In this study, the pharmacokinetics, tolerability and efficacy of 40 ml of ropivacaine 7.5 mg/ml (300 mg) for axillary brachial plexus block were investigated. With institutional review board approval, 10 patients presenting for surgery of the upper limb were enrolled in this open study. The axillary plexus was identified with a nerve stimulator and the study drug was injected into the neurovascular sheath. Fifteen venous blood samples were obtained from each patient for pharmacokinetic measurements over a 24-h period. All blocks were sufficient for surgery after 45 min without any need for supplemental analgesia or general anesthesia. The mean (SD) peak plasma concentration was 2.3 (0.8) mg/l at median t(max) 54 min (range 16-92 min). The mean (SD) maximum free plasma concentration was calculated to be 0.12 (0.06) mg/l (range 0.07-0.29 mg/l). The t(1/2) was about 6 h. There were no clinical signs or symptoms of central nervous system and/or cardiac toxicity in any patient. Ropivacaine 7.5 mg/ml, used in a dose of 300 mg, was effective and well tolerated for axillary brachial plexus block.

In this prospective meta-analysis, we have evaluated the effect of epidural analgesia with ropivacaine for pain in labour on neonatal outcome and mode of delivery compared with bupivacaine. In six randomized, double-blind studies, 403 labouring women, primigravidae and multiparae, received epidural analgesia with ropivacaine or bupivacaine 2.5 mg ml-1. The drugs were administered as intermittent boluses in four studies and by continuous infusion in two. Apgar scores, neurological and adaptive capacity scores (NACS), degree of motor block and mode of delivery were recorded. The studies were designed prospectively to fit meta-analysis of the pooled results. Results showed similar pain relief and consumption of the two drugs. In the vaginally delivered neonates, NACS scores were approximately equal for both groups at 2 h, but at 24 h there were fewer infants with NACS less than 35 in the ropivacaine compared with the bupivacaine group (2.8% vs 7.6%; P < 0.05). Spontaneous vaginal deliveries occurred more frequently overall with ropivacaine than with bupivacaine (58% vs 49%; P < 0.05) and instrumental deliveries (forceps and vacuum extraction) less frequently (27% vs 40%; P < 0.01), while the frequency of Caesarean section was similar between groups. The intensity of motor block was lower with ropivacaine. There were no significant differences in adverse events.

Ropivacaine is a new type of long-acting local anaesthetic of less systemic toxicity than bupivacaine. The objective of this double-blind study was to compare the efficacy and safety of ropivacaine 0.5% and mepivacaine 1% for infiltration anaesthesia in dermatologic surgery. Sixty out-patients aged 18–65 years, scheduled for excision of a benign naevus on the back, were randomly assigned to infiltration anaesthesia with either ropivacaine or mepivacaine. Both agents had a fast onset, and provided reliable anaesthesia and painfree surgery which could be carried out without the use of vasoconstrictive adjuncts or diathermy. Ropivacaine resulted in a longer duration of analgesia than mepivacaine, and both treatments were well tolerated.