The production and use of New Psychoactive Substances (NPS) has skyrocketed over the last decade, causing major challenges for government authorities, public health agencies, and laboratories across the world. NPS are designed to mimic the psychoactive effects of unregulated or controlled drugs, while constantly being modified to evade drug control regulation. Hence, they are referred to as “legal highs”, as they are technically legal to sell, possess, and use. NPS can be classified by their pharmacological mechanism of action and include cannabimimetic, depressants, dissociatives, hallucinogens, opioids, and stimulants. There is significant structural diversity within each NPS class, leading to variable detection using traditional clinical laboratory testing and complicating the interpretation of results. In this article, we review each of the NPS classes and summarize their associated mechanism of action, common structures, and metabolic pathways, and provide examples of recent drugs and emerging threats with a focus on Canadian drug trends. We also explore the current analytical advantages and limitations commonly faced by the clinical laboratory and provide insight on how toxicosurveillance can improve detection of NPS in the ever-changing NPS landscape.

Acute hepatic porphyrias (AHP) comprise four rare monogenic autosomal conditions. Each is linked to a deficiency of heme metabolizing enzymes. Common manifestations include severe abdominal pain, nausea, confusion, hyponatremia, hypertension, tachycardia, and neuropathy. Diagnosis is challenging due to a non-specific, variable presentation with symptoms mimicking other common conditions. Initial diagnosis of AHP can be made with a test for urinary porphobilinogen, δ-aminolevulinic acid and porphyrins using a single random (spot) sample. However, many patients have complications due to delays in diagnosis and management. A novel small interfering RNA-based agent, givosiran, has demonstrated efficacy in reducing acute attacks in a recent Phase III trial, leading to its approval for the management of AHP. Early diagnosis is crucial for the timely introduction of disease-modifying treatments that reduce impairments, enhance quality of life, and extend survival. In this guidance, we aim to improve awareness and outcomes of AHP by making recommendations about diagnosis, monitoring, and treatment in Canada.

Illicit drug use during pregnancy is a concern worldwide, with many international studies describing attempted strategies to mitigate this problem. Drug misuse during pregnancy is associated with significant maternal as well as perinatal complications, which include a high incidence of stillbirths, fetal distress, neonatal abstinence syndrome (NAS) and increased neonatal mortality. Unfortunately, the identification of a drug-exposed mother or neonate is challenging. Maternal disclosure of drug use is often inaccurate, principally due to psychosocial factors including behavioral denial or the fear of the consequences resulting from such admissions. Likewise, many infants who have been exposed to drugs in utero may appear normal at birth and initially show no overt manifestations of drug effects. Thus, the identification of the drug-exposed infant requires a high index of clinical suspicion. Conversely, analytical testing is an objective means of determining drug exposure when it may be necessary to document proof of the infant's exposure to illicit drugs. The review will discuss the different matrices that are most commonly used for testing (e.g., maternal urine, neonatal urine, meconium, and umbilical cord), the strengths and limitations for each matrix, which drugs and metabolites are appropriate for testing, the various testing methods, and the advantages and disadvantages of each method.

Introduction Nirmatrelvir/Ritonavir was approved for use in high risk outpatients with coronavirus disease (COVID-19). However, patients with severe chronic kidney disease, including patients on dialysis, were excluded from the phase 3 trial, and currently the drug is not recommended below a glomerular filtration rate of 30 ml/min/1.73m2. Based on available pharmacological data and principles, we developed a modified dose which was lower, and administered at longer intervals.We administered nirmatrelvir/ritonavir as 300/100 mg on day one, followed by 150/100 mg daily from day two to day five. In this case series, we report the initial experience with this modified dose regimen.Methods This is a retrospective chart review, conducted after obtaining institutional board approval. Demographic and outcome data was abstracted from the electronic medical record for dialysis patients who developed COVID-19 during the period of study and received nirmatrelvir/ritonavir. The principal outcomes we describe are symptom resolution, and safety data with the modified dose regimen in the dialysis patients.Results 19 patients developed COVID-19 during the period of study of whom 15 received nirmatrelvir/ritonavir. 47% of them were female and 67% had diabetes. Most patients had received three doses of the vaccine (80%) while 13% were unvaccinated. Potential drug interactions concerns were common (median 2 drugs per patient) with amlodipine and atorvastatin being the commonest drugs requiring dose modification. Nirmatrelvir/ritonavir use was associated with symptom resolution in all patients, and was well tolerated. One patient had a rebound of symptoms, which improved in 2 more days. There were no COVID-19 related hospitalizations or deaths in any of the patients.Conclusion In this case series of 15 hemodialysis patients with COVID-19, a modified dose of nirmatrelvir/ritonavir use, with pharmacist support for drug interaction management, was associated with symptom resolution, and was well tolerated with no serious adverse effects.### Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.### Funding StatementThe study did not receive any direct funding. SH, PAB and EGC receive research salary support from the Department of Medicine, University of Ottawa.### Author DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesThe details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:The Institutional review board of the Ottawa Hospital, the Ottawa Health Sciences Research Ethics Board gave ethical approval for this work.I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.YesAll data produced in the present study are available upon reasonable request to the authors, and after approval from the Ottawa Health Sciences Research Ethics Board

BACKGROUND:Immunoassays provide a rapid tool for the screening of drugs-of-abuse (DOA). However, results are presumptive and confirmatory testing is warranted. To reduce associated cost and delay, laboratories should employ assays with high positive and negative predictive values (PPVs and NPVs). Here, we compared the results of urine drug screens on cobas 6000 (cobas) and ARCHITECTi2000 (ARCHITECT) platforms for six drugs against LC-MS/MS to assess the analytical performance of these assays.METHODS:Eighty nine residual urine specimens, which tested positive for amphetamine, THC-COOH, benzoylecgonine, EDDP, opiates and/or oxycodone during routine drug testing, were stored frozen until later confirmation by LC-MS/MS. Immunoassays were performed on cobas and ARCHITECT using a split sample. A third aliquot from these samples was tested by LC-MS/MS to assess the percentage of false positive, false negative, true positive and true negative results and calculate the PPVs and NPVs for each immunoassay.RESULTS:The PPVs of THC-COOH and EDDP assays were 100% on both platforms. Suboptimal PPVs were achieved for oxycodone (cobas, 57.1% vs ARCHITECT, 66.7%), amphetamine (77.8 vs. 100%), opiates (80.0 vs. 84.6%) and benzoylecgonine (88.9 vs. 84.2%) assays. The NPV was 100% for cobas and ARCHITECT oxycodone assays. Lower NPVs were achieved for THC-COOH (cobas, 28.6% vs ARCHITECT, 25.0%), EDDP (72.7% for both assays), benzoylecgonine (74.4% vs 73.8%), amphetamine (83.3% vs 82.8%) and opiates (100% vs 85.3%).CONCLUSION:Overall, cobas and ARCHITECT urine drug screens have comparable analytical performance. Confirmatory testing is warranted for positive test results especially for oxycodone, amphetamine, opiates and cocaine. Negative drug screen results must be interpreted with caution especially for THC-COOH, EDDP, benzoylecgonine, amphetamine and opiates.

Objectives: Point-of-care testing (POCT) is testing performed outside the traditional laboratory, often at the patient bedside. In hospital settings, blood glucose is the most common POCT. Staff performing POCT are not usually laboratory trained; they are clinical staff with a primary focus on treating patients. Clinical staff find POCT quality assurance (QA) practices burdensome and are often non-compliant. In hospitals within EORLA (Eastern Ontario Regional Laboratories Association), all critically high POCT glucose results must be repeated prior to acting, according to policy. Compliance with this policy is audited regularly. Design: and methods: All POCT glucose tests performed in participating sites between January and June 2018 and June and December 2019 were audited for compliance with the critical repeat policy. The discordant repeat rate was also determined for each audit period. Between January and May 2019, there were interventions aimed at improving compliance with the repeat policy. Results: Compliance with the critical repeat policy increased from 30 to 57% in 2019 compared to 2018, following nursing education and implementation of notifications on the glucose meters themselves. The rate of discordant repeat results (>20% different from initial) also improved at most sites in 2019 compared to 2018. Nurses cited insufficient cleaning of patient hands prior to initial testing as the primary reason for discordant repeats. Conclusions: Operator compliance with POCT QA policies is an ongoing challenge requiring continual audit, feedback and education. A strong POCT multi-disciplinary committee with supports from senior and clinical leadership in an organization are key to improving compliance.

We undertook this retrospective study to describe decisions made following asparaginase activity monitoring implementation at our center. Clinically apparent reactions (CARs) and asparaginase activity monitoring costs were described. Patients with acute lymphoblastic leukemia, aged <18 years who received asparaginase between April 2016 and September 2017, were included. Decisions made following receipt of asparaginase activity results were categorized as continuation, modification, premedication, or discontinuation. We included 129 patients (median age: 5.33 years) receiving 565 asparaginase doses. CARs were observed following 25 asparaginase doses (19/361 [5.3%] pegaspargase). A total of 224 asparaginase activity levels were ordered in 88 patients. Following receipt of 190 asparaginase activity results, asparaginase therapy was continued, modified, or premedicated in 188 (98.9%), 1 (0.005%), and 1 (0.005%) cases, respectively. Inadequate asparaginase activity was observed in three patients receiving Erwinia asparaginase. Asparaginase activity monitoring allowed patients with pegaspargase‐associated CAR and adequate activity to continue therapy unchanged and was cost neutral.

Escitalopram is used for post-partum depression; however, there are limited pharmacokinetic data of escitalopram in milk and plasma of infants breastfed by women taking the drug.

Background: Milrinone is a potent selective phosphodiesterase type III inhibitor which stimulates myocardial function and improves myocardial relaxation. Although therapeutic monitoring is crucial to maintain therapeutic outcome, little data is available. A proof-of-principle study has been initiated in our institution to evaluate the clinical impact of optimizing milrinone dosing through therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) in children following cardiac surgery. We developed a robust LC-MS/MS method to quantify milrinone in serum from pediatric patients in real-time.Methods: A liquid-liquid extraction procedure was used to prepare samples for analysis prior to measurement by LC-MS/MS. Performance characteristics, such as linearity, limit of quantitation (LOQ) and precision, were assessed. Patient samples were acquired post-surgery and analyzed to determine the concentration-time profile of the drug as well as to track turn-around-times.Results: Within day precision was < 83% across 3 levels of QC. Between-day precision was < 12%. The method was linear from 50 to 800 mu g/1; the lower limit of quantification was 22 mu g/l. Comparison with another LC-MS/MS method showed good agreement. Using this simplified method, turnaround times within 3-6 h were achievable, and patient drug profiles demonstrated that some milrinone levels were either sub-therapeutic or in the toxic range, highlighting the importance for milrinone TDM.Conclusions: This simplified and quick method proved to be analytically robust and able to provide therapeutic monitoring of milrinone in real-time in patients post-cardiac surgery. (C) 2017 Published by Elsevier B.V.

The objective of this study was to establish reference intervals for growth arrest-specific 6 (GAS6), a vitamin K-dependent protein, in human adult plasma according to the Guideline of Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) C28-A3. Blood samples were collected from 308 healthy volunteers aged 18-72 (157 female, 151 male). A non-parametric approach was used to calculate the reference interval. The plasma GAS6 reference interval was determined, with 90% confidence interval: the lower limit (2.5 percentile) was 2.5 (1.9-3.1) g/L and the upper limit (97.5 percentile)=18.8 (18.0-22.3) g/L. Harris-Boyd's test did not suggest partitioning by age or gender: medians for males [7.8 (5.8-10.7) g/L] and females [9.9 (7.1-13.5) g/L]. Three age-subgroups were tested: 18-29 years (n=168); 30-44 years (n=73); 45-72 years (n=67). The intra- and inter-assay variations were 12.6% (mean, 5.2 +/- 0.7g/L) and 14.0% (mean, 9.2 +/- 1.3g/L), respectively. The mean recovery was 104%. This study reports plasma GAS6 reference intervals established first according to the guideline of CLSI C28-A3.

Background: Nevirapine (NVP)-based combination antiretroviral therapy is routinely prescribed to infants deemed at high risk of vertical HIV infection in our centers. We evaluated NVP pharmacokinetics and safety of this regimen. Methods: Neonates were recruited prospectively between September 2012 and April 2015 or enrolled retrospectively if treated similarly before prospective study initiation. NVP was dosed at 150 mg/m 2 daily for 14 days, then twice daily for 14 days. NVP levels were drawn at weeks 1, 2, and 4 [target trough (NVP-T): 3–8 mg/L]. Results: Thirty-three neonates were included (23 prospectively). Median gestational age (GA) and birth weight were 38 weeks (32–41 weeks) and 2.9 kg (1.5–4.2 kg), respectively. Median NVP-Ts were 8.2 mg/L (1.6–25.1 mg/L), 3.5 mg/L (1.6–6.8 mg/L), and 4.3 mg/L (0.1–19.9 mg/L) at weeks 1, 2, and 4, respectively. The proportions with therapeutic NVP-T were 42%, 61%, and 73% at these same timepoints. Median apparent oral clearance (CL/F) increased from 0.05 L·kg −1 ·h −1 (0.01–0.50 L·kg −1 ·h −1 ) at week 2 to 0.18 L·kg −1 ·h −1 (0.01–0.78 L·kg −1 ·h −1 ) at week 4. Increased drug exposure [area under the curve (AUCτ)] correlated with younger GA (r = 0.459, P = 0.032) and lower birth weight (r = 0.542, P = 0.009). The most common adverse events potentially attributable to combination antiretroviral therapy were transient asymptomatic hyperlactatemia (26%), anemia (24.7%), and neutropenia (22.1%). Conclusions: Treatment dose NVP was generally well-tolerated and associated with normalization of trough levels over time in most cases without dose adjustment. Lower empiric dosing is recommended for infants <34 weeks of GA. Routine therapeutic drug monitoring may not be required for infants ≥34 weeks of GA.

Background: Therapeutic drug monitoring of immunosuppressant drugs are used to monitor drug efficacy and toxicity and to prevent organ transplant rejection. This study evaluates the analytical performance of semi-automated electrochemiluminescence immunoassays (ECLIA) for cyclosporine (CSA), tacrolimus (TAC) and sirolimus (SRL) on the Roche cobas e 411 analyzer at a major transplant hospital to assess method suitability and limitations.Methods: Residual whole blood samples from patients undergoing immunosuppressant therapy were used for evaluation. Imprecision, linearity, functional sensitivity, method comparisons and lot-to-lot comparisons were assessed.Results: Total imprecision ranged from 3.3 to 7.1% for CSA, 3.9 to 9.4% for TAC, and 4.6 to 8.2% for SRL. Linearity was verified from 30.0 to 960.9 μg/L for CSA, from 1.1 to 27.1 μg/L for TAC, and from 0.5 to 32.3 µg/L for SRL. The functional sensitivity met the manufacturer’s claims and was determined to be <6.5 μg/L for CSA, 1.1 μg/L for TAC, and <0.1 µg/L for SRL (CV≤20%). Deming regression analysis of method comparisons with the ARCHITECT immunoassay yielded slopes of 0.917 (95%CI: 0.885-0.949) and r of 0.985 for CSA, 0.938 (95%CI: 0.895-0.981) and r of 0.974 for TAC, and 0.842 (0.810-1.110) and r of 0.982 for SRL. Deming regression analysis of comparisons with the LC–MS/MS method yielded slopes of 1.331 (95%CI: 1.167-1.496) and r of 0.969 for CSA, 0.924 (95%CI: 0.843-1.005) and r of 0.984 for TAC, and 0.971 (95%CI: 0.913-1.030) and r of 0.993 for SRL.Conclusions: The cobas e 411 ECLIA for CSA, TAC, and SRL have acceptable precision, linearity, and functional sensitivity. The method comparisons correlated well with the ARCHITECT immunoassay and LC–MS/MS and is fit for therapeutic drug monitoring

Background: Therapeutic drug monitoring of immunosuppressant drugs are used to monitor drug efficacy and toxicity and to prevent organ transplant rejection. This study evaluates the analytical performance of semi-automated electrochemiluminescence immunoassays (ECLIA) for cyclosporine (CSA), tacrolimus (TAC) and sirolimus (SRL) on the Roche cobas e 411 analyzer at a major transplant hospital to assess method suitability and limitations. Methods: Residual whole blood samples from patients undergoing immunosuppressant therapy were used for evaluation. Imprecision, linearity, functional sensitivity, method comparisons and lot-to-lot comparisons were assessed. Results: Total imprecision ranged from 3.3 to 7.1% for CSA, 3.9 to 9.4% for TAC, and 4.6 to 8.2% for SRL. Linearity was verified from 30.0 to 960.9 μg/L for CSA, from 1.1 to 27.1 μg/L for TAC, and from 0.5 to 32.3 µg/L for SRL. The functional sensitivity met the manufacturer’s claims and was determined to be <6.5 μg/L for CSA, 1.1 μg/L for TAC, and <0.1 µg/L for SRL (CV≤20%). Deming regression analysis of method comparisons with the ARCHITECT immunoassay yielded slopes of 0.917 (95%CI: 0.885-0.949) and r of 0.985 for CSA, 0.938 (95%CI: 0.895-0.981) and r of 0.974 for TAC, and 0.842 (0.810-1.110) and r of 0.982 for SRL. Deming regression analysis of comparisons with the LC–MS/MS method yielded slopes of 1.331 (95%CI: 1.167-1.496) and r of 0.969 for CSA, 0.924 (95%CI: 0.843-1.005) and r of 0.984 for TAC, and 0.971 (95%CI: 0.913-1.030) and r of 0.993 for SRL. Conclusions: The cobas e 411 ECLIA for CSA, TAC, and SRL have acceptable precision, linearity, and functional sensitivity. The method comparisons correlated well with the ARCHITECT immunoassay and LC–MS/MS and is fit for therapeutic drug monitoring