We have searched for gravitational waves (GWs) associated with the SGR 1806 (cid:1) 20 hyperflare of 27 December 2004. This event, originating from a Galactic neutron star, displayed exceptional energetics. Recent investigations of the x-ray light curve’s pulsating tail revealed the presence of quasiperiodic oscillations (QPOs) in the 30–2000 Hz frequency range, most of which coincides with the bandwidth of the LIGO detectors. These QPOs, with well-characterized frequencies, can plausibly be attributed to seismic modes of the neutron star which could emit GWs. Our search targeted potential quasimonochro-matic GWs lasting for tens of seconds and emitted at the QPO frequencies. We have observed no candidate signals above a predetermined threshold, and our lowest upper limit was set by the 92.5 Hz QPO observed in the interval from 150 s to 260 s after the start of the flare. This bound corresponds to a (90% confidence) root-sum-squared amplitude h 90%rss - det (cid:2) 4 : 5 (cid:3) 10 (cid:1) 22 strain Hz (cid:1) 1 = 2 on the GW waveform strength in the detectable polarization state reaching our Hanford (WA) 4 km detector. We illustrate the astrophysical significance of the result via an estimated characteristic energy in GW emission that we would expect to be able to detect. The above result corresponds to 7 : 7 (cid:3) 10 46 erg ( (cid:2) 4 : 3 (cid:3) 10 (cid:1) 8 M (cid:4) c 2 ), which is of the same order as the total (isotropic) energy emitted in the electromagnetic spectrum. This result provides a means to probe the energy reservoir of the source with the best upper limit on the GW waveform strength published and represents the first broadband asteroseismology measurement using a GW detector.

Strathprints is designed to allow users to access the research output of the University of Strathclyde. Unless otherwise explicitly stated on the manuscript, Copyright © and Moral Rights for the papers on this site are retained by the individual authors and/or other copyright owners. Please check the manuscript for details of any other licences that may have been applied. You may not engage in further distribution of the material for any profitmaking activities or any commercial gain. You may freely distribute both the url (https://strathprints.strath.ac.uk/) and the content of this paper for research or private study, educational, or not-for-profit purposes without prior permission or charge.

We report on an all-sky search with the LIGO detectors for periodic gravitational waves in the frequency range 50-1000 Hz and with the frequency's time derivative in the range -1.0E-8 Hz/s to zero. Data from the fourth LIGO science run (S4) have been used in this search. Three different semi-coherent methods of transforming and summing strain power from Short Fourier Transforms (SFTs) of the calibrated data have been used. The first, known as "StackSlide", averages normalized power from each SFT. A "weighted Hough" scheme is also developed and used, and which also allows for a multi-interferometer search. The third method, known as "PowerFlux", is a variant of the StackSlide method in which the power is weighted before summing. In both the weighted Hough and PowerFlux methods, the weights are chosen according to the noise and detector antenna-pattern to maximize the signal-to-noise ratio. The respective advantages and disadvantages of these methods are discussed. Observing no evidence of periodic gravitational radiation, we report upper limits; we interpret these as limits on this radiation from isolated rotating neutron stars. The best population-based upper limit with 95% confidence on the gravitational-wave strain amplitude, found for simulated sources distributed isotropically across the sky and with isotropically distributed spin-axes, is 4.28E-24 (near 140 Hz). Strict upper limits are also obtained for small patches on the sky for best-case and worst-case inclinations of the spin axes.

Received 29 February 2008DOI:https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.77.069903©2008 American Physical Society

We present the results of the first joint search for gravitational-wave bursts by the LIGO and GEO 600 detectors. We search for bursts with characteristic central frequencies in the band 768 to 2048 Hz in the data acquired between the 22nd of February and the 23rd of March, 2005 (fourth LIGO Science Run S4). We discuss the inclusion of the GEO 600 data in the Waveburst-CorrPower pipeline which first searches for coincident excess power events without taking into account differences in the antenna responses or strain sensitivities of the various detectors. We compare the performance of this pipeline to that of the coherent Waveburst pipeline based on the maximum likelihood statistic. This likelihood statistic is derived from a coherent sum of the detector data streams that takes into account the antenna patterns and sensitivities of the different detectors in the network. We find that the coherent Waveburst pipeline is sensitive to signals of amplitude 30−50% smaller than the Waveburst-CorrPower LIGO-GEO S4 analysis 6 pipeline. We perform a search for gravitational-waves bursts using both pipelines and find no detection candidates in the S4 data set.

The first simultaneous operation of the AURIGA detector and the LIGO observatory was an opportunity to explore real data, joint analysis methods between two very different types of gravitational wave detectors: resonant bars and interferometers. This paper describes a coincident gravitational wave burst search, where data from the LIGO interferometers are cross-correlated at the time of AURIGA candidate events to identify coherent transients. The analysis pipeline is tuned with two thresholds, on the signal-to-noise ratio of AURIGA candidate events and on the significance of the cross-correlation test in LIGO. The false alarm rate is estimated by introducing time shifts between data sets and the network detection efficiency is measured with simulated signals with power in the narrower AURIGA band. In the absence of a detection, we discuss how to set an upper limit on the rate of gravitational waves and to interpret it according to different source models. Due to the short amount of analyzed data and to the high rate of non-Gaussian transients in the detectors noise at the time, the relevance of this study is methodological: this was the first joint search for gravitational wave bursts among detectors with such different spectral sensitivity and the first opportunity for the resonant and interferometric communities to unify languages and techniques in the pursuit of their common goal.

We report on a search for gravitational waves from the coalescence of compact binaries during the third and fourth LIGO science runs. The search focused on gravitational waves generated during the inspiral phase of the binary evolution. In our analysis, we considered three categories of compact binary systems, ordered by mass: (i) primordial black hole binaries with masses in the range 0.35 M(sun) < m1, m2 < 1.0 M(sun), (ii) binary neutron stars with masses in the range 1.0 M(sun) < m1, m2 < 3.0 M(sun), and (iii) binary black holes with masses in the range 3.0 M(sun)< m1, m2 < m_(max) with the additional constraint m1+ m2 < m_(max), where m_(max) was set to 40.0 M(sun) and 80.0 M(sun) in the third and fourth science runs, respectively. Although the detectors could probe to distances as far as tens of Mpc, no gravitational-wave signals were identified in the 1364 hours of data we analyzed. Assuming a binary population with a Gaussian distribution around 0.75-0.75 M(sun), 1.4-1.4 M(sun), and 5.0-5.0 M(sun), we derived 90%-confidence upper limit rates of 4.9 yr^(-1) L10^(-1) for primordial black hole binaries, 1.2 yr^(-1) L10^(-1) for binary neutron stars, and 0.5 yr^(-1) L10^(-1) for stellar mass binary black holes, where L10 is 10^(10) times the blue light luminosity of the Sun.

Received 29 February 2008DOI:https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.77.069905©2008 American Physical Society

Received 29 February 2008DOI:https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.77.069902©2008 American Physical Society

Received 29 February 2008DOI:https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.77.069904©2008 American Physical Society

The fourth science run of the LIGO and GEO 600 gravitational-wave detectors, carried out in early 2005, collected data with significantly lower noise than previous science runs. We report on a search for short-duration gravitationalwave bursts with arbitrary waveform in the 64–1600 Hz frequency range appearing in all three LIGO interferometers. Signal consistency tests, data quality cuts, and auxiliary-channel vetoes are applied to reduce the rate of spurious triggers. No gravitational-wave signals are detected in 15.5 days of live observation time; we set a frequentist upper limit of 0.15 per day (at 90% confidence level) on the rate of bursts with large enough amplitudes to be detected reliably. The amplitude sensitivity of the search, characterized using Monte Carlo simulations, is several times better than that of previous searches. We also provide rough estimates of the distances at which representative supernova and binary black hole merger signals could be detected with 50% efficiency by this analysis. PACS numbers: 04.80.Nn, 95.30.Sf, 95.85.Sz Submitted to Classical and Quantum Gravity

We present the results of a search for short-duration gravitational-wave bursts associated with 39 gamma-ray bursts (GRBs) detected by gamma-ray satellite experiments during LIGO's S2, S3, and S4 science runs. The search involves calculating the crosscorrelation between two interferometer data streams surrounding the GRB trigger time. We search for associated gravitational radiation from single GRBs, and also apply statistical tests to search for a gravitational-wave signature associated with the whole sample. For the sample examined, we find no evidence for the association of gravitational radiation with GRBs, either on a single-GRB basis or on a statistical basis. Simulating gravitational-wave bursts with sine-gaussian waveforms, we set upper limits on the root-sum-square of the gravitational-wave strain amplitude of such waveforms at the times of the GRB triggers. We also demonstrate how a sample of several GRBs can be used collectively to set constraints on population models. The small number of GRBs and the significant change in sensitivity of the detectors over the three runs, however, limits the usefulness of a population study for the S2, S3, and S4 runs. Finally, we discuss prospects for the search sensitivity for the ongoing S5 run, and beyond for the next generation of detectors.

B. Abbott, R. Abbott, R. Adhikari, J. Agresti, P. Ajith, B. Allen, R. Amin, S. B. Anderson, W. G. Anderson, M. Arain, M. Araya, H. Armandula, M. Ashley, S. Aston, P. Aufmuth, C. Aulbert, S. Babak, S. Ballmer, H. Bantilan, B. C. Barish, C. Barker, D. Barker, B. Barr, P. Barriga, M. A. Barton, K. Bayer, K. Belczynski, J. Betzwieser, P. T. Beyersdorf, B. Bhawal, I. A. Bilenko, G. Billingsley, R. Biswas, E. Black, K. Blackburn, L. Blackburn, D. Blair, B. Bland, J. Bogenstahl, L. Bogue, R. Bork, V. Boschi, S. Bose, P. R. Brady, V. B. Braginsky, J. E. Brau, M. Brinkmann, A. Brooks, D. A. Brown, A. Bullington, A. Bunkowski, A. Buonanno, M. Burgamy, O. Burmeister, D. Busby, R. L. Byer, L. Cadonati, G. Cagnoli, J. B. Camp, J. Cannizzo, K. Cannon, C. A. Cantley, J. Cao, L. Cardenas, M. M. Casey, G. Castaldi, C. Cepeda, E. Chalkey, P. Charlton, S. Chatterji, S. Chelkowski, Y. Chen, F. Chiadini, D. Chin, E. Chin, J. Chow, N. Christensen, J. Clark, P. Cochrane, T. Cokelaer, C. N. Colacino, R. Coldwell, R. Conte, D. Cook, T. Corbitt, D. Coward, D. Coyne, J. D. E. Creighton, T. D. Creighton, R. P. Croce, D. R. M. Crooks, A. M. Cruise, A. Cumming, J. Dalrymple, E. D’Ambrosio, K. Danzmann, G. Davies, D. DeBra, J. Degallaix, M. Degree, T. Demma, V. Dergachev, S. Desai, R. DeSalvo, S. Dhurandhar, M. Diaz, J. Dickson, A. Di Credico, G. Diederichs, A. Dietz, E. E. Doomes, R. W. P. Drever, J.-C. Dumas, R. J. Dupuis, J. G. Dwyer, P. Ehrens, E. Espinoza, T. Etzel, M. Evans, T. Evans, S. Fairhurst, Y. Fan, D. Fazi, M. M. Fejer, L. S. Finn, V. Fiumara, N. Fotopoulos, A. Franzen, K. Y. Franzen, A. Freise, R. Frey, T. Fricke, P. Fritschel, V. V. Frolov, M. Fyffe, V. Galdi, J. Garofoli, I. Gholami, J. A. Giaime, S. Giampanis, K. D. Giardina, K. Goda, E. Goetz, L. Goggin, G. Gonzalez, S. Gossler, A. Grant, S. Gras, C. Gray, M. Gray, J. Greenhalgh, A. M. Gretarsson, R. Grosso, H. Grote, S. Grunewald, M. Guenther, R. Gustafson, B. Hage, W. O. Hamilton, D. Hammer, C. Hanna, J. Hanson, J. Harms, G. Harry, E. Harstad, T. Hayler, J. Heefner, I. S. Heng, A. Heptonstall, M. Heurs, M. Hewitson, S. Hild, E. Hirose, D. Hoak, D. Hosken, J. Hough, E. Howell, D. Hoyland, S. H. Huttner, D. Ingram, E. Innerhofer, M. Ito, Y. Itoh, A. Ivanov, D. Jackrel, B. Johnson, W. W. Johnson, D. I. Jones, G. Jones, R. Jones, L. Ju, P. Kalmus, V. Kalogera, D. Kasprzyk, E. Katsavounidis, K. Kawabe, S. Kawamura, F. Kawazoe, W. Kells, D. G. Keppel, F. Ya. Khalili, C. Kim, P. King, J. S. Kissel, S. Klimenko, K. Kokeyama, V. Kondrashov, R. K. Kopparapu, D. Kozak, B. Krishnan, P. Kwee, P. K. Lam, M. Landry, B. Lantz, A. Lazzarini, B. Lee, M. Lei, J. Leiner, V. Leonhardt, I. Leonor, K. Libbrecht, P. Lindquist, N. A. Lockerbie, M. Longo, M. Lormand, M. Lubinski, H. Luck, B. Machenschalk, M. MacInnis, M. Mageswaran, K. Mailand, M. Malec, V. Mandic, S. Marano, S. Marka, J. Markowitz, E. Maros, I. Martin, J. N. Marx, K. Mason, L. Matone, V. Matta, N. Mavalvala, R. McCarthy, B. J. McCaulley, D. E. McClelland, S. C. McGuire, M. McHugh, K. McKenzie, J. W. C. McNabb, S. McWilliams, T. Meier, A. Melissinos, G. Mendell, R. A. Mercer, S. Meshkov, E. Messaritaki, C. J. Messenger, D. Meyers, E. Mikhailov, P. Miller, S. Mitra, V. P. Mitrofanov, G. Mitselmakher, R. Mittleman, O. Miyakawa, S. Mohanty, V. Moody, G. Moreno, K. Mossavi, C. MowLowry, A. Moylan, D. Mudge, G. Mueller, S. Mukherjee, H. Muller-Ebhardt, J. Munch, P. Murray, E. Myers, J. Myers, T. Nash, G. Newton, A. Nishizawa, K. Numata, B. O’Reilly, R. O’Shaughnessy, D. J. Ottaway, H. Overmier, B. J. Owen, H.-J. Paik, Y. Pan, M. A. Papa, V. Parameshwaraiah, P. Patel, M. Pedraza, S. Penn, V. Pierro, I. M. Pinto, M. Pitkin, H. Pletsch, M. V. Plissi, F. Postiglione, R. Prix, V. Quetschke, F. Raab, D. Rabeling, H. Radkins, R. Rahkola, N. Rainer, M. Rakhmanov, M. Ramsuder, K. Rawlins, S. Ray-Majumder, V. Re, H. Rehbein, S. Reid, D. H. Reitze, L. Ribichini, R. Riesen, K. Riles, B. Rivera, N. A. Robertson, C. Robinson, E. L. Robinson, S. Roddy, A. Rodriguez, A. M. Rogan, J. Rollins, J. D. Romano, J. Romie, R. Route, S. Rowan, A. Rudiger, L. Ruet, P. Russell, K. Ryan, S. Sakata, M. Samidi, L. Sancho de la Jordana, V. Sandberg, V. Sannibale, S. Saraf, P. Sarin, B. S. Sathyaprakash, S. Sato, P. R. Saulson, R. Savage, P. Savov, S. Schediwy, R. Schilling, R. Schnabel, R. Schofield, B. F. Schutz, P. Schwinberg, S. M. Scott, A. C. Searle, B. Sears, F. Seifert, D. Sellers, A. S. Sengupta, P. Shawhan, D. H. Shoemaker, A. Sibley, J. A. Sidles, X. Siemens, D. Sigg, S. Sinha, A. M. Sintes, B. J. J. Slagmolen, J. Slutsky, J. R. Smith, M. R. Smith, K. Somiya, K. A. Strain, D. M. Strom, A. Stuver, T. Z. Summerscales, K.-X. Sun, M. Sung, P. J. Sutton, H. Takahashi, D. B. Tanner, M. Tarallo, R. Taylor, R. Taylor, J. Thacker, K. A. Thorne, K. S. Thorne, A. Thuring, K. V. Tokmakov, C. Torres, C. Torrie, G. Traylor, M. Trias, W. Tyler, D. Ugolini, C. Ungarelli, K. Urbanek, H. Vahlbruch, M. Vallisneri, C. Van Den Broeck, M. Varvella, S. Vass, A. Vecchio, J. Veitch, P. Veitch, A. Villar, C. Vorvick, S. P. Vyachanin, S. J. Waldman, L. Wallace, H. Ward, R. Ward, K. Watts, J. Weaver, D. Webber, A. Weber, A. Weidner, M. Weinert, A. Weinstein, R. Weiss, S. Wen, K. Wette, J. T. Whelan, D. M. Whitbeck, S. E. Whitcomb, B. F. Whiting, C. Wilkinson, P. A. Willems, L. Williams, B. Willke, I. Wilmut, W. Winkler, C. C. Wipf, S. Wise, A. G. Wiseman, G. Woan, D. Woods, R. Wooley, J. Worden, W. Wu, I. Yakushin, H. Yamamoto, Z. Yan, S. Yoshida, N. Yunes, M. Zanolin, J. Zhang, L. Zhang, PHYSICAL REVIEW D 77, 069904(E) (2008)

We carry out two searches for periodic gravitational waves using the most sensitive few hours of data from the second LIGO science run. The first search is targeted at isolated, previously unknown neutron stars and covers the entire sky in the frequency band 160-728.8 Hz. The second search targets the accreting neutron star in the low-mass X-ray binary Scorpius X-1, covers the frequency bands 464-484 Hz and 604-624 Hz, and two binary orbit parameters. Both searches look for coincidences between the Livingston and Hanford 4-km interferometers. For isolated neutron stars our 95% confidence upper limits on the gravitational wave strain amplitude range from 6.6E-23 to 1E-21 across the frequency band; For Scorpius X-1 they range from 1.7E-22 to 1.3E-21 across the two 20-Hz frequency bands. The upper limits presented in this paper are the first broad-band wide parameter space upper limits on periodic gravitational waves using coherent search techniques. The methods developed here lay the foundations for upcoming hierarchical searches of more sensitive data which may detect astrophysical signals.