Treatment of juxtarenal and complex neck abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAAs) is now commonly by endovascular rather than open surgical repair (OSR). Published comparisons show poor validity and scientific precision. UK-COMPASS is a comparative cohort study of endovascular treatments vs. OSR for patients with an AAA unsuitable for standard on label endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR).

Objective: Abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAAs) with adverse morphology of the aneurysm neck are "complex". Techniques employed to repair complex aneurysms include open surgical repair (OSR) and a number of on label endovascular techniques such as fenestrated endovascular aneurysm repair (FEVAR) and endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) with adjuncts (including chimneys and endo-anchors), as well as off label use of standard EVAR. The aim was to conduct a network meta-analysis (NMA) of published comparative outcomes. Data Sources: An electronic search was performed in Embase, MEDLINE, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL). These databases were interrogated using the PubMed interface and the Healthcare Databases Advanced Search (HDAS) interface developed by the National Institute of Health and Care Excellence. Review methods: Online databases were interrogated up to April 2020. Studies were included if they compared outcomes between at least two methods of repair for complex aneurysms (those with at least one adverse neck feature: absent/short neck, conicality, angulation, calcification, large diameter, and thrombus). The primary outcome measure was peri-operative death. Pre-registration was done in PROSPERO (CRD42020177482). Results: The search identified 24 observational studies and 7854 patients who underwent OSR, FEVAR, off label EVAR, or chimney EVAR. No comparative studies included EVAR with endo-anchors. NMA was performed on 23 studies that reported outcomes of aneurysms with short/absent infrarenal neck. Compared with OSR, off label EVAR (relative risk [RR] 0.10, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.01 - 0.41) and FEVAR (RR 0.62, 95% CI 0.32-0.94) were associated with lower peri-operative mortality. This difference was not seen at the midterm follow up (30 months). Compared with OSR, FEVAR was associated with a lower peri-operative myocardial infarction (MI) rate (RR 0.37, 95% CI 0.16 - 0.62) but a higher midterm re-intervention rate (hazard ratio 1.65, 95% CI 1.04 - 2.66). All studies had a "moderate" or "high" risk of bias. Confidence in the network findings (GRADE) was generally "low". Conclusion: This NMA demonstrated a peri-operative survival benefit for off label EVAR and FEVAR compared with OSR, potentially due to reduced risk of MI. FEVAR carries a greater midterm re-intervention risk than OSR, with potential implications for cost effectiveness. There is paucity of comparative data for cases with adverse neck features other than short length.

INTRODUCTION:In one-third of all abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAAs), the aneurysm neck is short (juxtarenal) or shows other adverse anatomical features rendering operations more complex, hazardous and expensive. Surgical options include open surgical repair and endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) techniques including fenestrated EVAR, EVAR with adjuncts (chimneys/endoanchors) and off-label standard EVAR. The aim of the UK COMPlex AneurySm Study (UK-COMPASS) is to answer the research question identified by the National Institute for Health Research Health Technology Assessment (NIHR HTA) Programme: 'What is the clinical and cost-effectiveness of strategies for the management of juxtarenal AAA, including fenestrated endovascular repair?'METHODS AND ANALYSIS:UK-COMPASS is a cohort study comparing clinical and cost-effectiveness of different strategies used to manage complex AAAs with stratification of physiological fitness and anatomical complexity, with statistical correction for baseline risk and indication biases. There are two data streams. First, a stream of routinely collected data from Hospital Episode Statistics and National Vascular Registry (NVR). Preoperative CT scans of all patients who underwent elective AAA repair in England between 1 November 2017 and 31 October 2019 are subjected to Corelab analysis to accurately identify and include every complex aneurysm treated. Second, a site-reported data stream regarding quality of life and treatment costs from prospectively recruited patients across England. Site recruitment also includes patients with complex aneurysms larger than 55 mm diameter in whom an operation is deferred (medical management). The primary outcome measure is perioperative all-cause mortality. Follow-up will be to a median of 5 years.ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION:The study has received full regulatory approvals from a Research Ethics Committee, the Confidentiality Advisory Group and the Health Research Authority. Data sharing agreements are in place with National Health Service Digital and the NVR. Dissemination will be via NIHR HTA reporting, peer-reviewed journals and conferences.TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER:ISRCTN85731188.

Introduction - In the UK hospital admissions associated with skin,soft tissue and vascular infections (SSTVI) secondary to illicit opiod use have increased in the last 5 years. People who inject drugs (PWID) utilise a significant amount of secondary care resources and the extent of this has not been fully evaluated in the contemporary literature. The utilisation of femoral vessels for injection is indicative of long-term intravenous drug use as more easily accesible vessels in the hand and antecubital fossa become thrombosed. This study evaluates the demographics, presentation, subsequent management and outcomes of PWID presenting to a tertiary vascular unit in the UK with SSVTI. The region this work was undertaken experiences the highest number of PWID related admissions to hospital in the UK. Methods - Admissions to our hospital from Jan 2014 to Dec 2017 were collected for retrospective analysis. A total of 202 patients were admitted with a SSTVI in this time period. Presenting complaint, in-patient length of stay (LOS), receiving speciality, imaging modalities, microbiology, blood borne virus (BBV) status along with subsequent medical and surgical management were reviewed. Results - 69.3% of patients admitted with a SSTVI were male with the majority being in the age range of 40-60 (55.9%). Median LOS was 6 days (IQR 2-12.75), with 49.5% of patients being treated by the Vascular Surgical team, the rest being managed across medical, orthopaedic and general surgical teams. 30.7% of patients had USS of the SSVTI, 28.7% had a CT angiogram, 10.4% had a plain x-ray and 13.9% had both CT angiogram and USS. 48% of the patients tested positive for the Hepatitis C core antigen indicating current or recent exposure to the Hepatitis C virus. 16.3% of the patients had detectable levels of Hepatitis C viraemia on ribonucleic acid. 1% of patients were positive for HIV-1. 67 patients underwent groin exploration and drainage of an abscess with 27 also requiring ligation of a femoral pseudoanueysm. No patients underwent reconstruction of the femoral artery following ligation and there were 3 above knee amputations performed during the same in-patient episode. Conclusion - We have noted a significant increase in the number of patients presenting with SSVTI over the period of our study. This has had a significant impact on resources given the LOS and multidisciplinary input required to ensure a safe and timely discharge from hospital when dealing with PWID. All patients in whom a SSVTI is suspected in the groin should undergo a CT angiogram as the imaging modality of choice as this accurately identifies any vascular complications as well as the presence of foreign bodies which may potentially cause a needle stick injury to the surgical team. Ligation of femoral pseudoaneurysms generally does not result in patients requiring amputation, however, they are often claudicants as a result.

This is a protocol for a Cochrane Review (Intervention). The objectives are as follows: To assess the effects of fast track surgery (FTS) programmes for abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) in patients undergoing elective repair by endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) or open surgical repair.

BACKGROUND:Iodinated contrast during endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) is used with caution in patients with chronic kidney disease. Contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) imaging using nonnephrotoxic sulphur hexafluoride microbubble contrast is a novel imaging modality that accurately identifies and characterizes endoleaks during EVAR follow-up. We report our initial experience of using three-dimensional (3D) CEUS imaging intraoperatively as completion imaging after endograft deployment. Our aim was to compare intraoperative 3D CEUS against uniplanar angiography in the detection of endoleak, stent deformity, and renal artery perfusion during EVAR.METHODS:The study enrolled 20 patients undergoing elective conventional infrarenal EVAR, after which a completion angiogram was performed and the presence of endoleak, renal artery perfusion, or device deformity were recorded. With the patient still under anesthetic, a vascular scientist blinded to angiographic findings performed 3D CEUS and reported on the same parameters.RESULTS:Three endoleaks, one type I and two type II, were detected on uniplanar angiography and 13 endoleaks, 11 type II and two type I, were found using 3D CEUS imaging. Of note, one of these type I endoleaks was not seen on angiography, and this patient underwent balloon moulding of the neck with resolution of the endoleak on repeat imaging. Of the 11 type II endoleaks seen with 3D CEUS imaging, the inflow vessel was identified in nine cases. No graft deformity or limb kinking was seen in any patient. Both renal arteries could be visualized in 10 patients, whereas the target renal artery was seen in 11 patients. In the remaining patients, the renal arteries could not be visualized, mainly due to intra-abdominal gas or patient body habitus.CONCLUSIONS:3D CEUS imaging detected endoleaks not seen on uniplanar digital subtraction angiography, including a clinically important type I endoleak, and was also more sensitive than 2D CEUS imaging for the detection of the source of endoleak. This technology has the potential to supplement or replace digital subtraction angiography for completion imaging to reduce the use of x-ray contrast. Intraoperative 3D CEUS has been applied to allow safe EVAR with ultralow or no iodinated contrast usage in selected cases, without compromising completion imaging.

BACKGROUND:The chimney graft technique has been proposed as an alternative endovascular treatment of juxtarenal aortic aneurysms, extending the landing zone and enabling successful exclusion of the aneurysm with standard endograft devices.METHODS:A prospective observational study assigning patients with juxtarenal aortic aneurysm treated with single renal chimney grafts in a tertiary vascular center in the United Kingdom was conducted. Primary outcome endpoints were defined as technical success, perioperative morbidity and mortality, and freedom from any type of endoleak, reintervention, and aneurysm-related death.RESULTS:Nine patients were enrolled. Successful aortic and chimney graft implantation was achieved in all patients. A proximal type I endoleak noticed on completion angiogram was treated with an aortic extension cuff. None of the patients died within 30 days of treatment. Two patients developed a type IA endoleak during follow-up, resulting in aneurysm rupture and death. Both patients had had uneventful chimney procedures, and no endoleak was evident on previous surveillance computed tomographic scans. All chimney grafts remained patent, and none of the patients developed renal impairment during the follow-up period.CONCLUSIONS:Proximal type I endoleak constitutes a weak point of chimney graft interventions. Increased vigilance in surveillance of such patients to prevent late aneurysm-related complications is required. Additional research to identify potential poor prognostic morphologic indicators is expected.