DNA G-quadruplexes (G4s) spontaneously arise in guanine-rich regions such as telomeres. Although G4s regulate essential biological process, their persistence can interfere with DNA metabolism and induce replication stress (RS). Helicases such as BLM and FANCJ play key roles in resolving G4 structures to maintain genome stability. Our investigation delves into how BLM and FANCJ respond to telomeric RS induced by the telomeric G4 ligand, RHPS4. To examine their individual and combined functions, we employed CRISPR/Cas9 to deplete BLM and siRNA to silence FANCJ in U251MG glioblastoma cells. Our results revealed a functional interplay between the two helicases: RHPS4 treatment led to increased FANCJ protein levels and telomeric recruitment in both wild-type and BLM-/- cells. Notably, FANCJ depletion resulted in heightened sensitivity to RHPS4, accompanied by increased telomere dysfunction and DNA damage, particularly in the absence of BLM. These findings underscore a compensatory role for FANCJ in maintaining telomere integrity under RS and highlight its potential as a therapeutic target for enhancing the efficacy of G4-stabilizing agents in cancer treatment. Functional dissection of G-quadruplex–induced replication stress uncovers complementary telomeric roles of BLM and FANCJ helicases and identifies FANCJ loss as a vulnerability that increases telomere damage and sensitivity to G4-stabilizing agents.

Centromeres are essential regions of the genome that ensure chromosome segregation during mitosis. Yet, they are also hotspots for chromosome breaks and rearrangements in cancer. The mechanisms underlying this fragility is not fully elucidated. Here we show that oxidative DNA damage destabilizes centromeres and promotes chromosome instability. Using a chemoptogenetic system to generate singlet oxygen locally at centromeres, we uncouple centromeric oxidative damage from global oxidative stress. We find that oxidative base lesions activate base excision repair at centromeres but slow DNA synthesis, destabilize CENP-A chromatin, and are converted into DNA breaks that can persist into subsequent cell cycles. Single cell time lapse imaging reveals that the cellular fate of centromeric DNA damage depends on the cell cycle phase during which the oxidative lesions occur. Lesions induced before and during replication primarily induce cell cycle delays and often drive the cells into a state of quiescence, whereas lesions arising after replication allow mitotic progression but compromise the proliferative capacity of daughter cells. Finally, in pre-tumorigenic cells, centromeric oxidative lesions lead to mitotic defects, aneuploidy, and whole-arm chromosome translocations. Collectively, we identify centromeres as cell cycle-sensitive DNA damage sensors and oxidative stress as a direct driver of centromere fragility and chromosome instability.

The alternative lengthening of telomeres (ALT) pathway is a telomerase-independent telomere maintenance mechanism leveraged by a subset of human cancers. In these tumors, telomere DNA synthesis is achieved via homologous recombination-based mechanisms. ALT-positive tumors harbor distinctive hallmarks, including heterogeneous telomere lengths, the presence of ALT-associated PML bodies, extrachromosomal telomeric repeats, telomere fragility, and mitotic DNA synthesis. These features reflect underlying replication stress and deregulated DNA repair mechanisms. ALT is associated with various tumor types and can often contribute to worsening the patient’s prognosis. Strikingly, ALT cancers are particularly enriched in childhood cancers, especially in high-grade gliomas, neuroblastoma, and osteosarcomas, three cancer types that are very common in children. Here, we provide a comprehensive review of the DNA repair factors that drive ALT activation and maintenance and explore emerging therapeutic opportunities associated with the selective dependence of ALT cancer cells on these specific DNA damage response factors. We aim to promote a growing interest in deciphering the DNA-repair-dependent mechanisms of ALT, ultimately helping to build a foundation for the discovery of novel therapeutics against aggressive ALT tumors, for which prognosis is particularly poor and treatments are currently severely lacking.

Alternative DNA structures that differ from the canonical B-form of DNA can arise from repetitive sequences and play beneficial roles in many cellular processes such as gene regulation and chromatin organization. However, they also threaten genomic stability in several ways including mutagenesis and collisions with replication and/or transcription machinery, which lead to genomic instability that is associated with human disease. Thus, the careful regulation of non-B-DNA structure formation and resolution is crucial for the maintenance of genome integrity. Several protein factors have been demonstrated to associate with alternative DNA structures to facilitate their removal, one of which is the ADP-ribose transferase (ART) PARP1 (also called ADP-ribosyltransferase diphtheria toxin-like 1 or ARTD1), a multifaceted DNA repair enzyme that recognizes single- and double-stranded DNA breaks and synthesizes chains of poly (ADP-ribose) (PAR) to recruit DNA repair proteins. It is now well appreciated that PARP1 recognizes several nucleic acid structures beyond DNA lesions, including stalled replication forks, DNA hairpins and cruciforms, R-loops, and DNA G-quadruplexes (G4 DNA). In this review, we summarize the current evidence of a direct association of PARP1 with each of these aforementioned alternative DNA structures, as well as discuss the role of PARP1 in the prevention of non-B-DNA structure-induced genetic instability. We will focus on the mechanisms of the recognition and binding by PARP1 to each alternative structure and the structure-based stimulation of PARP1 catalytic activity upon binding. Finally, we will discuss some of the outstanding gaps in the literature and offer speculative insight for questions that remain to be experimentally addressed.

PARP2 is a DNA-dependent ADP-ribosyl transferase (ARTs) enzyme with Poly(ADP-ribosyl)ation activity that is triggered by DNA breaks. It plays a role in the Base Excision Repair pathway, where it has overlapping functions with PARP1. However, additional roles for PARP2 have emerged in the response of cells to replication stress. In this study, we demonstrate that PARP2 promotes replication stress-induced telomere fragility and prevents telomere loss following chronic induction of oxidative DNA lesions and BLM helicase depletion. Telomere fragility results from the activity of the break-induced replication pathway (BIR). During this process, PARP2 promotes DNA end resection, strand invasion and BIR-dependent mitotic DNA synthesis by orchestrating POLD3 recruitment and activity. Our study has identified a role for PARP2 in the response to replication stress. This finding may lead to the development of therapeutic approaches that target DNA-dependent ART enzymes, particularly in cancer cells with high levels of replication stress.

PARP1 is a DNA-dependent ADP-Ribose transferase with ADP-ribosylation activity that is triggered by DNA breaks and non-B DNA structures to mediate their resolution. PARP1 was also recently identified as a component of the R-loop-associated protein-protein interaction network, suggesting a potential role for PARP1 in resolving this structure. R-loops are three-stranded nucleic acid structures that consist of a RNA-DNA hybrid and a displaced non-template DNA strand. R-loops are involved in crucial physiological processes but can also be a source of genome instability if persistently unresolved. In this study, we demonstrate that PARP1 binds R-loops in vitro and associates with R-loop formation sites in cells which activates its ADP-ribosylation activity. Conversely, PARP1 inhibition or genetic depletion causes an accumulation of unresolved R-loops which promotes genomic instability. Our study reveals that PARP1 is a novel sensor for R-loops and highlights that PARP1 is a suppressor of R-loop-associated genomic instability.

The ADP-ribose transferase (ART) family comprises 17 enzymes that catalyze mono- or poly-ADP-ribosylation, a post-translational modification of proteins. Present in all subcellular compartments, ARTs are implicated in a growing number of biological processes including DNA repair, replication, transcription regulation, intra- and extra-cellular signaling, viral infection and cell death. Five members of the family, PARP1, PARP2, PARP3, tankyrase 1 and tankyrase 2 are mainly described for their crucial functions in the maintenance of genome stability. It is well established that the most describedrole of PARP1, 2 and 3 is the repair of DNA lesions while tankyrases 1 and 2 are crucial for maintaining the integrity of telomeres. Telomeres, nucleoprotein complexes located at the ends of eukaryotic chromosomes, utilize their unique structure and associated set of proteins to orchestrate the mechanisms necessary for their own protection and replication. While the functions of tankyrases 1 and 2 at telomeres are well known, several studies have also brought PARP1, 2 and 3 to the forefront of telomere protection. The singular quality of the telomeric environment has highlighted protein interactions and molecular pathways distinct from those described throughout the genome. The aim of this review is to provide an overview of the current knowledge on the multiple roles of PARP1, PARP2, PARP3, tankyrase 1 and tankyrase 2 in the maintenance and preservation of telomere integrity.

The repertoire of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19)-mediated adverse health outcomes has continued to expand in infected patients, including the susceptibility to developing long-COVID; however, the molecular underpinnings at the cellular level are poorly defined. In this study, we report that SARS-CoV-2 (severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2) infection triggers host cell genome instability by modulating the expression of molecules of DNA repair and mutagenic translesion synthesis. Further, SARS-CoV-2 infection causes genetic alterations, such as increased mutagenesis, telomere dysregulation, and elevated microsatellite instability (MSI). The MSI phenotype was coupled to reduced MLH1, MSH6, and MSH2 in infected cells. Strikingly, pre-treatment of cells with the REV1-targeting translesion DNA synthesis inhibitor, JH-RE-06, suppresses SARS-CoV-2 proliferation and dramatically represses the SARS-CoV-2-dependent genome instability. Mechanistically, JH-RE-06 treatment induces autophagy, which we hypothesize limits SARS-CoV-2 proliferation and, therefore, the hijacking of host-cell genome instability pathways. These results have implications for understanding the pathobiological consequences of COVID-19.

Background: Glioblastoma is the most aggressive and most lethal primary brain tumor in the adulthood. Current standard therapies are not curative and novel therapeutic options are urgently required. Present knowledge suggests that the continued glioblastoma growth and recurrence is determined by glioblastoma stem-like cells (GSCs), which display self-renewal, tumorigenic potential, and increased radio- and chemo-resistance. The G-quadruplex ligand RHPS4 displays in vitro radiosensitizing effect in GBM radioresistant cells through the targeting and dysfunctionalization of telomeres but RHPS4 and Ionizing Radiation (IR) combined treatment efficacy in vivo has not been explored so far. Methods: RHPS4 and IR combined effects were tested in vivo in a heterotopic mice xenograft model and in vitro in stem-like cells derived from U251MG and from four GBM patients. Cell growth assays, cytogenetic analysis, immunoblotting, gene expression and cytofluorimetric analysis were performed in order to characterize the response of differentiated and stem-like cells to RHPS4 and IR in single and combined treatments. Results: RHPS4 administration and IR exposure is very effective in blocking tumor growth in vivo up to 65days. The tumor volume reduction and the long-term tumor control suggested the targeting of the stem cell compartment. Interestingly, RHPS4 treatment was able to strongly reduce cell proliferation in GSCs but, unexpectedly, did not synergize with IR. Lack of radiosensitization was supported by the GSCs telomeric-resistance observed as the total absence of telomere-involving chromosomal aberrations. Remarkably, RHPS4 treatment determined a strong reduction of CHK1and RAD51 proteins and transcript levels suggesting that the inhibition of GSCs growth is determined by the impairment of the replication stress (RS) response and DNA repair. Conclusions: We propose that the potent antiproliferative effect of RHPS4 in GSCs is not determined by telomeric dysfunction but is achieved by the induction of RS and by the concomitant depletion of CHK1 and RAD51, leading to DNA damage and cell death. These data open to novel therapeutic options for the targeting of GSCs, indicating that the combined inhibition of cell-cycle checkpoints and DNA repair proteins provides the most effective means to overcome resistance of GSC to genotoxic insults.

In the present paper, the biological effects of three different naphthalene diimides (NDIs) G-quadruplex (G4) ligands (H-NDI-Tyr, H-NDI-NMe2, and tetra-NDI-NMe2) were comparatively evaluated to those exerted by RHPS4, a well-characterized telomeric G4-ligand, in an in vitro model of glioblastoma. Data indicated that NDIs were very effective in blocking cell proliferation at nanomolar concentrations, although displaying a lower specificity for telomere targeting compared to RHPS4. In addition, differently from RHPS4, NDIs failed to enhance the effect of ionizing radiation, thus suggesting that additional targets other than telomeres could be involved in the strong NDI-mediated anti-proliferative effects. In order to test telomeric off-target action of NDIs, a panel of genes involved in tumor progression, DNA repair, telomere maintenance, and cell-cycle regulation were evaluated at transcriptional and translational level. Specifically, the compounds were able to cause a marked reduction of TERT and BCL2 amounts as well as to favor the accumulation of proteins involved in cell cycle control. A detailed cytofluorimetric analysis of cell cycle progression by means of bromodeoxyuridine (BrdU) incorporation and staining of phospho-histone H3 indicated that NDIs greatly reduce the progression through S-phase and lead to G1 accumulation of BrdU-positive cells. Taken together, these data indicated that, besides effects on telomeres and oncogenes such as Tert and Bcl2, nanomolar concentrations of NDIs determined a sustained block of cell proliferation by slowing down cell cycle progression during S-phase. In conclusion, our data indicate that NDIs G4-ligands are powerful antiproliferative agents, which act through mechanisms that ultimately lead to altered cell-cycle control.