Oncoproteins encoded by the early region 1A (E1A) of adenoviruses (Ads) have been shown to be powerful tools to study gene regulatory mechanisms. As E1A proteins lack a sequence-specific DNA-binding activity, they modulate viral and cellular gene expression by interacting directly with a diverse array of cellular factors, among them sequence-specific transcription factors, proteins of the general transcription machinery, co-activators and chromatin-modifying enzymes. By making use of these factors, E1A affects major cellular events such as cell cycle control, differentiation, apoptosis, and oncogenic transformation. In this review we will focus on the interaction of E1A with cellular components involved in the cAMP/PKA signal transduction pathway and we will discuss the consequences of these interactions in respect to the activation of CREB/CBP-dependent target genes.
Cells transformed by proteins of early regions 1A (E1A) and 1B (E1B) of oncogenic adenovirus serotype 12 (Ad12) grow to tumours in syngeneic, immunocompetent rodents. To gain insight into the mechanisms of oncogenic transformation, we point mutated the first splice donor in the Ad12-E1A gene, leading to the loss of the Ad12-E1A9.5S and Ad12-E1A11S/10S proteins and to a conservative amino acid (aa) exchange at position aa 30 (valine vs. leucine) in the Ad12-E1A13S and Ad12-E1A12S proteins. BMK cells transformed by mutant Ad12-E1A (Ad12-E1Am) plus Ad12-E1B via retrovirus-mediated gene transfer showed features comparable to wild-type Ad12-E1A (Ad12-E1Awt) plus Ad12-E1B-transformed cells: they formed foci in soft agar and produced tumours in immunodeficient nude mice, although after a prolonged latency period. These results suggest that Ad12-E1A9.5S and Ad12-E1A11S/10S are dispensable for cellular transformation. However, in contrast to Ad12-E1Awt cells, Ad12-E1Am cells failed to grow to tumours in syngeneic, immunocompetent rodents, with the exception of one cell line, which produced tumours in about 50% of the immunocompetent animals. Interestingly, the concentration of the putative tumour suppressor and co-activator p300 was elevated in cell lines expressing high levels of Ad12-E1A and Ad12-E1B due to an increased half-life. These results indicate that p300 is stabilized in Ad12-E1-transformed BMK cells, probably by a mechanism linked to high expression of Ad12-E1A/E1B.
Adenovirus (Ad) E1A proteins are transcriptional regulators with antioncogenic but also transforming properties. We have previously shown that transformation-defective Ad5 E1A-derivatives are excellent tumor suppressors. For tumor-specific expression of the E1A-derivatives we intend to use tumor specific human telomerase reverse transcriptase ( hTERT ) core promoters. Here, we show that Spm2 and other E1A proteins with an intact amino terminus activated all hTERT constructs 10–20-fold in malignant tumor cells but not in primary fibroblasts, without affecting the activity of endogenous telomerase. The transcription rate in tumor cells was in the range of transcription from the SV40 promoter, which qualifies an E1A- hTERT system as a putative tumor targeting/expression system. The activation of the hTERT promoter by E1A was enhanced upon deletion of the Wilms' tumor 1 negative regulatory element and maintained high after deletion of the adjacent c-Myc-responsive E-box, demonstrating an important role of the remaining sequences that contain several Sp1-motifs. E1A-mediated hTERT activation was independent from the presence of the conserved region 3 (CR3) of E1A but dependent on E1A's binding to p300/CBP and recruitment of its histone acetyltransferase activity. Moreover, E1A-Spm2 and histone deacetylase-1 behaved as antagonists with respect to the regulation of transcription from the hTERT promoter. Overall, hTERT promoter/E1A-Spm2 systems may turn out to be excellent tools for transcriptionally targeted anticancer gene therapy.
Major histocompatibility complex (MHC) class I proteins are an essential component of the immune system allowing the organism to protect from viral infections and neoplastic transformation. Expression of the MHC class I genes is regulated by a variety of cis-regulatory promoter elements among which the enhancer A is of particular importance. This enhancer is synergistically activated through AP-1/ATF and NF-κB transcription factors. NF-κB recruits the histone acetyltransferase (HAT) p300/CREB-binding protein (CBP) to the multiprotein complex bound to the enhancer A. Here we present evidence that acetylation and deacetylation processes are involved in the activation of the enhancer A. The p300/CBP associated factor PCAF, but not p300/CBP, counteracts the repression of the enhancer A mediated by the histone deacetylase HDAC1. Furthermore, overexpression of PCAF results in an increase in the acetylation of histone H4 bound to the enhancer A and HDAC1 counteracts the PCAF-mediated H4 acetylation. The activation function of PCAF requires the p300/CBP binding motif indicating that PCAF might be recruited to the enhancer A through an association with p300/CBP. Moreover, PCAF and the Brahma/SWI2-related protein BRG-1, which is a key factor of the human ATP-dependent chromatin remodelling complex SWI/SNF, synergistically up-regulate the enhancer A. Synergistic activation requires the HAT domain of PCAF. Taken together our data suggest that members of two different groups of chromatin modifying complexes are involved in the activation of the enhancer A of the MHC class I promoter.
The adenovirus type 12 (Ad12) E1A12S oncoprotein utilizes the cAMP/protein kinase A (PKA) signal transduction pathway to activate expression of the viral E2 gene, the products of which are essential for viral replication. A central unsolved question is, however, whether E1A12S interacts directly with PKA in the process of promoter activation. We show here that E1A12S binds to the regulatory subunits (R) of PKA in vitro and in vivo. Interaction depends on the N-terminus and the conserved region 1 (CR1) of E1A12S. Both domains are also essential for the activation of viral E2 gene expression. Infection of cells with Ad12 leads to the cellular redistribution of RIIalpha from the cytoplasm into the nucleus. Furthermore, RIIalpha is also located in the nucleus of cells transformed by E1 of Ad12 and transient expression of E1A12S leads to the redistribution of RIIalpha into the nucleus in a N-terminus- and CR1-dependent manner. Cotransfection of E1A12S with RIIalpha results in strong activation of the E2 promoter. Based on these results we conclude that E1A12S functions as a viral A-kinase anchoring protein redistributing RIIalpha from the cytoplasm into the nucleus where it is involved in E1A12S-mediated activation of the E2 promoter.
Activation of the transcription unit early region 2 (E2) promoter of the oncogenic adenovirus serotype 12 (Ad12), which regulates the expression of proteins essential for viral replication, requires the assembly of a ternary complex consisting of cAMP response element-binding protein (CREB)-1/activating transcription factor (ATF)-1, the Ad12 12S oncogene product of early region 1A (E1A(12S)), and the co-activator p300/CBP on the E2(Ad12) cAMP response element (E2-CRE). Here we show that the active E2(Ad12) promoter is associated with acetylated histone H4 whereas an E2-CRE point-mutated promoter which is transcriptionally inactive due to its inability to assemble this ternary complex is not bound by acetylated histone H4. The histone deacetylase 1 as well as Roscovitine, which blocks the activation of the histone acetyltransferase (HAT) activity of CBP by cyclin E-Cdk2, prevents E2(Ad12) promoter activation through E1A(12S). p300/CBP counteracts the repressive function of histone deacetylase 1 in a HAT domain-dependent manner whereas the p300/CBP-associated factor PCAF failed to rescue E2(Ad12) promoter activity. E1A(12S) bound p300/CBP displays strong HAT activity. Most interestingly, E1A(12S)-mediated activation of the E2(Ad12) promoter correlates well with the ability of the viral protein to associate with the HAT activity of p300/CBP in vivo. Taken together these data indicate that the recruitment of the HAT activity of p300/CBP by E1A(12S) plays an important role in E2(Ad12) promoter activation.
Expression of the transcription unit early region 2 (E2) is of crucial importance for adenoviruses because this region encodes proteins essential for viral replication. Here, we demonstrate that the E1A(12S) protein of the oncogenic adenovirus serotype 12 activates the E2 promoter in dependence of the N terminus and the conserved region 1. Activation is mediated through a cAMP-response element that is bound by CREB-1 and ATF-1. Moreover, the Ad12 E2 promoter is inducible by protein kinase A and repressed by either a dominant-negative cAMP-response element-binding protein (CREB) mutant or the highly specific protein kinase A inhibitor protein underscoring the participation of CREB-1/ATF-1 in promoter activation. E1A(12S) binds to CREB-1 and ATF-1 in dependence of the N terminus and CR1 and is recruited to the E2 cAMP-response element through both cellular transcription factors. Most interestingly, point mutations revealed that E1A(12S) domains essential for binding to CREB-1/ATF-1 and for activation of the Ad12 E2 promoter are also essential for binding to the CREB-binding protein. Due to these data and results obtained in DNA-dependent protein-protein interaction assays, we propose a model in which the cAMP-independent activation of the Ad12 E2 promoter is mediated through a ternary complex consisting of CREB-1/ATF-1, E1A(12S) and CREB-binding protein, which assembles on the E2 cAMP-response element.
Association with the cellular coactivators p300 and CBP is required for the growth-regulatory function of adenoviral (Ad) early region 1A (E1A) proteins. E1A regions necessary for these interactions overlap with domains involved in the induction of tumours in immunocompetent rodents through highly oncogenic Ad12. Differences in the association of cellular factors with the respective E1A domains of Ad12 and nononcogenic Ad2 might therefore be involved in serotype-specific oncogenicity. We analyzed the interaction of the Ad12 E1A 235R protein with p300 and CBP. Here we demonstrate that in the case of Ad12, but not Ad2/5, amino acids (aa) 1-29 of E1A proteins are sufficient to bind the p300-C/H3 domain in vivo and wild-type p300 in vitro. The conserved arginine-2, which is essential for the interaction between Ad2 E1A and p300, was dispensable for the Ad12 E1A 235R-p300 interaction in vitro. In addition to the p300-C/H3 region, we identified a second domain within p300 (aa 1999-2200) binding to the 235R protein. Contrary to p300, the amino-terminus and CR1 are necessary to associate with CBP. The aa 1-29 of the 235R protein but not CR1 are essential for the repression of colTRE-driven gene expression. This repression function is strictly dependent on p300 but not on CBP.
Major histocompatibility complex (MHC) class I genes encode highly polymorphic antigens that play an essential role in a number of immunological processes. Their expression is activated in response to a variety of signals and is mediated through several promoter elements among which the enhancer A is one of the key control regions. It contains binding sites for several transcription factors, for example: (i) a well-characterized binding site for rel/NF-kappaB transcription factors in its 3'-end (the H2TF1 or kappaB1 element), (ii) a second kappaB site (the kappaB2 element), which is located immediately adjacent 5' to the H2TF1 element and which is recognized by p65/relA in the human HLA system, and (iii) an AP-1/ATF recognition sequence in the 5' end (EnA-TRE). Here we demonstrate that latter element is bound by at least two distinct heterodimers of the AP-1/ATF transcription factor family, namely c-Jun/ATF-2 and c-Jun/Fra2. Moreover, our data reveal that the enhancer A is simultaneously bound by AP-1/ATF and rel/NF-kappaB transcription factors and that the cellular coactivator p300, which enhances enhancer A-driven reporter gene expression if cotransfected, is recruited to the enhancer A through this multiprotein complex. In contrast to the complete enhancer A, neither the EnA-TRE nor the H2TF1 element on their own are able to confer activation on a heterologous promoter in response to the phorbol ester tumor promoter TPA or the cytokine TNFalpha. Moreover, deletion of any one of the enhancer A control elements results in a dramatic loss of its inducibility by TNFalpha, and point mutations in either the EnA-TRE or the H2TF1 element lead to the loss of AP-1/ATF or NF-kappaB binding, respectively, and to the loss of enhancer A inducibility. Therefore, we conclude that the enhancer A is synergistically activated through a multiprotein complex containing AP-1/ATF, NF-kappaB transcription factors as well as the cellular coactivator p300.
Transcriptional control of p53 expression participates in the generation of appropriate levels of active p53 in response to mitogenic stimulation. This prompted us to study the role of a putative AP-1 and a NF-κB motif in the human p53 promoter for transcriptional regulation. We show that mutation of the AP-1 or the NF-κB motif abolishes transcription from the human p53 promoter in HeLa, HepG2 and adenovirus type 5 E1-transformed 293 cells. In comparison, mutation of the previously characterized Myc/Max/USF binding site in the human p53 promoter reduces the transcription rate fivefold. The AP-1 motif in the human p53 promoter binds c-Fos and c-Jun and the NF-κB motif binds p50NF-κB1 and p65RelA. The cooperative nature of transcriptional activation by these factors was documented by repression of c-fos or NF-κB1 translation: Pretreatment of the cells with a c-fos or p50NF-κB1 antisense oligonucleotide suppresses transcription from the human p53 promoter completely. In addition, we show that (a) the level of endogenous p53 mRNA and (b) transcription from the strictly p53-dependent human mdm2 promoter are reduced in the presence of c-fos, c-jun, p50NF-κB1, p65RelA or c-myc antisense oligonucleotides, underscoring the importance of these transcription factors for the expression of functional p53.
Early region 1A (E1A) gene products of adenoviruses (Ad) play an essential role in both productive infection and cellular transformation. Besides their function to induce the expression of all other adenoviral genes they modulate the expression of specific cellular genes to ensure an efficient viral reproduction. Gene regulatory functions of E1A proteins are mainly located in the conserved regions 1–3 (CRs) and in the non-conserved amino terminal end and are mediated via protein/protein interactions with cellular factors. We could show recently, that the E1A N-terminus (amino acids [aa] 1–29) of oncogenic Ad12 contains a unique `trans'-activation domain. Here we demonstrate that this region binds to rap30/TFIIF and to the TATA-box binding protein TBP in vitro. Mutation analyses suggest that binding to rap30 and `trans'-activation are two independent functions as a mutant which failed to interact with rap30 was still able to induce gene expression with wildtype efficiency. Moreover loss of transcriptional activity does not correlate with a loss of TBP binding suggesting that this association is not necessary for the N-terminal `trans'-activating activity. Interestingly, aa 1–29 of Ad2 E1A binds also to rap30 indicating that this interaction might be a common feature of E1A proteins from different serotypes.
Early region 1A (E1A) of adenoviruses (Ad) codes for potent activator and repressor molecules which are involved in the regulation of viral and cellular gene expression. Gene regulatory functions of E1A proteins are mainly located in their conserved regions (CR) 1 to 3. In addition to the CRs, specific amino acids (aa) of the N-terminal end play an important role in some gene regulatory functions. We describe here the identification and characterization of a novel trans-activation domain which is located in the non-conserved N-terminal end of Ad12 E1A, namely aa 1-29. Fusion of this region to the DNA-binding domain of the yeast transcription factor Gal4 generates a strong trans-activator which induces gene expression of reporter constructs in dependence on Gal4 DNA-binding sites. Furthermore, transient expression assays using the physiological E1A-responsive adenoviral E2 early promoter revealed that the N terminus is involved in its activation. The gene regulatory function of the N terminus is specific for E1A proteins of the highly oncogenic serotype Ad12, as the respective E1A N terminus of the non-oncogenic serotype Ad2 is unable to activate the expression of the reporter gene as Gal4 fusion protein. Moreover, deletion mutant analyses demonstrate that Ad12 E1A proteins carry three independently acting activation domains: (1) aa 1-29, (2) CR1 and (3) CR3.
The transformation-defective Vero cell host range mutant CS-1 of the highly oncogenic adenovirus type 12 (Ad12) (Ad12-CS-1) has a 69-bp deletion in the early region 1A (E1A) gene that removes the carboxy-terminal half of conserved region 2 and the amino-terminal half of the Ad12-specific so-called spacer that seems to play a pivotal role in the oncogenicity of the virus. Despite its deficiency in immortalizing and transforming primary rodent cells, we found that the E1A 13S protein of Ad12-CS-1 retains the ability to bind p105-RB, p107, and p130 in nuclear extract binding assays with glutathione S-transferase-E1A fusion proteins and Western blot analysis. Like wild-type E1A, the mutant protein was able to dissociate E2F from retinoblastoma-related protein-containing complexes, as judged from gel shift experiments with purified 12S and 13S proteins from transfection experiments with an E1A expression vector or from infection with the respective virus. Moreover, in transient expression assays, the 12S and 13S products of wild-type Ad12 and Ad12-CS-1 were shown to transactivate the Ad12 E1A promoter containing E2F-1 and E2F-5-motifs, respectively, in a comparable manner. The same results were obtained from transfection assays with the E2F motif-dependent E2 promoter of adenovirus type 5 or the human dihydrofolate reductase promoter. These data suggest that efficient infection by Ad12 and the correlated virus-induced reprogramming of the infected cells, including the induction of cell cycle-relevant mechanisms (e.g. E2F activation), can be uncoupled from the transformation properties of the virus.
We have analysed the different regulation of cell-cycle-relevant proteins by interferon alpha (IFN alpha) in IFN alpha-sensitive and resistant U937 leukemic cell lines. In contrast to the INF alpha-sensitive U937 variant cell line U937V, the IFN alpha-resistant derivative (U937VR) is insensitive to the antiproliferative activity of IFN alpha. As we found no differences between these cell lines concerning the induction by IFN alpha of the pathway involving tyrosine-protein kinases and the signal transducer and activator of transcription (Jak-Stat), we examined whether cell-cycle-regulating proteins are differently affected by IFN alpha in U937VR and U937VR cells. In U937V cells IFN alpha induced the formation of the complex between early-region-2 transcription factor 1 (E2F-1) and retinoblastoma protein (RB) which is known to repress transcription of E2F-1-inducible genes, necessary for cell cycle progression. Formation of this complex was not inducible by IFN alpha in U937VR cells, although the suitable binding partners (E2F-1 and under-phosphorylated RB) were present. Interestingly, treatment of nuclear extracts from logarithmically growing U937V and U937VR cells with an antiserum against cyclin A that disrupts cyclin-A-containing complexes, led to the formation of the E2F-1-RB complex, suggesting the presence of under-phosphorylated (active) RB, trapped in nuclear complexes that contain cyclin A. This suggestion was supported by combined immunoprecipitation/western blot experiments that revealed a physical interaction between phosphorylated as well as under-phosphorylated forms of RB and cyclin A complex(es) in U937V and U937VR cells. RB, especially the under-phosphorylated form, was released by treatment with IFN alpha from this complex(es) in the case of U937V cells but not U937VR cells. We conclude that the missing induction of the E2F-1-RB transrepressor by IFN alpha and the failure to release RB from cyclin-A-containing complexes might contribute to the resistance of U937VR cells to the antiproliferative effects of IFN alpha.
Transcription of the E1A gene of the highly oncogenic adenovirus 12 (Ad12) initiates at two start sites (TS1 and TS2). We have previously shown that the E2F and ATF motifs distal of TS1 co-operatively participate in E1A autostimulation from the TS1 promoter region. Here we report the identification of a second E2F-like target region (E2DFII) immediately upstream of the E1A-stimulating factor 1 binding site (ESF-1), important for 13S-mediated autoactivation from TS2. Reporter constructs lacking distinct TS2 cis-acting elements were analysed for their levels of CAT expression in the absence and presence of the E1A 13S protein in transient expression assays. In the absence of 13S, full promoter activity was observed only for a construct containing all elements (the E2F-like motif, and E-Box and the TATA element). Promoter activation increased significantly in Ad12 E1A-co-transfected cells. Induction by the 13S protein was also detected for the construct containing a non-functional ESF-1 sequence. Our results indicate that the E2F-like motif is responsible for activation medicated by the 13S protein from TS2, while ESF-1-or TATA-binding protein activity were not involved. Additionally, the TATA sequence appeared to be dispensable for transactivation. Gel-shift experiments using the E2F-like promoter element as a probe indicated the binding of an E2F-5 or E2F-5-like transcription factor to this region. We conclude that transcription through the TS1 as well as the TS2 promoter region is stimulated by the Ad 12 13S protein. Moreover, transfection of the construct including both TS1 and TS2 indicates an E2F-site-mediated synergism between both regions with respect ot E1A-induced transactivation.
Down-regulation of major histocompatibility (MHC) class I gene expression by protein products of the early region 1A (E1A), which might allow transformed cells to escape the host immune system, is discussed as one cause for the oncogenicity of Adenovirus (Ad) subtype 12-transformed cells. The MHC class I promoter is activated through several cellular-transcription factors among them AP-1, whose target sequences are located in the enhancers A and B, and NF kappa B. In this report we present evidence that the Ad12-unique 52R E1A protein inhibits c-Jun-induced activation of MHC class I gene expression. Repression occurs through both AP-1 recognition sequences with the AP-1 binding site of Enhancer A, which can be bound by c-Jun dimers in vitro, being the main target for c-Jun activation as well as 52R-mediated down-regulation. Furthermore our data revealed that both promoter elements of Enhancer A, the AP-1 and NF kappa B binding sites, are necessary for full promoter activity. As NF kappa B is down-regulated by the 266R protein of Ad12 E1A our results suggest a model in which two Ad12 E1A proteins co-operate in the repression of MHC class I gene expression.
The early region 1A 52R polypeptide, a protein expressed exclusively by the in vivo oncogenic adenovirus subtype 12, represses the trans-activating function of the cellular transcription factor complex AP-1 consisting of c-Jun-c-Jun homodimers. In this report we demonstrate that the repression in vivo correlates with a direct physical interaction of the adenovirus protein with c-Jun in vitro. Interestingly, the 52R protein binds to the bZIP domain of c-Jun essential for dimerization and DNA binding but not to the c-dun activation domain. This interaction does not prevent the promoter binding of c-Jun/AP-1. Moreover, the physical association between c-Jun and the TATA box-binding protein TBP is not disturbed by the 52R polypeptide. In fact, we show evidence that down-regulation of c-Jun activity by the adenoviral protein is due to the inhibition of phosphorylation of the c-Jun trans-activation domain. In vivo phosphorylation of the c-Jun activation domain is necessary for the interaction of c-Jun with specific cofactors such as CBP and therefore a prerequisite for the activation of target genes. Due to these results we propose a model in which the 52R protein represses the trans-activating function of c-Jun by preventing its phosphorylation through a specific kinase necessary for the activation of the cellular transcription factor.
For more than 15 years human adenoviruses (Ad) have been a powerful tool for studying cellular processes such as regulation of gene expression, alternative splicing, polyadenylation, and replication. Especially the analysis of viral proteins encoded by early region 1A (E1A), which was shown to regulate transcription, has given many insights into how DNA viruses regulate their own and cellular gene expression. Moreover, E1A proteins have been the subject of extensive studies because of their ability to act as oncoproteins that cooperate with the adenovirus E1B gene products to transform rodent cells in culture and, in case of the oncogenic adenoviruses (e.g., Ad12), to induce tumors in animals (Gallimore et al. 1974; Graham et al. 1974a, b; Houweling 1980; Jochemsen et al. 1982). The ability to promote oncogenic transformation and transcriptional regulation appear to be distinct activities of the E1A polypeptides (for review see Moran and Mathews 1987). In oncogenic transformation, protein functions of region E1A are necessary to immortalize primary cells, whereas functions of region E1B are essential to obtain a fully transformed phenotype. The functions of region E1B can be substituted by specific cellular gene products, e.g., activated Ha-ras (Byrd et al. 1988; Ruley 1983). The reasons for the difference in oncogenicity of variant adenovirus serotypes are not yet understood.