Introduction: Understanding the appropriate application of telemetry and other technologies for nonclinical investigation of functional safety issues in the context of ongoing toxicology evaluations is a current industry challenge. One major issue is related to the potential impact of surgical implantation of a telemetry device on contemporarily established measures of drug toxicity, and potential for confounding pathological issues related to the systemic and local response of the experimental animal to the presence of a foreign body. This study was designed to evaluate the potential local and systemic impact of different implanted telemetry devices with varying requisite degrees of surgical complexity on general toxicology study endpoints. Methods: Sixteen male beagle dogs 1) no surgical instrumentation [n=4], 2) Jacketed External Telemetry (JET) with femoral artery blood pressure implant (PA-C10 LA) [n=4], or 3) fully implantable (DSI-D70-CCTP) devices [n=8], were assigned to experimental groups and evaluated within the context of a standard repeat-dose toxicology design to determine the potential impact of these treatments on routine in-life and post-mortem toxicological endpoints. Results: Device implantation, regardless of the level of invasiveness/complexity was without effect on any in-life safety parameter, including clinical chemistry and hematology, assessed in the experimental design. Histopathological findings were limited to the expected, primarily minimal to mild localized effects characteristic of a foreign body reaction (fibrosis, inflammation) in the area immediately in contact with the body of the transmitter device and associated sites of ECG lead and pressure catheter interface with local tissues. Discussion: This study represents the first definitive evaluation of the influence of variably invasive telemetry device implantation on standardized, essential toxicology endpoints in the context of a simulated repeated dose experimental design. The data suggest that, when carefully evaluated, the local effects of implanted telemetry devices can be managed in the context of a standard Investigational New Drug (IND)-enabling toxicology study. This study provides support for the potential incorporation of unrestrained cardiovascular assessments via implanted or external telemetry into standard multi-dose toxicology studies. (C) 2013 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

BACKGROUND: A novel formulation of ≥98% pure capsaicin (4975) is currently undergoing clinical investigation using novel routes of delivery to provide selective analgesia lasting weeks to months with a single dose. We conducted this study to assess the safety and effects of instilled and injected 4975 in rat models of wound healing osteotomy repair and sensory-motor nerve function. METHODS: Adult male and female Sprague-Dawley rats were used. To assess the effects of 4975 on nerve or muscle, 0.0083 or 0.025 mg 4975 or vehicle (25% polyethylene glycol-300) was applied to exposed sciatic nerve, or 0.1 mg 4975 or vehicle was injected into the surrounding muscle (Group 1). To assess the effect of 4975 on bone healing, an osteotomy was made in one femur and 0.5 mg of 4975 or vehicle was instilled into the site (Group 2). Behavioral testing was performed on both groups of rats and histological evaluation of the sciatic nerve, and surrounding soft tissue and bone was done at days 3, 14, and 28 after surgery. Femurs from osteotomy rats were assessed using peripheral quantitative computed tomography and biomechanical testing. Standard statistical tests were used to compare groups. RESULTS: Rats with direct application of 4975 to the sciatic nerve and surrounding muscle were no different from the controls in nociceptive sensory responses (F = 0.910, P = 0.454), grip strength (F = 0.550, P = 0.654), or histology of the muscle or sciatic nerve. In osteotomy rats, there were no statistical differences between 4975 and vehicle-treated rats for bone area (H = 2.858, P = 0.414), bone mineral content (F = 0.945, P = 0.425), or bone mineral density (F = 0.87, P = 0.462) and no difference in soft tissue healing. There were neither differences in bone stiffness (F = 1.369, P = 0.268) nor were there noticeable differences in the macro- or microscopic appearance of the right femur osteotomy healing site and surrounding soft tissues between the control group and the 4975-treated animals. CONCLUSION: A single, clinically relevant application of instilled or injected 4975 has no observable adverse effect on wound and bone healing after osteotomy or on the structural integrity of exposed muscle and nerve.