Aims The aim of this paper was to draw attention to the possible rare causes of recurrent rectal bleeding.

Methods A retrospective cross-sectional study, that involved patients undergoing emergency colonoscopy at the Department of Emergency Gastroenterology, Clinical Center of Serbia was performed, for a period of two years. Data were obtained on the basis of medical records. Descriptive statistics methods were used. Continuous variables were presented as mean ± standard deviation. Discontinuous variables were presented as frequencies (percentages).

Aims To evaluate changes in clinico-epidemiologic characteristics of patients who presented with acute upper gastrointestal bleeding (AUGIB) during the last 10 years in Serbia

Iron deficiency anemia (IDA) is the most common type of anemia in the world. The most common cause for men and postmenopausal women is gastrointestinal blood loss. Endoscopy is unavoidable method for detecting the cause of IDA. The aim of this study is to assess of the correlation between the patients characteristics with diagnostic finding of esophagogastroduodenoscopy and colonoscopy.

Background and Aims: Currently, platelet count to spleen diameter ratio (PC/SD ratio) is used to predict the presence of oesophagel varices in patients with decompensated liver cirrhosis. Although this index is validated in numerous trials, when trying to assess the risk from variceal haemorrhage this index is inept and heavy-handed. Thus, we are proposing the modification of this ratio with INR value. With it we can closely and more precisely evaluate the variceal haemorrhage incidence in this category of patients. Methods: We conducted comparative study analysis with two arms of patients based on the INR value. First arm of patients was with the INR value ≤ 2 having 21 patients in total (INR≤2, n=21). Second was with 23 patients who had INR > 2 (INR>2, n=23). All patients in our study were with the PC/SD ratio of less than 909 (PC/SD ratio <909). Results: Our results show that INR value is crucial for determining variceal haemorrhage risk prognosis in patients with decompensated liver cirrhosis. In table 1. and 2. we have shown the incidence of variceal haemorrhage in time and demonstrated that INR value is ‘per se’ an independent factor which can modify the current use of PC/SD ratio into oesophageal varices haemorrhage predictive tool. Conclusion: We have demonstrated that the use of PC/SD ration in combination with INR value can be of predictive value when the risk of oesophageal variceal haemorrhage is concerned. The modification of the PC/SD ratio is made with the INR value and it clearly shows that variceal haemorrhage is closely dependant on time as well as on INR value. With time variceal haemorrhage incidence is more distinctive when comparison is made with the INR modification. We conclude that our risk prognosis and predictive value with the INR modification can be used in clinical settings being non-invasive assessment tool for oesophageal variceal haemorrhage incidence.

Abstract Purpose: Duodenal tumors are rare and require a different management from that of esophagogastric neoplasia. The present study retrospectively analyses the endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) features of duodenal tumors of both epithelial and subepithelial origin. Materials and Methods: During a 12 year period, all duodenal tumors with histologic confirmation by surgery or biopsy were collected including endoscopic and endosonographic images. EUS images were analyzed for specific features (echogenicity, wall layer structure and relation, outer margins) to possibly distinguish epithelial (polyps and carcinoma versus lymphoma) and subepithelial (tumor type) tumors. Results: 53/80 cases had histologic confirmation (mean age 53.1 ± 11.4 years, m:f = 33:20), 31 were epithelial (13 adenomas, 12 carcinomas, 6 lymphomas) and 22 subepithelial (11 GISTs, 7 Brunneromas, 1 lipoma, 3 NETs). EUS did not recognize carcinomas in 2/13 adenomas. EUS features suggesting carcinoma were loss of wall layers and irregular margins. 5/6 lymphomas showed inhomogeneous thickening with layers partially recognizable. Tumor type of subepithelial lesions correlated with echogenicity: GIST tumors were mostly (62.5 %) hypocheoic with the 3 malignant cases being characterized by heterogeneous echopattern with irregular outer margins. Of the hyperechoic lesions, lipomas had a homogeneous whitish appearance, while NET and Brunneromas were less hyperechoic. In the latter, the endoscopic aspect was also helpful for differential diagnosis. Accuracy of combined endoscopic/EUS imaging for all duodenal lesions was 84.9 % (45/53). No procedural complications occurred among all patients that received EUS examinations. Conclusion: EUS contributes to the differential diagnosis of epithelial lesions known to be malignant; in subepithelial tumors, tissue confirmation is still required.

Diagnosis of choledocholithiasis is still difficult to establish and presents a great challenge in gastroenterology and surgery of biliary tract, since it requires expensive and sophisticated examining techniques. 10 to 15% of patients with symptomatic cholelithiasis were presented with choledocholithiasis as well. By EUS is possible to establish a diagnosis of choledocholithiasis with accuracy of 90 to 100% and precisely estimate dimensions of revealed stones. The main purpose of this survey is to present a great importance and many advantages of EUS as a contemporary diagnostic method. All patients were examined by Olympus equipment for endoscopic ultrasound with radial probe working with the frequency of 7,5 and 12 MHz at the Department for Endoscopic Ultrasound of the Clinic for Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Clinical Center of Serbia. They were previously diagnosed with choledocholithiasis by ERCP method. We examined 16 patients, which were selected by estimated risk for cholelithiasis. We have tried to evaluate the importance of diameter of choledochus, defined by common ultrasonography, as well as values of alkaline phosphatase and serum GT. We defined 3 groups of patients: group no.1, with 2 patients presented with a low risk for choledocholithiasis; group no.2, with 6 patients with a moderate risk for choledocholithiasis, and group no.3, with 8 patients presented with significant risk for cholelithiasis. According to obtained results, EUS presents the most effective method for detecting of choledocholithiasis, which is sometimes even more efficient than ERCP. After choledocholithiasis is previously revealed by EUS, it is much easier to decide if some invasive method such as EPT or precut papillotomy has to be used. EUS is always recommended as a diagnostic method when it is necessary to avoid some expected complications, such as pancreatitis.

Even though pancreatic cancer is not such a common diagnosis, its treatment is very expensive and it has a great economic impact to the health system. 5-year survival rates after excessive surgical treatment is only 5%, which imposes more careful selection of patients that have to be surgically treated. According to experience from some medical centers all over the world, EUS is considered as a high sensitive diagnostic method for establishing a diagnosis of pancreatic cancer and evaluation of TNM staging. The main purpose of this survey is to present our experience in using of EUS as a diagnostic method in establishing a diagnosis of pancreatic cancer, as well as to evaluate how reliable this method is in preoperative evaluation if tumor could be successfully resected. We examined the group of 63 patients with pancreatic cancer, which were surgically explored after EUS examination. We wanted to compare TNM status before and after the surgical treatment. All patients were examined by Olympus equipment for endoscopic ultrasound with radial probe working with the frequency of 7,5 and 12 MHz at the Department for Endoscopic Ultrasound of the Clinic for Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Clinical Center of Serbia. Evaluation of pancreatic tumor extension to local organs (pancreas, duodenum, choledochus, stomach, colon and large veins) was performed for all patients. All regional lymph nodes were also explored. Due to low penetration ability of the probe working with the frequency of 7.5 MHz, EUS is not a suitable method for evaluation of M stage (figure 8,9). Patients were divided in different groups, specified by TNM status. For 10 patients resection was estimated as a probably successful solution, but only 8 of them was surgically treated. According to this, our estimation was 79.7% accurate, which is in accordance to results obtained from other medical centers all over the world.

Background: Endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS) is an important tool for diagnosis and pretreatment staging of primary gastric lymphoma. The aim of the study was to evaluate the diagnostic importance of endosonography (EUS)in gastric lymphoma; to assess the depth of tumoral infiltration in low-grade gastric lymphoma of mucosa-associated lymphoid tissue (MALT) and to assess EUS response to medical treatment (Cyclophosphamid/Mabtera and/or anti-Helicobacter pylori therapy). Methods: 26 patients with MALT gastric lymphoma were investigated by EUS. Six of them were evaluated after the eradication of Helicobacter pylori infection and 20 after and during the cyclophosphamide/Mabtera and anti H.pylori treatment. EUS staging was compared with histopathology. Tumors were staged according to the 2000 TNM and modified Ann Arbor classification. Results: Six patients were treated with anti - Helicobacter pylori eradication therapy. Full regression of lymphoma was observed in 2 of 6 (33.3%) patients, which was endoscopicaly and histologicaly proved. EUS correlated with histology in all (6/6). In 20 patients treated with cyclophosphamide/Mabtera therapy, EUS revealed regression of lymphoma in 14 cases. Positive correlation with histology was found in 11 patients (11/14; 78%). The initial EUS showed an increased wall thickness more than 5mm in 24 of 26 patients (92%). The thickening was predominantly of mucosa and submucosa and in 11 patients extended the muscularis propria. After the therapy, the gastric wall thickening returned to normal in 14 patients, however, 3 of them still had positive histology findings. In 2 cases, during the follow-up, the EUS showed remained thickening of gastric wall, whereas biopsies were negative. Six months later histology revealed progressive low-grade MALT lymphoma in this cases. Conclusion: EUS appears to be a sensitive procedure for initial staging and assessment of treatment response and long-term follow up in patients with gastric lymphoma. The importance of EUS lies in ability to detect relapse early, too.

The main purpose of this survey is to present the importance of EUS in establishing a diagnosis of tumor of the choledochus. It is also important to emphasize that EUS is the most suitable diagnostic method for determination of tumor invasion to choledochus, i.e. to determine TN patient status and to predict if tumor could be successfully resected. The author would like to present his own experience in using of EUS as a contemporary method for establishing a diagnosis and effective treatment of patients with tumor of choledochus. All patients were examined by Olympus equipment for endoscopic ultrasound with radial probe working with the frequency of 7,5 and 12 MHz at the Department for Endoscopic Ultrasound of the Clinic for Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Clinical Center of Serbia. All examined patients were subjected to surgical exploration after that. Therefore it was possible to compare preoperative estimation of tumor invasion with a final result obtained by surgical exploration. Five patients were diagnosed with tumor of choledochus localized at the distal part of choledochus. TN status of examined patients was specified by standard criteria. Estimated TN status for two patients was defined as T2N1a and T2N0, which indicate the possibility of excessive surgical treatment, what was confirmed by surgical exploration as well. A small number of patients was not possible to use for statistical evaluation. Our conclusion is that EUS presents the most effective method to estimate a degree of tumor invasion to choledochus, since it provides an accurate definition of TN patient status and predicts if tumor could be successfully resected.

BACKGROUND:Endoscopic ultrasonography(EUS) allows high-resolution demonstration of the entire gut wall. The aim of the study was to clarify the usefulness of the EUS in differential diagnosis of upper gastro-intestinal subepithelail lesions(SEL).METHODS:From September 1998- March 2005, EUS was performed in 1600 patients. Among them, in 206pts (13%), this examination was carried out due to previous upper endoscopy, which revealed the suspicion to SEL or extraluminal compression. We studied the location, the size, echo pattern and originating layer of SEL. The results were compared with CT, angiography and operation with histology when possible. All EUS examinations were performed using Olympus GIF-130 videoecho-endoscope with 7,5/12MHz switchable radial probe.RESULTS:EUS accuracy in separating intramural masses from extraluminal compression was 96%(44/46). Among 160 pts with true SEL, in 95(59.3%), EUS revealed the existence of a stromal tumor arising from muscularis propria (92) or muscularis mucosae (3). The size of the tumor varied from 5-75mm; depth: 8-40mm. 33 patients were operated on. In 14/16(87%), the EUS diagnosis of benign stromal tumor was confirmed on operation. In 18/19(95%), EUS correctly disclosed the malignant tumor. EUS accuracy in predicting malignancy was 91.5%(32/35). Findings suggestive for malignancy were: size 40mm; inhomogenicity with microcysts and irregular outer margin. In 12 pts, EUS revealed lypoma. Abberant pancreas was correctly diagnosed in all 22pts. In 16 persons, EUS disclosed submucosal cysts: 6 of them were operated on and EUS diagnosis was confirmed in all. In 10 patients EUS visualized varices. The finding was confirmed on angiography.CONCLUSION:The EUS appears to be very effective in differential diagnosis of SEL in upper gastro-intestinal tract. Tumour size greater than 40mm, inhomomogenous echo pattern and irregular outer margin are very suggestive for malignancy.

Traditionally, the operation of hernia is considered as a clean operation due to expected, low incidence of infection, on the spot of surgical work (SSI). The incidence of SSI in hernia surgery is more frequent then it is assumed. The important risk factors for SSI are the following: type of hernia (inguinal, incisional), operative approach (open - laparoscopic), usage of the prosthetic material and drainage. Comparing to inguinal hernia repair, incisional hernia repair, is more frequently followed by the infection. The laparoscopic operations are followed with the lower incidence of SSI then in the case of open operation. The usage of the mesh does not increase the incidence of SSI, although the consequences of the mesh infection may be severe. A type I of the prosthesis is more resistant to the infection then prosthesis II and III. The mesh infection (type I) never involves its body but it is present around sutures and bended edges. The mesh infection Type II involves entire prosthesis while in the case of Type III it is present in its peripheral part. In the case of SSI, a prosthesis Type I is possible to be saved, while prosthesis Type II must be removed completely; and the same is for the Type III (the partial removal is rarely suggested). The defect that remained after excision of non-resorptive prosthesis is a long-term and very complicated surgical problem. In regard to the position of the mesh, SSI is more common if the mesh is placed subcutaneously then in the case of sub-aponeurotic peri-muscular, pre-aponeurotic retromuscular or pre-peritoneal mesh placemen. If the infection is present the non-tension techniques using non-resorptive prosthetic implants are not recommended. the presence of drainage and its duration increases the incidence of SSI. It is more common for incisional hernioplasty then for inguinal hernia repair. If there is an indication for drainage it should be as short as possible. The cause of SSI for elective operations are bacteria?s that arrives from the skin, while in the case of opening of various organs dominant bacteria?s originate from them. The superficial infection does not lead to the recurrence, while it is very possible in the case for deep infection. There are no prospective studies that justify the usage of antibiotic prophylaxes in hernia surgery. The antibiotic prophylaxis in hernia surgery. The antibiotic prophylaxis is indicated for the clean operations when placing the implants and when severe complication is expected. The appearance of SSI increases the price of treatment and may lead to the recurrence.

Diagnosis of choledocholithiasis is still difficult to establish and presents a great challenge in gastroenterology and surgery of biliary tract, since it requires expensive and sophisticated examining techniques. 10 to 15% of patients with symptomatic cholelithiasis were presented with choledocholithiasis as well. By EUS is possible to establish a diagnosis of choledocholithiasis with accuracy of 90 to 100% and precisely estimate dimensions of revealed stones. The main purpose of this survey is to present a great importance and many advantages of EUS as a contemporary diagnostic method. All patients were examined by Olympus equipment for endoscopic ultrasound with radial probe working with the frequency of 7,5 and 12 MHz at the Department for Endoscopic Ultrasound of the Clinic for Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Clinical Center of Serbia. They were previously diagnosed with choledocholithiasis by ERCP method. We examined 16 patients, which were selected by estimated risk for cholelithiasis. We have tried to evaluate the importance of diameter of choledochus, defined by common ultrasonography, as well as values of alkaline phosphatase and serum ?GT. We defined 3 groups of patients: group no.1, with 2 patients presented with a low risk for choledocholithiasis; group no.2, with 6 patients with a moderate risk for choledocholithiasis, and group no.3, with 8 patients presented with significant risk for cholelithiasis. According to obtained results, EUS presents the most effective method for detecting of choledocholithiasis, which is sometimes even more efficient than ERCP. After choledocholithiasis is previously revealed by EUS, it is much easier to decide if some invasive method such as EPT or precut papillotomy has to be used. EUS is always recommended as a diagnostic method when it is necessary to avoid some expected complications, such as pancreatitis.

Purpose: It is highly desirable to achieve the most accurate diagnostic information possible with more noninvasive technology. By defining tumor involvement of blood vessels Doppler ultrasonography has been increasingly reported as an effective screening tool for clinical staging and treatment decisions in patients with pancreatic neoplasm.

Traditionally, the operation of hernia is considered as a clean operation due to expected, low incidence of infection, on the spot of surgical work (SSI). The incidence of SSI in hernia surgery is more frequent then it is assumed. The important risk factors for SSI are the following: type of hernia (inguinal, incisional), operative approach (open - laparoscopic), usage of the prosthetic material and drainage. Comparing to inguinal hernia repair, incisional hernia repair, is more frequently followed by the infection. The laparoscopic operations are followed with the lower incidence of SSI then in the case of open operations. The usage of the mesh does not increase the incidence of SSI, although the consequences of the mesh infection may be severe. A type I of the prosthesis is more resistant to the infection then prosthesis II and III. The mesh infection (type I) never involves its body but it is present around sutures and bended edges. The mesh infection Type II involves entire prosthesis while in the case of Type III it is present in its peripheral part. In the case of SSI, a prosthesis Type I is possible to be saved, while prosthesis Type II must be removed completely; and the same is for the Type III (the partial removal is rarely suggested). The defect that remained after excision of non-resorptive prosthesis is a long-term and very complicated surgical problem. In regard to the position of the mesh, SSI is more common if the mesh is placed subcutaneously then in the case of sub-aponeurotic premuscular, pre-aponeurotic retromuscular or pre-peritoneal mesh placemen. If the infection is present the nontension techniques using non-resorptive prosthetic implants are not recommended. The presence of drainage and its duration increases the incidence of SSI. It is more common for incisional hernioplasty then for inguinal hernia repair. If there is an indication for drainage it should be as short as possible. The cause of SSI for elective operations are bacteria's that arrives from the skin, while in the case of opening of various organs dominant bacteria's originate from them. The superficial infection does not lead to the recurrence, while it is very possible in the case for deep infection. There are no prospective studies that justify the usage of antibiotic prophylaxes in hernia surgery. The antibiotic prophylaxis is indicated for the clean operations when placing the implants and when severe complication is expected. The appearance of SSI increases the price of treatment and may lead to the recurrence.

BACKGROUND:Preoperative localization of pancreatic neuroendocrine tumours (NET) is usually very difficult. Noninvasive, imaging tests, such as abdominal ultrasound, CT or MRI are not sensitive enough as well as selective angiography. The aim of the study was to clarify the usefulness of the EUS in preoperative localization of the pancreatic NET.METHODS:From September 1998 March 2005, EUS was performed in 1600 patients. Among them, in 10 (0.7%), this examination was carried out due to previous biochemical tests, which diagnosed the pancreatic NET. We studied the location, the size and echo-pattern of the neoplasm. The results were compared with operation and histology or EUS- FNA guided pancreatic biopsy in 9/10 patients. All EUS examinations were performed using Olympus GIF-130 videoecho-endoscope with 7,5 /12MHz switchable radial probe.RESULTS:EUS correctly localized the pancreatic NET in 7/8 cases, (sensitivity:87.5%). In 2 patients, EUS accurately exclouded pancreatic NET. There were no false positive findings (specificity 100%). Six tumours were benign (75%), and two were malign (25%). We localized 6 insulinomas and single pancreatic carcinoid tumour. The median tumour size detected by EUS was 21mm.CONCLUSION:EUS is highly accurate in preoperative localization of the pancreatic NET-s and We confirmed it in our study. EUS presents the method of choice for preoperative localization of the pancreatic NET.

BACKGROUND:To evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of endosonography (EUS) in preoperative staging of stomach cancer.METHODS:Sixty-two patients with gastric carcinoma were investigated by endosonography. 49 underwent surgery. EUS reports were compared with operative and histology findings. Tumours were staged according to the 2000. TNM classification.RESULTS:EUS had a diagnostic accuracy of 89.8% for the T category, 83.7% for the N category.CONCLUSION:EUS is an excellent clinical procedure for the staging of local-regional spread of gastric cancer and useful complement to the other gastrointestinal examinations for evaluation of these tumours.

Background: Preoperative localization of pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (NET) is usually very difficult. Noninvasive, imaging tests, such as abdominal ultrasound, CT or MRI are not sensitive enough as well as selective angiography. The aim of the study was to clarify the usefulness of the EUS in preoperative localization of the pancreatic NET. Methods: From September 1998 - March 2005, EUS was performed in 1600 patients. Among them, in 10 (0,7%), this examination was carried out due to previous biochemical tests, which diagnosed the pancreatic NET. We studied the location, the size and echo-pattern of the neoplasm. The results were compared with operation and histology or EUS- FNA guided pancreatic biopsy in 9/10 patients. All EUS examinations were performed using Olympus GIF-130 videoecho-endoscope with 7,5 /12MHz switch able radial probe. Results: EUS correctly localized the pancreatic NET in 7/8 cases, (sensitivity:87,5%). In 2 patients, EUS accurately excluded pancreatic NET. There were no false positive findings (specificity 100%). Six tumors were benign (75%), and two were malign (25%). We localized 6 insulinomas and single pancreatic carcinoid tumor. The median tumor size detected by EUS was 21mm. Conclusion: EUS is highly accurate in preoperative localization of the pancreatic NET-s and We confirmed it in our study. EUS presents the method of choice for preoperative localization of the pancreatic NET.