Psychological stress has complex effects on eating behavior, appearing to reduce homeostatically regulated feeding, while increasing hedonically motivated feeding. The present work tests this idea using two feeding paradigms that offer a highly palatable food on a time-limited basis, together with continual access to a low palatability food. This approach provides a natural separation between periods of eating that are primarily homeostatic vs. hedonically regulated. First, the impact of acute stress exposure on feeding behavior was tested using an acute “meal-dessert” paradigm. When fasted adult male rats were given a recent stressor of moderate intensity (restraint), refeeding with a chow-meal was reduced, without affecting chocolate-dessert intake, thereby increasing the proportion of calories derived from chocolate. Next, the effect of chronic moderate stress was tested using a “binge” eating paradigm. Chow-fed rats were given unexpected (3d per week) vs. expected (7d per week) brief access to a highly palatable high-fat diet (HFD), and feeding behavior was compared to control groups that were maintained with continuous access to only chow or only HFD. Chronic stress reduced total caloric intake in all groups, including binge-like HFD intake. Binge-like HFD intake caused metabolic dysfunction (increased adiposity and impaired glucose homeostasis) to an extent beyond that predicted by total caloric intake or body weight gain. Finally, binge-like HFD intake shifted stress coping behavior from an active to a passive phenotype, particularly in rats receiving concurrent chronic stress, suggesting the possibility of increased risk for stress-related disorders, like depression, in individuals who binge eat during stress.

Limited intermittent consumption of palatable food reduces HPA axis responses to stress in chow-fed rats, and this effect is dependent on the rewarding properties of the palatable food. However, obesity may be a state of reduced consummatory food reward, suggesting that palatable foods may be less effective at blunting HPA axis reactivity in the context of diet-induced obesity (DIO). To test this hypothesis, adult male Long-Evans rats were given unlimited access to Western (high-fat, high-sugar) diet (WD) vs. normal chow (controls). After 8 weeks of diet exposure, rats were given limited sucrose intake (LSI) consisting of additional twice-daily access to a small amount (4 ml) of either 3% or 30% sucrose drink, or water (controls) for 2 weeks. Rats then received an acute restraint stress challenge, with collection of tail blood samples for measurement of plasma corticosterone. WD-fed rats had increased caloric intake, body weight and adiposity, as expected. Rats offered LSI (3% or 30%) readily drank the maximal amount allowed (8 ml/day) and reduced their dietary intake to compensate for the sucrose calories, such that LSI did not alter body weight regardless of diet type. In chow-fed lean rats, LSI with either 3% or 30% sucrose reduced the plasma corticosterone response to restraint stress, but this effect was absent in WD-fed DIO rats. Together, these data support the hypothesis that obesity attenuates stress blunting by palatable foods and suggest the possibility that consequently, individuals with obesity may need to consume larger amounts of palatable food to obtain adequate stress relief.

Eating palatable foods reduces behavioral and hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenocortical (HPA) axis responses to stress - an idea referred to by the colloquial term "comfort" food. To study the underlying stress-relieving mechanisms of palatable foods, we previously developed a paradigm of limited sucrose feeding in which male rats are given twice-daily access to a small amount of sucrose drink and subsequently have reduced stress responses. Prior research in humans and rodents implicates high dietary sugars/carbohydrates with reduced stress responsivity. However, it is not clear whether the stress-relieving effects of the limited sucrose paradigm depend upon its macronutrient content. To test this idea, the current work measures stress responses in male rats following the limited intermittent intake of cheese - a highly palatable food that is low in sugar and other carbohydrates. The data show that a history of limited cheese intake (LCI) reduced HPA axis responses to acute psychological (restraint) and physiological (hypoxia) stressors. LCI also reduced behavioral struggling during restraint, increased sociability during a social interaction test, and increased open arm activity in the elevated plus-maze test. Z-score analyses evaluated the extent to which these behavioral effects extended within and across assays, and indicated that there was an overall reduction in stress-related behaviors following LCI. Finally, LCI increased immunolabeling for FosB/deltaFosB (a protein associated with repeated or chronic neuronal activation) in the nucleus accumbens. These results indicate that palatable foods can provide stress blunting regardless of their sugar/carbohydrate composition, and support the idea that food reward per se contributes to stress relief.

Second generation antipsychotics (SGA) induce adverse metabolic effects (SGA-AME) that increase morbidity and cardiovascular risk, but the mechanisms involved are unknown. Recent human and animal studies suggest the circadian system is implicated in SGA-AME, and nightly melatonin administration (NMA) shows promise in their prevention. We evaluated the effect of repeated olanzapine administration and NMA on cardiovascular and temperature circadian regulation.

Eating palatable foods can provide stress relief, but the mechanisms by which this occurs are unclear. We previously characterized a limited sucrose intake (LSI) paradigm in which twice-daily access to a small amount of 30% sucrose (vs. water as a control) reduces hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenocortical (HPA) axis responses to stress and alters neuronal activation in stress-regulatory brain regions in male rats. However, women may be more prone to 'comfort feeding' behaviors than men, and stress-related eating may vary across the menstrual cycle. This suggests that LSI effects may be sex- and estrous cycle-dependent. The present study therefore investigated the effects of LSI on HPA axis stress responsivity, as well as markers of neuronal activation/plasticity in stress- and reward-related neurocircuitry in female rats across the estrous cycle. We found that LSI reduced post-restraint stress plasma ACTH in female rats specifically during proestrusiestrus (P/E). LSI also increased basal (non-stress) FosB/deltaFosB- and pCREB-immunolabeling in the basolateral amygdala (BLA) and central amygdala specifically during P/E. Finally, Bayesian network modeling of the FosB/deltaFosB and pCREB expression data identified a neurocircuit that includes the BLA, nucleus accumbens, prefrontal cortex, and bed nucleus of the stria terminalis as likely being modified by LSI during P/E. When considered in the context of our prior results, the present findings suggest that palatable food reduces stress responses in female rats similar to males, but in an estrous cycle-dependent manner. Further, the BLA may contribute to the LSI effects in both sexes, whereas the involvement of other brain regions appears to be sex-dependent. (C) 2018 IBRO. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.