Developing an oral formulation for the chemotherapeutic cabazitaxel might improve its patient-friendliness, costs, and potentially exposure profile. Cabazitaxel oral availability is restricted by CYP3A-mediated first-pass metabolism, but can be substantially boosted with the CYP3A inhibitor ritonavir. We here tested whether adding the ABCB1/P-glycoprotein inhibitor elacridar to ritonavir-boosted oral cabazitaxel could further improve its tissue exposure using wild-type, CYP3A4-humanized and Abcb1a/b-/- mice. The plasma AUC0-2h of cabazitaxel was increased 2.3- and 1.9-fold in the ritonavir- and ritonavir-plus-elacridar groups of wild-type, and 10.5- and 8.8-fold in CYP3A4-humanized mice. Elacridar coadministration did not influence cabazitaxel plasma exposure. The brain-to-plasma ratio of cabazitaxel was not increased in the ritonavir group, 7.3-fold in the elacridar group and 13.4-fold in the combined booster group in wild-type mice. This was 0.4-, 4.6- and 3.6-fold in CYP3A4-humanized mice, illustrating that Abcb1 limited cabazitaxel brain exposure also during ritonavir boosting. Ritonavir itself was also a potent substrate for the Abcb1 efflux transporter, limiting its oral availability (3.3-fold) and brain penetration (10.6-fold). Both processes were fully reversed by elacridar. The tissue disposition of ritonavir-boosted oral cabazitaxel could thus be markedly enhanced by elacridar coadministration without affecting the plasma exposure. This approach should be verified in selected patient populations.

An oral docetaxel formulation boosted by the Cytochrome P450 (CYP) 3 A inhibitor ritonavir, ModraDoc006/r, is currently under clinical investigation. Based on clinical data, the incidence of grade 1–2 diarrhea is increased with this oral docetaxel formulation compared to the conventional intravenous administration. Loperamide, a frequently used diarrhea inhibitor, could be added to the regimen as symptomatic treatment. However, loperamide is also a substrate of the CYP3A enzyme, which could result in competition between ritonavir and loperamide for this protein. Therefore, we were interested in the impact of coadministered loperamide on the pharmacokinetics of ritonavir-boosted oral docetaxel. We administered loperamide simultaneously or with an 8-hour delay to humanized CYP3A4 mice (with expression in liver and intestine) receiving oral ritonavir and docetaxel. Concentrations of docetaxel, ritonavir, loperamide and two of its active metabolites were measured. The plasma exposure (AUC and Cmax) of docetaxel was not altered during loperamide treatment, nor were the ritonavir plasma pharmacokinetics. However, the hepatic and intestinal dispositions of ritonavir were somewhat changed in the simultaneous, but not 8-hour loperamide treatment groups, possibly due to loperamide-induced delayed drug absorption. The pharmacokinetics of loperamide itself did not seem to be influenced by ritonavir. These results suggest that delayed loperamide administration can be added to ritonavir-boosted oral docetaxel treatment, without affecting the overall systemic exposure of docetaxel.

Intravenously administered chemotherapeutic cabazitaxel is used for palliative treatment of prostate cancer. An oral formulation would be more patient-friendly and reduce the need for hospitalization. We therefore study determinants of the oral pharmacokinetics of cabazitaxel in a ritonavir-boosted setting, which reduces the CYP3A-mediated first-pass metabolism of cabazitaxel. We here assessed the role of organic anion-transporting polypeptides (OATPs) in the disposition of orally boosted cabazitaxel and its active metabolites, using the Oatp1a/b-knockout and the OATP1B1/1B3-transgenic mice. These transporters may substantially affect plasma clearance and hepatic and intestinal drug disposition. The pharmacokinetics of cabazitaxel and DM2 were not significantly affected by Oatp1a/b and OATP1B1/1B3 activity. In contrast, the plasma AUC0-120 min of DM1 in Oatp1a/b-/- was 1.9-fold (p < 0.05) higher than that in wild-type mice, and that of docetaxel was 2.4-fold (p < 0.05) higher. We further observed impaired hepatic uptake and intestinal disposition for DM1 and docetaxel in the Oatp-ablated strains. None of these parameters showed rescue by the OATP1B1 or -1B3 transporters in the humanized mouse strains, suggesting a minimal role of OATP1B1/1B3. Ritonavir itself was also a potent substrate for mOatp1a/b, showing a 2.9-fold (p < 0.0001) increased plasma AUC0-120 min and 3.5-fold (p < 0.0001) decreased liver-to-plasma ratio in Oatp1a/b-/- compared to those in wild-type mice. Furthermore, we observed the tight binding of cabazitaxel and its active metabolites, including docetaxel, to plasma carboxylesterase (Ces1c) in mice, which may complicate the interpretation of pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic mouse studies. Collectively, these results will help to further optimize (pre)clinical research into the safety and efficacy of orally applied cabazitaxel.

There is currently great interest in developing oral taxanes due to their lower costs and greater patient friendliness. We here wanted to test whether oral ritonavir, a cytochrome P450 3A (CYP3A) inhibitor, could boost the pharmacokinetics and tissue distribution of orally administered cabazitaxel (10 mg/kg) in male wild-type, Cyp3a-/-, and Cyp3aXAV (transgenic overexpression of human CYP3A4 in liver and intestine) mice. Ritonavir was initially administered at a dose of 25 mg/kg, but lower dosages of 10 and 1 mg/kg were also studied to assess the remaining amount of boosting, aiming to minimize possible side effects. Compared to the respective vehicle groups, plasma exposure of cabazitaxel (AUC0-24h) was enhanced 2.9-, 10.9-, and 13.9-fold in wild-type mice and 1.4-, 10.1-, and 34.3-fold in Cyp3aXAV mice by treatment with 1, 10, and 25 mg/kg ritonavir, respectively. Upon treatment with 1, 10, and 25 mg/kg of ritonavir, the peak plasma concentration (Cmax) was increased by 1.4-, 2.3-, and 2.8-fold in wild-type mice, while it increased by 1.7-, 4.2-, and 8.0-fold in Cyp3aXAV mice, respectively. AUC0-24h and Cmax remained unchanged in Cyp3a-/-. Biotransformation of cabazitaxel to its active metabolites still took place when coadministered with ritonavir, but this process was delayed due to the Cyp3a/CYP3A4 inhibition. These data indicate that CYP3A is the primary limiting factor in the plasma exposure to cabazitaxel and that cabazitaxel oral bioavailability could be dramatically enhanced by coadministration of an effective CYP3A inhibitor such as ritonavir. These findings could be a starting point for the setup of a clinical study, which would be needed to verify the boosting of cabazitaxel by ritonavir in humans.

Niraparib (Zejula), a selective oral PARP1/2 inhibitor registered for ovarian, fallopian tube, and primary peritoneal cancer treatment, is under investigation for other malignancies, including brain tumors. We explored the impact of the ABCB1 and ABCG2 multidrug efflux transporters, the OATP1A/1B uptake transporters, and the CYP3A drug-metabolizing complex on oral niraparib pharmacokinetics, using wild-type and genetically modified mouse and cell line models. In vitro, human ABCB1 and mouse Abcg2 transported niraparib moderately. Compared to wild-type mice, niraparib brain-to-plasma ratios were 6- to 7-fold increased in Abcb1a/1b-/- and Abcb1a/1b;Abcg2-/- but not in single Abcg2-/- mice, while niraparib plasma exposure at later time points was ∼2-fold increased. Niraparib recovery in the small intestinal content was markedly reduced in the Abcb1a/1b-deficient strains. Pretreatment of wild-type mice with oral elacridar, an ABCB1/ABCG2 inhibitor, increased niraparib brain concentration and reduced small intestinal content recovery to levels observed in Abcb1a/1b;Abcg2-/- mice. Oatp1a/1b deletion did not significantly affect niraparib oral bioavailability or liver distribution but decreased metabolite M1 liver uptake. No significant effects of mouse Cyp3a ablation were observed, but overexpression of transgenic human CYP3A4 unexpectedly increased niraparib plasma exposure. Thus, Abcb1 deficiency markedly increased niraparib brain distribution and reduced its small intestinal content recovery, presumably through reduced biliary excretion and/or decreased direct intestinal excretion. Elacridar pretreatment inhibited both processes completely. Clinically, the negligible role of OATP1 and CYP3A could be advantageous for niraparib, diminishing drug-drug interaction or interindividual variation risks involving these proteins. These findings may support the further clinical development and application of niraparib.