While robotic and laparoscopic surgeries are both minimally invasive in nature, they are intrinsically different approaches and it is critical to understand outcome differences between the two. Studies evaluating pain outcomes and opioid requirement differences between the robotic and laparoscopic colorectal resections are conflicting and often underpowered. In this retrospective, cohort study, we compare postoperative opioid requirements, reported as morphine milligram equivalents (MME), postoperative average and highest pain scores across postoperative days (POD) 0–5, and return to work in patients who underwent robotic versus laparoscopic colorectal resections. The sample size was selected based on power calculations. Daily pain scores and MME were used as outcomes in linear mixed effect models with unstructured covariance between time points. Propensity score weighting was used to adjust for imbalances. Patients in the robotic group required significantly less opioids as measured by MME on all postoperative days (p = 0.004), as well as lower average and highest daily pain scores for POD 0–5 (p = 0.02, and p = 0.006, respectively). In a linear mixed-effects model, robotic resections were associated with a decrease in average pain scores by 0.36 over time (p = 0.03) and 35 fewer MME requirements than the laparoscopic group (p = 0.0004). Patients in the robotic arm had earlier return to work (2.1 vs 3.8 days, p = 0.036). The robotic approach to colorectal resections is associated with significantly less postoperative pain, decreased opioid requirements, and earlier return to work when compared to laparoscopy, suggesting that the robotic platform provides important clinical advantages over the laparoscopic approach.

Background. Frailty, a multidimensional state leading to reduced physiologic reserve, is associated with worse postoperative outcomes. Despite the availability of various frailty tools, surgeons often make subjective assessments of patients' ability to tolerate surgery. The Risk Analysis Index (RAI) is a validated preoperative frailty assessment tool that has not been studied in cancer patients with plans for curative-intent surgery. Methods. In this prospective, surgeon-blinded study, patients who had abdominal malignancy with plans for resection underwent preoperative frailty assessment with the RAI and nutrition assessment by measurement of albumin, prealbumin, and C-reactive protein (CRP). Postoperative outcomes and survival were assessed. Results. The study included 220 patients, 158 (72%) of whom were considered frail (RAI >= 21). Frail patients were more likely to be readmitted within 30 and 90 days, (16% vs. 3% [P = 0.006] and 16% vs. 5% [P = 0.025], respectively). Patients with abnormal CRP, prealbumin, and albumin experienced higher rates of unplanned intensive care unit admission (CRP [27% vs. 8%; P < 0.001], albumin [30% vs. 10%; P < 0.001], prealbumin [29% vs. 9%; P < 0.001]) and increased postoperative mortality at 90 and 180 days. Survival was similar for frail and non-frail patients. In the multivariate analysis, frailty remained an independent risk factor for readmission (hazard ratio, 5.58; 95% confidence interval, 1.39-22.15; P = 0.015). In the post hoc analysis using the pre-cancer RAI score, the postoperative outcomes did not differ between the frail and non-frail patients. Conclusion. In conjunction with preoperative markers of nutrition, the RAI may be used to identify patients who may benefit from additional preoperative risk stratification and increased postoperative follow-up evaluation.

Background Neoadjuvant therapy (NAT) is increasingly utilized in the treatment of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC). However, there are limited data on risk factors and patterns of recurrence after surgical resection. This study aimed to analyze timing and recurrence patterns of PDAC after NAT followed by curative resection. Methods The medical charts of patients with PDAC treated with NAT followed by curative-intent surgical resection at a single health system from January 1, 2012 to January 1, 2020 were retrospectively reviewed. Early recurrence was defined as recurrence within 12 months of surgical resection. Results 91 patients were included and median follow up was 20.1 months. Recurrence occurred in 50 (55%) patients, with median recurrence free survival (RFS) of 11.9 months. Overall, 18 (36%) patients had local and 32 (64%) had distant recurrences. Median RFS and overall survival (OS) between local and distant recurrence were similar. Perineural invasion (PNI) and the presence of a T2 + tumor was significantly higher in recurrence group than in no recurrence group. PNI was a significant risk factor for early recurrence. Conclusion After NAT and surgical resection of PDAC, disease recurrence was common, with distant metastasis being the most common. PNI was significantly higher in the recurrence group.

Introduction: Many patients undergoing cytoreductive surgery with hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (CRS-HIPEC) for appendiceal adenocarcinoma peritoneal metastases (APM) undergo preoperative systemic chemotherapy. The primary aim of this study is to evaluate differences in oncologic outcomes among two popular chemotherapy approaches in patients with APM undergoing CRS-HIPEC.Methods: We performed a multicenter retrospective review of patients who underwent CRSHIPEC for APM due to high or intermediate grade disease between 2013 and 2019. Patients in the total neoadjuvant therapy group (TNT) received 12 cycles of preoperative chemotherapy. Patients in the "sandwich" chemotherapy group (SAND) received six cycles of preoperative chemotherapy with a maximum of six cycles of postoperative chemotherapy. The primary outcomes were overall survival (OS) and recurrence-free survival (RFS) defined as months from date of first treatment or surgery, respectively.Results: A total of 39 patients were included in this analysis, with 25 (64%) patients in the TNT group and 14 (36%) patients in the SAND group. Patients in the TNT group had a median OS of 62 mo, while median OS in the SAND group was 45 mo (P = 0.01). In addition, patients in the TNT group had significantly longer RFS compared to the SAND group (35 versus 12 mo, P = 0.03). In a multivariable analysis, TNT approach was independently associated with improved OS and RFS.Conclusions: In this multicenter retrospective analysis, a TNT approach was associated with improved overall and recurrence-free survival compared to a sandwiched chemotherapy approach in patients undergoing CRS-HIPEC for high or intermediate grade APM.(c) 2022 Published by Elsevier Inc.

Background The primary aim of this study is to evaluate the oncologic outcomes of two popular systemic chemotherapy approaches in patients with colorectal peritoneal metastases (CPM) undergoing cytoreductive surgery with hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (CRS-HIPEC). Methods We performed a dual-center retrospective review of consecutive patients who underwent CRS-HIPEC for CPM due to high or intermediate-grade colorectal cancer. Patients in the total neoadjuvant therapy (TNT) group received 6 months of preoperative chemotherapy. Patients in the "sandwich" (SAND) chemotherapy group received 3 months of preoperative chemotherapy with a maximum of 3 months of postoperative chemotherapy. Results A total of 34 (43%) patients were included in the TNT group and 45 (57%) patients in the SAND group. The median overall survival (OS) in the TNT and SAND groups were 77 and 61 months, respectively (p = 0.8). Patients in the TNT group had significantly longer recurrence-free survival (RFS) than the SAND group (29 vs. 12 months, p = 0.02). In a multivariable analysis, the TNT approach was independently associated with improved RFS. Conclusion In this retrospective study, a TNT approach was associated with improved RFS, but not OS when compared with a SAND approach. Further prospective studies are needed to examine these systemic chemotherapeutic approaches in patients with CPM undergoing CRS-HIPEC.

810 Background: Frailty is associated with increased postoperative complications. Despite multiple evidence-based modalities to assess frailty, surgeons often make subjective assessments of patients’ ability to tolerate surgery. Identification of those at risk of poor outcomes is particularly important in Surgical Oncology, as major resections may worsen debility and functional status, limiting the patients' ability to receive further therapy. The Risk Analysis Index (RAI-C) is a validated tool to assess frailty in surgical patients. It assigns points for any cancer diagnosis, potentially overestimating frailty in Surgical Oncology patients, and has not been validated in this subgroup. Methods: We performed a prospective, surgeon-blinded study to correlate results of a preoperatively administered frailty survey to predict short- and long-term outcomes in patients with histologically proven malignancy who underwent surgery. The RAI-C, Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ9), and General Anxiety Disorder (GAD) surveys were administered to assess for frailty, depression, and anxiety, respectively; C-reactive protein (CRP), pre-albumin, albumin, and hematocrit were obtained. Outcomes, including readmission, major complications, ICU admission, disposition (home vs rehabilitation/nursing facility), and 1-year survival were compared between the different groups as defined by survey and lab results. Results: One hundred ninety-one patients were included, of which 135 patients were considered frail based on the predefined value (RAI-C ≥21). Frail patients were more likely to be readmitted within 30 days (14% vs 2%, P=0.01). No difference was found in length of stay, 90-day readmission, ICU admission, major complications, or disposition. Only 15.8% of patients met criteria for anxiety and 11% met criteria for depression. Measured outcomes were similar in patients defined as anxious or depressed. Patients with abnormal pre-albumin levels were more likely to require ICU admissions (31% vs 8%, P <0.005), postoperative intubation (12% vs 0.02%, P=0.02), and to be discharged to a facility other than home (19% vs 10%, P=0.01). Similar trends were noted for patients with abnormal albumin levels who also had longer lengths of stay (mean 9.32 vs 7.88 days, P=0.007). There was an association of improved 1-year survival in patients with normal CRP, pre-albumin, albumin, and hematocrit levels. Frailty as determined by RAI-C survey was not associated with decreased 1-year survival. Conclusions: The RAI-C is a validated tool that can be used for prescreening of Surgical Oncology patients at risk of postoperative readmission, however the score did not correlate with other important outcomes including major morbidity, discharge disposition, and 1-year survival. Results from the survey, as well as preoperative laboratory results can be used in screening patients who may benefit from preoperative optimization and increased follow-up.

Guidelines recommend hepatitis B (HBV) testing in individuals from endemic areas, and if positive, screening for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). While screening programs are well established in the Asian immigrant population in New York City (NYC), less is known about the characteristics of HBV/HCC among the African immigrant community. A retrospective review was performed of HCC cases from 2005 to 2018 at our institution. Country of origin was not documented in the electronic medical record; therefore, African immigrant status was approximated using self-identified race/ethnicity, positive HBV status, and an online registry to determine country of origin based on last name. Surnames with the greatest prevalence or density in an African country were considered. Among 4400 patients with HCC, 472 identified as non-Hispanic Black; of these, 86 were HBV+. Based on surname, it was estimated that 33 individuals were likely immigrants from Africa. In this group, median age of HCC diagnosis was 48 years (IQR 43–55). In patients with an available date of HBV diagnosis (n = 24), 17 (71%) were unaware of their HBV status when they presented with HCC. Zero patients were diagnosed with HCC through routine screening, most patients (66%) were diagnosed upon imaging evaluation of symptoms. Twelve patients (36%) underwent resection or transplantation; the remaining 64% were ineligible for surgical treatment. Of the 26 patients with follow-up data, 18 (69%) died of disease or were critically ill at last encounter, and of these, 14 (77%) died within 1 year of HCC diagnosis. In conclusion, African immigrants in NYC with HBV/HCC are at high risk of HCC related mortality at a young age. Most were unaware of their hepatitis status at the time of HCC diagnosis. No patients were enrolled in routine HCC screening; the majority were diagnosed based on imaging obtained for symptoms. Most individuals presented with inoperable disease, and the majority died within months of diagnosis. Awareness of these findings may help healthcare providers improve patient outcomes.

Background Gallbladder cancer accounts for 1.2% of global cancer diagnoses. Literature on biliary-type adenocarcinoma (BTA), and specifically carcinoma arising from intracholecystic papillary-tubular neoplasms (ICPNs), is limited. This study describes a retrospective, single-institution experience with gallbladder cancer, focusing on histological subtypes and prognosis. Methods A retrospective review was performed of patients who underwent cholecystectomy for a malignant neoplasm of the gallbladder between 2007 and 2017. Demographic, clinicopathologic, and operative variables, as well as survival outcomes, were analyzed. Results From a total of 145 patients, BTAs were most common (93, 64%). Compared with non-BTAs, BTAs were diagnosed at a lower American Joint Committee on Cancer stage (p = 0.045) and demonstrated longer median recurrence-free survival (38 vs. 16 months, p = 0.014; median follow-up 36 months). Tumors arising from ICPNs (18, 12%) were more commonly associated with BTA (14 cases). Compared with BTAs not associated with ICPNs (29 patients), associated cases demonstrated lower pathologic stage (p = 0.006) and lower rates of liver and perineural invasion (0% vs. 49% and 14% vs. 48%, respectively; p < 0.05). Cumulative 5-year survival probability was higher for patients with gallbladder neoplasm of any subtype associated with ICPNs compared with those that were not associated with ICPNs (54% vs. 41%, p = 0.019; median follow-up 23 months). This difference was also significant when comparing BTAs associated with ICPNs and non-associated cases (63% vs. 52%, p = 0.005). Conclusions This study demonstrated unique pathological and prognostic features of BTAs and of carcinomas arising from ICPNs. Histopathological variance may implicate prognosis and may be used to better guide clinical decision making in the treatment of these patients.

Postoperative respiratory failure (PRF) is associated with increased morbidity after surgery. This retrospective study explores preoperative and perioperative risk factors associated with PRF in patients undergoing cytoreductive surgery and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (CRS/HIPEC) and the resultant impact on survival. We identified all patients who underwent CRS/HIPEC at our institution between 2007 and 2017. PRF was defined as mechanical ventilation for more than 48 h after surgery or reintubation not related to an additional procedure within the first 30 days postoperatively. The relationship between clinicopathologic variables and PRF was examined using Kaplan–Meier log-rank survival analysis and multivariable Cox regression models with 90-day, 1-year and 5-year overall survival (OS). Overall, 314 patients underwent CRS/HIPEC, of whom 24 patients (7.6

Introduction Failure to rescue (FTR) is defined as death after a major complication. We evaluated FTR after cytoreductive surgery (CRS) with and without hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC). Methods The ACS NSQIP database 2005-2018 was reviewed for all cases of CRS. Propensity score matching was used to compare outcomes between those undergoing CRS alone and those undergoing CRS/HIPEC. Patients were matched on age, sex, ascites, diabetes, hypertension and resection of liver, pancreas, colon/rectum, diaphragm, stomach, small bowel, and/or spleen. Results Thirty nine thousand one hundred and twenty-six patients underwent CRS; 38,387 underwent CRS alone; 739 underwent CRS/HIPEC. After matching there were 726 patients in each arm. Patients undergoing CRS/HIPEC had higher risk of reintubation (25 [3.4%] vs. 13 [1.8%] p = 0.049), urinary tract infection UTI (44 [6.1%] vs. 25 [3.4%] p = 0.019) and sepsis (73 [10.1%] vs. 44 [6.1%] p = 0.005). Patients in the CRS arm required more transfusions (229 [31.5%] vs. 176 [24.2%] p = 0.002). There was no significant difference in FTR between the CRS and CRS/HIPEC groups (11 [4.0%] vs. 6 [2.3%] p = 0.258), nor in the pooled incidence of major complications (275 [37.9%] vs. 262 [36.1%] p = 0.48). Conclusion CRS/HIPEC is associated with increased rates of reintubation, UTI, and sepsis while CRS alone was associated with increased transfusion. However, the addition HIPEC to CRS did not increase the risk of pooled major complication or FTR.