Background Post hepatectomy liver failure (PHLF) remains a significant risk in patients undergoing curative liver resection for cancer, however currently available PHLF risk prediction investigations are not sufficiently accurate. The Hepatectomy risk assessment with functional magnetic resonance imaging trial (HEPARIM) aims to establish if quantitative MRI biomarkers of liver function & perfusion can be used to more accurately predict PHLF risk and FLR function, measured against indocyanine green (ICG) liver function test. Methods HEPARIM is an observational cohort study recruiting patients undergoing liver resection of 2 segments or more, prior to surgery patients will have both Dynamic Gadoxetate-enhanced (DGE) liver MRI and ICG testing. Day one post op ICG testing is repeated and R15 compared to the Gadoxetate Clearance (GC) of the future liver remnant (FLR-GC) as measure by preoperative DGE- MRI which is the primary outcome, and preoperative ICG R15 compared to GC of whole liver (WL-GC) as a secondary outcome. Data will be collected from medical records, biochemistry, pathology and radiology reports and used in a multi-variate analysis to the value of functional MRI and derive multivariant prediction models for future validation. Discussion If successful, this test will potentially provide an efficient means to quantitatively assess FLR function and PHLF risk enabling surgeons to push boundaries of liver surgery further while maintaining safe practice and thereby offering chance of cure to patients who would previously been deemed inoperable. MRI has the added benefit of already being part of the routine diagnostic pathway and as such would have limited additional burden on patients time or cost to health care systems. ( Hepatectomy Risk Assessment With Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging - Full Text View - ClinicalTrials.gov , n.d.) Trial registration ClinicalTrials.gov, ClinicalTrials.gov NCT04705194 - Registered 12th January 2021 – Retrospectively registered

The resulting large workload requires automated contour propagation from planning CT (pCT) to the rCTs.Consequently, decisions to re-plan are directly based on the propagated contours.Therefore, we investigated whether deformable propagated organs at risk (OARs) contours of head and neck cancer patients can be used for clinical treatment plan evaluation on rCTs.

Objective: Chemotherapy commonly causes liver injury through sinusoidal obstructive syndrome and steatosis. Chemotherapy-induced liver injury may make it more difficult to detect metastases secondary to reduced contrast between the injured liver and metastases. The aim of this study was to determine the sensitivity of superparamagnetic iron oxide (SPIO) contrast-enhanced imaging in patients who have undergone chemotherapy prior to liver surgery.Methods: Local ethics committee approval was obtained. Thirty-one patients with hepatic metastases completing preoperative chemotherapy were prospectively recruited. Images were reviewed independently by two blinded observers who identified and localized lesions with a four-point confidence scale. The alternative free-response receiver operator characteristic method was used to analyze the results.Results: The sensitivity in detecting colorectal metastases following chemotherapy was 78% and 76%, respectively, for observers 1 and 2 (95% confidence interval: 71%-85% and 68%-82%). The areas under the alternative free-response receiver operator curves were 0.73 and 0.80 for observers 1 and 2, respectively.Conclusion: Compared to previously published work on chemotherapy-naive patients, it is clear that the sensitivity of SPIO-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in detecting colorectal metastases following chemotherapy is reduced. It is therefore critical that all imaging - pre-, during and postchemotherapy - is reviewed when reporting liver MRI prior to surgery. (C) 2012 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

PURPOSE:To assess the predictive value of superparamagnetic iron oxide (SPIO) -enhanced T2-weighted gradient echo (GRE) imaging to determine the presence and severity of sinusoidal obstructive syndrome (SOS).PATIENTS AND METHODS:Sixty hepatic resection patients with colorectal metastases treated with chemotherapy underwent unenhanced magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) followed by T2-weighted GRE sequences obtained after SPIO. The images were reviewed in consensus by two experienced observers who determined the presence and severity of linear and reticular hyperintensities, indicating SOS-type liver injury, using a 4-point ordinal scale. Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV) with 95% CIs for the detection of SOS were calculated.RESULTS:Twenty-four of 60 patients had moderate to severe SOS on MRI. MRI achieved a sensitivity of 87% (95% CI, 66% to 97%), specificity of 89% (95% CI, 75% to 97%), PPV of 83% (95% CI, 63% to 95%), and NPV of 92% (95% CI, 77% to 98%). SOS was never found at surgery or histology in patients whose background liver parenchyma was normal on SPIO-enhanced MRI.CONCLUSION:SOS is present in a significant proportion of patients with treated colorectal metastases and is effectively detected on SPIO-enhanced T2-weighted GRE images.

PURPOSE:To prospectively compare accuracy of dynamic contrast material-enhanced thin-section multi-detector row helical computed tomography (CT), high-spatial-resolution three-dimensional (3D) dynamic gadolinium-enhanced magnetic resonance (MR) imaging, and superparamagnetic iron oxide (SPIO)-enhanced MR imaging with optimized gradient-echo (GRE) sequence for depiction of hepatic lesions; surgery and histologic analysis were the reference standard.MATERIALS AND METHODS:Local ethics committee approval was granted, and written informed consent was obtained. Fifty-eight patients (45 men, 13 women; age range, 47-82 years) with hepatic metastases were imaged with multi-detector row CT (3.2-mm section thickness), 3D dynamic gadolinium-enhanced MR imaging (2.5-mm effective section thickness), and SPIO-enhanced MR by using an optimized T2-weighted GRE sequence. Images were reviewed independently by two blinded observers who identified and localized lesions with a four-point confidence scale. Accuracy of each technique was measured with alternative free-response receiver operating characteristic analysis. Results were correlated with findings at surgery with intraoperative ultrasonography or histopathologic examination. Statistical differences among techniques for each observer were measured.RESULTS:Accuracy values for each observer for all metastases (n = 215) and 1.0-cm or smaller metastases (n = 80), respectively, follow: For CT, those for reader 1 were 0.82 and 0.65; for reader 2, 0.81 and 0.68. For gadolinium-enhanced MR imaging, those for reader 1 were 0.92 and 0.79; for reader 2, 0.90 and 0.76. For SPIO-enhanced MR imaging, those for reader 1 were 0.92 and 0.83; for reader 2, 0.92 and 0.81. For all metastases for both observers, there was no significant difference between MR techniques, but both were significantly more accurate than CT (P < .01). For metastases 1.0 cm or smaller and one observer, there was no significant difference between MR techniques, but both were more accurate than CT (P < .01); for the other observer, SPIO-enhanced MR imaging was more accurate than gadolinium-enhanced MR imaging (P < .05) and CT (P < .02), but there was no significant difference between gadolinium-enhanced MR imaging and CT (P = .2).CONCLUSION:Accuracy for gadolinium-enhanced MR imaging and SPIO-enhanced MR imaging was similar. Both techniques were significantly more accurate than CT.

The aim of this study was to establish whether enhancement of the liver by the MRI contrast agent ferumoxides could be effectively achieved at a reduced dose of 7.5 micromol/kg in patients with advanced liver cirrhosis. Forty-two liver transplant candidates with end-stage cirrhosis underwent SPIO-enhanced MRI at 1.5T, using either 15 micromol/kg or 7.5 micromol/kg ferumoxides. The lower dose of ferumoxides was also used in 21 non-cirrhotic patients with colorectal liver metastases who acted as a control group. The percentage signal intensity loss (PSIL) after SPIO was measured in all patients, and in those patients with tumors the post-SPIO contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) was measured. The median PSIL after SPIO in the high dose cirrhotic (HDLC), low dose non-cirrhotic (LDNC) and low dose cirrhotic (LDLC) patients was 86.3%, 74.6%, and 64.2% respectively. These differences were significant using the Mann-Whitney U test. Tumors were found in 8 patients in the high dose cirrhotic group, 9 in the low dose cirrhotic group, and all 21 of the control group. No significant differences were found between the CNR values after SPIO in the 3 groups (median values HDLC 15.1, LDNC 23.7, LDLC 19.5). In patients with late-stage cirrhosis the PSIL after SPIO was significantly less at 7.5 micromol/kg than at 15 micromol/kg, but both doses produced a substantial loss of signal. Lesion to liver CNR was not adversely affected by using the lower dose, so when imaging at 1.5T the authors would recommend using 7.5 micromol/kg in patients with liver cirrhosis.