IntroductionDYRK1A, a protein kinase located on human chromosome 21, plays a role in postembryonic neuronal development and degeneration. Alterations to DYRK1A have been consistently associated with cognitive functioning and neurodevelopmental disorders (e.g., autism, intellectual disability). However, the broader cognitive and behavioral phenotype of DYRK1A syndrome requires further characterization. Specifically, executive functioning, or cognitive processes that are necessary for goal-directed behavior, has not yet been characterized in this population.MethodsIndividuals with DYRK1A variants (n = 29; ages 4 to 21 years) were assessed with a standardized protocol with multiple measures of executive functioning: Delis-Kaplan Executive Function Schedule, and chronologically age-appropriate caregiver-report forms of the Behavior Rating Inventory of Executive Function (BRIEF) and Achenbach System of Empirically Based Assessment (ASEBA). We first examined the feasibility and appropriateness of established executive functioning measures among participants with DYRK1A syndrome to inform selection of executive functioning tools in future research. We then characterized executive functioning among the group, including associations with other phenotypic features.ResultsNeurocognitive assessments of executive functioning were deemed infeasible due to cognitive and verbal functioning. Caregiver-report revealed elevated executive functioning concerns related to self-monitoring, working memory, and planning/organization on the BRIEF, and attention and ADHD on the CBCL. Only two participants had existing ADHD diagnoses; however, 5 participants (out of 10 participants with data) exceeded the cutoff on the BRIEF, 13 individuals (out of 27 with data) exceeded the cutoff on the ASEBA ADHD subscale, and 18 exceeded the cutoff on the ASEBA attention subscale. There was concordance between ADHD diagnosis and the ASEBA, but not BRIEF. Executive functioning was correlated with nonverbal IQ and autism traits.DiscussionObjective measures of executive functioning are needed for individuals with intellectual disability who are nonverbal and/or have motor limitations. Diagnostic overshadowing, or the tendency to attribute all problems to intellectual disability and to leave other co-existing conditions, such as executive functioning challenges or ADHD, undiagnosed, is common. Phenotypic characterization of executive functioning is therefore important for our understanding of DYRK1A syndrome and for ensuring that caregivers’ concerns are addressed, and individuals receive the clinical services that best meet their needs.

Specialized multidisciplinary supports are important for long-term outcomes for autistic youth. Although family and child factors predict service utilization in autism, little is known with respect to youth with rare, autism-associated genetic variants, who frequently have increased psychiatric, developmental, and behavioral needs. We investigate the impact of family factors on service utilization to determine whether caregiver (autistic features, education, income) and child (autistic features, sex, age, IQ, co-occurring conditions) factors predicted service type (e.g., speech, occupational, behavioral) and intensity (hours/year) among children with autism-associated variants (N = 125), some of whom also had a confirmed ASD diagnosis. Analyses revealed variability in the types of services used across a range of child demographic, behavioral, and mental health characteristics. Speech therapy was the most received service (87.2

Abstract Background Neurodevelopmental conditions such as intellectual disability (ID) and autism spectrum disorder (ASD) can stem from a broad array of inherited and de novo genetic differences, with marked physiological and behavioral impacts. We currently know little about the psychiatric phenotypes of rare genetic variants associated with ASD, despite heightened risk of psychiatric concerns in ASD more broadly. Understanding behavioral features of these variants can identify shared versus specific phenotypes across gene groups, facilitate mechanistic models, and provide prognostic insights to inform clinical practice. In this paper, we evaluate behavioral features within three gene groups associated with ID and ASD – ADNP, CHD8, and DYRK1A – with two aims: (1) characterize phenotypes across behavioral domains of anxiety, depression, ADHD, and challenging behavior; and (2) understand whether age and early developmental milestones are associated with later mental health outcomes. Methods Phenotypic data were obtained for youth with disruptive variants in ADNP, CHD8, or DYRK1A (N = 65, mean age = 8.7 years, 40% female) within a long-running, genetics-first study. Standardized caregiver-report measures of mental health features (anxiety, depression, attention-deficit/hyperactivity, oppositional behavior) and developmental history were extracted and analyzed for effects of gene group, age, and early developmental milestones on mental health features. Results Patterns of mental health features varied by group, with anxiety most prominent for CHD8, oppositional features overrepresented among ADNP, and attentional and depressive features most prominent for DYRK1A. For the full sample, age was positively associated with anxiety features, such that elevations in anxiety relative to same-age and same-sex peers may worsen with increasing age. Predictive utility of early developmental milestones was limited, with evidence of early language delays predicting greater difficulties across behavioral domains only for the CHD8 group. Conclusions Despite shared associations with autism and intellectual disability, disruptive variants in ADNP, CHD8, and DYRK1A may yield variable psychiatric phenotypes among children and adolescents. With replication in larger samples over time, efforts such as these may contribute to improved clinical care for affected children and adolescents, allow for earlier identification of emerging mental health difficulties, and promote early intervention to alleviate concerns and improve quality of life.

Introduction:Autistic students have limited access to inclusive classes and activities in their schools. Principals and special education teachers who directly teach and administer programs for autistic elementary students can offer critical insight into factors, such as educators' attitudes, that may impact inclusive opportunities in schools. These attitudes may serve as barriers to or facilitators of promoting an inclusive school setting. Methods:Semi-structured interviews with 26 elementary school principals and 26 special education teachers explored their experiences implementing evidence-based practices for autistic students (pivotal response training, discrete trial training, and visual schedules) in 26 self-contained classrooms in the United States. Autism-specific culture and inclusion emerged as a theme, which was analyzed for this paper. Results:An inductive approach to thematic analysis revealed principals' and special education teachers' perspectives regarding the "autism-specific culture" in the school, including attitudes towards and inclusion of autistic students in self-contained classrooms in the broader school environment. Analysis of text related to "autism-specific culture" detailed aspects of inclusion, factors (i.e., barriers and facilitators) affecting inclusion, principals' and special education teachers' attitudes towards autistic students placed in self-contained classrooms, attitudes of other school staff towards teachers in self-contained classrooms, and recommendations to support an inclusive school environment for autistic students. Discussion:Results suggest that valuing "equal" access to classes and activities for autistic students in self-contained classrooms may not be sufficient for promoting an inclusive school environment, Educators may benefit from targeted strategies to facilitate inclusion. Strategies range from supporting educators' attitudes and knowledge of autism to shifting physical aspects of the school environment (e.g., location of classrooms). Additional implications for supporting the true inclusion (i.e., inclusion that goes beyond physical inclusion) involves of autistic students in self-contained classrooms schools are discussed.