malignant disease was 60 years; it was 44 years for those with benign disease. Operative treatment consisted of resection alone in 58% of patients and resection after reduction in 42%. Three patients were treated nonoperatively.Conclusions: Our data support a selective approach to the operative treatment of intussusception in adults. Colonic lesions should not be reduced before resection because they most likely represent a primary adenocarcinoma. Small bowel intussusception should be reduced only in patients in whom a benign diagnosis has been made preoperatively or in patients in whom resection may result in short gut syndrome. (J Am Coil Surg 1999;188:390-395. (C) 1999 by the American College of Surgeons).

Our data support a selective approach to the operative treatment of intussusception in adults. Colonic lesions should not be reduced before resection because they most likely represent a primary adenocarcinoma. Small bowel intussusception should be reduced only in patients in whom a benign diagnosis has been made preoperatively or in patients in whom resection may result in short gut syndrome.

A 15-year-old girl with known Peutz-Jeghers syndrome and with nausea and vomiting of all ingested food was transferred from an outside institution. Physical examination revealed a palpable upper abdominal mobile mass. Upper gastrointestinal series revealed a stacked coin appearance consistent with small bowel intussusception. An abdominal computed tomographic scan showed a left upper quadrant sausage-shaped mass with invagination of bowel into bowel suggestive of small bowel intussusception. The patient was taken to the operating room for a combined upper endoscopy and laparoscopy. Laparoscopy confirmed the radiologic findings and a jejuno-jejunal intussusception was identified and reduced laparoscopically. The endoscope could not be passed to the level of the polyp, thus, this loop of small bowel was resected laparoscopically. The final pathologic diagnosis was multiple hamartomas. We conclude that laparoscopy is a safe and effective method of managing intussusception in the Peutz-Jegher syndrome because the pathologic lead point is a benign hamartoma. A combined endoscopic and laparoscopic approach can be used to treat proximal small bowel intussusception and this could possibly eliminate the need for laparotomy and reduce the post-operative complications associated with multiple reoperations in this patient population.

New laparoscopic instrumentation coupled with standard surgical techniques allows one to perform procedures previously thought impossible via the laparoscope. This report reviews the natural history, the indications for resection, and the technique of laparoscopic resection of hepatic hemangiomata. Two women, 24 and 62 years of age, were first seen with abdominal pain. A diagnosis of hemangioma was made in each case, and both lesions were removed laparoscopically. Operative blood loss was 200 cc in each case, and neither patient required transfusion. Diets were started on the first postoperative day (POD), and the patients were discharged on the second and fourth PODs without narcotic analgesia. If the size and location of the tumor are favorable, laparoscopic resection of liver hemangiomata can be performed safely. Blood loss comparable to that of open procedures and a quicker recovery support an endosurgical approach to resection of liver hemangiomata in selected cases.

New laparoscopic instrumentation coupled with standard surgical techniques allows one to perform procedures previously thought impossible via the laparoscope. This report reviews the natural history, the indications for resection, and the technique of laparoscopic resection of hepatic hemangiomata. Two women, 24 and 62 years of age, were first seen with abdominal pain. A diagnosis of hemangioma was made in each case, and both lesions were removed laparoscopically. Operative blood loss was 200 cc in each case, and neither patient required transfusion. Diets were started on the first postoperative day (POD), and the patients were discharged on the second and fourth PODs without narcotic analgesia. If the size and location of the tumor are favorable, laparoscopic resection of liver hemangiomata can be performed safely. Blood loss comparable to that of open procedures and a quicker recovery support an endosurgical approach to resection of liver hemangiomata in selected cases.