PURPOSE:Residual or undertreated inflow disease is a major cause of stent occlusion following endovascular thrombectomy for iliofemoral deep venous thrombosis (DVT). The profunda femoral vein (PFV) is an important inflow vessel alongside the femoral vein but is traditionally challenging to treat via an antegrade popliteal approach. This technical note describes a novel approach for PFV clearance in iliofemoral thrombectomy via the popliteal vein.MATERIALS AND METHODS:Eight patients underwent PFV clearance as part of iliofemoral DVT thrombectomy via an antegrade popliteal approach. In seven patients, a popliteal-profunda communicating vessel was identified permitting PFV access and thrombectomy. In one patient, a popliteal-profunda communicator was not identified and an 'up and over' approach via the femoral bifurcation from the same popliteal access was utilised. Thrombectomy was performed using the Inari ClotTriever device or Penumbra's Indigo system.RESULTS:Technical success in PFV thrombectomy was 100%. Six patients (75%) underwent stenting for an iliac stenotic lesion or May Thurner compression point. At the four-week ultrasound follow-up, the pelvic iliofemoral segment was patent in 7 patients (87.5%). The PFV was patent in 7 patients (87.5%) whereas the FV was only patent in 4 patients (50%). One patient underwent reintervention for iliofemoral stent occlusion. No PFV injury occurred and no post-procedure profunda reflux was identified.CONCLUSION:PFV clearance can be achieved via an antegrade popliteal approach in iliofemoral thrombectomy to optimise inflow, negating the need for alternative or additional venous access. PFV may maintain upstream iliofemoral vein patency even with an occluded femoral vein.LEVEL OF EVIDENCE:Level 4, Case Series.

Background: Management of chronic venous ulcers in exintravenous drug users is complex with significant effects on patient QOL and health care costs. Although more than two-thirds of patients in a methadone treatment program were found to have chronic venous insufficiency, limited published literature on the role of venous stenting in managing this group of patients exists. The main aim is to describe our experience and results in treating this patient group.

To establish factors predictive of success prior to Prostate Artery Embolization (PAE) with MRI imaging. A prospective cohort study of 50 patients with Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia (BPH) were treated with PAE in a single institution. Patients had moderate to severe symptoms of BPH refractory to medical management for at least 6 months. Patients were imaged with multiparametric MRI imaging pre-PAE and at 3 months, 12 months and 24 months post-PAE. Clinical success was measured with IPSS, IIEF and EQ-5D-5L quality of life questionnaires. The technical success was 48/50 (96%).The mean age of the group was 67 (range 54–83). The mean IPSS score pre-PAE was 21 and at 24 months was 8 (p < 0.001). There was no deterioration in erectile function. The mean volume of the prostate post-PAE was reduced at 3 and 12 months post-PAE but not significantly different at 24 months. This did not correlate with the IPSS score. Patients with median lobe enlargement has similar symptomatic improvement as those without median lobe enlargement. Internally within the prostate patients with adenomatous-dominant BPH initially did better than patients with stromal enlargement; however, at 24 months patients with stromal enlargement of the prostate improved greatest. Initial volume of the prostate was not a good predictor of clinical success. PAE is a safe and effective treatment strategy for treating men with BPH. Patients with Adenomatous BPH clinically do better until 12 months but not at 24 months. Initial prostate volume does not affect outcome, and patients with median lobe enlargement do as well as those without.

Purpose To present our experience of the patterns of revascularisation of the prostate and efficacy of repeat prostate artery embolisation (rPAE) in patients with recurrence of lower urinary tract symptoms. Materials and Methods We retrospectively analysed 12 patients who underwent rPAE at a single centre between November 2015 and March 2020. The patients had their intraprocedural angiography and cone beam CT images as well as their pre-procedural CT retrospectively reviewed to establish the patterns of revascularisation. Clinical follow-up occurred at a minimum of 3 months. Results 11/12 patients (91.6%) had significant international prostate symptom score (IPSS) reduction following rPAE with change in mean IPSS from 18.4 to 8.1 at 3 months (p < 0.0001). Mean prostate volume was reduced by 41.6% (p = 0.03). 8/12 (75%) had a complete clinical success. 20/24 hemiprostates demonstrated revascularisation angiographically, of which 16 (80%) had prostatic arterial supply at rPAE by the main prostatic artery. Other mechanisms of revascularisation included supply from capsular prostatic artery branches and supply from other internal iliac pelvic branches. Unilateral embolisation at rPAE, where bilateral embolisation was not feasible (4/12), resulted in no difference in clinical outcomes compared with bilateral rPAE (p = 0.55). Conclusion We have found rPAE to be an effective treatment for recurrent lower urinary tract symptoms in patients who had good clinical response to initial PAE. The mechanisms of revascularisation are variable, but most patients that underwent rPAE had recanalisation of their main prostatic artery.