AbstractObjectiveThis study aimed to compare the cost per use of video-rhinolaryngoscopy using reusable and disposable devices in a tertiary referral centre.MethodsA cost-comparison study was performed that utilised retrospective cost data and prospective utilisation data to compare the total costs of using reusable video-rhinolaryngoscopes versus a single-use alternative.ResultsIt was estimated that 4776 and 1821 procedures were performed annually with reusable and disposable video-rhinolaryngoscopes, respectively. The cost per use was £66.61 for reusable devices versus £150.00 for disposable devices. The break-even point (i.e. when cost per use was equal, occurred at 1374 procedures per year). Thereafter, it was cheaper to use reusable devices.ConclusionDisposable rhinolaryngoscopes may present a cheaper solution to services with low rates of rhinolaryngoscope utilisation. However, for larger services considering replacement of their reusable rhinolaryngoscopes with disposable units, it is likely that the recurring costs will be prohibitive in the medium to long term.

ObjectiveTo compare psychosocial outcomes (follow-up related worries and satisfaction with follow-up related information and support) over 30 months of two alternative management policies for women with low-grade abnormal cervical cytology.MethodsWomen aged 20-59 years with low-grade cytological abnormalities detected in the National Health Service Cervical Screening Programme were randomised to cytological surveillance or initial colposcopy. A total of 3399 women who completed psychosocial questionnaires at recruitment were invited to complete questionnaires at 12, 18, 24 and 30 months. Linear mixed models were used to investigate differences between arms in the two psychosocial outcomes. Each outcome had a maximum score of 100, and higher scores represented higher psychosocial morbidity.ResultsOn average, over 30 months, women randomised to colposcopy scored 2.5 points (95%CI -3.6 to -1.3) lower for follow-up related worries than women randomised to cytological surveillance. Women in the colposcopy arm also scored significantly lower for follow-up related satisfaction with information and support (-2.4; -3.3 to -1.4) over 30 months. For both outcomes, the average difference between arms was greatest at 12th- and 18th-month time points. These differences remained when the analysis was stratified by post-school education.ConclusionsWomen with low-grade cytology, irrespective of their management, have substantial initial psychosocial morbidity that reduces over time. Implementation of newer screening strategies, which include surveillance, such as primary HPV screening, need to consider the information and support provided to women. (c) 2016 The Authors. Psycho-Oncology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

L. Sharp, S. Cotton, A. Thornton, N. Gray, D. Whynes, L. Smart, N. Waugh, I. Duncan, M. Cruickshank and J. Little, on behalf of the TOMBOLA GroupWhich women default from follow‐up cervical cytology tests? A cohort study within the TOMBOLA trialObjective: To identify factors associated with default from follow‐up cervical cytology tests.Methods: A cohort study was conducted involving 2166 women, aged 20–59, with recent low‐grade cervical cytology taken within the NHS Cervical Screening Programmes in Scotland and England, and managed by 6‐monthly cytology in primary care. For the first (6‐month) and second (12‐month) surveillance cytology tests separately, women were categorized as ‘on‐time attendees’ (attended ≤6 months of test being due), ‘late attendees’ (attended greater than 6 months after test was due) or ‘non‐attendees’ (failed to attend). Multivariate odds ratios (ORs) were computed for factors associated with late and non‐attendance.Results: For the first surveillance test, risk of non‐attendance was significantly higher in younger women, those without post‐secondary education, and non‐users of prescribed contraception. Factors significantly associated with late attendance for the first test were the same as for non‐attendance, plus current smoking and having children. The most important predictor of non‐attendance for the second surveillance test was late attendance for the first test (OR = 9.65; 95% CI, 6.60–16.62). Non‐attendance for the second test was also significantly higher among women who were younger, smokers and had negative cytology on the first surveillance test. Late attendance for the second surveillance test was higher in women who were younger, smokers, had children and attended late for the first test.Conclusions: Women at highest risk of default from follow‐up cytology tend to be young, smoke, lack post‐secondary education, and have defaulted from a previous surveillance appointment. Tackling default will require development of targeted strategies to encourage attendance and research to better understand the reasons underpinning default.

Background: The debate continues regarding the best management for women with low-grade abnormal cervical cytology attending colposcopy. We compared psychosocial outcomes of alternative management policies in these women. Methods: In all, 989 women, aged 20–59 years, with low-grade abnormal cytology, were randomised to immediate large loop excision (LLETZ) or two to four targeted punch biopsies taken immediately with recall for LLETZ if these showed cervical intra-epithelial neoplasia 2/3. At 6 weeks after the last procedure, women completed the hospital anxiety and depression scale (HADS) and the impact of event scale (IES). At 12, 18, 24 and 30 months post recruitment, women completed the HADS and process outcome specific measure (POSM). Prevalence of significant depression (⩾8), significant anxiety (⩾11) and distress (⩾9) and median POSM scores were compared between arms. Multivariate odds ratios (ORs) for immediate LLETZ vs biopsy and recall were computed. Results: Over the entire follow-up, there was no significant difference between arms in cumulative prevalence or risk of significant depression (OR=0.78, 95% CI 0.52–1.17) or significant anxiety (OR=0.83, 95% CI 0.57–1.19). At 6 weeks post procedure, distress did not differ significantly between arms. At later time points, 8–11% had significant depression and 14–16% had significant anxiety but with no differences between arms. The POSM scores did not differ between the arms. Conclusions: There is no difference in long- or short-term psychosocial outcomes of immediate LLETZ and punch biopsies with selective recall.

Receipt of an abnormal cervical smear result often generates fear and confusion and can have a negative impact on a woman's well-being. Most previous studies have focussed on high-grade abnormal smears. This study describes the psychological and psychosocial effects, on women, of having received a low-grade abnormal smear result. Over 3500 women recruited to TOMBOLA (Trial Of Management of Borderline and Other Low-grade Abnormal smears) participated in this study. Anxiety was assessed using the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) at recruitment. Socio-demographic and lifestyle factors, locus of control and factors associated with the psychosocial impact of the abnormal smear result were also assessed. Women reported anxiety levels consistent with those found in previous studies of women with high-grade smear results. Women at highest risk of anxiety were younger, had children, were current smokers, or had the highest levels of physical activity. Interventions that focus particularly on women's understanding of smear results and pre-cancer, and/or directly address their fears about cancer, treatment and fertility might provide the greatest opportunity to reduce the adverse psychosocial impact of receiving a low-grade abnormal cervical smear result.

This paper describes the process of developing and testing a new questionnaire, Process Outcome Specific Measure (POSM), including an assessment of its content validity and reliability. The questionnaire was developed within the context of Trial Of Management of Borderline and Other Low-grade Abnormal smears (TOMBOLA) to assess the psychosocial impact of a low-grade abnormal cervical smear result and the subsequent management. A literature search, focus groups and thorough pre-testing involving experts and patients resulted in a short (15-item), easily completed and understood questionnaire. Questions address issues including cancer, health, fertility and sexual concerns. Repeatability was assessed in 110 TOMBOLA recruits using weighted κ; all but one of the questions showed levels of reliability near to, or above, 0.5. Cronbach’s standardised α was 0.73, indicating acceptable internal consistency. Each POSM item was correlated with the anxiety and depression sub-scales of the Hospital Anxiety Depression Scale (HADS). All except one of the questions correlated more highly with the total POSM score than with the HADS sub-scales thus indicating discriminant validity. The POSM will enable comparison of the alternative management policies for low-grade cervical smears in terms of the benefits (or otherwise) perceived by the women managed by these policies.

As a part of the evaluation of Nottingham's response to the Changing Childbirth initiative, a cohort of pregnant women were asked to complete diaries, recording their perceptions of events and their feelings over the entire pregnancy period. Before the study began, we were concerned that the diary completion rate could be low and that those completing would be unrepresentative of the population. in this paper, we report the nature of responses to the diary and show that these problems were far less serious than was initially expected. A high degree of coverage was achieved, implying that large numbers of women were sufficiently motivated to maintain detailed records over many months. The research suggests that the diary is a viable method of data capture in such circumstances.

OBJECTIVESTo identify socio-demographic, economic, medical and attitudinal factors that explain subjects' choice of test for screening for colorectal cancer (biennial faecal occult blood test versus once-only flexible sigmoidoscopy).METHODSData obtained from a questionnaire, administered by general practitioners and returned by approximately 2700 asymptomatic subjects. Thereafter, logistic regression modelling to explain willingness to participate in screening, whether or not a test preference is expressed, and the nature of the preference.RESULTSAn interest in undertaking screening is more probable if the subject is white, older, married and possesses a high health motivation. An intention to participate is more probable if the subjects are particularly worried about the disease, feel themselves to be particularly susceptible to it, and have already had experience of screening for colorectal and (if female) other cancers. Persons in receipt of a household income below 10,000 Pounds are less likely to express an interest in screening. Women are more likely to express a test preference and this preference is more likely to be for the faecal occult blood test. Subjects' worries and perception of risk are associated with reported experiences of cancer, stomach problems and depression. A positive attitude towards screening is positively associated with frequency of dental visits.CONCLUSIONSSocio-demographic, economic and other factors evidently influence subjects' preferences for particular screening tests and, by implication, the likelihood of compliance with any future screening offer. The models support the view that participation in colorectal cancer screening has as much to do with a positive attitude towards health and health promotion generally as with any specific concern about the disease.

BACKGROUND The aim of the study was to discover whether the use of community pharmacy, rather than general practice, as the first port of call for suspected head lice infestation would represent an acceptable, effective and cost-reducing means of management in the community. METHODS A before-and-after study was carried out of a new system of care delivery. Between September and November 1997, pharmacists in Nottingham City West recorded details of all patients attending with prescriptions for head lice treatment or those purchasing over-the-counter medication. The new system of care delivery began in January 1998, during which, pharmacists were providing advice and treatment for head lice, in the absence of a referral from general practice. Changes in prescribing behaviour were assessed from Prescribing Analysis and Cost (PACT) data. Acceptability and subjective assessment of the scheme (patients and professionals) was gauged from questionnaires. RESULTS Referral patterns were altered drastically (away from general practice and towards self-referral) by the project, and the changes were apparent within the first month. This trend continued throughout and beyond the formal evaluation period. Cost analysis suggests that the community pharmacy scheme generates resource savings, largely driven by the lower cost of a pharmacy consultation, as opposed to a GP consultation. Questionnaire evidence suggests that both patients and health care professionals viewed the new arrangement as at least as acceptable as the old. CONCLUSION With respect to the original objective, the new delivery system appears to provide no evidence of ineffectiveness; evidence of acceptability on the part of the majority of patients and professionals; and evidence of improved cost-effectiveness.

There is an increasing need to evaluate the costs and benefits of an occupational health service (OHS). However, measuring benefits from an OHS is inherently difficult. Instead, an economic model can be constructed to present the minimum threshold benefits required for OHSs to be cost-effective, given what is known about costs. This model assumes that the benefits of an OHS are to maximize health and morale of employees; maximize performance and increase productivity; minimize medico-legal costs; enhance workplace safety; and reduce sickness absence. A certain distribution across these benefits can be assumed for each OHS. The overall required value of all benefits brought about by use of an OHS is in the range 158-199 Pounds per year. The plausibility of results can be assessed using known data and judgement. Despite many uncertainties it is likely that the minimum benefit thresholds will be achieved overall.

OBJECTIVE:To identify how some general practices have low growth in prescribing costs relative to other practices. DESIGN:Observational study. SETTING:Trent region of England. PARTICIPANTS:162 general practices: 54 with low growth in prescribing costs, 54 with average increases in costs, and 54 with large increases in costs. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES:Changes in prescribing costs in therapeutic categories in which it has been suggested that savings can be made. RESULTS:There were significant differences between the three groups of practices in terms of their changes in prescribing costs for almost all the variables studied. For the group of practices with lowest growth in costs the most important factors were reducing numbers of prescription items and costs per item; relatively low growth in the costs of "new and expensive" drugs; increasing generic prescribing; and reducing costs for modified release products. This group of practices did not increase costs as much as the others for lipid lowering drugs (P=0.012) and hormone replacement therapy (P=0. 007). The practices with the greatest increases in costs had particularly large increases for proton pump inhibitors, selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors, and modified release products. Compared with the other groups these practices had larger increases in costs for "expensive hospital initiated drugs" (P=0.009). CONCLUSION:General practices vary in their growth in prescribing costs in many ways, with growth in costs for "new and expensive" drugs being particularly important.

Objectives: To examine the variation in prescribing costs explained by the Age, Sex and Temporary Resident Originated Prescribing Unit (ASTRO-PU) and its replacement, the ASTRO (97)-PU, in order to determine the appropriateness of their use in the setting of prescribing budgets in English general practice.Methods: Linear regression analysis was used to analyse routinely collected patient and prescribing data from one English health authority (Lincolnshire Health) for the fiscal year 1995.Results: The goodness-of-fit of the regression models constructed varied according to whether practices had dispensing status (i.e. rural practices that have permission to dispense drugs to their own patients as a means of compensating for the lack of pharmacies in such areas), with the ASTRO-PU and ASTROP(97)-PU explaining a higher proportion of the variation in prescribing costs amongst practices with such status.Conclusions: This paper draws two main conclusions. First, the weights embodied in the ASTRO-PU and the ASTRO(97)-PU may have been biased by the number of dispensing practices sampled during their construction. Second, the denominators may be more applicable to dispensing practices, implying that primary care groups may need to follow the principle of 'local flexibility' during the budget-setting process.

If fundholding is to be dismantled, consideration must be given to fundholders' prescribing budgets. One possibility would be budgeting by consent--involving GPs in setting budgets. More research is needed on prescribing budgets before they are abandoned.

OBJECTIVES:The managerial requirements of budget-setting and performance monitoring in general practice (primary care) in the UK require an understanding of the causal relationship between practice activities and the characteristics of both the practice and its patients. This study sought to model the determinants of three major components of general practice activities (consultations, prescribing costs and referrals to secondary care), paying particular attention to the influence of the demographic structure of the patient list.METHODS:Stepwise regression analysis was carried out on data for 98 practices in the county of Lincolnshire using 12 independent variables pertaining to patient and practice characteristics plus 14 statistical measures derived from the demographic structure of the patients registered with the practice.RESULTS:Robust statistical models were estimated for the three dependent variables, of which list size emerged as the most significant independent variable. In addition, six other independent variables, including the patients' unemployment rate, fundholding status and single-handed status, were statistically significant in one or more of the equations. Variables based on the demographic structure of the practice population also appeared in each model. The Jarman score and degree of urbanization did not achieve statistical significance.CONCLUSIONS:Activity and workload in general practice can be predicted from routine data. Such models are of particular value for planning and financial management when demographic change in practice populations is anticipated.