PURPOSETo define the maximum-tolerated dose (MTD) and to evaluate the dose-limiting toxicities (DLT) of the combination of capecitabine and vinorelbine in patients with metastatic breast cancer who relapse after adjuvant and/or first-line treatment. In addition, we aimed to obtain data on efficacy and safety at the recommended dose.PATIENTS AND METHODSPatients with measurable metastatic breast cancer after failure of prior chemotherapy (including anthracyclines and/or taxanes) were eligible. Capecitabine was administered with a fixed dose of 1000 mg/m(2) orally twice daily for 2 weeks followed by 1 week rest. One treatment cycle consisted of 6 weeks of treatment containing two treatment periods of capecitabine. Vinorelbine was given intravenously at escalated doses of 25 mg/m(2) (dose level 1) and 30 mg/m(2) (dose level 2) on days 1 and 8, and 22 and 29.RESULTSThirty-three patients received a total of 91 cycles of capecitabine and vinorelbine. The median number of administered cycles per patient was three (range one to six). Thirty-one patients were evaluable for toxicity. At dose level 2 four out of seven patients experienced DLTs (nausea/vomiting, febrile neutropenia, grade 4 neutropenia, infection and diarrhea); thus, the MTD was defined. In order to confirm the safety and efficacy, dose level 1 was extended to 24 patients. Two patients [8.3%; 95% confidence interval (CI) 1% to 27%] showed DLTs (hospitalization due to febrile neutropenia and prolonged neutropenia). The main toxicity was neutropenia, which was observed at National Cancer Institute Common Toxicity Criteria grade 3 and 4 in 39% of patients. The overall response rate for capecitabine and vinorelbine was 55% (95% CI 36% to 72.7%), including three patients with a complete remission. The median time to disease progression was 8 months (95% CI 4.3-11.7) with an overall survival of 19.2 months (95% CI 11.3-27.1) based on intention-to-treat analysis.CONCLUSIONSThe combination of capecitabine and vinorelbine can be administered with manageable toxicity and showed significant efficacy for patients with metastatic breast cancer even after failure of a anthracycline- and/or taxane-based therapy.

The purpose of this prospective trial was to study a combined-modality treatment including local consolidation by surgery or radiotherapy and high-dose chemotherapy (HDC) followed by peripheral-blood stem-cell (PBSC) transplantation. In all, 48 patients with oligometastatic breast cancer amenable to local treatment after induction chemotherapy with epirubicin and cyclophosphamide or paclitaxel and cisplatin, depending on prior adjuvant chemotherapy, were enrolled. The median follow-up was 41 months (range, 7-85 months). PBSC were collected in 47 patients, and 40 received one or two courses of HDC. Local therapy was given in 37 patients. No treatment-related deaths occurred. Of 47 evaluable patients, 36 (75% of intention-to-treat population) had no evidence of disease or complete remission after completion of therapy. Six patients (12.5%) had partial response, two patients (4%) no change, and three patients (6%) progressive disease. The median time to progression and overall survival was 17.5 (95% confidence interval (CI), 14-21 months) and 42.2 months (95% CI, 33-52 months), respectively, and 27% of patients were progression free after 5 years. In conclusion, patients with oligometastatic breast cancer can be treated safely with this combined modality protocol with promising relapse-free survivals.

PURPOSECombining trastuzumab with doxorubicin and paclitaxel (AT) is attractive because of the activity of AT and survival improvements observed when trastuzumab is added to either agent in HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer. This pilot study evaluates the efficacy and cardiac tolerability of AT followed by paclitaxel with trastuzumab started with AT or paclitaxel alone and investigates pharmacokinetic interactions.EXPERIMENTAL DESIGNTwo cohorts of 16 patients were enrolled. Cohort 1 received three cycles of AT (60/150 mg/m2) plus trastuzumab (4 mg/kg initial dose followed by 2 mg/kg), initiated concomitantly with doxorubicin, followed by nine cycles of paclitaxel (80 mg/m2) plus trastuzumab and then trastuzumab alone. Cohort 2 was treated with the same regimen, but trastuzumab was initiated with paclitaxel after AT. Cardiac function, pharmacokinetic interactions, and efficacy were evaluated.RESULTSMedian baseline left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) was 62% (range, 57-74%) and 66% (range, 57-77%) in cohorts 1 and 2, respectively. Most patients had an absolute decrease in LVEF. Congestive heart failure was not observed. LVEF in three patients decreased to <50% but recovered despite continued treatment. Response rates were 87.5% in both cohorts (cohort 1:2 complete response, 12 partial response; cohort 2:3 complete response, 11 partial response). No unexpected side effects were observed. Pharmacokinetics of paclitaxel and its metabolites and of doxorubicin were similar without and with trastuzumab.CONCLUSIONSTrastuzumab administered with AT followed by weekly paclitaxel alone is highly active whether trastuzumab is initiated with AT or paclitaxel. Congestive heart failure was not observed, and LVEF decreases were reversible. Further studies of this regimen are warranted.

PURPOSE:We evaluated whether dose-intensive or high-dose chemotherapy can eliminate micrometastases in high-risk breast cancer patients.EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN:We monitored cytokeratin (CK)/17-1A positive cells in the bone marrow (BM) and peripheral blood stem cells (PBSC) and studied Her-2/neu serum levels of patients with locally advanced (n = 13; group 1) and metastatic breast cancer (n = 30; group 2) using immunomagnetic separation, immunocytochemistry, and ELISA.RESULTS:CK+ cells were found in the BM of 3 of 13 (23%) group 1 patients before but not after chemotherapy, resulting in an overall survival (OS) of 92% after a median follow-up of 33 months. Contamination of PBSC in 2 of 9 (22%) patients was not associated with decreased survival. In group 2 patients, the CK+ rate was 60% (18 of 30 patients) before and 40% (4 of 10 patients) after therapy with an OS rate of 43% after 29 months. PBSC samples were positive in 7 of 24 (29%) patients. CK+ BM and PBSC led to a rapid progress and short OS, whereas tumor cell-free BM and PBSC resulted in a mean OS of 30 months. The antigen 17-1A was detected on most CK+ cells in both patient groups before therapy, on all of CK+ PBSC, and on CK+ cells in group 2 patients after therapy. Increased Her-2/neu levels were found in group 2 patients before chemotherapy.CONCLUSION:Micrometastatic cells are present in PBSC grafts and can survive even high-dose chemotherapy. The presence of immunotherapeutic target antigens supports the idea that a combined chemoimmunotherapy might be successful in eliminating minimal residual disease.

This phase I study was designed to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) and dose-limiting side effects of combination treatment with paclitaxel (Taxol) and UFT (uracil and tegafur in a 4:1 molar ratio) plus oral calcium folinate (Orzel) for advanced metastatic breast cancer. After premedication, patients received paclitaxel as a 3-hour IV infusion (175 mg/m2) on day 1; UFT was administered orally at 300 mg/day (dose level 1), 400 mg/day (dose level 2), 500 mg/day (dose level 3), or 600 mg/day (dose level 4) in combination with 90 mg/day of calcium folinate in three divided doses for 14 days. Twenty patients with pretreated metastatic breast cancer have entered the trial so far. The main toxicity was neutropenia, occurring in 68% of patients. World Health Organization grades 1 and 2 peripheral neuropathy, arthralgia, and myalgia were common but not dose-limiting. All patients had grade 3 alopecia due to paclitaxel. One of six patients treated at dose level 4 experienced a dose-limiting toxicity with neutropenic fever. But within four dose levels MTD was not reached, and the study will continue to accrue patients to dose level 5. Objective responses were observed at all dose levels. In conclusion, the combination of paclitaxel and UFT plus oral calcium folinate seems to be a convenient and effective regimen for patients with pretreated metastatic breast cancer. Phase I is ongoing in order to determine MTD and the recommended dose for phase II testing.

The purpose of this randomized phase III trial was to study whether medroxyprogesterone acetate (MPA) maintenance treatment prolongs the time to progression in advanced breast cancer patients responding to an induction chemotherapy. Patients with progressive advanced breast cancer previously untreated with anthracylines and progestins were given epirubicin (30 mg/m2) and ifosfamide (2 g/m2) on days 1 and 8 at 3‐weekly intervals. Patients without disease progression after 6 cycles of chemotherapy were randomly assigned to receive, until progression, either no treatment or MPA at a daily total dose of 500 mg. Ninety patients were randomized: 46 to the MPA arm and 44 to the observation arm. Median time to progression was longer in the MPA arm: 4.9 months versus 3.7 months in the intent‐to‐treat analysis (p=0.02), and 4.9 months versus 3.0 months in the secondary efficacy analysis (p=0.012). Seven patients were removed from MPA due to side effects. The changes in patient‐rated quality of life scores were similar in both groups. The median length of survival from randomization was 17.4 months for patients receiving MPA and 18.3 months for patients randomized to observation (p=0.39). In conclusion, in patients with advanced breast cancer achieving remission or non‐progression with 6 cycles of epirubicin and ifosfamide chemotherapy, MPA maintenance treatment led to a significant, though modest, prolongation of the time to progression without affecting overall survival of the study patients.

Seit der Entwicklung von Kombinations-Chemotherapien und der Einfuhrung von Doxorubicin in den 70er Jahren gab es nur geringe Erfolge hinsichtlich der Verlangerung der Uberlebenszeit fur diese in der Prognose ungunstige Patientengruppe. Die Entwicklung von Chemotherapeutika mit neuen Wirkungsmechanismen, die einen Vorteil bei der Behandlung anthrazyklinresistenter Tumore aufweisen, die Erprobung neuer Therapiekonzepte wie die Hochdosis-Chemotherapie mit Stammzelltransplantation sowie die Einfuhrung biologischer Therapien wie der monoklonale Antikorper HER2/neu (Herceptin) konnten den Fortschritt in der Behandlung dieser Entitat beschleunigen. Auch die Bestimmung neuer tumorassoziierter Proteine oder Gene (z. B. die Uberexpression von HER2/neu, p53) als Marker fur Sensitivitat bzw. Resistenz gegenuber einer Systemtherapie konnte von Bedeutung sein.

Internistische Onkologie L. Bergmann, Frankfurt/M. V. Diehl, Köln P. Drings, Heidelberg A. Engert, Köln H. H. Fiebig, Freiburg i.Br. D. Hoelzer, Frankfurt/M. H. Huber, Wien H. J. Illiger, Oldenburg U. R. Kleeberg, Hamburg G. Kornek, Wien R. Morant, St. Gallen M. Pfreundschuh, Homburg/Saar F. Porzsolt, Ulm K. Possinger, Berlin H. Samonigg, Graz H. Sauer, München H.-J. Schmoll, Halle J. Schütte, Essen

Our phase II study results demonstrating high efficacy and low toxicity for a weekly schedule of high-dose, 24-hour infusional 5-fluorouracil (5-FU)/leucovorin (LV) in intensively pretreated patients with metastatic breast cancer prompted the addition of paclitaxel (Taxol; Bristol-Myers Squibb Company, Princeton, NJ) to the regimen for a phase I/II study of outpatient second-line treatment of metastatic breast cancer. That study further prompted the addition of cisplatin to the regimen for first-line treatment. Twenty-eight patients with metastatic breast cancer have been evaluated. Pretreatment comprised adjuvant chemotherapy in 24 of 28 patients, but no prior chemotherapy for metastatic disease. Patients were treated with high-dose 5-FU 2 g/m2 (24-hour infusion) plus LV 500 mg/m2 (2-hour infusion before 5-FU) weekly for 6 weeks (days 1, 8, 15, 22, 29, and 36); in addition, paclitaxel 175 mg/m2 (3-hour infusion) was administered on days 0 and 21 and cisplatin 50 mg/m2 (1-hour infusion) on days 1 and 22 before high-dose 5-FU/LV, repeated every 50 days. Patients were treated as outpatients using Port-a-Cath systems (SIMS Deltec Inc, St Paul, MN) and portable pumps. Neutropenia was common but mild to moderate and of short duration in most patients. No hospitalizations were required because of febrile neutropenia, and no granulocyte colony-stimulating factor support was used. Aside from common total alopecia, nonhematologic toxicities consisted mainly of moderate myalgia, diarrhea, mucositis, and nausea and vomiting. Hand-foot syndrome and peripheral neuropathy were cumulative and occurred most commonly during the third treatment cycle with mild to moderate expression. In 28 patients with bidimensionally measurable disease, 25% (seven of 28) attained a complete response, 57% (16 of 28) achieved a partial response, 11% (three of 28) had stable disease, and 7% (two of 28) had disease progression. Overall response was 82% (95% confidence interval, 66% to 100%). We conclude that the combination of paclitaxel/cisplatin with weekly high-dose infusional 5-FU/LV appears to be effective in the first-line treatment of metastatic breast cancer. Preliminary results must be confirmed by the final analysis of response duration, time to progression, and survival.

Our phase II study results demonstrating high efficacy and low toxicity for a weekly schedule of high-dose, 24-hour infusional 5-fluorouracil(5-FU)/folinic acid (HD5-FU/FA) in intensively pretreated patients with metastatic breast cancer prompted addition of paclitaxel (Taxol) to the regimen, for a phase I/II study of outpatient second-line treatment of metastatic breast cancer. That study further prompted the addition of cisplatin (Platinol) to the regimen for first-line treatment. So far, 28 patients with metastatic breast cancer have been evaluated. Pretreatment comprised adjuvant chemotherapy in 24 of 28 patients, but no prior chemotherapy for metastatic disease. Patients were treated with HD5-FU 2 g/m2 (24-hour infusion) plus FA 500 mg/m2 (2-hour infusion prior to FU) weekly for 6 weeks (days 1, 8, 15, 22, 29, and 36); in addition, paclitaxel 175 mg/m2 (3-hour infusion) was administered on days 0 and 21 and cisplatin 50 mg/m2 (1-hour infusion) on days 1 and 22 prior to HD5-FU/FA, repeated every 50 days. Patients were treated as outpatients using Port-a-Cath systems and portable pumps. Neutropenia was common (67% World Health Organization grade 3) but mild to moderate in most patients and was of short duration. No hospitalizations were required because of febrile neutropenia, and no granulocyte colony-stimulating factor support was used. Aside from common total alopecia, nonhematologic toxicities consisted mainly of moderate myalgia, diarrhea, mucositis, and nausea and vomiting. Hand-foot syndrome and peripheral neuropathy were cumulative and occurred most commonly during the third treatment cycle, with mild-to-moderate expression. In 28 patients with bidimensionally measurable disease, 25% (7/28) attained a complete response, 57% (16/28) achieved partial response, 11% (3/28) had stable disease, and 7% (2/28) had disease progression. Overall response was 82% (95% confidence interval, 66% to 100%). Eight of 28 patients are still receiving treatment. It is concluded that the combination of paclitaxel/cisplatin with weekly HD5-FU/FA appears to be effective in the first-line treatment of metastatic breast cancer. Preliminary results must be confirmed by the final analysis of response duration, time to progression, and survival.

Binding of [3H]-NMS to human atrial and ventricular membranes was rapid, reversible and saturable (KD-values: 0.5–1.0 nmol/l). The maximal number of [3H]-NMS binding sites, however, was approximately 2.5-fold higher in right and left atrial membranes (200–250 fmol[3H]-NMS specifically bound/mg protein) than in right and left ventricular membranes (80–100 fmol/mg protein).