Hepatitis B e antigen (HBeAg) loss is a key event in the natural history of chronic hepatitis B virus infection. The rate and determinants of HBeAg loss depend upon cohort characteristics at baseline. Few studies have examined the age-dependent rate, and none have examined the effect of patient sex and ethnicity on the age-dependant rate. The study of age-dependent rates requires the identification and long-term follow-up of a pediatric cohort. We have studied the age-dependent rate of HBeAg loss, and the rate of HBeAg loss measured from baseline, in a multi-ethnic cohort of 454 pediatric patients. During observation, HBeAg loss was observed in 121/303 (39.9%) HBeAg-positive patients. The rate of HBeAg loss was greater in the second versus the first and third decades of life. The age-related rate of HBeAg loss was clearly affected by patient sex and ethnicity, with earlier loss observed for males and for White versus both South Asian and Chinese ethnicities. When measured from baseline, Chinese patients had a slower rate of HBeAg loss in comparison with White patients. In multivariate analysis of HBeAg loss during prolonged follow-up, male sex, older age, and White ethnicity were associated with HBeAg loss, but antiviral treatment was not.

OBJECTIVES To quantify mortality rates for patients successfully treated for hepatitis C in the era of interferon-free, direct acting antivirals and compare these rates with those of the general population.DESIGN Population based cohort study.SETTING British Columbia, Scotland, and England (England cohort consists of patients with cirrhosis only).PARTICIPANTS 21 790 people who were successfully treated for hepatitis C in the era of interferon-free antivirals (2014-19). Participants were divided into three liver disease severity groups: people without cirrhosis (pre-cirrhosis), those with compensated cirrhosis, and those with end stage liver disease. Follow-up started 12 weeks after antiviral treatment completion and ended on date of death or 31 December 2019.MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES Crude and age-sex standardised mortality rates, and standardised mortality ratio comparing the number of deaths with that of the general population, adjusting for age, sex, and year. Poisson regression was used to identify factors associated with all cause mortality rates.RESULTS 1572 (7%) participants died during follow-up. The leading causes of death were drug related mortality (n=383, 24%), liver failure (n=286, 18%), and liver cancer (n=250, 16%). Crude all cause mortality rates (deaths per 1000 person years) were 31.4 (95% confidence interval 29.3 to 33.7), 22.7 (20.7 to 25.0), and 39.6 (35.4 to 44.3) for cohorts from British Columbia, Scotland, and England, respectively. All cause mortality was considerably higher than the rate for the general population across all disease severity groups and settings; for example, all cause mortality was three times higher among people without cirrhosis in British Columbia (standardised mortality ratio 2.96, 95% confidence interval 2.71 to 3.23; P<0.001) and more than 10 times higher for patients with end stage liver disease in British Columbia (13.61, 11.94 to 15.49; P<0.001). In regression analyses, older age, recent substance misuse, alcohol misuse, and comorbidities were associated with higher mortality rates.CONCLUSION Mortality rates among people successfully treated for hepatitis C in the era of interferon-free, direct acting antivirals are high compared with the general population. Drug and liver related causes of death were the main drivers of excess mortality. These findings highlight the need for continued support and follow-up after successful treatment for hepatitis C to maximise the impact of direct acting antivirals.

Hepatitis B virus e antigen (HBeAg) loss and the appearance of antibodies to HBeAg (anti-HBe) are favourable events in the history of chronic hepatitis B virus (CHB) infection. Most CHB patients have the HBeAg/anti-HBe profiles +/- or -/+, and little is published on the derivation or fate of the +/+ and -/- profiles. We have used electronically accessible patient data to study the HBeAg and anti-HBe profiles of a multi-ethnic cohort of adult HBV patients seen at a single centre over a period of more than 20 years. 3594 HBsAg-positive patients were identified and patients with viral coinfection or acute HBV infection were excluded. Cross-sectional and longitudinal analyses of HBeAg/anti-HBe status were undertaken. Compared with White or Black patients, Chinese and Asian patients are more likely to be HBeAg positive during child-bearing years. Patients with +/+ profile are likely to undergo HBeAg loss and seroconversion during relatively short follow-up. Chinese patients have a relatively increased rate of seroconversion. For HBeAg-positive patients, the risk of seroconversion diminishes with advancing age. Despite HBeAg loss, seroconversion is seldom observed after age 60 years. The proportion of HBV patients with -/- increases with age, and most acquire this profile by HBeAg loss but without antecedent seroconversion. -/- patients can lose HBsAg and develop anti-HBs. It was not possible to demonstrate a favourable impact of antiviral treatment on the rate of HBeAg seroconversion.

Abstract Background Chronic hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection affects 71 million individuals, mostly residing in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). Direct-acting antivirals (DAAs) give high rates of sustained virological response (SVR) in high-income countries where a restricted range of HCV genotypes/subtypes circulate. Methods We studied United Kingdom–resident patients born in Africa to examine DAA effectiveness in LMICs where there is far greater breadth of HCV genotypes/subtypes. Viral genome sequences were determined from 233 patients. Results Full-length viral genomic sequences for 26 known subtypes and 5 previously unidentified isolates covering 5 HCV genotypes were determined. From 149 patients who received DAA treatment/retreatment, the overall SVR was 93%. Treatment failure was associated primarily with 2 subtypes, gt1l and gt4r, using sofosbuvir/ledipasvir. These subtypes contain natural resistance-associated variants that likely contribute to poor efficacy with this drug combination. Treatment failure was also significantly associated with hepatocellular carcinoma. Conclusions DAA combinations give high SVR rates despite the high HCV diversity across the African continent except for subtypes gt1l and gt4r, which respond poorly to sofosbuvir/ledipasvir. These subtypes are widely distributed across Western, Central, and Eastern Africa. Thus, in circumstances where accurate genotyping is absent, ledipasvir and its generic compounds should not be considered as a recommended treatment option.

Objectives: Public Health England (PHE) aims meet the WHO target to eliminate hepatitis C as a public health concern by 2030. One aspect of this strategy is to use historical surveillance data of anti-HCV positive patients identified by PHE to re-engage with offers of PCR testing and treatment if RNA-positive. Operational Delivery Networks (ODN), who deliver Hepatitis C treatment across 22 regions in England, are responsible for enacting this initiative. This study aims to evaluate the effectiveness of using this data with regional PCR results to re-engage HCV-infected persons in the West Midlands region of England. Study design: A longitudinal prospective study using historical surveillance data. Methods: A dataset of historical anti-HCV positive antibody patients provided to the ODN by PHE was cross-referenced with HCV RNA data from 01/01/1996 to 01/01/2019 from five laboratories across the West Midlands. Letters were sent to the general practitioner and to the patients who were HCV RNA positive to invite them for repeat testing and treatment to achieve cure. Results: From a dataset of 4540 anti-HCV antibody results, 31.7% (n=1440) had a PCR result: 48.1% (n=693) were PCR positive for HCV RNA. 693 letters were sent to GPs with responses from 14.2% (n=99). By May 2021, only 212 patient letters were sent (due to significant interruption by the COVID-19 pandemic) and 11.3% (n=24) replied, 17 presented for PCR testing and 4 were found to be viraemic. To date, one patient has achieved cure and three have completed treatment awaiting confirmation of cure. Conclusion: The use of historical anti-HCV antibody results can be used to successfully re-engage people into testing and treatment for hepatitis C, albeit with modest gains.

Whilst the benefit of direct‐acting antiviral agents (DAAs) in achieving sustained virological response (SVR) is now well‐accepted, their impact on liver function, particularly in relation to achievement of SVR, has not been well documented. We studied 2394 patients with chronic HCV infection, 1276 receiving DAAs and 1118 interferon‐based therapy. Liver function was assessed by the albumin‐bilirubin (ALBI) score or grade. Overall survival according to SVR status and baseline ALBI grade was examined. We also studied time to first decompensation according to ALBI grade, as well as longitudinal changes in ALBI score over time according to SVR. Among the patients receiving DAAs, 89% achieved SVR (Japan = 99%, UK = 78%). Amongst the decompensated patients in the UK cohort, three distinct risk groups according to ALBI grade at baseline were observed. The UK patients receiving DAAs, who had predominantly decompensated disease, showed clear evidence of improvement of liver function detectable within 2 years of the start of treatment, especially in those achieving SVR. These early changes in liver function were very similar to those observed in the first 2‐3 years after interferon‐based therapy. DAAs improve liver function especially in those with decompensated disease who achieve SVR. Experience with interferon‐based therapy suggests that failure to achieve SVR is associated with long‐term decline in liver function and, in contrast, patients who do achieve SVR can expect long‐term disease improvement and subsequent stabilization of liver function. Our initial analysis suggests that those receiving DAAs are likely, in the long term, to follow a similar course.

This chapter discusses the potential role of antiviral therapy in the management of acute hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection in order to prevent fulminant hepatitis and/or to prevent evolution to chronic hepatitis B. The primary aim of antiviral therapy for acute HBV is to prevent acute liver failure. In severe infection, an improvement in liver function may obviate the need for liver transplantation. Secondary goals include the prevention of evolution to chronic infection and amelioration of symptoms. More recent studies have explored the role of nucleoside/nucleotide inhibitors of HBV DNA polymerase that primarily interrupt viral replication through DNA chain termination and result in rapid reduction of detectable serum HBV DNA. This may prove clinically advantageous if early viral burden determines the course of acute infection. The subclinical nature of acute HBV infection and high rate of spontaneous viral clearance make it difficult to design robust, controlled studies to determine the role of antiviral therapy.

Many direct‐acting antiviral regimens have reduced activity in people with hepatitis C virus (HCV) genotype (GT) 3 infection and cirrhosis. The C‐ISLE study assessed the efficacy and safety of elbasvir/grazoprevir (EBR/GZR) plus sofosbuvir (SOF) with and without ribavirin (RBV) in compensated cirrhotic participants with GT3 infection. This was a phase 2, randomized, open‐label study. Treatment‐naive participants received EBR/GZR + SOF + RBV for 8 weeks or EBR/GZR + SOF for 12 weeks, and peginterferon/RBV treatment‐experienced participants received EBR/GZR + SOF ± RBV for 12 weeks or EBR/GZR + SOF for 16 weeks. The primary endpoint was HCV RNA <15 IU/mL 12 weeks after the end of treatment (sustained virologic response at 12 weeks [SVR12]). Among treatment‐naive participants, SVR12 was 91% (21/23) in those treated with RBV for 8 weeks and 96% (23/24) in those treated for 12 weeks. Among treatment‐experienced participants, SVR12 was 94% (17/18) and 100% (17/17) in the 12‐week arm, with and without RBV, respectively, and 94% (17/18) in the 16‐week arm. Five participants failed to achieve SVR: 2 relapsed (both in the 8‐week arm), 1 discontinued due to vomiting/cellulitis (16‐week arm), and 2 discontinued (consent withdrawn/lost to follow‐up). SVR12 was not affected by the presence of resistance‐associated substitutions (RASs). There was no consistent change in insulin resistance, and 5 participants reported serious adverse events (pneumonia, chest pain, opiate overdose, cellulitis, decreased creatinine). High efficacy was demonstrated in participants with HCV GT3 infection and cirrhosis. Treatment beyond 12 weeks was not required, and efficacy was maintained regardless of baseline RASs. Conclusion: Data from this study support the use of EBR/GZR plus SOF for 12 weeks without RBV for treatment‐naive and peginterferon/RBV–experienced people with GT3 infection and cirrhosis (ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02601573). (Hepatology 2018;67:2113‐2126)

Background & Aims: Glecaprevir plus pibrentasvir (G/P) is a pangenotypic, once-daily, ribavirin-free direct-acting antiviral (DAA) treatment for hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection. In nine phase II or III clinical trials, G/P therapy achieved rates of sustained virologic response 12 weeks after treatment (SVR12) of 93-100% across all six major HCV genotypes (GTs). An integrated efficacy analysis of 8-and 12-week G/P therapy in patients without cirrhosis with HCV GT 1-6 infection was performed. Methods: Data were pooled from nine phase II and III trials including patients with chronic HCV GT 1-6 infection without cirrhosis who received G/P (300 mg/120 mg) for either 8 or 12 weeks. Patients were treatment naive or treatment experienced with peginterferon, ribavirin, and/or sofosbuvir; all patients infected with HCV GT 3 were treatment naive. Efficacy was evaluated as the SVR12 rate. Results: The analysis included 2,041 patients without cirrhosis. In the intent-to-treat population, 943/965 patients (98%) achieved SVR12 when treated for eight weeks, and 1,060/1,076 patients (99%) achieved SVR12 when treated for 12 weeks; the difference in rates was not significant (p = 0.2). A subgroup analysis demonstrated SVR12 rates > 95% across baseline factors traditionally associated with lower efficacy. G/P was well tolerated, with one DAA-related serious adverse event (< 0.1%); grade 3 laboratory abnormalities were rare. Conclusions: G/P therapy for eight weeks in patients with chronic HCV GT 1-6 infection without cirrhosis achieved an overall SVR12 rate of 98% irrespective of baseline patient or viral characteristics; four additional weeks of treatment did not significantly increase the SVR12 rate, demonstrating that the optimal treatment duration in this population is eight weeks. Lay summary: In this integrated analysis of nine clinical trials, patients with chronic HCV genotype 1-6 infection without cirrhosis were treated for either 8 or 12 weeks with the directacting antiviral regimen glecaprevir/pibrentasvir (G/P). The cure rate was 98% and 99% following 8 and 12 weeks of treatment, respectively; the difference in rates was not significant (p = 0.2), nor was there a significant difference in the cure rates across the two treatment durations on the basis of baseline patient or viral characteristics. These results, along with a favourable safety profile, indicate that G/P is a highly efficacious and well-tolerated pangenotypic eight-week therapy for most patients with chronic HCV infection. (C) 2018 European Association for the Study of the Liver. Published by Elsevier B.V.

Summary Following the introduction of direct‐acting antivirals ( DAA ), there have been reports of declining incidence of hepatitis C ( HCV )‐related liver disease as a liver transplantation indication. In this study, we assessed the impact of DAA on liver transplant indications in the UK and waiting list outcomes for patients with HCV . We assessed UK adult elective liver transplant registrants between 2006 and 2017. The aetiology of liver disease at registration was reclassified using an accepted hierarchical system and changes were assessed over time and compared before and after the introduction of DAA . Registration UKELD scores and 1‐year waiting list outcomes were also compared. The proportion of waiting list patients registered with HCV ‐related cirrhosis reduced after the introduction of DAA from 10.5% in 2013 to 4.7% in 2016 ( P < 0.001). Alcohol‐related liver disease ( ARLD ) was the leading indication for liver transplantation followed by liver cancer (26.1% and 18.4% in 2016, respectively). The proportion of registrations with Hepatocellular carcinoma ( HCC ) associated with HCV reduced from 46.4% in 2013 to 33.7% in 2016 ( P = 0.002). For patients with HCV ‐related cirrhosis at one year the outcomes of death, transplantation, delisting due to improvement or deterioration and awaiting a graft at 1 year were similar. For patients with HCV ‐related HCC , the proportion dying at 1 year reduced significantly from 2.9% to 0.0% ( P = 0.04). These data demonstrate an association between DAA and reduced listing rates for HCV ‐related cirrhosis and HCC , but no significant changes in waiting list outcomes other than reduced mortality in the HCC group.

Well‐tolerated, ribavirin‐free, pangenotypic hepatitis C virus (HCV) treatments for transplant recipients remain a high priority. Once‐daily glecaprevir/pibrentasvir demonstrates high rates of sustained virologic response at 12 weeks posttreatment (SVR12) across all major HCV genotypes (GTs). This trial evaluated the safety and efficacy of glecaprevir/pibrentasvir for patients with chronic HCV GT1‐6 infection who had received a liver or kidney transplant. MAGELLAN‐2 was a phase 3, open‐label trial conducted in patients who were ≥3 months posttransplant. Patients without cirrhosis who were HCV treatment‐naive (GT1‐6) or treatment‐experienced (GT1, 2, 4‐6; with interferon‐based therapy with or without sofosbuvir, or sofosbuvir plus ribavirin) received glecaprevir/pibrentasvir (300/120 mg) once daily for 12 weeks. The primary endpoint compared the percentage of patients receiving glecaprevir/pibrentasvir with SVR12 to a historic SVR12 rate based on the standard of care. Safety of glecaprevir/pibrentasvir was assessed. In total, 80 liver transplant and 20 kidney transplant patients participated in the trial. Most patients had no or minimal fibrosis (80% had fibrosis scores F0‐F1) and were infected with HCV GT1 (57%) or GT3 (24%). The overall SVR12 was 98% (n/N = 98/100; 95% confidence interval, 95.3%–100%), which exceeded the prespecified historic standard‐of‐care SVR12 threshold of 94%. One patient experienced virologic failure. One patient discontinued because of an adverse event considered to be unrelated to treatment; this patient achieved SVR12. Adverse events were mostly mild in severity, and laboratory abnormalities were infrequent. Conclusion: Once‐daily glecaprevir/pibrentasvir for 12 weeks is a well‐tolerated and efficacious, ribavirin‐free treatment for patients with chronic HCV GT1‐6 infection who have received a liver or kidney transplant. (ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02692703.) (H epatology 2018; 00:000‐000).

SummaryGlecaprevir coformulated with pibrentasvir (G/P) is approved to treat hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection and was highly efficacious in phase 2 and 3 studies. Treating HCV genotype (GT) 3 infection remains a priority, as these patients are harder to cure and at a greater risk for liver steatosis, fibrosis progression and hepatocellular carcinoma. Data were pooled from five phase 2 or 3 trials that evaluated 8‐, 12‐ and 16‐week G/P in patients with chronic HCV GT3 infection. Patients without cirrhosis or with compensated cirrhosis were either treatment‐naïve or experienced with interferon‐ or sofosbuvir‐based regimens. Safety and sustained virologic response 12 weeks post‐treatment (SVR12) were assessed. The analysis included 693 patients with GT3 infection. SVR12 was achieved by 95% of treatment‐naïve patients without cirrhosis receiving 8‐week (198/208) and 12‐week (280/294) G/P. Treatment‐naïve patients with cirrhosis had a 97% (67/69) SVR12 rate with 12‐week G/P. Treatment‐experienced, noncirrhotic patients had SVR12 rates of 90% (44/49) and 95% (21/22) with 12‐ and 16‐week G/P, respectively; 94% (48/51) of treatment‐experienced patients with cirrhosis treated for 16 weeks achieved SVR12. No serious adverse events (AEs) were attributed to G/P; AEs leading to study drug discontinuation were rare (<1%). G/P was well‐tolerated and efficacious for patients with chronic HCV GT3 infection, regardless of cirrhosis status or prior treatment experience. Eight‐ and 12‐week durations were efficacious for treatment‐naïve patients without cirrhosis and with compensated cirrhosis, respectively; 16‐week G/P was efficacious in patients with prior treatment experience irrespective of cirrhosis status.

Meeting Abstract Conference: 67th Annual Meeting of the American-Association-for-the-Study-of-Liver-Diseases (AASLD) Location: Boston, MA Date: NOV 11-15, 2016 Sponsor(s):Amer Assoc Study Liver Dis

Introduction. Hepatitis C virus (HCV)-related cirrhosis remains the commonest indication for liver transplantation worldwide, yet few studies have investigated the impact of donation after circulatory death (DCD) graft use on HCV recurrence and patient outcomes. DCD grafts have augmented the limited donor organ pool and reduced wait-list mortality, although concerns regarding graft longevity and patient outcome persist. Methods. This was a single-center study of all HCV + adults who underwent DCD liver transplantation between 2004 and 2014. 44 HCV + patients received DCD grafts, and were matched with 44 HCV + recipients of donation after brainstem death (DBD) grafts, and their outcomes examined. Results. The groups were matched for age, sex, and presence of hepatocellular carcinoma; no significant differences were found between the group's donor or recipient characteristics. Paired and unpaired analysis demonstrated that HCV recurrence was more rapid in recipients of DCD organs compared with DBD grafts (408 vs 657 days; P = .006). There were no significant differences in graft survival, patient survival, or rates of biliary complications between the cohorts despite DCD donors being 10 years older on average than those used in other published experience. Conclusions. In an era of highly effective direct acting antiviral therapy, rapid HCV recrudescence in grafts from DCD donors should not compromise long-term morbidity or mortality. In the context of rising wait-list mortality, it is prudent to use all available sources to expand the pool of donor organs, and our data support the practice of using extended criteria DCD grafts based on donor age. Notwithstanding that, clinicians should be aware that HCV recrudescence is more rapid in DCD recipients, and early post-transplant antiviral therapy is indicated to prevent graft injury.